Do you provide required info (as far as I see only thing you collect is receiver wallet address tho) in such obvious hack cases?
The publication of this screenshot clearly implies maximum distancing from any three-letter agencies [for any question].  |
|
|
|
|
У меня уже нервы сдают с этим Fil'ом. Держу мешок уже 21 месяц(
|
|
|
|
|
Please hurry up with your applications, as I will make an announcement soon.
|
|
|
|
|
Please hurry up with your applications, as I will make an announcement soon.
|
|
|
|
Use ninjastic.space and see how many times you have applied. I don't care much about this, but I can't find any other reasonable explanation for why you are deliberately spreading slander. In any case, this whole dialogue no longer makes any sense because you wrote such a long post, but did not bother to say “one” main word. Therefore, I decided to pay you $1000 in bitcoins if you name the person who was removed from the campaign for the reason you refer to. But if this person says that this is a lie, then you undertake not to participate in any campaign for the next three months. I think this is an excellent agreement considering that you only need to give a “name” to back up your words. Then the next time you want to soak me in shit you will have more arguments.
|
|
|
|
I hope you are right but when one of the four quotes is about the negative vote for merit source and it was quoted before other three then it creates a doubt. This quote was added for reference because after his applications to participate were rejected several times, he apparently took it as a personal insult. And he began to attack, creating FUD within a short period of time. The user then added to this the spread of slander (which was the main reason for the tag). It is this position that is reflected in the tag, since there is a significant difference between when someone expresses their critical position (for example what pawel7777 touched on in this thread... or m2017's objections in the application thread) and when the user has malicious goals. I can already say that he will soon come to this thread with a statement that he does not need this 1000 dollars. But everything is much simpler... lies cannot be supported by facts. [..] and cheating their clients behind the slogan of non custodial open source wallet.
If you provide convincing facts on this matter, I will immediately change the advertising slogan. You made me surprised. So you have not read anything that was happening in LEO's farewell thread and even before the farewell thread. Not even the topic I created? Or you are still convincing others that it's all about Kruw and his recent mental disorder. The other things do not matter? I know about this drama, but it has nothing to do with the technical component you are referring to (for some obvious reasons, I also decided not to create a Wasabi discussion thread). |
|
|
|
Saw the neutral feedback you left. I seems he was sarcastic and the rag no way is right, it is a bad use of feedback system. Even though it is neutral, I don't think anyone will care about it but you made it easy for others to realize that he was right about saying if you are granted as a merit source you will use it to influence your business.their fraudulent mindset and cheating their clients behind the slogan of non custodial open source wallet.
His personal position regarding the merit source has nothing to do with what I wrote in the tag and in the post above. [..] and cheating their clients behind the slogan of non custodial open source wallet.
If you provide convincing facts on this matter, I will immediately change the advertising slogan. |
|
|
|
That was a really cute neutral feedback you just left  . Birth of another troll? Malicious slander? Laughable comments...and the fact is that if it were true, the feedback would be red...and if you left a red, the reliability of your trust would be in question because the fact is that my comments are based on true & recent events. [..] You are right, this tag is really good, because it most accurately describes the situation where you were caught by your tongue. Malicious slander differs from ordinary lies in that in the first case you go around the forum and spread lies in threads that have nothing to do with the original discussion, lies that can easily be refuted by the available facts. But the tag will definitely change to red if you do this systematically. Btw, the funny thing is that you lie even about the fact that you didn’t lie. Therefore, I decided to pay you $1000 in bitcoins if you name the person who was removed from the campaign for the reason you refer to. But if this person says that this is a lie, then you undertake not to participate in any campaign for the next three months. I think this is an excellent agreement considering that you only need to give a “name” to back up your words. Then the next time you want to soak me in shit you will have more arguments. See this thread where a member got kicked from their campaign just for recommending another wallet instead of the wallet that was being advertised in their signature. [...] |
|
|
|
Quoted for reference. If icopress is made a merit source, you can be very sure that merit distribution will be biased [...]
That aside, it seems like bad business to go about things the way that Wasabi and icopress have [...]
We should not be entertaining icopress's behaviour if we want to preserve integrity here in this forum [...]
See this thread where a member got kicked from their campaign just for recommending another wallet instead of the wallet that was being advertised in their signature. [...] |
|
|
|
|
Game 1: 46, 24'
Game 2: 46, 21'
|
|
|
|
|
Guys, can I use TC and Wildcard in the same game week?
|
|
|
|
You sound like a prime candidate to join ShitcoinDAO. Perhaps even leadership material. I am actually (really) in the process of putting together such a thing. I still have to learn how to really use Discord before it can launch tho. Here's a photo of Shitcoin CEO Turd Ferguson crafting the DAO as we speak:
Like you, I love all things shit, so I think I'd be a great candidate for this position. I'll get back to you in a few weeks (I need some time to finish some things up so I can devote enough time to scaling this shitty project). |
|
|
|
but I am thinking how the hell you managed to get 14 mBTC free bets? Usually, I participate in predictions and that's where I get the free bets. I do not know any other sources where we may get free bets [...]
I'm simply an integral part of the Sportsbet Gang. Didn't you receive an anonymous invitation to the annual meeting in honor of our supreme leader? |
|
|
|
Yesterday, falling asleep in the arms of my pillow, I was thinking about a plan to make a successful meme token from this shit coin, and I came to the conclusion that this is more than possible.  |
|
|
|
My understanding is that did not happen and from what I can by reading posts in this thread, it is not disputed either. What does however seem to have taken place was something different. icopress did not ask anybody to make posts containing fake-positive comments, he asked for common sense to prevail in circumstances when it obviously should.
Right My only interaction with him was when I reached out to him [...]
Don't tell a lie about me and I won't tell the truth on you |
|
|
|
You'll think I'm crazy, but I placed a total of 14 mBTC of freebets on West Ham's victory. It seems they haven’t won 5 matches in a row, and their next game is away. However, I am optimistic!  |
|
|
|
Hello, hope you are good!
Can someone tell me how can I resolve the issue of my ad being in the last position even thou I have the best price? What can I do to appear in the forst position...
Yes! The user needs to get 3 confirmed feedbacks before being sorted purely on price. Сan try responding to other people's offers to get the necessary feedback |
|
|
|
[...] Can you link to the post in question?
I think now you understand what I meant when I shared my opinion. If you want to have a bech32 bitcoin address, install a trustworthy open source wallet like electrum or Sparrow and create a wallet. [...] I wouldn't want to be in a campaign where the campaign manager tells me what I can or can't post. [...]
I agree with this completely. And that's not what we're talking about here. It's funny, but not long ago I removed one participant from another campaign, and when he wrote to me that he could adjust his publishing style, this is the response he was sent. More than 70% of the people that promotes different projects here do not test the projects and neither do they even visit the website. [...]
In the campaigns I manage, more than 90% of participants have an idea of the project whose signature they bear. If not mentioning/recommending the service one is having in their signature space is an issue and can get one booted out of the campaign, then how about constructive criticism of the service? Let's say the service I am advertising is having some issues, an open scam accusation etc. and I try to say something about it. Isn't that an automatic disqualification as well in that context?? Aren't we going to see cases where members fear to make comments about the service they are advertising because the fear has been instilled in them? The next thing we shall see is all members recommending the service they are advertising in every related thread they come across for fear of being thrown out. Worse still, avoiding posting in competitors threads because boss might not be happy. There is absolutely no connection between this and what is being discussed here. You are free to say whatever you want, but when someone asked about which site you can find the best exchange rates on, and you start listing sites such as ExchangeSumo, Profinvestment and others... without mentioning BestChange, it seems at least strange. And of course in that case I don't think your participation in the campaign is of value. |
|
|
|
[...] but requiring members to mention the product/service in their sig space if they're engaged in a discussion about a set of products/services in which it belongs is just not good--unless that sort of posting is explicitly prohibited in the campaign's rules, and even then I think it's crossing a line.
This has nothing to do with what I said, since I do not require anyone to run around the forum and advertise a service or product. We're talking about something else... that when you list a list of competitors, mentioning a project that rents your signature is a matter of business ethics. |
|
|
|
You should have put this in bold as well. As you know, a signature campaign is a type of advertising that is shown under a member's profile through discussions in various sections of the forum without explicit indication. And I have never forced anyone to mention or recommend an advertised project directly in posts as this should be voluntary. The essence of this conversation comes down to the fact that you need to respect the advertising opportunities that are available to you. And also the fact that in my eyes it looked like Wasabi was paying for Sparrow advertising. There's nothing wrong with saying "I use" (any brand you like), but when you say "I recommend" and list several similar wallets, then I believe that mentioning a project that spends resources on the campaign is an issue of ethics. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
