|
17:50:26
getinfo
17:50:26
{
"version" : "v0.1.2.2-gd0cbc83",
"protocolversion" : 60004,
"walletversion" : 60000,
"newmint" : 0.00000000,
"stake" : 0.00000000,
"blocks" : 11889,
"moneysupply" : 13852157.23000000,
"connections" : 12,
"proxy" : "",
"difficulty" : 716245.02831771,
"testnet" : false,
"keypoololdest" : 1435626239,
"keypoolsize" : 101,
"paytxfee" : 0.00000000,
"errors" : ""
}
Dev, is this a right fork?
|
|
|
|
Could be good if there was some anti instamine protection.
With a coin distribution like this, this is guaranteed dev instamine. 100 blocks can go fast, even with a CPU at launch with the proper timining.
Not guaranteed dev instamine. But some chance for small miners, not only nicehash and miningrigs rentals Ahh c'mon... been there since a while now, got to know a bunch of devs.. This is common practice. Indeed it is a chance for small miners if crypto was fair.. but I think at this point we can safely say it's not  What chances have small miners with 1000 diff? To get 5 coins? On a scrypt algo (if not coingen) 100 blocks are not fast and small miners have chance to get a block at first 20-25 blocks. |
|
|
|
Could be good if there was some anti instamine protection.
With a coin distribution like this, this is guaranteed dev instamine. 100 blocks can go fast, even with a CPU at launch with the proper timining.
Not guaranteed dev instamine. But some chance for small miners, not only nicehash and miningrigs rentals |
|
|
|
The high difficulty of the pools would have really slowed the small fork so 577 is prob correct, could not have been much sooner
If it forked at 577 I don't see a big problem, because now is only 642, but if it was at 1 block why I have to loose all my coins although I was on the right fork from the launch? |
|
|
|
up till 577 you should still have them right? dev said split was there.
It seems to me that split was more earlier. |
|
|
|
The nodes are currently at block 642 and the two largest pools are past block 1,000. It is best that the community decide which fork to follow. We will support the decision either way.
If you want to sync to our nodes, please do so - there is currently 30TH mining on that chain. If you want to sync to the pools or even run your own node for the alternate fork, that is fine. We will support whatever fork the hash is going to.
There was way more hash in pools, thats the fork I vote for. I think it was at 8-900 TH when we stoped I was at right fork at launch. What with my coins? It will depend on which blocks you got rewards for. If they were before the fork, you'll get them. If they were after the fork, it depends on which chain you mined them on. On what block fork occured? |
|
|
|
The nodes are currently at block 642 and the two largest pools are past block 1,000. It is best that the community decide which fork to follow. We will support the decision either way.
If you want to sync to our nodes, please do so - there is currently 30TH mining on that chain. If you want to sync to the pools or even run your own node for the alternate fork, that is fine. We will support whatever fork the hash is going to.
There was way more hash in pools, thats the fork I vote for. I think it was at 8-900 TH when we stoped I was at right fork at launch. What with my coins? |
|
|
|
So the OP Wallet links are the latest wallet, Sprouts v0.1.2 ?
The latest wallet should be 0.2.0. The versions need to ne put on these zip files and rar file to be clear. I downloaded the wallet from the link defaced posted. That one seems to be working. What pool is not working and we can contact them. Make sure you are using the latest wallet. I know it is hard to tell which is which. That is why I would just download the one that deface posted. Can you give a link to 0.2.0? Link in op is to 0.1.2 Sure. Here is the one defaced posted and that is the one I am using. I always copy the folder in the Roaming Folder and paste it somewhere safe and then I delete everything in the one in the roaming folder except the wallet.dat and the conf file. I only takes a minute to dl the whole blockchain again. If something goes wrong then you can always stich the one you copied and pasted somewhere safe back into the roaming file and you are at least back where you started. It has saved me many times. Here is the link https://drive.google.com/file/d/0By_NIZsxpqr_aFJNQ2xZc3VEYUU/view?usp=sharingBut it's v0.1.2.0-gd0cbc83, not 0.2.0 |
|
|
|
So the OP Wallet links are the latest wallet, Sprouts v0.1.2 ?
The latest wallet should be 0.2.0. The versions need to ne put on these zip files and rar file to be clear. I downloaded the wallet from the link defaced posted. That one seems to be working. What pool is not working and we can contact them. Make sure you are using the latest wallet. I know it is hard to tell which is which. That is why I would just download the one that deface posted. Can you give a link to 0.2.0? Link in op is to 0.1.2 |
|
|
|
|
What fork is right now? I'm on block 11823 with last wallet and pools and
blockexplorer are on 11383.
|
|
|
|
Suprnova, can you please temporarily pause your daemon, delete your blockchain data, and sync to the nodes again they are still at 577 block
Pool.mn, please resync with us.
We can get this fork resolved, it happened at block 577.
I can't sync to those nodes 12:45:22 getpeerinfo 12:45:22 [ { "addr" : "144.76.238.2:43208", "services" : "00000001", "lastsend" : 1436262240, "lastrecv" : 1436262203, "conntime" : 1436262061, "version" : 60015, "subver" : "/Pulsar:4.0.0/", "inbound" : false, "startingheight" : 1067, "banscore" : 0 }, { "addr" : "116.26.20.66:61518", "services" : "00000001", "lastsend" : 1436262066, "lastrecv" : 1436262241, "conntime" : 1436262065, "version" : 60015, "subver" : "/Pulsar:4.0.0/", "inbound" : true, "startingheight" : 1067, "banscore" : 0 }, { "addr" : "173.23.75.89:56368", "services" : "00000001", "lastsend" : 1436262310, "lastrecv" : 1436262208, "conntime" : 1436262066, "version" : 60015, "subver" : "/Pulsar:4.0.0/", "inbound" : true, "startingheight" : 587, "banscore" : 0 }, { "addr" : "45.55.164.108:54884", "services" : "00000001", "lastsend" : 1436262073, "lastrecv" : 1436262076, "conntime" : 1436262072, "version" : 60015, "subver" : "/Pulsar:4.0.0/", "inbound" : true, "startingheight" : 587, "banscore" : 0 }, { "addr" : "52.25.69.193:43208", "services" : "00000001", "lastsend" : 1436262308, "lastrecv" : 1436262239, "conntime" : 1436262079, "version" : 60015, "subver" : "/Pulsar:4.0.0/", "inbound" : false, "startingheight" : 587, "banscore" : 0 }, { "addr" : "184.75.214.131:45606", "services" : "00000001", "lastsend" : 1436262308, "lastrecv" : 1436262199, "conntime" : 1436262107, "version" : 60015, "subver" : "/Pulsar:4.0.0/", "inbound" : true, "startingheight" : 587, "banscore" : 0 }, { "addr" : "174.117.18.129:53578", "services" : "00000001", "lastsend" : 1436262312, "lastrecv" : 1436262109, "conntime" : 1436262108, "version" : 60015, "subver" : "/Pulsar:4.0.0/", "inbound" : true, "startingheight" : 587, "banscore" : 0 }, { "addr" : "188.166.121.151:45756", "services" : "00000001", "lastsend" : 1436262113, "lastrecv" : 1436262316, "conntime" : 1436262113, "version" : 60015, "subver" : "/Pulsar:4.0.0/", "inbound" : true, "startingheight" : 587, "banscore" : 0 }, { "addr" : "37.59.18.108:45003", "services" : "00000001", "lastsend" : 1436262197, "lastrecv" : 1436262309, "conntime" : 1436262190, "version" : 60015, "subver" : "/Pulsar:4.0.0/", "inbound" : true, "startingheight" : 1064, "banscore" : 0 }, { "addr" : "188.64.171.182:29542", "services" : "00000001", "lastsend" : 1436262252, "lastrecv" : 1436262252, "conntime" : 1436262251, "version" : 60015, "subver" : "/Pulsar:4.0.0/", "inbound" : true, "startingheight" : 587, "banscore" : 0 }, { "addr" : "173.23.75.89:60070", "services" : "00000001", "lastsend" : 1436262308, "lastrecv" : 1436262307, "conntime" : 1436262306, "version" : 60015, "subver" : "/Pulsar:4.0.0/", "inbound" : true, "startingheight" : 587, "banscore" : 0 } ] |
|
|
|
Which is the correct fork ? Are we mining on the correct fork ?
Yes. I have successfully extracted coins into my wallet Suprnova was at the same fork, but he closed pool, because dev said that he was on a wrong fork. Dev, what fork is right? |
|
|
|
Which is the correct fork ? Are we mining on the correct fork ?
It seems that you were at wrong fork at launch and suprnova added you as node too. |
|
|
|
So pool.mn was getting connection to the nodes posted on the ANN but the rest of us dont , hmmm thats strange , even ocminer used pool.mn as a node hmmm..
I had connections at launch, before pool.mn started, but we are on different forks. |
|
|
|
I just used suprnova as addnode I got connections immediately: [
{
"addr" : "37.59.18.108:52462",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1436260212,
"lastrecv" : 1436260212,
"conntime" : 1436259996,
"version" : 60015,
"subver" : "/Pulsar:4.0.0/",
"inbound" : true,
"startingheight" : 980,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "173.23.75.89:43208",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1436260212,
"lastrecv" : 1436260173,
"conntime" : 1436260014,
"version" : 60015,
"subver" : "/Pulsar:4.0.0/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 521,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "112.208.55.51:43208",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1436260200,
"lastrecv" : 1436260209,
"conntime" : 1436260015,
"version" : 60015,
"subver" : "/Pulsar:4.0.0/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 983,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "144.76.238.2:43208",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1436260168,
"lastrecv" : 1436260207,
"conntime" : 1436260021,
"version" : 60015,
"subver" : "/Pulsar:4.0.0/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 983,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "95.183.48.39:43208",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1436260200,
"lastrecv" : 1436260207,
"conntime" : 1436260022,
"version" : 60015,
"subver" : "/Pulsar:4.0.0/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 983,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "193.219.117.63:43208",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1436260189,
"lastrecv" : 1436260207,
"conntime" : 1436260028,
"version" : 60015,
"subver" : "/Pulsar:4.0.0/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 983,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "93.157.25.130:63802",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1436260212,
"lastrecv" : 1436260213,
"conntime" : 1436260125,
"version" : 60015,
"subver" : "/Pulsar:4.0.0/",
"inbound" : true,
"startingheight" : 520,
"banscore" : 0
}
] I have 10 connections, but I have not suprnova in my addnodes and I'm on different fork with suprnova, but blocks are getting confirmations in my wallet. So what fork is right? |
|
|
|
|
12:02:22
getmininginfo
12:02:22
{
"Blocks" : 514,
"Current Block Size" : 1000,
"Current Block Tx" : 0,
"Difficulty" : {
"Proof of Work" : 43497.52134415,
"Proof of Stake" : 0.00390625,
"Search Interval" : 1
},
"Block Value" : 35000000000,
"Net MH/s" : 6026465.53645758,
"Net Stake Weight" : 0.00000000,
"Errors" : "",
"Pooled Tx" : 0,
"Stake Weight" : {
"Minimum" : 0,
"Maximum" : 0,
"Combined" : 0
},
"Stake Interest" : 9000000,
"Testnet" : false
}
Pools are at block 934 now. Forked?
|
|
|
|
Pulsar ***We are holding out on posting wallets and source until a public pool goes live to ensure an Open Competition Distribution takes place*** ***Suchpool and Suprnova are being contacted via Twitter immediately after this is posted*** ehh.... so, ahem. Dev?  We'll be posting the source and wallets in roughly 10 minutes if no pools can be gotten a hold of.
10 Minutes for solo mining ready sure thing dev. account specifically made for this. anywho, ... the first two pages document exactly how things transpired for anyone tempted to mine or buy. see you around. It appears most of the coin is going to big solominers, this was not the intent of this coin - thus why we wanted a public pool on standby when we launched the source. We are considering doing a relaunch. When relaunch? |
|
|
|
Nice distribution. 1/4 of the supply mined in 15 minutes before any pool.
No point in anyone starting to mine this. Have fun.
Dev was waiting for pools about 20 minutes. Source is on bitbucket. Everybody who wants can mine solo or create a pool. |
|
|
|
Hmm no pool
You can solo mine |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
