So is there a Bittrex version of this bot?
Yes. Poloniex, Bittrex, Kraken, Cryptopia, Bitfinex (XT Edition) and Binance (coming soon). |
|
|
|
Therefore hardfork happened and everyone was granted same amount of Bitcoin Cash, which tends to be better scaled solution.
Did you read this from Roger's twitter or from Jonald the Baboon's blog post?  1) No development team, all Core's code. 2) Big blocks != scaling. 3) Therefore, no scaling 4) Highly miner, node, and richlist centralization. Now its time for one or another to show who is real player. When exchanges start switching to Bitcoin Cash and recognise it as next version of Bitcoin, than you will look like stupid clowns.
You can't do that, neither morally, nor legally and it doesn't have any logical coherence. You must be out of you mind to think 2+2 = 5, or you're a bamboozled shill. So Bitcoin Cash is not alt coin.
It is a scam altcoin. |
|
|
|
The BTC escrowed funds is long gone from the multi-sig address, alt-coins untraceable
Stop posting lies you baboon. The funds are safe and sound, moved to a different address as was announced by me quite some time ago: https://blockchain.info/address/354jirex7gkFxMiNmN45SxyMxSUsdGcrsf.
Altcoins were never traceable, nor is that any of your concern. The team took less % than they could with the first release milestone. |
|
|
|
|
Reserved 1 more post for the list.
|
|
|
|
These links are broken and lead to accounts from your previous connection. Okay so this is my first attempt at busting some alts based on my own intuition. Lets see if I can bust them properly  Accounts connected: GraceSh0wer, GraceShowerIt's very likely that they are alts, but we have no non circumstantial evidence. Keep an eye out. I am not convinced that they are alts. Their profile statistics also don't match up. We have got a big fish here Arsen56 Accounts connected: Heisenberg74, Crystyan, oberon89, aricleather , agoenkjrz, wakeupcall, dudupang, montyfd, Lhinglhung, Trevon, gamblebuilder, ahmedshawezi, rampalija, dirts, Hypes, Omnivion, MindGrenade, wetroof, Maqa71, Kotos123, mekler22, ndan13, LoqUnknown connections: liberatorium CapitanikeProof: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1yd7bd94LuppHsBzoICGYJj3cEuf-eA8AoJPyhmvo45s/edit#gid=1764646260Arsen56 ETH address - https://etherscan.io/address/0x3b041627814ba14f6d5eaa29249d28df1d463fc8#tokentxnsAddresses:0x3b041627814ba14f6d5eaa29249d28df1d463fc8 - Arsen56 0xd47538f95737de4ab5e303a8ac0993b820cbb7ea - Heisenberg74 0xe7f97f8b7c2fa3550b76f976d5edb3535b3e11b20x21dfe64c86e7ad907eb03d848e763c4f48c382b5 - Crystyan 0x0267626a8b7812826740e1e61f06f9e26e08afcf - oberon89 0x395f63c7a9d9d5fd623f297c3fe3dced1d0197bd0xf8a3b60272641e216a393e8cfbbdb590cfc69f7c - aricleather 0x62a87c726c7a080e3817bf011ffd636a8ece0411 - agoenkjrz 0x9d8c45d15c216b16c450be5a596c54d124569b44 - wakeupcall 0x7b8b522133769c834328aa292831a3a28906805c - dudupang 0xb5648a334d26edabebb2894b275bc668cd739762 - montyfd 0x224657681f6ed007b1fb79602926fba1c714484d0xd6fda454ee37acfcb2b582c327b8fbf4df194803and others.
0x53b30d571423e46153fa56c1fd054317b7872226 - Lhinglhung All the follows addresses receive coins from Arsen56 in a similar timeframe: 0xacbfc73eee217e45348b8d7aa53c7689dbefb007 - Trevon 0xa6b6002b664b641e090fa46f8e46b8469cc1ebd4 - gamblebuilder 0x50967d9b2ebbba5c20cc0afa6c4c2a7f383fbaaf - ahmedshawezi 0x69e651f34d7bf3c47f629d31a9e966e55db79dd6 - rampalija 0x013231f183616d6a40aa161d0c300cea35dd3d4d - dirts 0xb8aa4193cf7d4123ced1e12684b63affb479530d - Hypes 0x04068a94c20958fd82f90be777219ae7651f3f64- Omnivion 0x8e4551e5e2e482b8bb4af0e4a5a88ef3c21d3c86 - MindGrenade 0x6c1aec43bfee2773160c7a6d55e23f36c29cf25f - wetroof 0x55abeefb64ee8aa299e47001ca7dce8fb87ad2b3 - Maqa71 0xd6fda454ee37acfcb2b582c327b8fbf4df194803 - Kotos123 0x224657681f6ED007B1Fb79602926Fba1c714484d - mekler22 0x395f63c7a9d9d5fd623f297c3fe3dced1d0197bd - ndan13 0x8dda68ad3eda90c4eef5a1776480031be216d074 - Loq The bolded part does not help me or anyone else. I've spent more time on this connection than I normally do and made it much clearer for the others. |
|
|
|
1) The format is wrong. It should be as follows: [b][color=black]What happened:: [/color][/b]
[b][color=black]Scammers Profile Link: [/color][/b]
[b][color=black]Reference Link: [/color][/b]
[b][color=black]Amount Scammed: [/color][/b]
[b][color=black]Payment Method: [/color][/b]
[b][color=black]Proof of Payment: [/color][/b]
[b][color=black]PM/Chat Logs: [/color][/b]
[b][color=black]Additional Notes: [/color][/b]
2) It is probably impossible to calculate how much money was lost due to their shilling of BCH. 3) They don't have an account here, so there's not much that we can do about it either. Get *prominent* people to call them out via social media. |
|
|
|
How can we proceed certification services?
There are no credible certification services as of yet. This thread is a discussion thread about establishing such services and not about certification. |
|
|
|
I believe the assessments our company makes as a requirement for prospective customers fit quite well in the definition of what you're looking for.
Is this some kind of bad joke? Our partnership with Bancor means we work exclusively on projects utilising Bancor smart tokens - and our expertise with the Bancor platform positions us perfectly to guide those projects through the crowdfund process.
You let that scam happen. I wonder how they get the services of such a service is very dubious people and teams. I have seen a lot of ico on the forum today, which do not correspond to the declared document. Scammers have very low to non existing criteria. Bancor is a prime example of obvious money grab with a flawed idea and zero people with any actual (relevant) knowledge. I was thinking about establishing a certification service, but I am almost certain that pretty much no one[1] grasps how complex a proper certification service for this would be. A "pass vs. fail" certification is definitely out of the rule. It would be too simple, imprecise and likely be inconsistent. What it requires is a grading scale, where the resulting grade is a combination of grades from several areas (similar to language certification) in addition to a level above which a service could be "certified". Theymos could then decide whether a project with a lower passing grade should be allowed to advertise or not.
[1] I've seen at least 1 person in this thread that took this thing seriously. |
|
|
|
Why don't you take advantage of the opportunity Quickseller is giving you to prove him wrong?
There is nothing that needs to be proven wrong. I'd have to be out of my damn mind to do something just because the pathetic scammer [1] asked for it. Snowflake, you lines are getting weaker.
[1] Context for the uninformed: Quickseller pulled bogus escrow scams, stealing pennies per escrow deal, and thus destroyed his reputation (among other things). |
|
|
|
Fallacies ARE how we determine who wins and loses debate. Whichever side commits more is what determines who has the strongest argument. I never said you were proven wrong - I said you lost the debate, and there is a big difference... "baboon".
There is no actual debate nor would I lose a debate against idiots like Quickseller, OP or other shills of users that I've busted. Now dance Muppet. |
|
|
|
That one doesn't even apply. Are you really that degenerate? Why don't you create a thread asking theymos to post all of your alts that he believes you have currently and ever have had?
That's none of your business.  |
|
|
|
Avoiding the IssueFallacies are scientific ways of determining who is wrong or right in debate. You literally just lost this debate by committing the above fallacy. Baboon, don't act smart and use things that you have little understanding of. Claiming that something is absolutely false just because it contains a fallacy is itself a fallacy[1]. You just played yourself.  Until you provide a valid explanation of how your own addresses are linked to an account you claim you never controlled, you must lose DT status.
"I claim I've never controlled"? You're a liar.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_fallacy |
|
|
|
I believe the assessments our company makes as a requirement for prospective customers fit quite well in the definition of what you're looking for.
Is this some kind of bad joke? Our partnership with Bancor means we work exclusively on projects utilising Bancor smart tokens - and our expertise with the Bancor platform positions us perfectly to guide those projects through the crowdfund process.
You let that scam happen. |
|
|
|
What about the linked addresses?
What about them? |
|
|
|
Who are you?
Do you really think that an alt account used for these purposes is going to reveal who they are? You must have not been paying almost any attention to this section. |
|
|
|
My bad. It also looks to me like he is trust farming, similar to the recent complains regarding aTriz and Aventhe and some others.
My intention was not to farm trust. You don't say? Nobody is expecting you to admit that your intention was just exactly that, otherwise you'd already be full of negative ratings. |
|
|
|
But you placed 0.02btc bid on account, that is certainly not shitposting, it is buying account and that post isn't edited as you can see from picture in "known alts of everyone".
I disagree. Bids are used for post padding more often than you'd think and that behavior fits exactly my profile from back then. Possibility that everyone is stupid or possibility that you were hacked?
The possibility of either one is non zero. Why did you give him negative? Maybe he was shitposting for post padding too?(disclaimer i am not pekelengito)
This isn't 2013/4. He was negatived 2017-10-24, 4 days after he made bid, but still you didn't give negative to:
...
...
OP? Not negative rated.... Why?
flaw..or? Help me to understand..or go with regular "i don't have time to tag every singl...."
I must have missed them, but newbie accounts are a waste of time to tag anyways (it's essentially playing whack-a-mole). I'll get to them soon TM. And IMO his head is deep in your ass.
He's barely made any private contact with me, thus I highly doubt that. Fuck off you idiot, only reason why you did create this topic is because you were negative rated. I didn't came to attack or defend lauda i am saying there is flaw in his trust ratings.
Harsh and honest. I like you; you sound a lot like me. Are you my alt?  |
|
|
|
Scammer? I fail to see what makes him a scammer. also, wtf r u doing with ur projects, ran scam project for ethconnect WHCH WAS SUCH OBVIOUS SCAM., WTF IS UR IQ 10???
He didn't run it, but apparently posted the ANNs and managed the campaign. I was strongly inclined to neg. rate him at the time, but never ended up doing so. That project was most certainly an obvious scam.
It also looks to me like he is trust farming, similar to the recent complains regarding aTriz and Aventhe and some others. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
