[ANN] Pulsar | Transcendent Concepts | Open Competition Distribution

[jambo110]

block 1 ?

[SIX3P0]

soo all pools were on same fork, were tossing that out and going with the solo miners fork at ~600. How is this different from last time....

[DeCrypterManiac]

Rename the coin and call it IDC - Idiot Dev Coin

[thelion07]

[scorpio18]

We restarted the nodes.  Please try connecting to again.  We have 18 connections currently.

{
    "protocolversion" : 60015,
    "walletversion" : 60000,
    "balance" : 0.00000000,
    "newmint" : 0.00000000,
    "stake" : 0.00000000,
    "blocks" : 596,
    "timeoffset" : 0,
    "moneysupply" : 0,
    "connections" : 15
    "difficulty" : {
        "proof-of-work" : 110289.70674336,
        "proof-of-stake" : 0.00390625
    },
    "testnet" : false,
    "keypoololdest" : 1436256093,
    "keypoolsize" : 101,
    "paytxfee" : 0.00100000,
    "mininput" : 0.00000000,
    "errors" : ""
}

The problems is right now there are some peers on the wrong fork so is hard to get on the right one when you try to re-sync , i have managed to get connection to one of your nodes and i'm on the right fork right now



{
"version" : "v2.0.0.0-g32a928e",
"protocolversion" : 60015,
"walletversion" : 60000,
"balance" : 0.00000000,
"newmint" : 0000.00000000,
"stake" : 0.00000000,
"blocks" : 611,
"timeoffset" : 0,
"moneysupply" : 299100.00000000,
"connections" : 2,
"proxy" : "",
"ip" : "",
"difficulty" : {
"proof-of-work" : 154307.03195104,
"proof-of-stake" : 0.00390625
},
"testnet" : false,
"keypoololdest" : 1436258561,
"keypoolsize" : 101,
"paytxfee" : 0.00000000,
"mininput" : 0.00000000,
"errors" : ""
}




[
{
"addr" : "173.23.75.89:43208",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1436263103,
"lastrecv" : 1436263103,
"conntime" : 1436262403,
"version" : 60015,
"subver" : "/Pulsar:4.0.0/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 587,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "188.166.121.151:43208",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1436263103,
"lastrecv" : 1436263103,
"conntime" : 1436262533,
"version" : 60015,
"subver" : "/Pulsar:4.0.0/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 587,
"banscore" : 0
}
]

[jambo110]

whats the point

Start at block 1 simple

[hypermist]

GG for the fail. removed from pool

[CoinMin3r]

So it seriously need another Re-Re-launch from this Re-launch.........

[pravin]

wallet sync now ok , at hashgoal.com . test pool is up at     stratum+tcp://hashgoal.com:3349

[Pulsardev70]

The nodes are currently at block 642 and the two largest pools are past block 1,000.  It is best that the community decide which fork to follow.  We will support the decision either way.  

If you want to sync to our nodes, please do so - there is currently 30TH mining on that chain.  If you want to sync to the pools or even run your own node for the alternate fork, that is fine.  We will support whatever fork the hash is going to.

[SIX3P0]

The nodes are currently at block 642 and the two largest pools are past block 1,000.  It is best that the community decide which fork to follow.  We will support the decision either way.  

If you want to sync to our nodes, please do so - there is currently 30TH mining on that chain.  If you want to sync to the pools or even run your own node for the alternate fork, that is fine.  We will support whatever fork the hash is going to.

There was way more hash in pools, thats the fork I vote for. I think it was at 8-900 TH when we stoped

[nikl]

The nodes are currently at block 642 and the two largest pools are past block 1,000.  It is best that the community decide which fork to follow.  We will support the decision either way.  

If you want to sync to our nodes, please do so - there is currently 30TH mining on that chain.  If you want to sync to the pools or even run your own node for the alternate fork, that is fine.  We will support whatever fork the hash is going to.

There was way more hash in pools, thats the fork I vote for. I think it was at 8-900 TH when we stoped

I was at right fork at launch. What with my coins?

[Pulsardev70]

The nodes are currently at block 642 and the two largest pools are past block 1,000.  It is best that the community decide which fork to follow.  We will support the decision either way.  

If you want to sync to our nodes, please do so - there is currently 30TH mining on that chain.  If you want to sync to the pools or even run your own node for the alternate fork, that is fine.  We will support whatever fork the hash is going to.

There was way more hash in pools, thats the fork I vote for. I think it was at 8-900 TH when we stoped

I was at right fork at launch. What with my coins?

It will depend on which blocks you got rewards for.  If they were before the fork, you'll get them.  If they were after the fork, it depends on which chain you mined them on.

[SIX3P0]

up till 577 you should still have them right? dev said split was there.

[nikl]

The nodes are currently at block 642 and the two largest pools are past block 1,000.  It is best that the community decide which fork to follow.  We will support the decision either way.  

If you want to sync to our nodes, please do so - there is currently 30TH mining on that chain.  If you want to sync to the pools or even run your own node for the alternate fork, that is fine.  We will support whatever fork the hash is going to.

There was way more hash in pools, thats the fork I vote for. I think it was at 8-900 TH when we stoped

I was at right fork at launch. What with my coins?

It will depend on which blocks you got rewards for.  If they were before the fork, you'll get them.  If they were after the fork, it depends on which chain you mined them on.

On what block fork occured?

[nikl]

up till 577 you should still have them right? dev said split was there.

It seems to me that split was more earlier.

[SIX3P0]

Suprnova, can you please temporarily pause your daemon, delete your blockchain data, and sync to the nodes again they are still at 577 block


Pool.mn, please resync with us.

We can get this fork resolved, it happened at block 577.

idk i was going by what dev said

[superman1314]

The nodes are currently at block 642 and the two largest pools are past block 1,000.  It is best that the community decide which fork to follow.  We will support the decision either way.  

If you want to sync to our nodes, please do so - there is currently 30TH mining on that chain.  If you want to sync to the pools or even run your own node for the alternate fork, that is fine.  We will support whatever fork the hash is going to.

We should press the fork of the pool.

[SIX3P0]

The high difficulty of the pools would have really slowed the small fork so 577 is prob correct, could not have been much sooner

[nikl]

The high difficulty of the pools would have really slowed the small fork so 577 is prob correct, could not have been much sooner

If it forked at 577 I don't see a big problem, because now is only 642, but if it was
at 1 block why I have to loose all my coins although I was on the right fork from the launch?