I'd tried it back when coinhive is a thing (for testing purposes), so I'm talking about Monero.

I used one Samsung S4 (about <10h/s) device to calculate if 10 or more can produce a decent amount of profit... and the result was like everyone is saying: it's a waste of time and mobile phones if you're planning to use your own devices because charger's pulling more power than the hashrate.
Those "mobile miners" aren't really designed for "personal" mining but for the so-called "advertisement-substitute" or botnets (hundred or thousand devices that you don't supply power and own will do ).

So @Flyingterlik forget it.

---

Why don't you just sell them?

I tried to get the actual image link from that banner for you but it turns out that it's not directly linked but encrypted from the server to prevent unwanted downloads.
Also, the "Legi** challenge your peers - win D**" text wasn't written to the image (shoes), it's an overlay.

Just do this instead (! if canva allowed you to !):

• Open the banner in full screen, then "print screen" (W10:Print Screen/W7 or others:Ctrl+PrintScreen)
• For W10: Go to the Screenshot folder, usually under Photo Folder.
• For W7: Get any random image and edit it using Windows Paint, then Press CTRL+V to paste the copied (CTRL+PrtScreen) image, save.
• Upload it to imgur or any image sharing site, and get the direct URL that ends with an extension.
• You can now post it to your thread.

---

BTW, for the OP (and other newbies), after pressing "preview" and saw that the texts are in the right format (excluding the images) you can just proceed and post it.
Now visit your profile page and click "Show the last post of this person" and your post should show like you're a Jr.Member+ with the images displayed (just in that page / given that you've linked the right format).

You're a copper member now, this wont make a difference now.

If that's the case, it isn't about "freedom of speech" but because of the admin and moderator's decision regarding scams.
Here's the FAQ in the Unofficial Rules, Guidelines and FAQs:

@Pingip Our "DT" (members in the Default Trust Lv2-1) are the ones who's doing those jobs, not the Mods.
The 2nd quote above states their reason for not doing so.

You can reach them by posting a scam accusation against BSV and others in this board: Bitcoin Forum > Economy > Trading Discussion > Scam Accusations
That's how it works here.

Since you're talking about Sprouts coin's full node (and been following their [ANN] thread), there's nothing we can add but "it's a bug" or hardware issues.

I just want to mention this, have you already excluded the node to your Antivirus and Firewall?
Because this message isn't clear if you need to "register in the whitelist" of their network or your "security software" aka Antivirus/Firewall:

And the whole team and supporters consist of anime & cartoon characters, a neko~chan and two no-image~san:
Looks promising! No wonder bugs aren't fixed.

If it isn't v3.1.0, it will not work. The latest update was on June 21.

---

However, TryNinja's 2nd link above was linked to v2.6.
Just use his 1st link and press "request update" then generate download link, it will be updated to the latest version (I've already requested, so the search will be short).

If you're planning not to spend from A1 and A2 for the long term, just "Freeze" address 1 and address 2 (address tab)
You can also Freeze specific inputs in the Coins tab using Electrum v3.3.5+,
then proceed to the Send tab.

It will automatically select Address 3's input(s) as long as there aren't any other addresses with available inputs.

That's because it's one of the basic keyboard shortcut for selection that's supported by most Operating systems and apps.

@Royse777 This might come in handy:

• CTRL+LeftClick  = Multi-select One by one.
• SHIFT+LeftClick = Select The first one and everything in between the next selection.

You can even try SHIFT+Click with this page's texts (Highlight=selection).
And CTRL+Click on any of the icons on your desktop (Windows).

With Electrum and most light clients, yes but...
not with BitcoinCore/qt client, you still need to backup the wallet.dat somewhere else as a fail-safe.
It's possible by exporting the master private key (xprv), but it isn't doable by your regular Joe.

So we can say "majority" not "everyone"

That's just a "quick look", we need to consider many things and possible future layers like Lightning Network to be more realistic.

It may (IMO, it will) be lower than today's transaction fee earning due to the fact that if Bitcoin's price grow beyond "high", developers and users might lower the minimum fee to a fraction of a satoshi or/and lower the maximum as well.
Another one is if LN become mainstream, there will be fewer on-chain transactions than we're experiencing today that will generally lower the fee earnings of miners.

It's too early to discuss that though.

Please make it clearer, are you really trying to install or verify Electrum?

If you're having trouble installing Electrum, verifying the signature won't fix it (though it's advisable for security purposes).
Or Did you mean "How to verify Electrum"?

If it is Bitcoin Core:
It's the random (1-0, a-f) characters next to "Transaction ID:", above "Transaction total size" and below "Credit" and "Net Amount".

If it is Electrum:
It's the one on the top-most part labeled "Transaction ID".

There are indeed other reports but most of them are victims of scam where the culprit offers cheap or free accounts with balance;
but the wallet is watch-only and only him can spend it.
Others are cases of lost old version wallets.

By any chance,
[1] Haven't you created that wallet yourself?
[2] Have you exported some or that particular address' private key before?
[3] Did you stored the 12/24-word SEED somewhere vulnerable (Cloud storage/Email/etc)?
Because those are the most possible reasons if we take malware and hacks into account.

Another problem is, if it was their fault, they wont be able to help you with it because the new version of blockchain.com wallet's private keys are only available for the user and not their server (as they said):

With those limited info, it's kinda hard to tell.
I could be a phishing site, compromised wallet/account, watch-only wallet, malicious browser extension and other "common" scams.

We need more information about the wallet, how you've created it and the actual URL of the website that you're visiting.

Your coins won't end up in an orphan block, your unconfirmed transaction(s) may.

But since you've already read about it, I'll just state the obvious~ish:
Since it's an orphaned block, most nodes will reject it and your wallet won't see it as "received" (1 confirmation) thus: (given that your node/server rejected it) you won't notice that your unconfirmed tx was included unless you search for orphaned blocks and the tx in it manually.
Your unconfirmed TX will stay in the nodes and mining node's mempool as long as it wasn't included in a valid block waiting for confirmation.

Also, today's usual orphaned blocks are almost the exact copy of the valid block with few differences in number of transactions and your tx in the orphaned block might be included to the valid block as well.

Check your balances' available inputs (TXID) if they have 6+ confirmations (if it didn't have, it already had more than thousand confirmation);
if it is, your coins are safe from this "issue" as it can only affect the latest block(s).

You might need to read what I've said above: post #4

There's no way you can use the balance in blockchain.com's wallet because you created it by importing the address which anyone can do.
The only way to recover your funds is to contact this "Cash App" to credit your previous deposit.
Just make sure that you're using the real Cash App because phishing scams and fake wallets are common these days.

BTW, Have you seen their rating?: https://www.trustpilot.com/review/cash.app

You can also post a scam accusation to Cash App if they didn't respond after a week or two: Scam Accusations

Since you're now a Jr. member, you can now post the images to this thread so we can directly view it.

But wait, you have the wallet laying in the same room?
That's kinda risky, if the room got robbed, your wallet will be taken too and your passphrase could be bruteforced.
If possible, use a "watch-only" wallet and keep the spendable one in a more secure device/PC.

Anyways, that's a very well designed room, far better than the usual "dusty-cluttered" room I'm always seeing.

I copied the output values directly from the raw hex and got these:
.

• 84 x 0.10239329btc = 8.60103636btc
• 20 x 0.20473754btc = 4.0947508btc
• 6 x 0.40947508btc = 2.45685048btc
• 4 x 0.81895016btc = 3.27580064btc
• 3 x 1.63790032btc = 4.91370096btc
• 3 x 3.27580064btc = 9.82740192btc
• 2 x 6.55160128btc = 13.10320256btc
• and more outputs of different value.

Now, copy this code and add all of them or paste the whole code here (scroll down) to add: http://v1.calculla.com/columnar_add
You'll get 81.26462135 which is the same as the displayed total output.

@Negotiation If this was the case, just open "Folder Options" (Start menu->Search->Folder Options);
Click on the "View" tab, scroll-down a little then find and uncheck "Hide extensions for known file types".

That'll display files extensions like (.txt) and others.

For issue no1:
You've created a "watch-only" wallet by importing the address instead of the private keys (but as Adolf said, Cash app doesn't allow users to have access to their deposit address' private key).
Think of it, if it's possible to spend Bitcoins by importing addresses, everyone's Bitcoins can be stolen.

Just do as he instructed but you have to reach the minimum withdrawal amount to do so.

For issue no2:
Contact the wallet's developer and users in the wallet's official thread: Coinomi Universal HD Wallet.
But it's been inactive for a while.

..And less hassle of zero-fill~ing the disk for paranoids (+ reinstalling OS and drivers takes time).

---

He must have browsed to the webpage then cut down the connection.
His supposedly randomly generated private key wasn't random at all but pre-generated key from an image file and can be reproduced by the culprit.
So even if he's offline the whole time (after loading the page), they can regenerate the possible key based from the malicious page's provided image.

This wont happen if he used the original code from Github.