I probably have some weird sense of humour but those leftist memes from the videos deserve to be funny. Sometimes the things are funny just because they are obviously retarded and the same quality community is also commenting and reposting all this garbage saying that it is something worthy.
Duno, maybe it is just a part of leftist culture that combined with the other communist stuff seems even more funny.

Notice that Amazon is still not receiving Bitcoin so you can't say that you are really paying with BTC for something. The other thing is that sometimes such big companies provide anti crypto policy and ban all crypto related accounts. Just as PayPal, some other payment systems and some big banks do.
So we still have to see Amazon's official statement about this payment method.

Twitter leftist administration already been banning many people that had another opinions about different political and social questions. They did that in a polite manner but still got banned. I am not surprised that they want to make more  censorship on crypto related topics.
The other thing that Twitter is not doing well and their stocks are slowly going down. They are getting no profits and generally it seems that pretty soon it will become another myspace (if anyone ofc remember it).

You will never get rid of scammers. That's how it work in real life and everything work the same way online.
In the internet people are willing to get a free speech but free speech is first of all a right to insult someone. Because expressing statements like "the sky is blue" got no risk of being arrested. That is why people are free to write some bullshit in the internet and there is nothing bad here.

If you are not sure about the future of bitcoin then don't buy it. Just spend some more time on this forum and read some more information about cryptocurrencies. Then in some weeks you will learn to analyze and make your own opinion about cryptocurrencies.
But generally witcoin would worth zero only in case if all miners would turn off their equipment. If that won't happen then BTC won't fall less than 1$.

If exchanges would start accepting PayPal or some other payment system that can be easily used and widely accepted foronline payments and can be withdrawed to your bank card almost instantly.
We already have the fiat system that doesn't force us to trust some shady 3rd parties like Bitfinex administration the emission of token. Reinventing the same thing is a pretty bad idea.

At the early stage of Bitcoin it was a marginal and unpopular currency. The community was small and consisted mostly of enthusiasts, that believe know pretty much about technical side of blockchain. So the community was small and homogeneous. But later, we've got many new people and most of them only came to get some fast and easy money. They know nothing about tech features of blockchain, they are coming from different social classes and probably are less educated than the first community.
The growing amount of users allowed to make more of such micro-communities that sometimes are not that friendly for the other people that are also sometimes retarded.

Transaction activity does not determine Bitcoin price. People can send BTC to each other, buy some goods in shops or exchange it on p2p exchanges like localbitcoins that does not have their own rates and does not determine the BTC price. BTC doesn't have to rise in this case.
BMI is also not a public thing so we don't know how it is calculated and it may be either wrong or used in attempts to manipulate the market.

If you open the link in OP's post you will find that Winklevoss brothers and Daniel Larimer are 37 y.o. Honestly there is only Vitalik Buterin on this list who is under 30. Since what time 37 is considered as young? Anyway, this list is pretty doubtfull, there is much more ppl around the crypto world that have millions worth of BTC and altcoins.

Religious groups don't own any countries. All your examples are just states with some official religion. We can't say that catholics in Europe own Germany. First was the state and only then came religion.
The other social and political sights of people in good countries are represented by their polititians in parliament.  This is why parliament almost in every country is full of retards. But for example if LGBT community gets extremely popular in your town then you may easily get a transgender major. That can easily happen in todays Europe.

Bitcoin is just another asset for investments, just like any other fiat currency, stock or ETF but with its own shitty specific. That means that it should be analyzed by educated and smart professionals that do the same with those stocks, ETFs and currencies. All those crypto analysts are just a bunch of uneducated retards that keep telling that  BTC would keep growing just because it grew before.
Also, the same website on OP's link contain another article with an opinion of another well known crypto idion John McAfee that claims that BTC price would grow to 1$mln in 2020. That once again tells us that such resources are untrustworthy.

It has absolutely no effect on cryptocurrency market. Corporations are creating their own stablecoins that would have fixed exchange rate and woukd be used only inside a company that issued them.
In the market someone would always have more money than you. Financial inequality is a natural thing, you won't replace it.

Sure. And now imagina how many people would buy cryptocurrency if they had to pay extra fees for privacy and other shit without getting a profit. That number would show us true crypto enthusiasts.

Luckily, even some democrats joined republicans in order to reject GND vote in congress. I never thought I would say that but hopefully, the american political system reached its peak of idiocy and soon it might stop degrading and throw people like Ocasio-Cortez away from the political field until they get more power.

It seems like they entered the market on high price when mining equipment was also pretty expensive and got huge losses. But one thing is still unclear to me: for now, mining is still considered as profitable activity, especially with cheap chinese electricity. At least most mining farms continue their work for that reason. But those guys somehow also got losses during their activities. How is that possible?

No one really knows who created WannaCry virus but for some reason many people are blaming NK for that, classic. I don't say that it is not true but there is no public evidence about this statement.
But there is a fact that NK have a small "hacker army" that it getting money from small hacks and even gold farming in online games. There is a good article about that on bloomberg: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2018-02-07/inside-kim-jong-un-s-hacker-army

Then Bitcoin will remain a marginal currency with a huge volatility. Crypto market should become resilient to any kinds of FUD from dome chinease politicians to get any kind of adoption in the other countries. Realizing that words of some chinease retard may dump my BTC savings in a single day doesn't make common users enthusiastic about cryptocurrencies.

I have no idea what Andrew Yang's would offer in his programme but there is a point that many new and young people on political arena are saying a complete bullshit and adding some good and obvious ideas like this one. You can pretty often see a programme, that starts from light drugs decriminalization and ends up with some bullshit like putting solar batteries on top of every building in US.
Decriminalization of light drugs if obviously a good thing but it is far not the main point you should put your attention to.

American SJWs are taking a huge loans for their education but for some reason they keep trying to force their absolutely retarded ideology. I'm not sure that education would help in this case. Also there is a great quote for such cases: "Formal instruction does not cure foolishness; it arms it." -Nicolás Gómez Dávila.

That's how the general EU immigration policy looks like. Peacefull and free-spirited europeans are not enforcing anything and willing to accept muslim refugees, that are not so free-spirited and would be happy to enforce their way of life that is unacceptable for most europeans.

Then you would probably have another mindset rather than any other people have. And in this case, why should we welcome those people if their traditions are unacceptable in our culture?

What things you want to remove from current political system? All major problems that we have did not come because of centralization.

Cryptocurrency is a currency / payment system / commodity or however you wanna call it. But that changes did you want to achieve by using another currency? With the same threat to modern monetary system you can start buying another fiat currency (like indian rupi) while leaving in UK. Blockchain did not provice any super new solution.
Any governmental changes due to the blockchain are also less likely to happen. For example in US we see a huge bureaucratic machine in charge of the country, it will not replace itself just because there is such thing like blockchain.