doesn't look good though. 950 is pushing it.
i'm using 5850 at 1030 core, 230 mem, with no problems. |
|
|
|
|
This program would start miner(s), query pools to see their progress. Once they reach around 40% (optimal time to get off), the miner will be killed, and another miner will be started (pointed to another server).
|
|
|
|
meh... I paid the guy in my thread via gift payment which I don't think you can charge back since it's labeled as 'gift'.
you can still say: "OMG MY PAIPAL GOT HAXXED" |
|
|
|
|
i'm guessing the graphics card is used?
|
|
|
|
|
are you going to buy bitcoins, as well as selling them? also, where are you located? it would be nice if i could just walk over, transfer some bitcoins, and walk away with cold, hard cash.
|
|
|
|
Guys Seriously. stop trying to mine wiht nvidias
A $114 5830 can pull 300 mega hases, Sell that bitchass nVidia card and xfire two 5830's
inb4 fanboi flame |
|
|
|
So if i wanted to pool hop, what kind of pool should i hop to? pay per share? proportional? score-based? I'm really interested in "improving" my efficiency as a miner  |
|
|
|
Not for anybody but the early adopters and their current bitcoin wallet value I suppose.
bitcoin wallet value? why does it help, or hurt you in namecoin, if you have a big, or small bitcoin wallet? the fact that domain-names get cheaper and cheaper over time dont actually hurt late namecoin adopters, the later you grab a name, the less NC you have to pay for registration (but maybe your favourite name is already taken by then). i don't really see any reason, why namecoin should become a thread to the bitcoin blockchain. currently, namecoins are more profitable to mine than bitcoins (according to the exchange-rates one can see on the forums), its >300times harder to generate 1BTC, yet you only get <100NC for 1BTC, CPU, or low-end GPU users should mine some namecoins, sell NC4BTC and make >100% average, instead of joining a bitcoin-pool and make way below 100%, although i've no idea about the current demand for namecoins, probably quite low, which makes it not worth it for big GPU clusters. it's surely needs more adoption. that's not going to work, even a few competitors can lower this price down to fair levels. |
|
|
|
|
protip: ati mines faster than nvidia (sorry, fanboys)
|
|
|
|
I have mined on both pools and I have to say they are both amazing.
Deepbit solves blocks so fast, you can just sit there and watch your balance go up. Deepbit also has the pay per share option which is really nice if you want ZERO variance. Instant payouts and payment for invalid blocks is pretty sweet too.
Deepbit has more frequent payouts, but each payout is less. 1 btc per hour vs 2 btc every 2 hours is the same thing. The invalid block "insurance" isn't worth the 3% fee (or even the +1% compared to other pools), because invalid blocks are so rare. BTC Guild doesn't have https  why do you need https? are you super paranoid about the government spying on you? |
|
|
|
|
yay, mtgox is finally comming to canada!
|
|
|
|
Yes you could use it to mine. Just SSH into it (I assume it's running Linux) and set up like normal from there.
this only works if your server has a graphics card. if you're going to mine with the CPU, don't bother, because it generates very little bitcoins. |
|
|
|
|
this is a terrible idea on pools that use a score based system.
|
|
|
|
Of course deepbit is the best one ever  because paying 3% for "block insurance" is totally worth it, considering failed blocks are below 1% for most pools. Actually, BitcoinPool.com is the best, 0 fees there, and it has the highest efficiency & stats  efficiency doesn't do anything, it only reduces server load. |
|
|
|
|
so is there a consensus on whether it really works or not? It would be nice if someone could publish results showing whether it works or not.
|
|
|
|
|
if there was a network split, then bitcoin users would likely find out about it, and hold off on transactions/mining until it's repaired.
|
|
|
|
you card is probably defective, considering that you get artifacts even at default clocks, and there is lag in 3d games. You should probably return to the retailer. I think I may know what the problem is. The default clock speed is too low and I need to set it higher. You could easily do this in the old ATi Catalyst Control Center, but since AMD have released their own version of ccc (AMD VISION Engine Control Center) I don't know how to make profiles.
Can anyone help me here?
the lower clock is to save energy in 2d mode. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
