Great effort, but there are some things that you don't understand about a free market. Let me point some out.
There is supply, and there is demand, that being said, you are not allowed to require anything about how payments should be made. There is the decision of the business how it desires to pay customers...btc or own tokens.
- Bounty manager's shouldn't ask submit report on OP, bounty report should collect by Google form. Proof of annunciation can be post to avoid bounty cheaters.
Everyone has a different method to run his campaign. There is no one's business to intervene.
- Managers shouldn't ask or forced more than 20 post per week for alt coin reward to avoid spam. Or they can pay per post
The number of posts are usually required by the business. Can you force a bounty manager not to take a job because his client wants 25 posts per week?
- Managers shouldn't accept spammer and spam post on count.
I agree, but you can't force them.
- Bounty managers shouldn't not ask reply on thread for airdrop, bounty and ANN Thread. If asked than thread should be trashed and OP should get temp ban
I am pretty sure it is not allowed to incentivise people to bump up threads. In any case, i don't see how thrashing the post would help with that...a red trust should be enough.
li]Thread should be locked after stake distributions. Because sometimes people's reply even bounty is over.[/li][/list]
Actually, the best way to identify scammers is to leave the thread open and then just ban those who continue posting after 3-4 weeks have passed since the end of a campaign.
- Both account should ban if caught managing bounty with alt account to avoid ban evasion.
Hard to say here, they could do it so they won't recieve retaliation trust from the scammers in the bounty.
li]Bounty manager's could add disclaimer on bounty thread, it's doesn't mean he/she will not get ban if stake isn't distributed on time. Bounty manager fully responsible if stake not distributed for hunters.
I still haven't found a reason why disclaimers help in any way...
Tokens are usually paid by the team, why would the bounty manager be responsible if the team doesen't deliver?
The team could decide to alocate bounty tokens proportionally with the ammount sold. Some of them market a big bounty budget to attract more people (if hardcap is reached)...you know, that's how marketing works
- Bounty budget shouldn't decrease after end of campaign if there is more than 100 participant on spreadsheet.
Bounty budget and the number of participants are negociated and agreed by the team and the bounty manager. Nobody's business, except them, how many participants should be allowed to participate.
- Ponzi scheme should not allow to promote on bounty section. ( All ponzi scheme turn into scam eventually)
I am pretty sure this is kinda obvious. They should not be allowed to be promoted anywhere on the forum.
In the end, before making rules or something like that, try to understand the dynamic of the the agreement between the bounty manager and the business.[/list]
Show Posts
