Lauda I don't even need to go in detail.
Properly making reports has nothing to do with going into detail. You can see his post history, and see the deleted comments (all of his are the exact same spam messages) on our thread. It is getting out of hand, and this recent extortion really caught me off guard.
You shouldn't be so naive when it comes to the internet. You should rather expect any kind of scum of this planet to eventually cross your path. A fine example of this would be Quickseller.
Anyhow, both tagged. If they truly are spamming a lot, then you need to take this up to the moderators directly. PM hilariousandco. |
|
|
|
|
Please provide:
1) Account links.
2) Examples of their *spamming*.
Are you 100% sure that the person "@islapdonkey" is actually the member that he/she claims to be? It is relatively easy to impersonate someone like that.
|
|
|
|
|
I strongly recommend for you to trip the referral system, just as I've recommended this to aTriz and he went through with my suggestion AFAIK.
|
|
|
|
You are a liar, along with the account of that project (whoever is behind it). After I made that post Lauda without any warning, without anything he just gave me a negative trust. (I thought that negative trust you gave to ppl who have malicious activity and are not trust worthy, but I guess not...).
You were explicitly warned, just like everyone else which was a rather very polite thing to do. Usually I do not give any kind of warning before leaving a rating. !!! WARNING !!!
Please be advised that this platform/project is promoting itself through the use of a stolen:
a) Thread design.
b) Signature design.
!!! WARNING !!!
Anybody wearing their signature or promoting this project will likely be tagged with negative trust.
You have been warned.
Source/proof: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2367257.0, as well as the negative ratings left on OP.
|
|
|
|
I see so even if I give some positive trust rating to someone it won't actually make a difference to their bar right?
Correct. However, this is something that you should know as a *long time* member given that: a) Your account isn't hacked. b) It isn't sold. |
|
|
|
I am also non non-technical i have no idea how it works. I never traded there can you undertand this ? the previous owner of that account was trading there. I am not connected with the trading from any side.
So you're saying that you bought this account from someone else? Quoted for reference. So i am asking Lauda will i ger my trust back if i pAy this gay 50$ ? i am not scamer and don't want to be assosiated with scamers.
That's not how this works. |
|
|
|
Kmrherradura05
Vladv26
Noore Najjar
retampan
rjbtc2017
Hannahanto
StonedWolf
zarados
Baofeng
btc78
dissgo
kaysersozee
fantasticromantic
Asmonist
|
|
|
|
Follow the proper format: [b][color=black]What happened:: [/color][/b]
[b][color=black]Scammers Profile Link: [/color][/b]
[b][color=black]Reference Link: [/color][/b]
[b][color=black]Amount Scammed: [/color][/b]
[b][color=black]Payment Method: [/color][/b]
[b][color=black]Proof of Payment: [/color][/b]
[b][color=black]PM/Chat Logs: [/color][/b]
[b][color=black]Additional Notes: [/color][/b]
However, this does not seem like a proper scam accusation for me. It may be better suited for the Reputation section. |
|
|
|
I think the decision is absolutely correct and that would be a big mistake if they continued on with their plan.
Their agenda remains malicious. They only did this in order to save face, not because of the reasons listed in that statement. Also, insider trading.
I've added a small list of attempted takeovers and the people that were involved in them. I'm missing out quite a number of names and dates. Therefore, if anyone has any suggestions you can post here or PM me and I'll update it. |
|
|
|
You write in a very similar way to Lauda and in this message you are answering as if the lawsuit was against you.
Could it be that both of these accounts are the same people?
It would make sense. Lauda giving everyone negative feedback and aTriz trying to run all of the bounty campaigns.
This is reaching levels of absurdity that I didn't think were possible. "Professional" platform indeed. It's a cool oxymoron we've got here.
I had to look up what a dingo was because of you.  |
|
|
|
I like that picture. You win. Also, we just need to contact a few of the hundreds of people you have tried to take down and we all of a sudden have a full case for you being a scammer and a blackmailer.
You have nothing other than your insecurity, and theft. Why are you refusing to reveal your identity? Where is all that legal "advice" of yours? Oh right, you're guilty. Lauda, you can't call our project a scam. Call it anything you want, but it is not a scam.
Are you James Fogden or one of the other "team members"? |
|
|
|
You on the other hand have been slanderous, which is a serious offence.
Take a look in the mirror baboon. Speaking of "slander", you've made a written statement that I'm both a "scammer" and a "blackmailer". The fresh smell of irony. 
You haven't answered my question from elsewhere: Lauda, you can't call our project a scam. Call it anything you want, but it is not a scam.
Are you James Fogden or one of the other "team members"? |
|
|
|
It is not a threat simply a fact, we will take you to court.
Have fun trying to make a case as a known liar and thief.
Speaking of "slander", you've made a written statement that I'm both a "scammer" and a "blackmailer". The fresh smell of irony. |
|
|
|
We suggest you PM the people who quoted it asking to unquote it so it disappears. As funny as you may find it now, this is no laughing matter and we will come after you with the full force of the law.
Is that a threat? Sounds like a threat to me. |
|
|
|
Lol call the meme police, people were hurt by a meme. Its only affecting you because your pic is attached, and I don't know why you would put it up publicly if you would be hurt by someone posting it in the first place.
TIL: Meme's are slander.
I took the advice from Aventhe and updated to a better standard.   |
|
|
|
Rather, you want to be emphasising one's stupidity (OP's) and creating a wonderful visual image about that.
Maybe the 'spongebob mocking' meme is more appropriate? Would seem so! I posted a gif of myself in the meantime. I'm wondering what text I should add to it, maybe "We only used bits of your design but we changed them". |
|
|
|
IMO @Lauda you could have made a better meme. You don't want to be emphasizing power in those memes as you will get QS on your back and you are done for. (Extortionists allowed in position of power.. etc... )
My emphasis wasn't on power, but rather the thief on the right side. You do have a point though, I was trying to figure out what the best wording would be but kind of ran out of ideas. The scammer Quickseller is just lurking and waiting for a chance to free his army of farmed accounts that I've busted along with other people. Rather, you want to be emphasising one's stupidity (OP's) and creating a wonderful visual image about that.
Maybe the 'spongebob mocking' meme is more appropriate? I havent cheated campaigns and im not the alt of Kermit. I even sent her proof wich he/she doesnt even bother to check.
I've looked at it. My non response to you is a response. But the conversation is not about me.
You don't say? |
|
|
|
Have a chill life kid.
Throwing tamper tantrums and calling me a kid. Quite ironic, no? |
|
|
|
Is ruining people reputation a joke to you?
If it were, I wouldn't be tagging the people who deserve negative ratings. Self-explanatory. The case of OP is very simple as everyone who acted on it has given him a negative rating.
Everyone could use a little comedy to freshen up their day every once in a while. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
