Greetings,

I was just wondering when the week 5 payments will be made?  We're already three days into week six.

Thanks for reading/responding.

Thanks for providing this list - it certainly gives a different window into just how many users have received merits and their distribution.  I hadn't considered X unique users from Y transactions. (and it shows some users such as romanornr with highly centralised merits given and received)

---

*IF* we were to look at unique users, then my rank would be about 100 higher than this list. (about 175)

*IF* we were to look at transactions, then my position would drop some thirty places into the 310's

---

On the most merited, factoring in previously gifted merits I am at 117 ranking and on the scale of (M/A/T/R) (Earned merit) the previous posts on this page seem to be favouring I am about 287.

So, that's four different values of merit.  I supposed the best I can hope for is the third places "earned merit" over fourth placed number of transactions.

Thanks and thank you to Yoshi for his latest investigation.  This is my 5,100^th post (one hundred posts in just seventeen days - I've been quite busy lately...

I'm not inclined to use online sites but prefer the atmosphere of live Casinos.  I'm spoiled for choice with two Casino's very near where I live here in SEQ, but I can understand that there are many people who don't have this luxury.  (Besides, not just in Queensland, but most parts of Australia have slot machines tucked into every nook and cranny of clubs and pubs - a whole other thread surrounding their oversupply).

Well someone is holding a very hefty purse. BTC 12.03 is a cool $120,000 (about € 110,000 - more than enough Coke (a-cola) and hookers entertainment)

A more accurate gauge of merits earned would be to utilise the methodology of how many unique times merit is earned, not totals received (regardless of starting amount).

A person who receives fifty unique merits of one merit each has earned far more than the next person who just once receives fifty merits.

Let that be your starting point.

The SatoshiMines.com wallet still has over 12 bitcoins in it.

2020-02-22 22:46:49   [3741ec4244]   +0.00494177       12.03224201    4ced75b58787ad473827…

---

15yfxytU6Vh2MUKuLNWoq59EPU59SYDiX4   0.002177      535   618539

That wallet address last received (very regular) deposits just two days ago.  Weird if the site's been offline for over a year.

I would appreciate it if you could acknowledge receipt of my report of a glitch in BPIP as reported a couple of days ago:

...and just like that - this proto-gambling site has gone with the OP changing the title and body to "fixed" - Irony of ironies - "fixed" is an expression e.g. when a race has been "fixed".

The OP's only two other posts are to ask where to make investments on BitCoinTalk.

Why not post links to an actual discord or overraz site, not just your name people have to go looking for?

As to having a "portion of the site" does that mean you will only talk with people *after* they have coughed up funds to be a shareholder?  If so, what terms are you offering?  (and why talk privately about design concepts?

Agreed - that would be a great re-addition.

---

Don't worry, I archived it... 

---

---

How is the "most trusted" feature calculated?

My score dropped from 229 to 277 when just one of my positive trust feedbacks went from being DT1/2 to DT/??3/4??  (it's still there, just not a DT1/2 any-more). Have just noticed Hhampuz has drastically modified his trust list in the last couple of days, but still the question remains.

---

---

Another glitch in your system: Vod, LoyceV, PrimeNumber7, suchmoon, ibminer, theymos and not forgetting iasenko

https://bpip.org/report.aspx?r=mostmerited - 117 (not 287) Archive [1a], [1b]

---

(117+152+277) = 546

546/3 = 182

1000 - 182 = 818 which would be 30th place - which is where I was until a week or thereabouts.

---

if we used the 227 value the end result would be 834 or ~24th place on most recognised.

---

There's definitely something not right with the calculations. (not on my end mind)

Here in Australia we have a saying "We don't give a rats arse!" as in

"That guy won at the table over there!"

"So? I don't give a rats arse!"

---

People are more focused on their own wins or losses that they barely nod whenever someone wins, and I'm not quite sure how big you think "big" wins are.  Roulette "35 to one" is probably one of the more high paying games, but you've got to pour a lot of money in to break even or even win once in a while.

Manners.

I answered your question.


But at least I get to wear the signature for a second time in this thread.  Thanks for the response.  If you don't like the answer, then perhaps you shouldn't ask the question.

No.

I can't recall ever hearing that a signature campaign has any kind of incentive for campaigners to fold their money back into the service they are being paid to promote.

Was that a threat?

I guess you never heard of the "Newbie of the Year award".

It doesn't work like that, if it did many many companies would just trade while insolvent as Crytopia did and expect the Government to wipe their bottom for them.


Not many people are getting any emails concerning Cryptopia.  That's true.  Who's fault is that then?

I know it's taken you eight days to respond.  The New Zealand laws are very closely aligned with the Australian Laws (Hint: it's know as the Westminster System)  Both are Constitutional Monarchies.

A theft occurred and it is being investigated by the New Zealand Police.

The follow-on of the theft is that the company was trading while insolvent (i.e. they had no money) and so the company was placed into receivership.

---

All of which has been discussed here countless times while you have been away.

Do try to keep up.

I've seen numerous threads debunking merit sources dishing upwards of fifty merits in one go.

When was the last time you saw a thread (or even a single post) saying a merit source got it right?

Perhaps instead of candidates nominating themselves, we should have candidates who are nominated by others and also exhibit the capacity to be impartial when dispensing those merits.

Then again, we probably wouldn't have *any* merit sources if we had to wait that long such is the flawed system we currently have in place.

I haven't looked into whether Nadziratel has copied anyone else's posts - but belka48 has certainly copied work.