Bitcoin Forum
June 16, 2024, 01:47:40 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 [239] 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 ... 486 »
4761  Other / Meta / Re: Gangs of BitcoinTalk :) on: February 19, 2020, 07:40:54 AM


Which is who?

The guy seated with the cigar was in the movie "The Last Castle" with Robert Redford.  I don't recognise any of the others - it looks like a mash-up montage (notice the reflection of the guy top left in pale jacket - his "mirror" image is facing the wrong way).
4762  Economy / Reputation / Re: [overview] Lauda's DT1/trust statistics & relevant topics list on: February 19, 2020, 07:31:21 AM
Lauda's just changed both his email address and his PGP keys.

(and he also removed one of the two negative trust feedbacks he'd previously left for me the same day he's telling others to ~Timelord2067 - Lauda is becoming increasingly confused about what he's saying and doing)
4763  Other / Meta / Re: Gangs of BitcoinTalk :) on: February 19, 2020, 07:25:25 AM
If GazetaBitcoin were genuine in his mantra of free speech by "the press", then he wouldn't have arranged to have my posts deleted from this tread thereby committing censorship.
4764  Other / Meta / Re: A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by a Bitcoin Forum moderator. on: February 19, 2020, 07:03:56 AM
More of my posts have been deleted over night without any user name being given as to the *cough* person behind it.  More retaliation no doubt from the un-named forum mods who are too afraid to put their name to their work.

Definitely untrustworthy behaviour.


I may also have hit upon why they are deleting my posts weeks, months and even years later.  As petty as it sounds they appear to be manipulating my score on the BPIP.  More information as it comes in.
4765  Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: [BPIP] Bitcointalk Public Information Project [Back in Action] on: February 19, 2020, 07:00:48 AM
What is the methodology being to used to calculate recognition?  Why I ask I was at 30th place with a score of 791.667 and then around the time my post count started dropping without explanation (as discussed in the original BPIP thread) now my recognition score is a dozen points lower while the other users with scores around mine are all fairly static.

At the time it was suggested that the posts were very old in threads that had been nuked, now I'm not so sure as the evidence suggests manipulation by mods to push my BPIP score down with very targeted deletion of posts.
4766  Other / Meta / Re: A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by a Bitcoin Forum moderator. on: February 18, 2020, 04:41:35 PM
...

Give it up Suchmoon - no one here is buying what you're peddling.
4767  Other / Meta / Re: ~GazetaBitcoin on: February 18, 2020, 04:36:21 PM
I didn't know there are different factions now. I thought there was only one known gang until today. It should be interesting to see how the turf war develops in the future. You may also want to add the Known Alts of any-one - A User Generated List Mk III gang. It looks like you have a beef with their leader so there's probably a bounty on your head right now  Cheesy

Agreed.

This post of mine has more relevance now than when it was created some 36 hours ago:



Especially when it is read in context with this post: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5226451.msg53862159#msg53862159
4768  Other / Meta / Re: A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by a Bitcoin Forum moderator. on: February 18, 2020, 03:54:03 PM

For me itis obvious abuse of power by a moderator.


Very well said - thank you for having started this thread to highlight this issue that, as it turns out, is not just limited to your and my posts.
4769  Economy / Gambling / Re: UK Gambling Commission mysteriously suspends Matchbook casino licence on: February 18, 2020, 08:30:07 AM
Perhaps if you had gone here first: https://www.gamblingcommission.gov.uk/Home.aspx and had a look around you might have found clues to your concern.

You can also check here: https://www.casino.co.uk/blacklisted/ for information on black-listed casinos.

and... what's more likely to have occurred can be found on this page: "Gambling on credit cards to be banned from April 2020" https://www.gamblingcommission.gov.uk/news-action-and-statistics/news/gambling-on-credit-cards-to-be-banned-from-april-2020?mod=article_inline



I doubt there's really anything "Mysterious" in their decision.
4770  Economy / Reputation / Re: GazetaBitcoin - who set you up? on: February 18, 2020, 08:11:00 AM
Personal trust lists are not really worth paying that much attention to. Unlike ratings, they're background metrics that affect how the one that sets them in his own profile sees trust ratings.

They only become impactful to the general userbase once they contribute to including/excluding someone in default trust. I wouldn't care that much what the reasons of someone trusting/distrusting others are.
Unless of course they themselves are in DT1 and are largely contributing to preventing others from ranking up. If there's no good reason for such specific actions, it's worth discussing more than hypotheticals.

This is where we are at:

http://loyce.club/trust/2020-02-08_Sat_07.44h/1285797.html

Quote
Trust list for: GazetaBitcoin (Trust: awaiting update) (245 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP) (created 2020-02-08_Sat_07.44h)
Back to index

GazetaBitcoin Trusts these users' judgement:
-

GazetaBitcoin Distrusts these users' judgement:
-


GazetaBitcoin's judgement is Trusted by:
-

~GazetaBitcoin's judgement is Distrusted by:
1. NEW Timelord2067 (Trust: +8 / =4 / -1) (DT1 (-9) 339 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)


Source: LoyceV's Trust list viewer.
Get your own Trust list in BBCode at loyce.club/trust.

You're crying that just one person on DT1 - (with a negative value at that) has distrusted you on default trust?  (Something you've never even dabbled in before this week?)



Who put you up to this?



(Note to @LoyceV - this link isn't updating http://loyce.club/trust/ranking/131361.html )




Edit on the 31st August 2020.  Two weeks after this post the OP added ten UID's to the trust list. (Week 58)

It is now week 85 and their trust list looks like this:

https://loyce.club/trust/2020-08-29_Sat_05.07h/1285797.html

Quote
Trust list for: GazetaBitcoin (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (889 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP) (created 2020-08-29_Sat_05.07h)
Back to index

GazetaBitcoin Trusts these users' judgement:
1. theymos (Trust: +29 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (57) 6889 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. philipma1957 (Trust: +22 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (20) 1585 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
3. TMAN (Trust: +27 / =0 / -1) (1305 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
4. Lauda (Trust: +35 / =4 / -2) (1643 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
5. Biodom (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (589 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
6. LoyceV (Trust: +29 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (54) 5839 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
7. nullius (Trust: +4 / =3 / -0) (1631 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
8. o_e_l_e_o (Trust: +10 / =0 / -0) (4686 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
9. DdmrDdmr (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (20) 4094 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
10. mikeywith (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (2891 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

GazetaBitcoin Distrusts these users' judgement:
-


GazetaBitcoin's judgement is Trusted by:
-

~GazetaBitcoin's judgement is Distrusted by:
1. TECSHARE (Trust: +37 / =6 / -2) (DT1 (-1) 935 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. Timelord2067 (Trust: +8 / =6 / -1) (470 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
3. andulolika (Trust: #  +1 / =1 / -6) (26 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
4. teeGUMES (Trust: +10 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (2) 640 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
5. mhanbostanci (Trust: +2 / =0 / -2) (342 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
6. Vispilio (Trust: +3 / =3 / -1) (DT1 (-5) 983 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
7. Blacknavy (Trust: +5 / =0 / -2) (DT1 (-6) 1011 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
8. miyav (Trust: neutral) (88 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
9. Chlotide (Trust: neutral) (98 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)


Source: LoyceV's Trust list viewer.
Get your own Trust list in BBCode at loyce.club/trust.




I feel vindicated in distrusting this person when I did.
4771  Economy / Reputation / Re: Extending "~" to peers of your untrustees through association - Why? on: February 18, 2020, 07:48:36 AM
Mind your manners, child.  

nullius is another one of those shill accounts that's been brought back to life.  Instead of making contact for their concern about a post of mine, they went on a stumbling rant about the post.




A PM to TL would have been appropriate first.

Ask the OP how many hours after he sent a PM did he wait before starting this thread.  (and ask his did he notice I was offline for a couple of days - over the weekend) - I know the answer and it's not very many hours at all.  No follow-up PM to ensure I received the first PM, no discussion via PM, nothing.

This is a nothing thread from start to finish.
4772  Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: [BPIP] Bitcointalk Public Information Project [Back in Action] on: February 18, 2020, 07:37:36 AM
Hi again,

have found another glitch:

https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Timelord2067 returns a valid page.

https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?id=Timelord2067 does not:

Quote
Server Error in '/' Application.
Error converting data type nvarchar to int.
Description: An unhandled exception occurred during the execution of the current web request. Please review the stack trace for more information about the error and where it originated in the code.

Exception Details: System.Data.SqlClient.SqlException: Error converting data type nvarchar to int.

Source Error:

An unhandled exception was generated during the execution of the current web request. Information regarding the origin and location of the exception can be identified using the exception stack trace below.

Stack Trace:


[SqlException (0x80131904): Error converting data type nvarchar to int.]
   System.Data.SqlClient.SqlConnection.OnError(SqlException exception, Boolean breakConnection, Action`1 wrapCloseInAction) +3306108
   System.Data.SqlClient.TdsParser.ThrowExceptionAndWarning(TdsParserStateObject stateObj, Boolean callerHasConnectionLock, Boolean asyncClose) +736
   System.Data.SqlClient.TdsParser.TryRun(RunBehavior runBehavior, SqlCommand cmdHandler, SqlDataReader dataStream, BulkCopySimpleResultSet bulkCopyHandler, TdsParserStateObject stateObj, Boolean& dataReady) +4061
   System.Data.SqlClient.SqlDataReader.TryConsumeMetaData() +90
   System.Data.SqlClient.SqlDataReader.get_MetaData() +99
   System.Data.SqlClient.SqlCommand.FinishExecuteReader(SqlDataReader ds, RunBehavior runBehavior, String resetOptionsString, Boolean isInternal, Boolean forDescribeParameterEncryption, Boolean shouldCacheForAlwaysEncrypted) +604
   System.Data.SqlClient.SqlCommand.RunExecuteReaderTds(CommandBehavior cmdBehavior, RunBehavior runBehavior, Boolean returnStream, Boolean async, Int32 timeout, Task& task, Boolean asyncWrite, Boolean inRetry, SqlDataReader ds, Boolean describeParameterEncryptionRequest) +3303
   System.Data.SqlClient.SqlCommand.RunExecuteReader(CommandBehavior cmdBehavior, RunBehavior runBehavior, Boolean returnStream, String method, TaskCompletionSource`1 completion, Int32 timeout, Task& task, Boolean& usedCache, Boolean asyncWrite, Boolean inRetry) +667
   System.Data.SqlClient.SqlCommand.RunExecuteReader(CommandBehavior cmdBehavior, RunBehavior runBehavior, Boolean returnStream, String method) +83
   System.Data.SqlClient.SqlCommand.ExecuteReader(CommandBehavior behavior, String method) +301
   System.Data.SqlClient.SqlCommand.ExecuteReader() +137
   Website.Profile_page.Page_Load(Object sender, EventArgs e) in C:\Users\bpip\source\repos\BPIP\Website\profile.aspx.cs:66
   System.Web.UI.Control.OnLoad(EventArgs e) +106
   System.Web.UI.Control.LoadRecursive() +68
   System.Web.UI.Page.ProcessRequestMain(Boolean includeStagesBeforeAsyncPoint, Boolean includeStagesAfterAsyncPoint) +3785


Version Information: Microsoft .NET Framework Version:4.0.30319; ASP.NET Version:4.7.3429.0
4773  Economy / Reputation / Re: The BCT PGP/GPG Public Key Database: Stake Your PGP Key Here on: February 18, 2020, 07:24:46 AM
Old key is here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1159946.msg46696549#msg46696549.

Quote
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

This key expires tomorrow. New key generated.
Fingerprint:
1F2E 62A4 553E DA69 3A11  C923 44E3 4D3B 633C F4EA

- -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----

mDMEXkpVxhYJKwYBBAHaRw8BAQdAUxufqRTd+8uyRkTp+ZIHXTfUDCx0/S6MuJKf
iU2D0u+0BUxhdWRhiJYEExYIAD4WIQQfLmKkVT7aaToRySNE4007Yzz06gUCXkpV
xgIbAwUJA8JnAAULCQgHAgYVCgkICwIEFgIDAQIeAQIXgAAKCRBE4007Yzz06iMd
AP4woonf+rFOQ+R7nWcac+tcDHLHMwqAqqrCrcTYOdTWggEA32N2ZyVwOBWWJUTO
1/gT1bz0mxauaBVajG4RLWkE6AK4OAReSlXGEgorBgEEAZdVAQUBAQdAYT3Co5PJ
JkJ0sB3oB+k4xNawjDzVEmYGXUrvVvnrjSMDAQgHiH4EGBYIACYWIQQfLmKkVT7a
aToRySNE4007Yzz06gUCXkpVxgIbDAUJA8JnAAAKCRBE4007Yzz06lz9AQDSo02Y
D0RsIPWL/TpqIpoa01HAQDN/iZKr39MJwGCopAD+KgESbqYfiXO4xyEED+SbEd1C
LfSvrBU+CLjgOuFtvg8=
=V0Bx
- -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----

Date: 17/02/2020
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=DjjO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Quote
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Hello, World!

2020-02-17:   I am Lauda.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iHUEARYIAB0WIQQfLmKkVT7aaToRySNE4007Yzz06gUCXkpXbgAKCRBE4007Yzz0
6kNHAP0ZdN0OrzGSHTlMZeckeB5cBVzpwFCLlF1Bz0xP/qLQ+QD8Cti8A5CFnbWZ
3fRsTOLsa4qPkFSZDeWVprhrk+9Rsg8=
=otu8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Message quoted and archived for future reference: Archive [1a], [1b]
4774  Other / Meta / Re: [BPIP] FLAG VIEWER on: February 17, 2020, 11:20:27 PM
Will there be a search box added?



https://bpip.org/flagid.aspx?id=

comes up with:

Quote
Server Error in '/' Application.
The resource cannot be found.
Description: HTTP 404. The resource you are looking for (or one of its dependencies) could have been removed, had its name changed, or is temporarily unavailable.  Please review the following URL and make sure that it is spelled correctly.

Requested URL: /flagid.aspx

Version Information: Microsoft .NET Framework Version:4.0.30319; ASP.NET Version:4.7.3429.0
4775  Economy / Reputation / Re: Extending "~" to peers of your untrustees through association - Why? on: February 17, 2020, 04:33:32 PM
...

You've got your sensational minute in the sun.  Well done.[/b]
4776  Economy / Reputation / Re: Extending "~" to peers of your untrustees through association - Why? on: February 17, 2020, 03:52:37 PM
I'm starting this thread as I observed this bizarre behavior at some forum users.

I wasn't here for a couple of days - it's called "the week-end"

This post: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4736673.msg53789402#msg53789402 and this post: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4736673.msg53792258#msg53792258 are why I distrust you.
4777  Economy / Currency exchange / Re: Selling 4.7 BTC - I want to sell integers or fractions on: February 17, 2020, 01:14:22 PM
Wow a lot of Scam Analyst Specialists.
Do you also know that the QRCode at Myceliums Frontpage in a normal account shows the receiving address,
and after each transaction changes, so the receiving address is always empty?
 Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

But indeed, a screenshot never is a proof.

The screen shot is intended to be proof of ownership of funds being sold.  Perhaps the OP (activity one) can elaborate as to which wallet contains the BTC 4.7 ??
4778  Other / Meta / Re: [POLL] 2019 Bitcoin Forum's Newbie of the Year on: February 17, 2020, 05:06:17 AM
Congratulations geophphreigh - this was a great exercise to be introduced to some newbies who I may not otherwise have gotten a glimpse of as early in their time at BitCoinTalk.org

Hopefully this will become an annual event and we can welcome even more productive newbies into the fold.
4779  Economy / Collectibles / Re: [FREE ART RAFFLE] - Custom Bolivar Art 100 Spot Mega Raffle!! on: February 17, 2020, 04:44:45 AM
Congratulations and can I choose 38 please.  Grin
4780  Economy / Currency exchange / Re: Selling 4.7 BTC - I want to sell integers or fractions on: February 17, 2020, 03:53:04 AM
Hello, im looking to sell 4.7 BTC I want to sell integers or fractions

Today wallet Screenshot
https://imgur.com/a/4c2UGZu

Only payment method
Perfect Money
Payeer

Whatsapp Number
https://wa.me/13049150075
Your "wallet screenshot" has a QR code saying that 3Af5Jj7PoPDiMeYN34XQZcagWnXwpQQCxn is your address.

3Af5Jj7PoPDiMeYN34XQZcagWnXwpQQCxn has never received any coin...

Confirmed - I get the same result.  OP is pulling a scam.
Pages: « 1 ... 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 [239] 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 ... 486 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!