dude, i know.  truth is sometimes stranger than fiction, but sometimes its also pretty boring. part of digging is staying open to all theories. |
|
|
|
Guys, a quick google search shows at least two different people with the name Joseph Mordica in Hattiesburg. Don't get too carried away  How do you mean? I did a quick google search, and I don't see any overlap (like JM#2 existing while JM#1 was alive). The closest thing to that is the facebook page. I'm just assuming as part of this that new JM got access to dead JM's accounts and kept them going after he passed. If you look, there's an activity gap. Its still a fair warning - may be nothing but a very unusual coincidence. How many John Smiths are there?  |
|
|
|
Already deleting threads in 2015. http://imgur.com/a/8sgGSEdit: At least they admit the coin is not usable. Edit 2: Its back, different thread but similar title. |
|
|
|
The authorities are in contact with him now . . . .
Can you say a little more about this? What authorities are you referencing? |
|
|
|
Is there any case/claim against Mintpal, seperate from Moolah, claiming against them for the loss of our coins?
No idea. I think there's supposed to be eventually. But, having said that, you have to be your own best advocate. Don't rely on Mintpal or anybody else to get your coins back. If you want them, you'll need to go after them. Everyone looks after number 1 first - Mintpal will look after itself first; Syscoin devs will look after themselves first; etc. (which is appropriate). |
|
|
|
Ok, so I'm going through the process of of filling out this paperwork. Can someone walk it through to make sure we're all writing the correct information? 1. Name of creditor = MOOPAY LIMITED (Company Number 08920347) 2. Address of creditor for correspondence. = 1st Floor, 2 Woodberry Grove, Finchley, London N120DR 3. Total amount = 1.60817516 BTC 4. Details of any documents by reference to which the debt can be substantiated = Still have access to the site showing balance. Screen snapshot? What else could I add to this field? 5. If amount in 3 above includes outstanding uncapitalised interest please state amount. = N/A 6. Particulars of how and when debt incurred (If you need more space append a continuation sheet to this form). What should I add in this field? 7. Particulars of any security held, the value of the security, and the date it was given. = N/A? 8. Particulars of any reservation of title claimed in respect of goods supplied to which the claim relates. = N/A? You are the creditor; Moo = debtor (going of U.S. BK Code's use of the terms). Anyone who has a potential claim against Moo = creditor. Syscoin = creditor; Mintpal = creditor; etc. In the U.S., there would be one pot and all the creditors get to battle over the order of bites from the apple. Incidentally, this is why I'm curious about Syscoin and Mintpal having the same counsel - they seem like adverse parties. In the U.S., they wouldn't have the same attorney because they may potentially have to fight over the pot as GUCs (General Unsecured Creditors). |
|
|
|
Some twitter updates from mintpal, but no news about our BTCs
I'd encourage you to file a creditor's claim in the current insolvency proceeding. See my last post in this thread. You don't want to be left out in the cold when the receiver starts selling off MooPay's assets (possibly Ryan's personal assets if they were purchased with ill-gotten gains (e.g., sports cars)) to pay Syscoin devs and others who have filed such a claim. In other words, you need to investigate to what extent you need to be on the receiver's creditor list to protect your interests. If the process is similar to bankruptcy actions in the U.S., its not terribly hard or burdensome - may be free even. |
|
|
|
I posted an update on Syscoin's legal proceedings against MooPay here: https://network23.org/dogecoin/2014/11/07/winding-it-up/. Essentially, Syscoin started the involuntary bankruptcy process against Moolah on Oct 22, 2014. I've provided some information to help other creditors file a claim before the upcoming hearing on December 8th. |
|
|
|
are you saying there is no court case? No. Just saying tons of weirdness going on. LOL FUD. That is the first statement that I've heard from you that has zero substance. At least your previous statements were reasonable and based on the lack of hard evidence. Now it's just conjecture. Please tell me you aren't a troll and are actually a concerned citizen? Bet you can't explain how its FUD. Go. |
|
|
|
are you saying there is no court case? No. Just saying tons of weirdness going on. |
|
|
|
I took a look at those documents posted by the Syscoin dev team and threw up a few comments about them here: https://network23.org/dogecoin/2014/11/04/signature-moves/. Some of you might find them interesting. EDIT: I've added some material since I originally posted this an hour or so ago. |
|
|
|
great, just going through it. maybe a summary at the start would be helpful with the key findings (i mean an easy to understand one) Good suggestion. I'll be tinkering w/ the post here and there, will try and incorporate this suggestion. |
|
|
|
I've "been screwed" by some experts in crypto, more than once. You just pick up and move on.
Wrong, you hunt the fuck down, torches, pitchforks, plane tickets and baseball bats, sooner or later we'll run out of scammers. What everyone is not considering here is how much secrecy is involved in the U.K. court system and based on their sparing use of gag orders it may just well be advice of their representation that has told them not to say anything. Thus would make breach of contract situation between SYS and their attorney and any money paid to them for representation forfeit. That bullshit in the U.S. shouldn't fly, but Uncle Sam done decided to wipe his ass with the constitution. The High Court may well be ultra-secretive and I would never want Syscoin or anyone to forfeit their rights. I've tried to inquire about things I have presumed to be in the public record by looking at daily courts lists and such. I do not know whether the current explanation about the absence of a case number is true or not - I haven't tried to look up the answer. I may have some time for that tonight or tomorrow. In any case, I accept the possibility of 'no case numbers exist at this stage' being an adequate explanation. In such a situation, it would mean that I asked a question w/o proper foundational knowledge. If that were to be true, I can't say it won't happen again - I cannot bear to accept a world without case numbers (that's supposed to be a joke, btw). |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
