Wabi coin is the most undervalued coin right now.
-Low supply
Circulating supply: 45 248 033 WABI Total Supply: 99 218 023 WABI I see nothing good in this numbers. We have so much more coins to enter the market soon. If more than 80M WABI were in circulation, I would agree with the supply argument. I agree with the rest. It is not a bad coin. |
|
|
|
|
It is weird that there was not a single AI ICO up until SingularityNET came. And after that, in one month we are having tens of them. And I am seeing this trend in every sector after a successful ICO. Seems very fishy to me and I am very careful when these dynamics occur. I make twice more diligent research on them.
|
|
|
|
|
I am very excited about SkyCoin. When will the miners be fully operational? How many coins will be mined per month in the beginning?
If they fix their economic model a little bit, this project will receive a lot of investors' money.
|
|
|
|
|
If we have a huge market crash and a slow recovery, then only the fundamentally good coins will survive. The coins and tokens that have real use case and utility. The coins and tokens that represent projects with working platforms.
The rest will never recover and be worth close to zero.
Which raises interesting question: In a bear market, if you get coins from an ICO and they open up over the ICO price, should you sell or hold?
|
|
|
|
|
It is a reasonable idea, that is simple enough that any fairly competent person in the field could predict comming.
I think it is met with both enthusiasm and some criticism, because some vectors of exploitation and their prevention are not discussed by Vitalik.
I even see that The ABYSS ICO are heavily promoting themselves as a DAICO. I am curious if this will bring them any more benefits.
|
|
|
|
|
Guys, can you point one successful project that started with an airdrop? I mean, started with an airdrop as a main marketing strategy.
Not ICOs that do small airdrops on top of or in combination with other marketing practices.
I can't think of any such.
And no, Tron doesn't count as a successful project.
|
|
|
|
|
I completely agree with the leadership argument. If you take a close look at the top market capitalization coins:
Bitcoin are having a civil war for quite a while.
Litecoin's leader Charlee Lee sold all of his LTC at all-time high.
Bitcoin Cash's leader Roger Ver has very shady past.
The mentioned are focusing all their energy in time in battling with each other rather than focusing on their own projects and lead it ahead.
Vitalik is uber focused and the Ethereum community is very strong. I can see it overtaking Bitcoin for number one.
|
|
|
|
What will happen with the work we have done so far? Articles, translations? Does this spreadsheet here count? Or we have to submit again in the new bounty portal? |
|
|
|
|
Look for Sylon, Wapinter, Deadley, ColorlessK. They are the best.
|
|
|
|
|
I often catch myself attached to some coins after I buy them. Probably because I want to prove my judgement right. Especially if it is a small altcoin nobody talks about, I feel like it is my discovery and my precious. So I build a chunk of an ego around it.
I recognize it as a dangerous behaviour, though.
|
|
|
|
|
Be careful with these blockchain 3.0 promises. Most of them are still on a concept stage with no working product available. The risk is huge with such projects. I wouldn't mind them if it was a year ago and the whole crypto market was valued at $20B, but now, I believe they are already very overvalued for their current stage of development.
|
|
|
|
|
They tried something called "credits" I think a not a long ago, and they terminated it as an unsuccessful project. So they probably learned some lessons out of it.
WeChat and Kik are one step ahead of facebook I think.
The giants are very cumbersome usually.
|
|
|
|
|
I am not going back to BTC. I know the lighting news are the big thing now, but I believe BTC is overvalued even with the lighning network.
BTC dominance will never recover over 50%, not for more than a few days. If even that happens. I am sticking to the alts.
|
|
|
|
|
This is the second source I hear it. I didn't believe the first time, but I am giving it much more attention now. Bank wouldn't want to let so much control in the hands of a third party. Especially a third party associated in any way with the crypto world.
I believe banks will create their own blockchain.
|
|
|
|
|
How do think this is gonna impact the fees on these exchanges? Are we gonna see trading becoming more expensive? Somebody has to pay for the taxes and I doubt it will be the exchanges.
|
|
|
|
|
You holdings are heavily weighted towards coins. Why not ETH? You are going to buy most of the rest with ETH. Plus, not all coins will survive. There will be 2-3 max at the end. Consolidation just like in any traditional branch.
|
|
|
|
|
If a coin has a low circulating supply compared to total supply I am not sure is a good investment. One example is Skycoin. Absolutely great project, but so many coins to enter circulation soon.
|
|
|
|
|
I am not against KYC, but what happens if some scammers run an ICO just to collect these personal data and intend to use it for malicious goals? This is my concern and I am very picky with the ICOs I give my trust to.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
