>1000 BTC = 1%
1000+ BTC = 1.25 %
Sorry for being dumb, but isn't >1000 and 1000+ the same?!  Maybe you wanted to use <1000.  |
|
|
|
Funny how this looks just like something whywefight would post. Why is that? Maybe because it is actually written by whywefight? Let's read closely: (Credits to whywefight for making this response)
No need to imply any connection between those two accounts. Credit where credit is due. |
|
|
|
So 12.89454/12 months would give a MBE of roughly 1.29 BTC. |
|
|
|
These have been going around for months now. They have been popping up on Bitify/Cryptothrift for 70-80% off..
People tend not to tell/know in most cases, ignorance is bliss when fraud is being committed..lol
"Ignorance is bliss" is such a great principle, but I prefer the more concequent Ignorantia legis non excusat. |
|
|
|
Again: they are the sponsors for the tipster competition we are running; they are not the ones running the competition, the signature campaign, or even paying for the signature campaign, for that matter.
But the competition takes place at DirectBet.eu? For me, that makes the thing at least Y/N (as they are no independent 3rd party), but it's not on me to decide, let's wait for Mitchell/shorena. |
|
|
|
Do you get them illegally?
Im just re-selling. Have used it personally many times for different deals without problems though. What he is trying to find out is are these illegal or not but you are pushing beside the point. Im not pushing beside the point. His question implies I get them directly and hence I should know if its illegally obtained. But the fact is I dont "get" them, I am re-selling and hence I cant comment on how that other person gets them  I say I have used them without problems so they are definitely legit. Thats called trafficking... Which would not free you from the crime. IF those are obtained illegaly, that would make the resale handling in stolen good, and you a fence (or criminal, if you prefer). So, can you verify how your provider gets those? |
|
|
|
Hmm, that wouldn't be right; DirectBet is only the competition's sponsor.
Fixed campaigns are also listed with their payout per term, not with their payout per post. |
|
|
|
This is the Simple Table entry (I don't know if the name will fit, so feel free to change it to Tipster Competition, or something like it):
It would be the longest name in the table. How about DirectBet.eu? Also, there are no funds in escrow, if they are held by the runners behind the campaign. |
|
|
|
Well, you see my profile, I have good experience running campaign and there is no sense if people give me red for running a campaign, I can give you 10 reds because I hate then, does that make sense ?
In your last campaign, you gave rates based on what? I sometimes suspected you to use RNG to determine rates. You acted unprofessional on several bases. I wouldn't consider that a "good experience running campaign"s. |
|
|
|
I am really sorry, I realised that there is just a problem with Yobit withdrawals.
I would be able to send 0.0101BTC now or return your account to you?
Im ok with 0.0101 btc. Just send the rest later. This is getting more and more strange. |
|
|
|
|
Since they use the investors money to pay out, this thread belongs into the investor-based games subsection.
Please move it to the according section, where warnings are displayed.
|
|
|
|
I don't really care about signed message. Not sure I understand its importance.
All it proves is that an account was not hacked?
That's negligent and could lead to a lot of problems, in case the account has actually been hacked. I just want to recall the issue Altcoins4life/Murderouskirk had a few weeks ago. Always ask for a signed message from an old staked address. You might not have had any problems regarding that, but believe me, the moment you do, you wish your standards would have been higher. There is no neg trust from it being hacked!
Therefore it is not hacked, otherwise the previous owner would have left a note.
Not enough, maybe he didn't notice it yet?
That being said, since the account requested a loan to the same address 7 days ago, I don't think it has been hacked. But as a general rule, better be safe than sorry. |
|
|
|
Everything what I write is true. I'm not worry about my account and I will never sell my original account  I think that you have a complex. But I'm not 100% sure. Because you avoid questions that would reveal your lies? |
|
|
|
-snip-
Well, since we all don't seem to know you, how about you introduce yourself to us? Let's start, i don't know, maybe with your first name. |
|
|
|
And what does it prove?
Doesn't prove anything, only throws up a few questions. Care to tell me for how long you live in the GMT+0 timezone? |
|
|
|
that's the reason why Quickseller thinks I'm not the original owner of this account.
Funny how your staked addresses don't go back furter than one week. |
|
|
|
|
So, no escrow, right?
All posts are counted, right? You don't have rules which posts are elibigle for a payout and which are not.
And fyi: There are no links included in the signatures for full members and higher (probably a mistake).
|
|
|
|
Atleast make it neutral, so it doesn't fuck shit up. Thanks.
Won't do that, since I do not trust you. Your retaliation feedback wont change that either. You have no problem with earning your coins at the expense of others. |
|
|
|
Negative trust for that, really? Wow.
Yes, negative trust for that. "Trust" is not the same thing as being moral, this is just absurd.
And being moral is not the same thing as teaching others to obtain free goods via a method that can be classified as illegal. Trust abuse.
Nope, that's my opinion and I stand up for it. After all, I'm free to leave trust to the best of my knowledge and belief. Hence I do! |
|
|
|
Could this method in any way be classified as either a) social engineering or b) fraud?
Yes, I guess. Quoted for reference. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
