OK, I went to your link for block 721071
It shows that coinbase tx goes to 1GNgwA8JfG7Kc8akJ8opdNWJUihqUztfPe (Poolin) and not 12dRugNcdxK39288NjcDV4GX7rMsKCGn6B (Antpool)
It's just a couple more rows below the point you stopped with the (useless) paste from blockchain.com:

While I don't expect gsmarena have info about really all makers and models, I'd expect that the even cheaper ones (ie those that may be missing) will just increase the numbers of models without NFC.

You are free to click onto the bottom-right button and see the results = the actual phones for which you'll see the specs if clicked.
Unfortunately you may have to fiddle more with the settings and get subsets, since not all are shown if the number of results is that big.
And unfortunately they don't have search for "no NFC" (either All, either with NFC).

Even more, there are results with the specs telling "NFC    Yes (market/region dependent)"
These are included in the list with NFC, hence giving a certain extra advantage to "that side".


TL;DR; I was actually "nice" to tell 50%, and the real percent of no-NFC phones for 2021 may be even bigger.

RBF already exists and can be used, no new BIP is necessary for that. Especially Electrum has it implemented pretty nicely.

Now, it worth mentioning that:
* replacing a transaction, even if it has RBF enabled, is no longer possible after it was confirmed
* RBF doesn't have 100% rate of success - but I think that the second transaction didn't propagate/reach the mempool of the miner in those rare cases

The topic of canceling transactions was discussed/asked in the past multiple times, like https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5324590.0
You may want to read the explanations from those relies too.

It does. Not everybody understands English that good and having the white paper in his own language could get one actually read it.

This being said, one year ago there were still automated and bad translations too here and there, since some prefer to have their name visible there than a job properly done.
Hence it would be nice that the local communities would actually read the white paper in their own language even if they've already read it in English, to also see (tell) whether improvements in the translation are necessary.

I'm not sure what you want to achieve here (some merits? nahh)
You clearly didn't read all the older posts on this same topic and you propose something that most probably will not be taken into consideration.

Shortly:
* It's not about money. Changing account name will usually not happen for pretty good reasons.
* If this policy would ever change, it will most probably come either as a proposal from admin, either with a super big support from the community; and it's, by far, not the case.

I don't know where you got your data from but:
* I've checked 3-4 of those blocks and I didn't find that address you are talking about (for the coinbase tx)
* I've looked at coin.dance and it tells that most blocks were mined then by foundry USA, but not as many as you've stated; btc.com, antpool and poolin took a big share too

I'm afraid that if it'll be posted there then instead of a proper discussion it has a big chance to fill up with shitposters who won't understand what's all this about.
But maybe I'm wrong, maybe I have a wrong impression about the bounty hunters of 2022...

--
Seeing the logic behind the replies I understand now how right OP was to ask this question in the first place. And I believe that indeed the proper answer can only come from mods.

Well, if my theory is correct, then... unfortunately warrants don't come with a warning.


My experience tells that altcoins price move nicely only for very short periods of time. Speculating on them is very risky even without external unfortunate interventions.


Binance is losing money in all this. Their aim would have clearly been to leave people trade as much as possible, to give binance the trading fees. So I don't think that Binance wants to steal people's money.
Unfortunately they couldn't have asked people what to do, since then they would have been probably breaking the law. Also they could not take decisions on behalf of the users (about selling/exchanging).
Even worse, I am not convinced that those funds will be returned to the customers too soon (if ever).

It's a shitty situation and I can guess that many are devastated because many trade money they cannot really afford to lose. And I am very sorry for them.

My points were only two:

* There were discrete signs for who could read them; maybe 2 years ago Binance would have been stalling/ignoring governments' requests, but this is no longer an option due to their new direction.
   Also people did take unnecessary risks (without realizing that) and now they're in a very bad situation with no actual good solution

* I don't think that's Binance fault here


PS. Something that just came into my mind: did anyone try to ask Binance support to sell this and those coins for stable coins to avoid further loses? It could be (or it could have been) a possible course of actions.

Simply put, while some ants have some problems, other ants don't care. All in all, the forest may be slowly dying, but it may have better days.
I don't see the things be significantly worse than they were 6 months ago.
And there's clearly no relation to any arbitrary date, no matter how nice it looks like.

Stop reading/watching all the crap news (since their only goal is to panic you and keep you watching), try to find something interesting to do, get a book, or a computer game, or some good series to watch, maybe also go out if possible.
You seem to go towards depression and that doesn't help anyone. Break out of it.

From what I understand the actual signing still happens at the user, so it's just an overcomplication with doubtful benefits.


What if a malicious third party intercepts the message and ask for signing a transaction that send coins to a different address? Will your design get the user see and deny that?


2FA is not as good as you'd think. There can be many ways to go around it if the whole system is complicated.

---

However, let's say that all goes great. You have basically an online wallet where one still needs a local corresponding wallet to sign the transaction.
What stops the online wallet mine all kinds of data about the customers? And what's the benefit of those customers? (I don't see any.)

I'm not sure I understood what you mean. My guess is the 1 BTC is the buyer's money, so the word you are looking for is not withdraw (maybe exchange, then withdraw).
In that scenario you'll have to have an account to an exchange - probably a KYC centralized exchange - and API keys for that account.
The shopping platform will transfer 0.9 BTC to the exchange; your API will sell that 0.9 BTC based on your settings and market price; when your sale was successful you'll withdraw the fiat to a bank account.

This would be the theory, but I've never done that, you should verify and confirm for yourself.
Even more, my not-too-big experience tells that many banks don't like to get money from crypto exchanges. Also I think that I've also seen requirements like the account on the crypto exchange has to be on the same name as the bank account. But maybe I've got that wrong and maybe that's different in case of companies. You have to research though. (Or maybe you'll have to withdraw you your bank account and then transfer to seller's account?).

Imho the main options could be Gambling Discussion, Gambling or maybe Games and Rounds, although for the last one it's said


My vote would probably go for Gambling Discussion, although I know that's not gambling per se.

I kinda doubt it.
However, I've got an idea which I am not sure it was discussed:

Is there a chance that the wallet file cannot be properly written to HDD or get overwritten by an older version (by an antivirus or system protection), or something like that?
What I mean is the maybe you manage to try to restore your wallet on another computer (of course, make sure it's clean and that the Electrum is from electrum.org and verified). Or you can try for an 0.00000001 address even on your smartphone (although I don't have the same experience on smartphone) ; maybe you see whether it restores to the correct address and it's spendable or not. Or you can try sparrow wallet, which is pretty much compatible with Electrum and uses Electrum servers too, but it may get a bit more complicated to set up.

Maybe they're only crazy ideas, but if you have that time, it's only a bit of time to lose, isn't it?

The problem I see here is that it has happened at the request of law enforcement, hence they have probably had a warrant of some sort.
Maybe it's something that the affected users can ask for/request, so they know where they have to ask reimbursements from (if they are entitled, which I kinda doubt), or at least they can have the peace of mind that's not the exchange that's trying to scam them (not that it matters much, unfortunately).


Since they didn't sell, it's an unrealized loss. If the funds will b frozen for longer, it may turn out as profit, who knows?


Unfortunately this comes together with Binance being more open to all government requests. They've have given all the signals about this last year.
Centralized trading is no longer good for small fish from restricted countries, unfortunately. Whether the reasons are legit or not, they are at the mercy of the exchange, which sooner or later does have the potential to turn bad, no matter how is the exchange called. Sorry.

This is more a forum discussion, hence I'd say that you better move it to Meta (see bottom-left).
Now, if you go to your own user settings, you'll see that you can see the times for all posts in forum time or the time zone you prefer.

I think that forum time is UTC, hence that's what you'll get if you set no time offset.

TL;DR: UTC

Multumesc, asta e o informatie utila.
Si pot sa confirm ca acum vreo 17 ore a fost pusa postare noua pe twitter, pentru acest "concurs".

Asadar, sa sumarizam (sorry, Gazeta, dar o sa leg aceasta postare pentru concurs, ca o sa aleg un pic diferit linkurile) :

---

Nume giveaway/airdrop: Free Lilballers NFT

Detalii cat de cat la zi aici:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5376485.msg59077579#msg59077579
si ultimele postari de aici:
https://twitter.com/LilBallersNFT

Restul detaliilor:

Is it? When the internet was down, all that lot of hash power... was not missing...

I was expecting you know better than this.
The Kazakhstan "internet is down" business was shown plenty of times - with actual data - that it's based on fake news. There was no significant hash rate drop, hence there's not much of concentration of hash power in that country.

Even if that FUD went overly successful, I think (hope?) that traders are not so dumb to be fooled by same FUD twice.

Keep in mind that I don't work in advertising and such. I've just gave you some advises that looked logical to me.
I don't know those platforms you said, it's the first time I hear about them.

If by provider you also ask about campaign manager, there are plenty of good campaign managers available for hire if that's what you want, I also advertise one of them, you can look at my account's avatar, or, directly:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5328445.0

They can help you, but they will most probably not endorse your project, hence you'll need to start with an ANN made and posted by you.
Then you'll have to find somebody design the signatures. And only afterwards you can do signature campaign (or other bounties).

If the token is not a scam, then imho you have to hype the underlying project, the one that will bring usefulness to the token, and then hype the token. (or, well, you can do together too).
You should explain very well how the project can be successful. You have to make people understand how their investment will bring them more money.

I don't know that much about budgets, but you can find easily a cheap army of advertisers on Twitter, for example. But their audience may be limited basically to the other advertisers/shitposters.
They can bring you back links, they can probably get you into the attention of the robots, but I am not that much sure about the attention of real people.

If you want proper audience from crypto lovers you can clearly advertise here (signature campaign). It would be great. Just then you will probably have to pay more than 1k$/week, hence you can dry your budget super quick.

Of course, here, on Bitcointalk, you will have to start with a proper announcement thread (in altcoins' subforum). That's for free (well, if you want to add pictures there you may want to spend a couple of $ in bitcoin for a copper membership) and can get the discussion started. If the project is very good, it will already get some interest/buzz there (although I see that more an organic growth than a short-lived, higher intensity buzz).