First of all(since you are using my reference) i never said Lauda sold account(s) neither there is proof of that.
And then some wonder why they get tagged for lying. using 2 accounts for different signature campaigns but this is not against rules - lauda is..was? against it - and this is somehow flow in his trust ratings.
It is not. As I said there is flaw in his trust ratings.
What flaw? Who is lying now? Please, tell me how this can be a lie.
It's rather simple: It's a shitpost for post padding. I was certain that I was never involved in such deals before the shill came with the connection, and I stand by it[1]. There are most certainly multiple ways of something like that happening:
1) Temporary loss of control of the account due to whatever reason (e.g. hacking). You ARE saying that everyone is stupid. That's also a possibility. Do you see how this looks like?
You are trying to defend yourself in every single possible way while other DT's are staying apart from this, now please tell me that no one see this obvious facts.
There is nothing to defend myself from. I paid the price for shitposting long ago. You are not being rational. You can easily find random members and a few of their statements/ideas/views that fully contradict their positions/statements of today[2]. @lauda - lots of your trust ratings are unjustified and should be rated neutral - by you, but other DT members should tag them negative(something you requested in past when you were removed from DT).
Which ratings are we talking about? Obviously I will request others to tag all of them should I drop out. Some DT1 members couldn't give a damn about anything other than their own profit, thus exclusions which would release hundreds of scammers into the wild are always a possibility. Almost all negative ratings are good for community but you are being hypocrite.
How so? @actmyname you should really pull your head out of lauda's ass.  He is arguing rather unbiased IMO.
[1] There's always a possibility that I could be mistaken. See [2]. |
|
|
|
 On Bitcoinity in case that someone missed it.  |
|
|
|
Bitcoin Cash was spawned from the Bitcoin blockchain, and as such, maybe it should be allowed to use the word "Bitcoin" with a qualifying suffix.
No. Bitcoin Cash is nothing other than a blatant scam. |
|
|
|
When was Lone Shark either a scammer or a liar?
(insert citation here)
When was BTC-Graphicdesigns making sensible statements about something or someone? |
|
|
|
I deleted my post from thread, which is the subject of a dispute. That's all I can do in this situation.
Good. I'd like to point out that you should not: a) Try to join that bounty again. b) Knowingly become an accomplice to theft or other shady actions (even though this time it is unknowingly). As per cryptodevil's advice, repeated offenders will be left with a negative mark while seemingly innocent people will have their mark removed once they remedy the problem. |
|
|
|
He claims that he recovered it as per this thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2222494.msg23555770#msg23555770
However, given the following: The account is Hero registered in 2013 and early post show the original owner was mining and obviously was knowledgeable.
I do not believe him. So either: 1) Someone managed to hijack the account via recovery. 2) The account was sold earlier. |
|
|
|
Price falling. Any news from dev team ?
That's the problem, there is no dev team, only charlatans. Not a single cypherpunk on board with BCH. I think it is not fair to say that. There are some teams behind it. That is pure bullshit. There are 2-3 developers that have never produced any worthwhile code for Bitcoin. In other words: There is no development team, there are a few children playing in the sand box. |
|
|
|
This is the 2nd proven fact that Lauda is connected with shady behaviour.
There are no facts here, just speculation. I will discuss this with Shorna.
You mean Shorena, the one who is willing to escrow account sales? Oh wait. Lauda you have been removed from DT Trust and I think you will soon be removed from this entire Forum!
If Quickseller was not removed given his chronic concern trolling, then I highly doubt that. |
|
|
|
He Probably means the part where his imaginary friend wanted to buy an account.
Oh. I wonder whether anyone actually believes these stories as they pop up occasionally. "I didn't commit the crime, I did it for my friend"? I'm just shocked by you. you execute a person without trial and effect. Well done, bravo to you!
You've closed your own trial when you admitted to the action. My friend wanted to buy an account, at his request, I asked, but how he found out the price, he refused.
|
|
|
|
Can I somehow prove my innocence?
What innocence? You literally admitted that you wanted to buy the account, but it was too expensive for you. |
|
|
|
lauda. please to erase untrust on me, i'm just follow a bounty campaign. i don't know ehat's your problem. i never make mistake to you even i don't know you. take care your problem by your self, don't to me. do u understand?  You are an accomplice to theft. That is your problem, not mine. How can we know who thief and who not? I did not read all thread and did not see your warning. I found out about this problem only after got negative trust. What steps have you taken to remedy your involvement in it since you've found about it? |
|
|
|
continually spamming?? Realy?? In first message i demanded an answer from you, but you ignored me!
Sending me two messages within 24 hours, let alone 12 hours I consider spamming. You did send me according to that screenshot at least 4 messages and continues to spam my CET thread. QED. My friend wanted to buy an account, at his request, I asked, but how he found out the price, he refused.
You wanted to buy an account. Whether it is for this imaginary friend or not, it doesn't matter. Quoted for reference. What you mean? I'm bounty-manager. I give the opportunity to the money holders to earn money. I give the opportunity to the money holders to earn money by transferring from our language to them. As an example, you can look at the ODMCoin bounty - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2196019.0What in the fuck does that have to do with anything I said at all? Literally nothing. |
|
|
|
lauda. please to erase untrust on me, i'm just follow a bounty campaign. i don't know ehat's your problem. i never make mistake to you even i don't know you. take care your problem by your self, don't to me. do u understand? You are an accomplice to theft. That is your problem, not mine. |
|
|
|
To my question, he replied: "Stop PM-ing me. You were involved in account trades = neg." and was silent.
That is a lie as I have responded to you more times than you deserved. You were continually spamming me via PM with nonsense despite my warning to stop, even to the point where you had to be put on ignore. I think that you were also spamming my CET thread about this. There's even a bonus here [1]. Sales of Bitcointalk.org accounts is extremely discouraged and can lead to negative trust from DT2 Members. The Answer applies to ColdZerk too.
Which I've repeatedly tried explaining via PM. However, it seems that people who get caught are mostly just coming up with whining excuses. Responding to these excuses is draining the time that other users deserve from me or other DT members.
[1] You left me a retaliatory fake negative rating with the following description: Lauda 2017-11-16 0.00000000 Who are man? And why you set me negative trust? Should I complain to the admins too? |
|
|
|
It is time to rename this shitcoin to Crash Cash. Nobody in their right mind would want to support it. Welp I repaid my BCH loans with massive ~0.07 BTC per BCH profit, good times! Time for round two
Nicely done. I see Bcash as a good way to take away Bitcoin from criminals such as Ver, fake Satoshi & et. al. Situation elsewhere: https://i.redd.it/k2m5b0io56yz.gif. |
|
|
|
Is there anyone that has anything substantial to say or is this just a circle-jerk of scammers, account farmers and butthurt trolls?  |
|
|
|
IMO we are dealing with the 3rd case here. While you may be inclined to believe that, I am inclined to believe others. Generally I'm really doubtful of people, especially those that I've had next to no interactions with. My interactions with aTriz and Aventhe so far were brief and all of them very recent. I do not believe that: a) They are alts (as some have previous claimed). b) Their intention was to farm up trust. In case of doubt, the best that you can do here is just keep a closer eye on them. I will for sure. There's nothing wrong with being careful, so go for it. 3) People that might or might have not done that (but have not admitted to such nor is there any post which would confirm said behavior), but some people think/feel they they have done that/are trying to do that. Why Apologize then? Only people with guilt apologize that easily on the sign of first trouble. Well that's just me in this case. I think they should have stood their stance and said nope that was never our intention, But By apologizing they indirectly accepted what they were doing. I don't agree, especially as you're making a fallacious generalization that people without guilt don't apologize. That can't obviously be universally true. It also comes down to the personality of the user(s) in question. A decent[1] example to compare their reaction would be myself, where I stand strong ground on false accusations. I've also seen others apologize for mistakenly claiming something that was not true I believe (their intent was not to intentionally claim something untrue). If you're a good poster, there's always room for you somewhere else. However, I wouldn't expect a good campaign manager to deny entry to a good poster just because said poster criticized them (given that the criticism is objectively valid(!) and not some butthurt nonsense).
So do i, but i have seen abuse of power too many times to risk it all. Fair point. I agree. However, their reputation as managers would tank. You have not disappointed me Lauda, That's what i expect from you every time. Keep doing the good work.
Trying my best despite repeated attacks and setbacks.
[1] That might not be a very well example as I usually get attacked by butthurt shills and bullshit. |
|
|
|
That's a pretty weak deflection.
There is no deflection as you have no case. Scenario A--
OP creates a WTB accounts thread.
Seller: "I have an account for sale"
OP: "Send me a PM to arrange a deal."
Scenario B--
Lauda does not create a thread.
"I have an account for sale"
Xanis: "I'll offer 0.01 BTC." "How much for 10 accounts?"
FTFY deceitful liar. |
|
|
|
Seems pretty similar to me.
You've contradicted yourself. Changing the attack vector now, are we?  |
|
|
|
Its provably not a lie. Why are you so openly showing that you leave false feedback??
It is factually, without a shred of doubt, a blatant lie. Here is an example. Yesterday you tagged this user for account trading ("Account sales encourage scams, spam, and account farming.")---- Bump
I have member and jr accounts if you want to buy Send me a private message and we arrange a deal. , engaged in the exact same behavior here: ... What lie?? Opening a thread that you want to buy accounts is exactly the same as making a inquiry or a shitpost bid? Posting that you have accounts for sale is exactly the same as making a inquiry or a shitpost bid?
Chronic liar. You should get some help if you think those are exactly the same.  |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
