But money is money right? Losing ETH of 100 dollars value and losing BTC of 100$ value is essentially same if you talk in terms of dollar cost averaging. What differs is that they are two different assets and thus their market movements are different.

Thats why see more whales are spending BTC like anything on casinos when bitcoin price drops, probably they bought more bitcoin against USD when price dropped. I can understand that people would be more willing to keep bitcoin for a long term store of value instead of gambling with it. It is a reasonable decision.

Thanks for the new inputs, I have edited the OP to update the changes. It seems this user has a lot of accounts that are connected.

I have asked @M0neygrabb3r personally to post in this thread but they are not willing to.

This is the evidence I have collected about an old defaulter of mine that had taken a loan from me in Primedice. Unfortunately they cut contact and I assumed it to be defaulted. Loans were non-collateral there, so dont ask me why I didnt take a collateral.. Primedice forum also shut down its lending section but I made a snapshot of the page where he last communicated as well as the thread where scams are resolved in their forum.

The last message on my lending thread was here  towards the lower end of the page- https://web.archive.org/web/20180921112947/https://forum.primedice.com/topic/29174-lending-ultrabank-loans-at-low-interest-rate/?page=6&tab=comments

The resolution thread, he was banned and never came back to repay - https://forum.primedice.com/topic/30124-mrknight8686-defaulted-on-a-loan/

His usernames are MrKnight8686 (PD) and that is linked to the same username on bitcointalk - mrknight8686
via this post - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2272980.msg23105446#msg23105446
archived: http://archive.is/pOB3q#selection-1937.10-1937.23

Now that account is long inactive and abandoned, so I did some more digging and found out these-
His eth address was 0xa997C16ac933B4fE5207A81fd0eEA5C5295D6143
This has been used on bitcointalk by - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=980142
archived - http://archive.is/3O0MO#selection-553.0-553.42

So from this bixbem90 = mrknight8686

---

Next,
His stake username is same. Used by user PDAngel
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1051629
here - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2334624.msg24087262#msg24087262
http://archive.is/HzVIG#selection-4243.16-4243.29

How is MrKnight8686 (stake) and PDangel (bitcointalk) and MrKnight8686 (bitcointalk) connected?
https://forum.stake.com/topic/1407-wanted-bitcointalk-trust/?tab=comments#comment-26596
archived - http://web.archive.org/web/20181006153213/https://forum.stake.com/topic/1407-wanted-bitcointalk-trust/?tab=comments

PDAngel has another alt on Primedice - GodBlessU
proof here - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2130097.msg21287143#msg21287143
archived - http://archive.is/xkYNI#selection-4230.0-4230.1

So from this bixbem90 = mrknight8686 = PDAngel

---

PDAngel is using another Telegram account now -  @RockPrincess , Twitter account - https://twitter.com/auxterojunior
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5160104.msg51690973#msg51690973
archived - http://archive.is/eUGWS#selection-4602.0-4621.32

His telegram ID @rockprincess and twitter is being used by following UIDs:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1128571 archived here - http://archive.is/QjSXM#selection-2461.0-2477.33
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2649312 archived here - http://archive.is/HEzzK#selection-1435.0-1441.32

Now twitter account can be sold, but telegram accounts? I doubt that and it is very likely the same person. Checking the signup dates of MrPhil and M0neygrabb3r, one can see that the second one signed up right after the first one was tagged.

So from this, bixbem90 = mrknight8686 = PDAngel = MrPhil = M0neyGrabb3r

---

Listed addresses are posted here -

---

On the basis of the above statements I would like @bob123 and @M0neyGrabb3r to post what they have to say and I am accusing M0neyGrabb3r for defaulting and making multiple accounts to evade the default. I would like to hear what other DT have to say about this as well. I am not making a flag immediately but I will in the next 2days if I dont get a proper response from the accused.

If there is any question regarding the evidence, please post here, I will try to simplify it. It is a lot of information to go through and I have been collecting it for the last 2 years before I decided to finally call it out. The loan amount was around 20-30$ at that time but it is only 10$ today since ETH dropped in price. Still it has been a pain in the back for me, so I had to post this. I have already talked with @Parodium from whom @bixbem90 took a loan but was also never paid.

---

New inputs from this thread:

---

02/02/2021
Another account was caught by @lovesmayfamilis https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5260063.msg56249298#msg56249298

flag on LimLims - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=2613

What happened with QuadriCEX is one of a kind. I am sure that a similar method was being followed in other exchanges too but after that incident they probably changed their systems.

Both Liquidity and trust are important IMO. Its more a speculation at this stage because we have not see any more development of a new kind in the exchanges sector but we have seen what people use mostly and that is CEXes that their currency supports.

For exchanging, truly decentralization is probably a myth.

Honestly they are not related. Betwrong was probably having a lucky streak getting such numbers more frequently but this is pure luck. In general the probability checks out and you should let luck do its work and not try to change it because it is not possible to do so. The number of times a person will hit those big numbers can be calculated and the average number of rolls to get a chance of hitting them is close to that.

It is best if you  keep a tab running while working on PC and claim it every hour for a few hours and then leave it for the rest of the day. You might hit one of the big numbers and be happy about it, but dont spend time hunting for them.

As soon as I saw the topic title, I was sure that OP is bullshitting.
Turned out that I was right as always.

Hhampuz is a man of of his word. Most of such threads end up being clickbait anyway. Sadly this a forum so no way to control such topics from being made.

---

Dont trust but verify.

You can start by posting the name of your exchange here.

Make an ANN (announcement) thread in "Service Announcements" first and follow how other sites have done their ANN. If you need help, contact any of the bitcointalk ANN/graphics designers. You can find a lot of them here -Overview of Bitcointalk Designers

Next job would be to start a bitcointalk signature campaign like OSS said.

Then go for promotional content on news media sites like cointelegraph and others. Some managers here might be able to link you up with them for a sweet deal so make sure to ask them first.

You said yourself that lottery is unpredictable but then again you ask if there is any method to predict it. Whats your point?

If gambling on an EV- game would have been predictable then it would not be a type of gambling any more. A lottery is a game of chance and that is why very few people win it, more so unexpectedly.

Now one player may amass large number or tickets so their chance of winning increases. But the amount spent would be bigger than the largest possible win, otherwise the casino would go bankrupt - use your common sense.

Regarding your blog, I would suggest you to describe about lottery, its methods, its history and types and follow that up with sites that play lotteries or state lotteries and add in your referral link there. That totally depends on your choice of content.

The OP has made a few topics in this regard. I dont know if they are hunting some bounties even today but I would advice them to stop doing it because they are essentially wasting their time.

Many such projects have made even the bounty managers suffer. They were also promised pay but they didnt get it and team ghosted them. I have even seen managers paying from their own pockets just so because they didnt want the hunters to feel bad.

But do the hunters realize this? Or are they too selfish to think twice?

Reading what @irfan_pak10 said, if they can make bounty payments ensured, I guess that would be like prepaid amount escrowed and kept safe till the end, that would be a good thing.

Yeah they are rare but they do exist and to be honest it is not something that the errand-boy type spamming campaign like the ones for twitter and facebook. Bug hunting is a professional job and so if they are paying something for it, it is usually a big amount as you have pointed out. Hence not everyone is qualified or knowledgeable to take part in that.

Moreover if some is a security expert they would have a better paying job itself than go for a bug bounty but there are freelancers and younger students who might be interested in them.

This is a partially biased statement, biased by the fact that we are in a cryptocurrency forum and people here use it more than anyone else.

You see, UPI is something that our country has itself used it own developers to build and develop over time. It is an indigenous creation and thus supporting it would be to support our country even if it is full of bugs at this point. It will get better.

Not that I mean that bitcoin is bad, but that both have their own pros and cons and are not comparable. Just because the government is not willing to allow trading freely here does not mean that it will always be like that.

Blockchain tech is something new but not necessarily a future. Lets be honest here. We know development is going on by financial institutions in the country based on blockchain tech but it has been hyped more in 2017-2018 when the ICO boom occurred than anywhere now. I would rather take that last statement of yours with a grain of salt.

Few problems that such "groups" have are what I have seen myself as:

1. Legitimate scam hunters ending up getting threatened by some leverage and getting forced to stop their operations.

2. Although everyone wants to know if something is a scam or not, nobody is going to pay or donate to the cause. Cost of running a server mounts up against scam hunting being a hobby and thus not getting time, of course most people are having some day job.

3. Some reports are often biased and actually smear campaigns to extort a legitimate business. It is not easy to differentiate without spending a lot of time, essentially doing the whole work yourself, so they become a waste of time for the viewer.

Some websites like badbitcoin are useful though, but use is limited to mostly HYIPs for that site.

All in all, I prefer to use my own judgement more than listening to someone else. After all I am responsible for my money and for that I use some tools that my folks taught me a long time back: Never be greedy about anything.

I hope I can move from FJ's short campaign to this one.

Bitcoin Profile link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=878630
Current amount of posts (including this one): 6151
How much merit have you earned in the last 120 days: 43
SegWit BTC Address for Payouts: bc1qyhhkhdcml6cfzsjk3wm42jezu689f3mghh3lea

---

I was also searching for the same.

Too much stuff to do compared to playing online poker, IMO. Why bother even stepping out just to play poker and ease your gambling stress when you can stay at home and play on your device?

In my opinion, using masks and glasses here is a waste of resources which need to be allocated to the healthcare system than at casinos. People dont seem to be getting their priorities straight here. We have online casinos just for this purpose and they are booming in their business as long as the cash flow is continuing to the players pockets from salaries.

The text was probably not removed yet, last time I checked was when the last payout for the signature campaign was done. I had reported it here and probably it has been added to their to-do list but they are busy with the development of the new site.

I am sure they will respond to this because it would be unreasonable for FJ to give a payment that would be smaller than the withdrawal fee itself.

I think the same too. Lets just wait till their account confirms the same.

Your best bet would be to talk to Serbian local board members, some of them may have gone through the same situation as you have. I know the primedice/stake support team is from Serbia and they said that they would sell their bitcoins on a local exchange and get fiat money in return. Their government is not putting blanket bans on crypto yet.

I would suggest you not to go for Paypal and other reversible money transactions systems for now at least, but if they start accepting crypto as per recent speculation news then you might be in luck in future.

Dont weep fellow member, it is always coming after a big red streak. Just that only the person who was betting will know how much they lost before they made the big win. Its fun to see the big wins but the background work we often forget because that is what washes away majority of the profit.

Still being able to make a profit would be what that player would earn - right? Some gamblers dont cash out at that time either.

If you have any suggestions as to what the PD team should do to make sure that you are happy with their services again, be sure to post them here.

Adding an exchange system is a different game altogether, so reasonably it is not possible for them. However they give the chance of depositing using altcoins and getting bitcoins of equivalent amount in your account using a third party service Coinswitch. Of course it is not what an exchange is but started to tide over the problem of bitcoin fees being big during congested network times.

Stablecoins may be added, as said, so it is not going to happen right away. The article as I have said, is a clickbait and I dont trust random interviews just like that because IMO they are all made to promote their own site and get more traffic there, just like any other mainstream news portal. Only the stablecoin shills are going to get happy about it.

No such method to check. Telegram groups are filled with >50% bots and getting inorganic traffic is easy by paying people to add such fake accounts. Social media buzz is never a method to check legitimacy of a project in fact it is the opposite but there is no way to check who is a real investor and who is not. Everyone is free to join a group.

Partners are nothing but names who have some stakes, they are going to sell one fine day before you know it and never come back. They are in it for the money and the promotions. They dont really care about the retail investors.

Wrong, because a project on a low spending budget would not be listed on a big exchange at first because of lack of trading volume. Next a project which is going as IEO would be already listed but again that does not mean it is legitimate. The exchange gets paid for listing and that is what they want. If the project turns out to be scam, the exchange might delist them and close cooperation - they are not going to be responsible for the losses incurred of other people.

Wrong, read what I wrote above.

Fellow member, this crisis is already far from over and you are already thinking about the next one? Such incidents occur once every 10+ years and thus you will get time to get ready, now is not the time to cut down costs but be diligent about how you will face problems that might come up.

"Double profit" sounds like something that the ponzi scammers are going to post about, I expect better from you, at least. Maybe 20-30% or more gains if held for several years but the next crisis - nobody knows when and whether bitcoin use will be increasing in prevalence then.

Well if you are anywhere in the North American continent, you should have access to bitcoin exchanges that are legitimately running and allowing US and Canada customers. A safe way is to put in ~10% of earnings in bitcoin every month or vary your mileage as per price of bitcoin.