The feedback timing in comparison to the the post's timing - that path is completely inconsequential. I don't think there's any use looking down this avenue.
On the thread, in essence, the question would be "is it only belka48 who is punished for plagiarism?"
I haven't looked into whether Nadziratel has copied anyone else's posts - but belka48 has certainly copied work.
|
|
|
Thread Archive: [ 1a], [ 1b] Nadziratel posts this: ...
This is probably the most different ANN I've seen in this section. So you found an interesting way of advertising. A platform that teaches poker ... It's interesting. belka48 posts this today: This is probably the most different ANN I've seen in this section. So you found an interesting way of advertising. A platform that teaches poker ... It's interesting.
So belka48 has copied verbatim Nadziratel's work. There are only 15 posts made by belka48 with the most recent not turning up direct copies of other users, and with little else to go on it's hard to say they are alts.
Nadziratel's trust feedback page brings up a whole other issue surrounding copied work: with whitemanwhite echoing kzv's post verbatim. Both of their posts are just two days after Nadziratel posted the above quoted post.
|
|
|
I hate to say it, but there's plenty of people here in BitCoinTalk that have threads for tipping and it doesn't cost a cent to join (except any any bets made). Given your source material is all coming from the one website it's likely some are the same authors/tipsters.
|
|
|
Thank you for your reply, So you have the following formula: Recognition = 1000 - ((Activity Rank + Trust Rank + Merit Rank) / 3).
In your case: 1000 - ((285 + 152 + 229) / 3) = 778
You can check which of your scores are dropping or who is above you.
Just a nit-picking bit of clarity, should that be 152, 229 then 285??
I think that was a part of a discussion I was reading with Vod trying to figure out formula. I never ended up finding a similar formulae that was using square roots of values that'd been squared and added (multiplied) together. It's a convoluted piece of formula and mostly works (never re-found it and put looking for it to one side)
|
|
|
And we do have our hats. It is just we left them at the dry cleaners. I prefer Men Without Hats:
|
|
|
I don't give a fuck. I am trying to make my way into the Thick Skinned gang.
It's more an inverse thick (ie thin) skin troupe of whinny middle aged gits.
|
|
|
You must be joking. You tell me you never watched sopranos? How old are you 20? Damn millenials.
I'll take that as a complement, as Jack Benny would say "I'm 39!". (you're still on my distrust list BTW - feel free to start a thread about it - everyone else does).I preferred Wise Guy actually.
|
|
|
Which is who? The guy seated with the cigar was in the movie "The Last Castle" with Robert Redford. I don't recognise any of the others - it looks like a mash-up montage (notice the reflection of the guy top left in pale jacket - his "mirror" image is facing the wrong way).
|
|
|
Lauda's just changed both his email address and his PGP keys.
(and he also removed one of the two negative trust feedbacks he'd previously left for me the same day he's telling others to ~Timelord2067 - Lauda is becoming increasingly confused about what he's saying and doing)
|
|
|
If GazetaBitcoin were genuine in his mantra of free speech by "the press", then he wouldn't have arranged to have my posts deleted from this tread thereby committing censorship.
|
|
|
More of my posts have been deleted over night without any user name being given as to the *cough* person behind it. More retaliation no doubt from the un-named forum mods who are too afraid to put their name to their work. Definitely untrustworthy behaviour. I may also have hit upon why they are deleting my posts weeks, months and even years later. As petty as it sounds they appear to be manipulating my score on the BPIP. More information as it comes in.
|
|
|
What is the methodology being to used to calculate recognition? Why I ask I was at 30th place with a score of 791.667 and then around the time my post count started dropping without explanation (as discussed in the original BPIP thread) now my recognition score is a dozen points lower while the other users with scores around mine are all fairly static. At the time it was suggested that the posts were very old in threads that had been nuked, now I'm not so sure as the evidence suggests manipulation by mods to push my BPIP score down with very targeted deletion of posts.
|
|
|
...
Give it up Suchmoon - no one here is buying what you're peddling.
|
|
|
I didn't know there are different factions now. I thought there was only one known gang until today. It should be interesting to see how the turf war develops in the future. You may also want to add the Known Alts of any-one - A User Generated List Mk III gang. It looks like you have a beef with their leader so there's probably a bounty on your head right now Agreed. This post of mine has more relevance now than when it was created some 36 hours ago: Especially when it is read in context with this post: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5226451.msg53862159#msg53862159
|
|
|
For me itis obvious abuse of power by a moderator.
Very well said - thank you for having started this thread to highlight this issue that, as it turns out, is not just limited to your and my posts.
|
|
|
Personal trust lists are not really worth paying that much attention to. Unlike ratings, they're background metrics that affect how the one that sets them in his own profile sees trust ratings.
They only become impactful to the general userbase once they contribute to including/excluding someone in default trust. I wouldn't care that much what the reasons of someone trusting/distrusting others are. Unless of course they themselves are in DT1 and are largely contributing to preventing others from ranking up. If there's no good reason for such specific actions, it's worth discussing more than hypotheticals.
This is where we are at: http://loyce.club/trust/2020-02-08_Sat_07.44h/1285797.htmlYou're crying that just one person on DT1 - (with a negative value at that) has distrusted you on default trust? (Something you've never even dabbled in before this week?)
Who put you up to this?
(Note to @ LoyceV - this link isn't updating http://loyce.club/trust/ranking/131361.html )
Edit on the 31st August 2020. Two weeks after this post the OP added ten UID's to the trust list. ( Week 58) It is now week 85 and their trust list looks like this: https://loyce.club/trust/2020-08-29_Sat_05.07h/1285797.html
I feel vindicated in distrusting this person when I did.
|
|
|
Mind your manners, child.
nullius is another one of those shill accounts that's been brought back to life. Instead of making contact for their concern about a post of mine, they went on a stumbling rant about the post.
A PM to TL would have been appropriate first.
Ask the OP how many hours after he sent a PM did he wait before starting this thread. (and ask his did he notice I was offline for a couple of days - over the weekend) - I know the answer and it's not very many hours at all. No follow-up PM to ensure I received the first PM, no discussion via PM, nothing. This is a nothing thread from start to finish.
|
|
|
Hi again, have found another glitch: https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Timelord2067 returns a valid page. https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?id=Timelord2067 does not: Server Error in '/' Application. Error converting data type nvarchar to int. Description: An unhandled exception occurred during the execution of the current web request. Please review the stack trace for more information about the error and where it originated in the code.
Exception Details: System.Data.SqlClient.SqlException: Error converting data type nvarchar to int.
Source Error:
An unhandled exception was generated during the execution of the current web request. Information regarding the origin and location of the exception can be identified using the exception stack trace below.
Stack Trace:
[SqlException (0x80131904): Error converting data type nvarchar to int.] System.Data.SqlClient.SqlConnection.OnError(SqlException exception, Boolean breakConnection, Action`1 wrapCloseInAction) +3306108 System.Data.SqlClient.TdsParser.ThrowExceptionAndWarning(TdsParserStateObject stateObj, Boolean callerHasConnectionLock, Boolean asyncClose) +736 System.Data.SqlClient.TdsParser.TryRun(RunBehavior runBehavior, SqlCommand cmdHandler, SqlDataReader dataStream, BulkCopySimpleResultSet bulkCopyHandler, TdsParserStateObject stateObj, Boolean& dataReady) +4061 System.Data.SqlClient.SqlDataReader.TryConsumeMetaData() +90 System.Data.SqlClient.SqlDataReader.get_MetaData() +99 System.Data.SqlClient.SqlCommand.FinishExecuteReader(SqlDataReader ds, RunBehavior runBehavior, String resetOptionsString, Boolean isInternal, Boolean forDescribeParameterEncryption, Boolean shouldCacheForAlwaysEncrypted) +604 System.Data.SqlClient.SqlCommand.RunExecuteReaderTds(CommandBehavior cmdBehavior, RunBehavior runBehavior, Boolean returnStream, Boolean async, Int32 timeout, Task& task, Boolean asyncWrite, Boolean inRetry, SqlDataReader ds, Boolean describeParameterEncryptionRequest) +3303 System.Data.SqlClient.SqlCommand.RunExecuteReader(CommandBehavior cmdBehavior, RunBehavior runBehavior, Boolean returnStream, String method, TaskCompletionSource`1 completion, Int32 timeout, Task& task, Boolean& usedCache, Boolean asyncWrite, Boolean inRetry) +667 System.Data.SqlClient.SqlCommand.RunExecuteReader(CommandBehavior cmdBehavior, RunBehavior runBehavior, Boolean returnStream, String method) +83 System.Data.SqlClient.SqlCommand.ExecuteReader(CommandBehavior behavior, String method) +301 System.Data.SqlClient.SqlCommand.ExecuteReader() +137 Website.Profile_page.Page_Load(Object sender, EventArgs e) in C:\Users\bpip\source\repos\BPIP\Website\profile.aspx.cs:66 System.Web.UI.Control.OnLoad(EventArgs e) +106 System.Web.UI.Control.LoadRecursive() +68 System.Web.UI.Page.ProcessRequestMain(Boolean includeStagesBeforeAsyncPoint, Boolean includeStagesAfterAsyncPoint) +3785
Version Information: Microsoft .NET Framework Version:4.0.30319; ASP.NET Version:4.7.3429.0
|
|
|
Old key is here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1159946.msg46696549#msg46696549. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256
This key expires tomorrow. New key generated. Fingerprint: 1F2E 62A4 553E DA69 3A11 C923 44E3 4D3B 633C F4EA
- -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
mDMEXkpVxhYJKwYBBAHaRw8BAQdAUxufqRTd+8uyRkTp+ZIHXTfUDCx0/S6MuJKf iU2D0u+0BUxhdWRhiJYEExYIAD4WIQQfLmKkVT7aaToRySNE4007Yzz06gUCXkpV xgIbAwUJA8JnAAULCQgHAgYVCgkICwIEFgIDAQIeAQIXgAAKCRBE4007Yzz06iMd AP4woonf+rFOQ+R7nWcac+tcDHLHMwqAqqrCrcTYOdTWggEA32N2ZyVwOBWWJUTO 1/gT1bz0mxauaBVajG4RLWkE6AK4OAReSlXGEgorBgEEAZdVAQUBAQdAYT3Co5PJ JkJ0sB3oB+k4xNawjDzVEmYGXUrvVvnrjSMDAQgHiH4EGBYIACYWIQQfLmKkVT7a aToRySNE4007Yzz06gUCXkpVxgIbDAUJA8JnAAAKCRBE4007Yzz06lz9AQDSo02Y D0RsIPWL/TpqIpoa01HAQDN/iZKr39MJwGCopAD+KgESbqYfiXO4xyEED+SbEd1C LfSvrBU+CLjgOuFtvg8= =V0Bx - -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
Date: 17/02/2020 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEYbYndMiukd+rDQpnxNflug4bR/AFAl5KVmAACgkQxNflug4b R/Dk9RAAjHg7ASvJBkZ36LoPQsSYI9j8GhaFOIGq/z6dDujs+boyYWLPx7iJvOGn sZIgAmhhL3yvEtadMhMG8g3VVyKVF9+YK6ONGt3rAcfIkj2t7BljBWXgk3NRMuvH D6H4yWpWcN7A3NYHk9jBVrxP3CWJjwcHn3ZrD6X4ohlSMJSSu5wL5FD5/SJOJaTH /DZqivYA2pCXvz85j1VDPsa4Ie07vQMxWijWzWZyQcw7PZ6r7B/VvT8PVplCIc8y 9jLfNCYTWY5oYP0d7/mVhMa7sOS/XeTnEOw5KKdGzoo4UEVCSh7AS6PiOD89Qx1r 1wHYjX576y0rvwK6vOR5CMl7tYI1sby6y9TvFGJS8D7dGJ2wWIPwgsGb1FKkWjii 6VBIBuq6hNNIybVQjwAUZ9Kbl7juw/pDQN2ecmPn95n7pkk3kWjoB5Dg+DkflolO PosN2obVYSQ8xg12TRQUCyUvQvXKDN35b5PXRWebgqlX5dcG8PfuH5KCtQ05IUjb +nawLuP+K26dC/CYs9QUAN4WkoJ9Mj7ai43yjE1eILljVC282f66zLgKtWBi72sS 4ZhqWYlcven9cY42+BFjB5ht8kuGgAW09c23qKBougfUDTy2bQxS5uyMwCZxF+Di d60pWjjg+htSAA1m8pnLxNDFzkY9fI1xt5sZ+m5tq5RR+GkqFBQ= =DjjO -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256
Hello, World!
2020-02-17: I am Lauda. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iHUEARYIAB0WIQQfLmKkVT7aaToRySNE4007Yzz06gUCXkpXbgAKCRBE4007Yzz0 6kNHAP0ZdN0OrzGSHTlMZeckeB5cBVzpwFCLlF1Bz0xP/qLQ+QD8Cti8A5CFnbWZ 3fRsTOLsa4qPkFSZDeWVprhrk+9Rsg8= =otu8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Message quoted and archived for future reference: Archive [ 1a], [ 1b]
|
|
|
|