|
Monedelor in sine, nu. Asta se intampla doar in totalitarism.
Legea prevede insa impozit pe profitul din crypto, ceea ce e bine. Initial se cerea impozit pe venitul din crypto. Noroc cu Asociatia Blockchain Romania, care le-a ilustrat aberatia din gandire...
|
|
|
|
Cred ca cel mai ok ar fi sa fie descentralizat asa ca putem sa fim mai "safe" in ceea ce priveste tinerea fondurilor pe exchange  Mi-ai luat vorba din gura Exchange-urile centralizate sunt benefice pentru propagarea fenomenului si pentru comoditate. Cei mai multi nu stiu insa la ce riscuri se supun. Am sa fac maine un thread pe tema asta. Sunt multi necunoscatori. Adineauri am citit un post unde cineva credea ca Satoshi e roman (in partea romaneasca a forumului). Nu stiam ca avem si noi cripto monede  sunt bune si forumurile astea la ceva...mai aflam lucruri noi si interesante. Totusi, BITCOIN e o cripto moneda romaneasca? adica acea cripto tata tatilor? Exchange-urile descentralizate sunt viitorul. Cele centralizate nu fac decat (scuze de repetitie) sa centralizeze ceea ce a fost gandit a fi descentralizat - banii privati, in general, si Bitcoin, in particular. Nu vreau sa arunc cu noroi in Tradesilvania, Bitcoin Romania, LDV Crypto Bank etc (si nici nu o fac). Patronii sunt afaceristi, similar celor de la Kraken, Poloniex sau, de ce nu, Mt. Gox. Pentru ei e o afacere. Insa Bitcoin nu a fost gandit asa. El a fost gandit ca substituent pentru banii fiat, nu pentru specula. Pentru ca asta este de fapt acest trading: o specula. In momentul in care atomic swaps vor ajunge la putere, alaturi de exchange-urile descentralizate, cele centralizate vor disparea. Stiu, suna utopic. Dar de ce ar apela cineva la o institutie care preda datele guvernului (vezi Coinbase), cand isi poate pastra anonimitatea?! Voi vorbi maine despre toate acestea, dar si despre multe altele. |
|
|
|
|
1. Poll-ul e de neinteles (partea cu "lucram pentru ei, e clar ca ei sunt in spate": cine sunt "ei"?; in spatele cui sunt "ei"?);
2. Comisionul e ireal;
3. OP are doar un post si doar 1 activity. Cred ca thread-ul poate fi inchis.
|
|
|
|
salut, eu am vazut foarte multi, cel putin pe canalul de Romania, care isi vand punctele de merit. eu nu inteleg de ce s-a bagat aceasta metoda de crestere in grad
Cine vinde sMerits? Poti detalia, te rog? |
|
|
|
Hello, After being encouraged by LoyceV, I decided to mention here 1 post of mine. "The Satoshi Revolution", by Wendy McElroy, translated in RomanianDescription : after working more than 1 year, I could proudly present the book, fully translated in Romanian, with the writer's approval and encouragement do so Category : crypto literature Section : Local > Romānă (Romanian) > Presa Regarding Rules
NEW: Don't post topics that are just a translation of another topic or website.
I tried to assure myself I won't break any rule by posting this here, this is why I asked LoyceV first, and I was told to try and see what happens. I understood there shouldn't be "a translation of another topic or website", and my post is not a translation of a topic, nor of a website, but it is indeed a translation. But it is a translation of a book. Considering the extremely low amount of Romanian crypto literature (either with Romanian authors or just foreign books translations) which, as far as I know, it is 0 (ZERO), I think this book may help a lot of Romanians, in case they decide to read it, to understand the real nature of Bitcoin and private money. The lack of technical writing, together with the crypto-anarchic ideas expressed by the author will help any reader to understand the principles behind Bitcoin. Thank you. |
|
|
|
La fel ca si in raspunsul meu anterior, este important ca postarea sa aduca un plus comunitatii pentru a primii merit, a fost acordat merit si pe sectiune de romana, poate nu cat ar trebui dar te asigur ca lucrul asta a fost din lipsa de timp in a citii tot ce misca pe forum(si cei ce sunt surse de merit, tot oameni sunt).Tocmai de aceea va rog sa lasati aici postarile care credeti ca ar trebui sa primeasca merit si sunt ferm convins ca cele care aduc un plus vor primi. P.S: Daca nu le vede Cyrus, il voi ruga eu sa se uite punctual.Dar pentru acest lucru este important ca acea postare sa "merite". P.S.S: Eu momentan nu mai am sMerit pentru ca l-am dat pe tot catre comunitate. In cazul acesta, as vrea sa subliniez si eu o postare a mea, o carte din domeniul crypto tradusa in limba romana. Desigur, cu acordul autoarei. Este extrem de interesanta si atractiva atat pentru incepatori cati si pentru avansati, mai ales ca este non-tehnica. Descrie principiile anarhice din spatele Bitcoin. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5193944.msg52796644#msg52796644 |
|
|
|
|
Din pacate, din ce am observat, putine ICO romanesti ofera transparenta si comunicare. Am contactat anul trecut mai multe dintre ele in vederea unor interviuri, insa putine au fost cele care au raspuns la email, printre cele care nu au raspuns numarandu-se si The Mine, Sether sau Restart Energy. In cazul unora nu am gasit nici macar o modalitate de contact.
In atare conditii mi se pare destul de greu sa capeti incredere intr-un proiect in care sa iti investesti banii.
|
|
|
|
Am aplicat pentru a fi sursa de merit. Va rog sa-mi cititi istoricul si daca considerati ca as fi eligibil si ca pot fi obiectiv in acordarea de puncte va rog sa ma sustineti aici : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3030575.0Sunt bine-veniti si cei care nu sunt de acord cu aplicatia mea dar cred ca ar trebui sa avem o sursa de merit care sa aiba timp pentru sub-forum-ul romanesc. Ti-am mentionat si eu aplicatia in acest thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5197548.new#new. Poate ajuta cu ceva. In continuare, partea romaneasca de forum este neschimbata in ceea ce priveste politica de acordare a meritelor, in ciuda recomandarilor lui theymos. But undoubtedly some people got screwed by this, and if they have decent posts, by all means, give them the 250 or 500 merit that they need to rank-up.
|
|
|
|
|
Vezi ca sunt niste thread-uri de "merit giveaway", daca le cauti bine. Pe sectiunea de romana a forumului sunt slabe sanse sa primesti merite, asa cum au mai sesizat si altii...
|
|
|
|
Maybe there should be implemented a limit of feedbacks / trust / flags in a given time (if it doesn't exist already)? Similar to the bump limit ( https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5183553.0). Practically, this would mean that an user isn't allowed to give multiple feedbacks in the same day, for example. Or, another suggestion, in case that several reputable members here (maybe those from trusted list) vote against someone's flag (example: 50 vote to oppose against what a spammer sustains about someone via feedback / flag etc), this user should have a given amount of time until he is able to post again feedbacks / flags. Besides, maybe it could be implemented a system where if a big number of reputable members (DT list, for example) vote for banning / deleting someone's account, this action to be performed automatically, without having to involve mods / administrators / theymos. Does it make sense what I'm saying here? |
|
|
|
Disclaimer: this topic was created by 1miau. However, at our joint request, on Dec 18th, 2023 theymos changed the ownership of the topic to me. This information was also confirmed by 1miau here
I've collected some of the most famous Bitcoin block explorers including a column for supported features like displaying native SegWit bech32-addresses or giving the possibility to identify an outgoing transaction from nested SegWit P2SH addresses. Finally, I've rated them from my side how useful each block explorer is. The better the rating, the more detailed the explorer is. Bitcoin block explorers *: | Name (link) | Bech32 / Bech32m (P2TR) supported? | SegWit (P2SH) identifiable?** | Usefulness (subjective rating)  *** | Works without JS? | Rated by | | ________________________ | ________________________________ | _________________________ | _________________________________ | ____________________ | ________________ | | Blockchair.com | Yes (09/2019) / Yes (05/2022) | Yes (09/2019) | 8 / 10 Points | Yes | 1miau | | Trezor Bitcoin Explorer | Yes (11/2019) / Yes (05/2022) | Yes (11/2019) | 7.5 / 10 Points | Partially**** | Saint-loup | | mempool.space | Yes (10/2020) / Yes (05/2022) | Yes (10/2020) | 7.5 / 10 Points | No | SFR10 | | OKLink | Yes (08/2022) / Yes (08/2022) | Yes (08/2022) | 7.5 / 10 Points | No | SFR10 | | bitaps.com | Yes (09/2019) / Yes (05/2022) | Yes (09/2019) | 7 / 10 Points | No | 1miau | | BTC.com | Yes (09/2019) / Yes (05/2022) | Yes (09/2019) | 7 / 10 Points | No | 1miau | | chainflyer.bitflyer.jp | Yes (12/2019) / Yes (05/2022) | Yes (12/2019) | 7 / 10 Points | No | Alveus | | BitcoinWho'sWho | Yes (09/2022) / Yes (09/2022) | Yes (09/2022) | 7 / 10 Points | No | GazetaBitcoin | | BitcoinExplorer | Yes (08/2022) / Yes (08/2022) | Yes (08/2022) | 7 / 10 Points | Partially**** | SFR10 | | bitquery | Yes (09/2022) / Yes (09/2022) | Yes (09/2022) | 7 / 10 Points | No | Rizzrack | | TokenView | Yes (09/2022) / Yes (09/2022) | Yes (09/2022) | 7 / 10 Points | No | ajiz138 | | BitInfoCharts | Yes (09/2022) / Yes (04/2023) | No (09/2022) | 7 / 10 Points | Partially (see Comments) | ajiz138 | | | 3xpl | Yes (05/2024) / Yes (05/2024) | No (05/2024) | 6.5 / 10 Points | Yes | SFR10 | | SoChain | Yes (09/2019) / Yes (05/2022) | Yes (09/2021) | 6 / 10 Points | No | 1miau | | Blockcypher.com | Yes (09/2019) / Yes (05/2022) | Yes (04/2023) | 6 / 10 Points | Partially**** | 1miau | | cryptoID | Yes (12/2019) / No (10/2022) | Yes (12/2019) | 6 / 10 Points | No | SFR10 | | ViaBTC.com | Yes (09/2019) / No (10/2022) | No (09/2019) | 6 / 10 Points | No | 1miau | | Btcscan | Yes (08/2022) / Yes (08/2022) | Yes (08/2022) | 6 / 10 Points | Yes | SFR10 | | Blockchain.com | Yes (11/2019) / Yes (10/2022) | Yes (12/2019) | 5 / 10 Points | Partially**** | 1miau | | BitcoinBlockExplorer | Yes (08/2022) / Yes (08/2022) | No (08/2022) | 5 / 10 Points | No | SFR10 | | jonasschnelli | Yes (01/2024) / Yes (01/2024) | Yes (01/2024) | 5 / 10 Points | Partially**** | SFR10 | | Atomic | Yes (08/2022) / Yes (08/2022) | No (08/2022) | 4.5 / 10 Points | Partially**** | SFR10 | | Learnmeabitcoin | Yes (10/2022) / No (10/2022) | Yes (05/2024) | 4.5 / 10 Points | Partially**** | SFR10 [Previously by ajiz138] | | Yogh | Yes (10/2022) / Yes (10/2022) | Yes (04/2023) | 4 / 10 Points | No | ajiz138 | | Blockexplorer.one | Yes (12/2019) / Yes (10/2022) | No (12/2019) | 3 / 10 Points | No | LTU_btc | | Blockpath | Yes (12/2019) / Yes (05/2022) | No (12/2019) | 3 / 10 Points | No | SFR10 | | AnonTransfer | Yes (10/2023) / No (10/2023) | No (10/2023) | 2 / 10 Points | No | SFR10 | | Blockstream | Yes (11/2019) / Yes (05/2022) | Yes (11/2019) | 2 / 10 Points | ? | pooya87 | | Insight | Yes (12/2019) / Yes (05/2022) | No (12/2019) | 1 / 10 Points | No | SFR10 | | Walletexplorer.com | Yes (09/2022) / Yes (05/2022) | No (09/2019) | 0 / 10 Points | Yes | 1miau |
*After evaluating our table layout, we have analyzed a few changes and after doing a survey, we have agreed to implement these changes. You'll still find our old table layout here. ** BTC addresses starting with "3" what are they ? simplified explanation.***You can hover your mouse over each score and a sign will pop up, where you'll see some comments brought up by members suggesting each Block explorer. Hover format for comments was suggested by SFR10 here. ****Some elements are not showing or working properly, but mostly works fine. PrivacyG has made a list of all Block Explorers above working without Java Script. You can find PrivacyG contribution here to find out more about it.
Removed BlockexplorersAll Blockexplorers which were removed from our list.
I've included a poll and if you want, please leave a vote which block explorer is your favorite one. Everyone will have 2 votes, you can revise it at any time, like when the block explorer makes changes and features are removed / added or when it goes completely offline. Different other sites / .onion links:
If you know about good Bitcoin block explorers I have missed on my list, you can post it here and rate it directly. You can use the following code: [table]
[tr]
[td]Name (link)[/td]
[td]Bech32 / Bech32m (P2TR) supported?[/td]
[td]SegWit (P2SH) identifiable?**[/td]
[td]Usefulness (subjective rating) :P ***[/td]
[td]Works without JS?[/td]
[td]Rated by[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]________________________[/td]
[td]________________________________[/td]
[td]_________________________[/td]
[td]_________________________________[/td]
[td]____________________[/td]
[td]________________[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td][url=http://xxx]xxx[/url][/td]
[td]Yes / No (xx/20xx) / Yes / No (xx/20xx)[/td]
[td]Yes / No (xx/20xx)[/td]
[td][b][color=black]x / 10 Points[/color][/b][/td]
[td][b]Yes / No[/b][/td]
[td]Your name[/td]
[/tr]
[/table]
Translations (in chronological order):
|
|
|
|
4) I have reported 379 posts with 98% accuracy (361 good, 11 bad, 7 unhandled).
Just curious, if I may: how did you calculate your post accuracy? Is there an algorithm for that? Or how were calculated the good and the bad posts? Besides, what are the unhandled posts? |
|
|
|
I came back with a second proposal. Bitcoin: freedom for people since 2009!  1EwSVNB64jPad2Epp7scoZHX2mfkUHQQ2x |
|
|
|
Thank you very much! I'll post a new proposal today for the 10th anniversary! |
|
|
|
I can't believe I'm the first one posting here Please find attached my proposals. This is how I see the future cards. Very colorful... in the front I thought that something with great impact such as family and life itself would join very well with Bitcoin, since I truly believe in its power and value. On the back, I thought about two big events from Bitcoin history. So people can never forget them!  Edit: I came back with a second proposal! I hope this one is more suitable  |
|
|
|
|
Indeed, you are right. I'm sorry for the confusion.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
