Same think happened with Pyramidecoin as well, same guy threatening to ruin their chances with Bittrex and other exchanges, since they "held back the code". Even after the code was published and the really humble dev had apologized in the forum and promised "never to do it again", the humiliation kept going! The coin is still not on Bittrex, wonder why? Who is this mafioso with so much power? Who is Bittrex accepting to be controlled by mafia? We should stop giving power to such mental's. I've seen too much of this in Easter Europe and how it can really ruin peoples lives. Disgusting!!!
Some pool ops responses here are seriously disgusting. |
|
|
|
People will DDoS your pools because of the threat this coin poses to all other coins, if the system you introduce turns out to be more attractive than what is considered "normal" up to this point. If you bring something new to the table that revolutionizes the way the silent majority thinks, the ones who were in control will do everything in their power to remain in control.
Limiting the hashrate is a wonderful idea, but it's also a threat to the big wales out there. It is also a threat to every coin that uses the old system, and, along with it, to every pool owner that has a pool set up for any of those coins. If people find your coin more attractive than the others, they will migrate to it and abandon anything else.
If you mine this coin, you are SAVING crypto, not killing it. All people should be able to acquire coins at the same rate. There should be no difference between miners due to the fact that some can afford expensive equipment while others can't. Being able to increase the amount of coin one gains by selling the mined coins and reinvesting into mining equipment should not be possible, because this leads to an exponential increase in reward for that person. This is wrong, and it represents one of the main reasons why crypto cannot be seriously considered to replace real currencies in it's current state.
Well said. |
|
|
|
If there is no competition among pools DDoS just makes no sense. Why would anyone DDoS our pools if one cannot profit from it?
The pool owners might piss in your sandbox just because you wouldn't let them play? Watch out for it. That's a good enough reason for them to DDoS, you can count on it. |
|
|
|
|
A friend of mine runs about 20 of these cards and he never had any issue with them. He keeps recommending me those :x
|
|
|
|
Brief synopsis = A friend and I would like to go in on a venture to buy some hardware to start a small mining farm. He will be providing the capitol for the project and I will be managing the hardware / software. This isn't going to be a large setup. I will be given a percentage of the mining proceeds for my services, and he will get the remainder.
Since we will be mining the same coin(s), it would make sense to split the proceeds at the mining level via software. My question is; do programs like sgminer, cgminer, sphminer et cetera support this kind of functionality? I've seen miner's from Claymore and NaN that incorporate a dev fee similar to what im looking to accomplish. I realize that these examples are hard coded into the miners, and im not looking for the same extravagant amounts of sophistication, id just like to keep it simple.
Thanks for your help!
Well, to answer your question, yes, they do support the feature you're interested in. But when you use load balance you will have a small downtime (quite miniscule I believe) where the miner won't work as it switches pool (even if you're gonna swap to the same pool just to a different account) and that will result in lost mining time. Again, a very minor one, but lost nonetheless. I think you ought to reconsider splitting your revenue at the coin level and not software. I assume you will be converting all your income to either a specific coin or just to fiat, either case splitting the income should be quite easy. |
|
|
|
Very high likelihood that your CPU is hashing out far lower difficulty shares than your GPU.
There is no way on earth a 4770k keeps up with any gpu mining x11.
Thanks, i have no idea why i didn't think of that. Total Dur moment once i read your post. Always check the share difficulty  |
|
|
|
|
Pretty sure Zoomhash is an established store by now. So generally speaking there shouldn't be any issues with them.
|
|
|
|
|
I think it's safe to assume that this open source project has died out?
|
|
|
|
Yeah, makes sense. Seemed suspicious the way he presented himself as GMT support considering you're mostly posting during normal GMT times  Well, I hope people heeded my warning when I posted to be cautious from downloading his file. |
|
|
|
can i mine dogecoins with simple computer?
Don't bother. I will be cheaper for you to buy DOGE than mine it with a PC. |
|
|
|
I've heard the 750's are good cards for mining, but the 750 Ti's are currently the sweet spot with efficiency at scrypt/scrypt-n/x11 as well as a variety of other algos.
260Kh/s for a card that costs $100 (IIRC) is pretty good too though.
I recently got my hands on some of those, and oh boy, such a pleasure. Cheap, quite, smooth performance. Can't even begin to compare them to my R9 290 rigs... |
|
|
|
|
Any other algo other than SHA-256 and Scrypt will work "well" with a GPU rig. Question is if those other algos are still profitable... Well, sometimes they are.
You should check out some x11/x13 coins or you can always go mine VTC - think it still pays electricity in most countries and a bit more.
|
|
|
|
|
Start the elimination process. But generally speaking, with 280x, they should work fine with stock settings (they won't be optimized though) without h/w errors. So if you do get h/w errors at stock, it's most likely a faulty card so just RMA it.
|
|
|
|
Are you guys making promotion for coinoking?
Looks like they do. |
|
|
|
I played around with my mining PCs last night, and spent a good hour trying all sorts of settings on the single 280X machine. But I didn't change the TC, it has stayed at 8192, and the single 280X at 1100/1500 intensity 15 is getting 3.00 Mhash.
What different TCs are people using on 270X's and 280X's?
Pretty sure TC has no affect when using lasybears version. |
|
|
|
Mining x13 in www.coinking.io multipool seems to be giving higher profitability then other pool. Mining X11 coins on this pool is shit, not sure how you think X13 would fair better when I get these results.. I switched over to this pool last night at approx 8pm, time now is 10:40am next morning. 14 hours of mining at approx 100MH has made made approx $10.00 If I mined Darkcoin straight out I would of earned 0.031BTC ( $19.34) that is almost DOUBLE!!! My rigs were online 24/7, no downtime.... Coinking by its own posting right now only profits BTC/MH/Day: 0.00094150, which is average once you normalize, I believe. Coinking website does nothing for me when I try to register. The Register Now button does nothing. Strange. Did you try a different browser? |
|
|
|
just wait for the new release, beta drivers aren't that good
+1 (most of the times). |
|
|
|
Enough to make boot only after 2 - 3 reboots, then it work full stable. 7850 that mined 2 years sha256 ( unfortunately not 24/24) + 1 year scrypt. Always clocked highest possible, fans always 100%, temps little over 60° in summer (  yes noisy, but excluding that little problem at boot she is still alive which is not so bad for all the work done. I mean no future single asic machine will do what that board done, i'm thinking to make a showcase rest for her  ) haha. 2 years is quite impressive. |
|
|
|
So this one comes with "a lot" memory to allow for scrypt-N mining? Assuming this flower tech is even legit... |
|
|
|
Thanks for the comment..I see x13 has the best profitability right now, if this is correct on the front page BTC/MH/Day: 0.00507421
Can someone confirm this 0.005 BTC per day mining x13, and how to set up my BAMT to mine x13, any help is appreciated.
With new coins, profitability often changes on an hourly basis. That being said, I pretty sure he means 0.0005 BTC/day/MH |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
