That stance is somewhat vague. As I've pointed out to you recently, there are some users who have been intentionally shilling Bcash with new threads in the Bitcoin Discussion sub-forum. Such users should be permanently banned IMO.

I fully agree.

Anyone who intentionally tries to deceive newbies that an altcoin is Bitcoin just because it stole the "Bitcoin" name, is an untrustworthy and malicious entity that can't be trusted. Doing something again these scams:
a) Not damaging to anyone (it actually does the opposite).
b) Not hurting freedom of speech (don't mistake acceptance of any kind of scam as a requirement for honoring freedom of speech).

---

The forum staff must absolutely use more rigorous measures in order to minimize the damage that these "people" try to cause.

I was not caught with anything. The fact that you jump on this pathetic bandwagon just shows how butthurt you are.

No, as I have not done anything wrong. Unless of course, they plan on abusing their position like a certain someone.

I nuked an account of a rank that can't be nuked? Sounds about right.

You keep on lying.

That is a lie. I have never, to my knowledge, bought nor sold an account.

That post is obviously just bullshit in an attempt to discredit me. I was banned twice for SPAM (maybe even three times; I don't remember anymore) before becoming a moderator (here's a hint: The same person who banned me later promoted me). Is he really trying to say that a very old, secondary account, is worse than that? If so, he's a bigger baboon than I thought. The account has not been nuked, it has been permanently banned on my request a very long time ago (after I wiped its posts). My hate for spam partially stems from my past. This should have been obvious to anyone, no?

---

Unlike most shitposters, including the owner of that alt account, I've learned from those mistakes after extensive discussions with those who banned me. If you wish to waste your time on nothing, then be my guest.

I concur.

It is hard to say accurately without wasting too much time on him. However, that is likely.

---

Tagged.

IMO it is not much different for leaving ratings for private trades. You can't really leave anything as a reference, can you?

Both of them are legitimate to the point where there is no need to doubt such a trade occurred.

Your point being? If I successfully traded big amount of money with someone, I am not allowed to leave them a rating for each time?

It's an internal thing, and a very valid rating. I can't exactly remember what the deal was with that Pizza, but I do remember it.

No. These people are literally trading thousands, tens of thousands (USD) worth of coins every month.

The paid and bamboozled shills Peter R and jbreher are out in full force, breaking the forum rules as they go (of course). You should wonder which agency is most likely to be funding agents to cause disruption in open source projects (NSA anyone?).

---

Back to what matters:

Because people waste my time asking for a review right away, when there is literally no or almost no improvement.

That is something that I do not help people with. You should find out how much it has been since your blacklist on your own. You can ask for a review after 60 days.

---

When I was talking about 180 or 360 days, I was thinking whether I should change this (not that I've changed it already).

That is factually a lie. People who maliciously lie in order to deceive newbies are people who can't be trusted. People who can't be trusted are people who get negative ratings. QED.

You are a chronic liar that can't be trusted. I have said no such thing, nor threatened you, nor responded to you in that post.


That is another lie. A lot of shills got tagged over the years.

---

Now go back to that degenerate bitcoin.com forum and the con men Ver. This place does not need bamboozled liars.

Well.. I *might* be sadist but only when it comes to the people that really deserve it.

There is no need to attack such legitimate members at this point. They've long realized that such actions are wrong, and have moved on.

I concur. It's just a bullshit excuse from those that got caught doing something.

You don't need to participate in a campaign to get blacklisted. You could, by randomly shitposting, stumble upon me somewhere in the forum. If I notice you, and if I review you, then you can get blacklisted easily.

No mistake. If I denied someone entry to a campaign after evaluating the, they likely went to the blacklist.

Which is almost guaranteed to get you permanently blacklisted (given the results of the people that instantly requested reviews). Smart move.
P.S. I've raised the minimum to 60 days quite some time ago, but it should  probably be longer. Maybe 180 or 360.

It does.

Safari should work, but I generally recommend against using that. Try Chrome. Optimally you'd run Gunbot on a Linux or Windows VPS though.

All enrolled.


Done.

---

Double check your information. The spreadsheet will be fixed later (styling). No more enrollment for the current round.

Scams are not moderated. He won't be banned. However, he can, and will receive negative trust from default trust members. I have tagged him.

Wrong. It is very easy to achieve that, especially if you buy a account.

No. Most are bamboozled shitposters.

This thread is in the wrong section. Move it to the Reputation section. You can find this option in the lower left corner while viewing this thread.

---

Have you sent a PM to Vod?

The fact that he named himself as "Lisk-investor", which is yet another random shitcoin, says more than enough about his intelligence or choices.

There is literally not a single cyberpunk on board of this scam coin. It still amazes me how they want ridiculously large blocks in the end, which would limit the node running capacities to big entities, which would result in massive centralization and pretty much end with the loss of everything that makes a cryptocurrency valuable. They continue to spread disgusting lies such as "Segwit breaks the signature chain", "Bitcoin Core will never propose a hard fork", "Bitcoin Core is controlled by 1 company", etc.

Obviously you did nothing wrong. Furthermore, whomever you question regarding that situation you're very likely going to get this very same answer from them.

Nicely put. IMO he is no longer mentally stable.

I would be very surprised if the army of shills that was going after me, doesn't go after you very soon.

BCH shills are trying to cover up the truth, classic. Criminals hanging out and planning malicious stuff with other criminals. 

Use escrow and priority, tracked and insured shipping.

If you want to get scammed, yes. Otherwise, no.