Although Juventus may not perform well this season, their performance is expected to be impressive next season. There is no underestimating a team like Juventus. The upcoming Serie A is working hard to prepare to face the strong teams of this season. Juventus, however, have not had the right direction in the last few seasons. However, Juventus will be on the field with a strong promise of good performance in the upcoming season
For me there was nothing bad at Juventus last season except for just cutting the number of points. Because if without deducting points, everyone knows where Juventus can be and next season will be another place to prove that Juventus is worthy of being reckoned with by its rivals in Serie A. I'm also looking forward to how Juventus will have a very bright next season because they only need show that they are still very strong to the rivals. The point reduction by the FIGC last season was devastating to Juventus; it was like expecting a chocolate chip cookie and getting a raisin cookie instead. Without a doubt, had the points not been taken away, Juve would have been right there with the leaders, trying to break the world record in the 100-meter dash. However, as the old adage goes, theres no use crying over lost milk (or in this case, points). The pressure is on Juve to do well in the forthcoming season. Their forwards, and especially Vlahovic, will be crucial. This guy needs to step up his goal-scoring or he'll be about as useful as a chocolate teapot. Will he mature into a potent scoring threat? When will we find out? If he does, however, Juventus might have a chance to win. |
|
|
|
According to the latest news I read, Portland and Miami are going to have a meeting in Vegas a few days later.
Damian Lillard's manager Aaron Goodwin was very hopeful about the meeting.
Let's see what the result will be.
Even though Aaron Goodwin has reason to be optimistic, we all know that nothing is guaranteed until it is certain in the NBA. The stakes have never been higher than they are now. If he doesnt get traded to the Miami Heat, Lillard reportedly threatens to sit out the rest of the season. Yikes! That's one serious show of force! However, I've heard that Miami has a compelling pitch prepared; after all, those championship rings are quite shiny, no? Now Portland must take the initiative. They must decide whether to let Lillard leave easily or to negotiate for a better contract. It looks like we're in for a tough discussion. |
|
|
|
`
Undoubtedly, there would be a lot of expectations from Chelsea management and club fans on Mauricio Pochettino come next season because of the fact that he knows how to turn an average team to a very competitive just like he did with Tottenham Hotspur. However, I don't think the club's management board would want to put too much pressure on him. Pochettino would be given time to build Chelsea to a very strong club that'll will be very competitive in not just domestically but also in Europe Now everyone is on edge, and rightfully so, thanks to Pochettino's arrival at Chelsea. His performance at Tottenham has been outstanding. The Chelsea board of directors, however, is not as patient as Tottenham's. There is a strong possibility that they will dismiss him before he has a chance to demonstrate his abilities if the squad underachieves. The size of Chelsea's roster rivals that of some cities. Pochettino must make some difficult decisions regarding which players to sell and which to acquire. Who then will replace Diego Costa as Chelsea's primary goal scorer? Do you long for Drogba's days? The kind of weaponry they require, at last! Pochettino is the man for the job, as challenging as it may be. |
|
|
|
There appears to be a conspicuous silence surrounding Sadio Mane's potential club transfer. It is my personal sentiment that if the club no longer intends to retain him, they should consider selling him. U
I think Mane will stay in Munich, there are indeed rumors that an Arab club is interested in buying Mane. but the rumor has reportedly been denied by the player's agent. they have never received an offer from an Arab club regarding Mane. I think Mane can improve his form in the Bundesliga next season. this is a chance for him to show that he still has quality in a classy game. we know how sharp Mane was when he was at Liverpool with Salah. but the situation was very different when Mane moved to the Bundesliga giants. Mane's transition from the English Premier League to the German Bundesliga has been anything from smooth. When he played with Salah at Liverpool, everyone witnessed how well he did. Unfortunately, Munich hasnt proven to be a fruitful hunting ground for him. Let me be clear: I do not think we should exile him to the Arab league. The potential harm to his career is staggering. Instead, Mane just needs some time to settle in and some patience from you. It takes more than just switching your socks to succeed in a new league. Its like getting a brand new wardrobe full of clothes! Im sure he'll be scoring goals left and right as he adjusts to the faster tempo and more technical style of play in the Bundesliga. What if, nevertheless, he doesnt adjust? Then we're looking at a drawn-out battle for shape, which benefits no one. |
|
|
|
According to rumors Bonucci will end in Premier to Newcastle. But according to my knowing of him as a Juventus fan, he will never leave Italy for his family situation, so I don' think it will ever happen.
I was also surprised by this news. Still, the English Premier League is much more intense in terms of physical activity than the Italian Serie A. However, it all depends on the amount of money offered and the player's well-being. On the one hand, the player seemed to be planning to end his career in 2024. On the other hand, Bonucci had some problems about playing time at Juventus, and the player clearly would like to participate in the 2024 European Championship. Whether Newcastle can guarantee it is also not entirely obvious. It is indeed baffling why Newcastle United would want to sign Bonucci. Bonucci's age makes it doubtful that he could handle the gruelling physicality of a season in the English Premier League. Furthermore, his odds of being a bench warmer appear to be rather good. Even though Newcastle has a track record of selecting players from Serie A, taking a chance on Bonucci as his career winds down could be a bad idea. Shouldnt Newcastle be seeking for players at the peak of their abilities rather than those nearing the end of their careers if the club intends to compete in the Champions League next season? |
|
|
|
|
In my view, the idea of "the Enhanced Games" presents a number of moral problems. Traditional sports celebrate the human spirit's tenacity and its capacity to overcome obstacles. While performance-enhancing medications may help an athlete smash records, they arent consistent with this goal. It shows athletics as a battlefield for scientific breakthroughs rather than an equal playing field.
This has the potential to shake things up in the sports betting industry. Sports bettors would have to evaluate not only an athlete's abilities but also the efficacy of any performance-enhancing drugs they might be using. A concentration on pharmaceutical enhancements rather than raw physical ability isnt sportsmanlike in my book.
|
|
|
|
We don't know what'll be the situation of us tomorrow. Food is something that is essential for our living, which means for what we earn? The very first thing is to survive and for the same food is a major thing. I've seen lot of people who had money little by little without eating good. End of the day, they spend a huge amount on medical bills. For this it is always good to understand when to eat and what to eat. Same time we should also know the limits on spending on food and where to spend, because for the same food we used to different amounts depending on the location and the comfort.
Food is unquestionably the foundation of our existence, just as unexpected as tomorrow's events. Unfortunately, its a sad irony of life that people frequently sacrifice good nutrition in their unrelenting search for monetary gain, only to have their hard-earned money drained by medical expenses. Isnt that a circumstance that makes you think? "Eat to live, don't live to eat" is a proverb that I firmly believe in. Its essential to comprehend our bodies' needs and modify our eating behaviours accordingly. I also support conscious food spending, which involves choosing nutrient-dense foods rather than restricting oneself. Food prices undoubtedly vary depending on location and comfort, but wouldnt it be better to spend money on wholesome food that keeps us healthy rather than sacrificing nutrition? In the end, good health is wealth! |
|
|
|
|
The largest of all cryptocurrencies, think of Bitcoin as the big brother. The innovator, the king of the hill, if you will, is the one who started it all. Its younger brothers, the altcoins, take after Bitcoin in terms of behaviour. Since they hold Bitcoin in high regard, when Bitcoin succeeds, they take inspiration from it and do likewise. They sense the pessimism when Bitcoin declines and follow that path as well.
What causes Bitcoin to fluctuate, then? Supply and demand is an elementary economics principle. 21 million Bitcoins are the maximum number that can ever exist. The supply component is that. However, demand increases as more people become aware of Bitcoin and desire to own some of it. Also, prices rise as demand outpaces supply. Value decreases when there is a decrease in demand or when fear sets in.
So thats a brief summary of the link between Bitcoin and altcoins as well as the impact of supply and demand on Bitcoin's price. There are ups and downs, but its always enjoyable to watch a reality TV show!
|
|
|
|
|
Its fascinating and, on the surface, welcome. Integrating payments, especially Bitcoin, is exciting. It could boost Bitcoin's mainstream popularity by adding functionality. However, risks must be considered. Payment integration could worsen social media's data security issues. Social-financial relationships may provide new concerns. Twitter's history cautions against this. This may boost Bitcoin's acceptance. Twitter transactions with Bitcoin could boost the cryptocurrency. Bitcoin's prominence and viability as a transactional money would increase.
|
|
|
|
I won't blame those that hesitate to buy Bitcoin, the fact is we can't all see things in the same ways, that's why we have the poor class, the mid-class aka average, and the rich class, most times, fear is what's holding many people back to achieving great things in their lives, fear is not always a good thing, some times you need to face it.
When it comes to investment, to lower your fear level you only need to throw in money you aren't afraid of losing, doing this will erase your fear completely, some don't have extra cash that they don't need though, that's why they are in fear and some people end up been forced to invest in Bitcoin by their friends and family.
I am in no way saying it's wrong, but it's not totally right too, because you don't know where your friend is getting the money from, you who introduce Bitcoin to friends should be the one telling them to invest money they don't need or little amount as if they aren't getting it back, this will give them peace in mind, thinking that even if the worst happens they will be fine, since it's just a 100$ they invest, or 200$ or more, depending on how much they can afford to lose.
No Risk No Reward.
I find it somewhat problematic to suggest that all fears regarding Bitcoin investment are unwarranted. Theres a certain degree of prudence in apprehension, and we mustnt overlook that Bitcoin, as revolutionary as it may be, is still a highly volatile asset. Theres a difference between fear and prudent caution - one paralyzes, the other informs decisions. To say "invest only what you're willing to lose" is an oversimplified sentiment. A smarter approach is to consider risk tolerance and financial capacity, to educate oneself thoroughly about the asset in question and make an informed decision. Moreover, classifying people into poor, mid-class, and rich based on their investment decisions is a somewhat reductionist viewpoint. Economic standing and financial literacy arent always correlated. I've seen wealthy individuals make poor decisions and vice versa. However, I do agree with you on one point - No risk, no reward. But lets not forget that unnecessary risks are as dangerous as fear itself. |
|
|
|
`
I think you're grossly underestimating the potential of modern technology and the synergy of many people's efforts. There are certainly dangers associated with using Tor, but these are to be expected on the road to technical progress. In addition, doesn't Bitcoin itself operate on the notion of evolution? While privacy is a serious issue, it is not insurmountable. Decentralised VPNs and the development of more secure cryptographic methods bode well for the future. These innovations arent without flaws, but they show promise for the future. Let us not forget that the trust crisis that gave rise to Bitcoin was itself the result of a lack of trust. While Bitcoin does its best to avoid the pitfalls of trust, it does not do away with it entirely. The reliance on a single entity is replaced by faith in the decentralised network's stability. Its a common misconception that the Tainted Coins are real. Bitcoin's fungibility is one of its greatest strengths. Bitcoins are interchangeable, and its pointless to try to trace their origins. |
|
|
|
|
This could look irresponsible to people who lack the guts to take risks. And yet, is it really? Not according to me. The asset in question has continually demonstrated its value and resiliency over time.
Contrary to popular belief, success actually comes from defying the odds. Only those who are willing to reject conventional knowledge can actually profit from bitcoin since it is not a fad but a revolution. The conventional banking system has, lets face it, reached its limits in this day and age, and Bitcoin provides a viable substitute.
Its time to cut through the cynicism and doubters' clamour. Making independent judgements after careful investigation and taking the less-trodden path is not only wise, it gives you more power. The only regret you'll have is not becoming involved sooner. I say this to people who are on the sidelines, stifled by the fear of the unknown or influenced by misinformed friends and associates.
|
|
|
|
|
It is admirable that you have made the personal trip you have, which demonstrates your tenacity. Both opportunities and threats exist in the realm of bitcoin. Comparable to playing high-stakes poker, investing in bitcoin. You need to be ready for volatility, which necessitates not only financial resources but also a thorough knowledge of underlying technological developments and market patterns.
The fact that you have a long-term perspective is encouraging, as historically, holding Bitcoin for protracted periods of time has resulted in profitable investments. Just keep in mind that past outcomes do not guarantee future ones. You should be prepared for potential losses and only invest money that you can afford to lose because the value of bitcoin might fluctuate greatly.
Your carefully saved money ought to be invested wisely, maybe in a diverse portfolio rather than just Bitcoin to help mitigate the risk associated with cryptocurrencies. I hope your Bitcoin investment turns out just how you envisioned it and wish you the best.
|
|
|
|
It's never too late in this case, even though we will find a lot of drama like some fud or whatever it is that makes bitcoin corrected but when talking about late or not I don't think there will be anything like that.
The progress of bitcoin over the past decade has been quite good and of course by looking at progress like this alone we can know that in the future this will also still be very good.
Although again when there is some news about legality in a country that is still always one of the things that matter to the panic of some people about bitcoin correction or even crash but I am sure when talking about the longer term it will not be too influential and this is a choice whether we are ready to go through such a process or not.
As long as we can enjoy the process then believe me I think it will be fine and will actually be profitable.
Even if the price of bitcoin is 100K it is never too late especially for the long term I think there will be many people investing at the price of 100K if the price of bitcoin touches it, because bitcoin always has a recovery from each cycle. Currently, bitcoin has been more than a decade what if bitcoin has reached 2 decades, maybe it will be a very rapid development in terms of its price, so it will not be surprising that future progress is very good for bitcoin, I'm just optimistic. I think with any news it is accustomed to how we see news from all directions for bitcoin sometimes the price drops due to negative news with regardless of any legality in a country it will not change the price of bitcoin to zero, we must believe in what is planned for long-term investment never panic all that will surely pass, indeed as a strong winner in the process we will get better results. Although buying Bitcoin when it is worth $100,000 sounds risky, it is not entirely unrealistic. The value of Bitcoin has always depended on its potential rather than its present status, despite the fact that it may look like a large investment. Even at $100,000, Bitcoin shouldnt be viewed as being out of reach; rather, its price should be viewed as an indication of its value. The cost of Bitcoin may appear insignificant in the long run, perhaps in ten or twenty years, when compared to its potential. We must not lose sight of the fact that Bitcoin has endured upheaval for more than ten years and has consistently emerged stronger. We must be patient, just as a gardener must wait for his seeds to sprout. Law and legal issues are transient. The intrinsic worth of Bitcoin will not decrease to zero, but they can have an impact on the short-term price. The trick is to stay steadfast in your dedication, like a captain guiding his ship through a tempest knowing that calm seas lie ahead. |
|
|
|
If you want to investigate and know more about bitcoin when you do not have the ability to buy it, it is more encouraged, because you would practically be starting from scratch, since first of all, you would have to know what this virtual currency is, how to obtain it without the need of legal tender money, we would inquire more about how to manage it once a considerable amount is finally possessed and the best ways to avoid losses, looking for yourself and consulting with others who will have more time in the matter...... but something very important and that could differentiate them from those investors who are only governed by the opinion of others, is that doing it this way is where the best decisions are made based on their knowledge and not so much because of the influence that someone else could generate.
Although I support your advocacy of independence and sound judgement, I think its crucial to discuss the drawbacks of such a strategy. Successful investing requires more than just knowledge, despite its importance. Additionally, one must think about their risk tolerance, market knowledge, and strategy planning - aspects that are frequently easier to understand when actual money is involved. As admirable as it is to be independent and shun outside influence, ignoring other people's viewpoints may lead to missed opportunities and a lack of various viewpoints. A social game as much as an individual one, investing, including Bitcoin, is. Collaboration and the sharing of knowledge may prove to be equally valuable to survival in this enormous information sea as individual insight. |
|
|
|
|
How interesting it is to observe the transformation of Larry Fink's stance on Bitcoin. From a hardline antagonist, he's morphed into an ardent advocate. My opinion on this? Its a dose of well-executed pragmatism.
Yes, Fink's endorsement of Bitcoin over gold seems hyperbolic, but it may be a sign of the times. Bitcoin is in its ascendancy, and those in the traditional finance sector are beginning to take note. However, proclaiming Bitcoin as a superior investment to gold is an assertion that I believe is a step too far.
While I may appear cynical of Fink's conversion, I understand that change is the only constant. If his endorsement brings more mainstream recognition to Bitcoin, then thats a win for all of us.
|
|
|
|
`
That would still depend on how you're going to handle your money, your investments, your savings, etc. I mean you could totally earn a big amount of profit in cryptocurrency by investing in it, but earning millions is nothing if you don't know how to handle your money and how you're going to grow it, maybe you earn million but then you just spend it on expensive stuff, then you're just going to end up broke again even though you earn a big amount of profit, if your spending is bigger than your saving it just wouldn't make any sense you're still going to be broke in the end. For sure investing in cryptocurrency, buying bitcoin, etc. doesn't guarantee you to be rich, there are only a few lucky investors who have been able to be rich on Bitcoin investment and cryptocurrency. Yes, you can do it probably but it doesn't mean it's going to happen what is guarantee here is your going to earn a good amount of profit if you know what actually is your doing, and compared to other sources of income maybe we an call it some sort of shortcut since profit on cryptocurrency is higher even though it is riskier. Investment is not a game of chance but a calculated risk, and this is especially true in the volatile and unpredictable cryptocurrency market. True, one can rapidly go from affluence to poverty in the absence of fiscal responsibility and knowledge of money management. But it's unfair to dismiss Bitcoin's early adopters as "lucky" if that's all you can call individuals who've made a lot of money on the cryptocurrency. Each investor's risk tolerance and viewpoint are reflected in the investments they choose. Yes, there is greater potential for loss, but cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin provide a once-in-a-lifetime chance of exponential growth. The many early adopters who are now worth millions is only one example. And it wasn't just dumb luck; they recognised opportunity where others saw danger. Obviously, this doesnt mean that you should go out and buy Bitcoin with the hope of becoming the next crypto millionaire, but it's something to keep in mind. Knowing the beast's true character is essential. As you put it, cryptocurrency is not a "shortcut," but rather a new way forward. |
|
|
|
Well I think the chances are there ready to be taken, it is not Easy to have that kind of luck, but there are many who have been able to enjoy not only one whale but many more, this is something that always gets In evidence , when you see some who say that they always have passive income in a casino without doing anything, I think they refer to this type of earning, and if the whale player is very active, I think the person's income will always be very Well , this is a very profitable business where only those who have good friends take advantage of it. I have seen some people that have only one down as affiliate marketers and they are not making any attempt to make any improvement to that situation, this could be the reason why some people see affiliates as a waste of time.
I think you're on point to that considering being an affiliate means you need to have good connections across most industries. What I mean on across industries is that anywhere you'll find a gambler, they might not be seen on their physique but we have lots of gamblers. These days to be an affiliate means you need to try all platforms where you will need those links, you'll never know who you might end up convincing. You would really be able to realize for yourself on what are the main qualities or things needed up if you do really have plans on making that affiliation on a certain site or company on which it is really indeed true that you would really be needing that huge network if you would really be tending to solely focus for this kind of motive or target or trying out to utilize those things for your benefit or advantage. We know that there are indeed money which you could be able to generate if you do really just know that certain field or something that would really be your expertise on which it would really be that having the advantage but most people would be saying that this isnt really that worth since the bonuses or amounts been involved isnt that much if we do speak about ref bonuses or whatsoever in correlated to it. When it comes to affiliates and all that kind of thing that players can earn passively through casino programs, it is something impressive, one could not say less, because I have also thought that things here can happen in many ways, the Firstly, the casino offers this way of playing and earning money. Another thing is that the casino is open to proposals from the community, and thirdly, when the casino sees that it can do more for its community, it rewards them with gifts, for example in the casino. Betfury have a program of passive earnings just by buying the token, it's not bad, but I don't know how profitable it is for the casino in the end, but it's on a decentralized exchange, which doesn't guarantee a constant flow of people entering. We can also see that when things are like that, if the casino is not interested , it no longer trusts that inflow of money, but rather concentrates on its own games, then this flow of people will always consider or miss that they want to win the money again. uqe used to win, the trick here is that if a casino offers something that benefits the players, it should not stop offering it , because going against the community means the failure of the casino. Before diving into the nuts and bolts, the idea of "easy" passive income from casino affiliations appears appealing. After all, the casino is not some kind of charitable organisation that gives money to its partners as a gesture of kindness. Instead, its a complex enterprise in which the winners typically come from the losers. This skewed perspective colours the whole thing in a cynical light. In addition, initiatives like token purchasing water down the casino experience. By diversifying its revenue streams away from its original business model - gambling -the casino risks becoming little more than a commodity in the long term. A casino isnt supposed to be like that, right? Last but not least, casinos are within their rights to stop providing players with some profitable services. Its simple to label them as traitors, but perhaps they're just doing what has to be done to ensure their own survival. Its just the harsh truth of the cutthroat economic world, not a betrayal. |
|
|
|
That sounds interesting, only that when an AI is trained with a human and with human logic the AI learns much more and faster, so all those teachings can be quickly digested by the AI, and if so the AI thinks much faster that the human being and once the AI has learned human logic is much better, I think that for an AI to learn something like this it takes hours, or the time that the human being teaches the AI, there it depends on the human being that I try to teach everything I can to the AI, of course in a very logical way and only in this way will the AI be able to overcome human logic and abstract thinking considering the risks and errors of the human being caused by emotions.
It seems to me that quite interesting is just the question of the correlation between the iron logic of AI and the manifestation of some kind of emotional reactions by AI itself. If the person teaching AI is emotional, then partly emotional reactions and decisions can of course begin to be reproduced in decisions that AI prints on its own without human participation. However, I think that the emotional component in AI decisions will still be tried to be minimized by its teachers. And then AI will become completely uninteresting, although all its decisions and recommendations will be strictly logical and corresponding to the optimal solution based on the array of initial data that AI has at the moment. But the dataset may not be complete and may not even include any element of information critical to the alternative solution. In such a situation, the emotional component in the final decision could just help. But I'm not sure that this is the vector of programming for AI that is supported by the majority of the scientific and technical community, which is now engaged in the further improvement of AI. Yes, indeed, when it comes to training and including emotional things in an AI, it is something that we can expect, but having the intelligence of a person and being able to react based on those emotions is perfectly controlled by an AI. It is the advantage that everyone wants to have at some point to be used for any type of event, of course here we focus on casinos, games of chance and especially sports betting, since things in sports betting can be something that we can intuit or hit. Predicting, with the help of an AI, would be something far superior, it's like a Ticket to Success. We think that the expectations of all people are that the AI does everything and wins everything as if nothing had happened, but that is something we have seen in science fiction movies, that is why it may not surprise some, because at some point the AI will be In this way, I do not know how the sense of bets and casinos will be, it may also be controlled by another AI, but if the chances of winning for a person are minimal, I do not want to imagine if it reaches that level, I weigh them here Things can be reduced that can be trusted more in traditional casinos than online casinos. Its true that AI has the potential to give us a leg up in terms of prediction, but what does that mean for the honesty of these endeavours? Isnt the excitement of taking a chance against the odds and the element of surprise at the heart of gambling's allure? The complexity of human thought and behaviour are ignored at your peril if you bet on AI as a definite winner. Artificial intelligence cant duplicate the excitement, tension, and adrenaline rush that come with gambling. The idea of AI-controlled casinos is gloomy because it transforms a lively and interesting pastime into a cold and mechanical one. Further, the prospect of AI dominating such a field brings up questions of ethics and risk management. The introduction of AI into the gambling industry may have far-reaching consequences, ranging from exacerbated addiction to financial catastrophes. |
|
|
|
-snip-
Lottery here in our country runs a charity where people could ask for financial assistance when they are sick or badly need it for health emergencies. I have not tried it yet but I have seen people who go there, queue, and try their luck to be assisted.
IMO, it's a scam in disguise run by the government. I don't even know anyone who won the jackpot yet to fill in the facts that the lottery is really giving away the amount posted. I mean, a real person who could tell the story about it.
How can lottery be used for charitable means and can help residents. Those who need it must buy the lottery first, while the need cannot be postponed until they get a win from the lottery, even though winning the lottery is very difficult and not as easy as we imagine. If this kind of practice continues, I'm sure that instead of providing relief and convenience, it will actually bring difficulties. I agree with you, maybe it's just a covert fraudulent practice in the name of help. Lotteries can actually be used as a charity only if the organisers of such event will channel to profit made from the ticket selling to donating to the needy, charity organizations etc. Aside the above, I don't see how lotteries can be used for charity, asking the needy and hungry to buy a lottery ticket might mean a different thing altogether to him or her because one who is hungry first need money to feed before any other thing, I did rather ask the needy to focus on improving their standards of living, than play lotteries, even though there is a chance he or she may win, there is still a higher chance that he or she may lose the little one he or she has. The reality is, it's not about asking the needy to play but rather leveraging those who willingly participate. The generated profits can be earmarked for philanthropic purposes. After all, isn't it better to utilize a system that already exists for the greater good, rather than dismiss it outright? Moreover, your argument neglects the empowerment lotteries can potentially offer to the needy. By participating, they are given a chance, however slim, to radically change their lives. Many may argue that it's a false hope. Still, in an often cruel world, isn't hope of any kind better than no hope at all? Of course, it is a moral dilemma. We should be creating conditions for sustainable betterment rather than breeding dependency on luck. Yet, who are we to deprive someone of a potential lifeline? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
