|
Hello. Show me the avatar that you need to place on this forum. Or is it classified?
|
|
|
|
|
Hello. How many tokens will be available in the second round of sales?
|
|
|
|
Hi everybody! I got acquainted with the concept of the project. In my opinion, the benefits for ordinary players are clear and obvious. And what will the streamers which own their personal channels on YouTube get? It turns out to be a kind of one-way process. Or am I wrong?
You’re wrong! Channel owners and streamers are pretty much "connected" in terms of opportunities by the policy of their services today, monetization programs, and applied restrictions in terms of marketing. Refereum will help to "move" and decentralize these "barriers" a little. Hmm. In fact, the project generates a competitor that captures the market. Due to what will the project be able to impose competition on them? The project creates favorable conditions for all the participants in the process: players, viewers, investors, bloggers, streamers and even game developers. That’s why there’s the mass and general coverage of the audience, which will receive clear feedback from everybody in favor of this project. Let’s return to the first question. The motivation of these categories of participants became clear to me, but what is offered to game developers, too? They still remain “above the battle.” You should notice that the project poses as one of the tasks the development of a single, most often used game engine, which should be arranged by the majority of developers. Moreover, this concept is based on the great idea of “getting income by playing computer games” using the crypto currency. This should make a splash! |
|
|
|
Hi everybody! I got acquainted with the concept of the project. In my opinion, the benefits for ordinary players are clear and obvious. And what will the streamers which own their personal channels on YouTube get? It turns out to be a kind of one-way process. Or am I wrong?
You’re wrong! Channel owners and streamers are pretty much "connected" in terms of opportunities by the policy of their services today, monetization programs, and applied restrictions in terms of marketing. Refereum will help to "move" and decentralize these "barriers" a little. Hmm. In fact, the project generates a competitor that captures the market. Due to what will the project be able to impose competition on them? The project creates favorable conditions for all the participants in the process: players, viewers, investors, bloggers, streamers and even game developers. That’s why there’s the mass and general coverage of the audience, which will receive clear feedback from everybody in favor of this project. |
|
|
|
Hi everybody! I got acquainted with the concept of the project. In my opinion, the benefits for ordinary players are clear and obvious. And what will the streamers which own their personal channels on YouTube get? It turns out to be a kind of one-way process. Or am I wrong?
You’re wrong! Channel owners and streamers are pretty much "connected" in terms of opportunities by the policy of their services today, monetization programs, and applied restrictions in terms of marketing. Refereum will help to "move" and decentralize these "barriers" a little. |
|
|
|
And what about if a company which possesses many empty houses and flats works on your platform?
Good afternoon. I’ve read that there will be such an opportunity. It seems that legal entities and corporations will have to pay $30 per month; it's something like a subscription fee. В Rentberry будет что-то подобное? Hah, that's very cool. By the way, I saw some companies’ message boards with a lot of ads giving an opportunity to small companies to create their personal pages with promo materials. Will there be something like this in Rentberry? Well, that sounds interesting. Moreover, companies will still pay $30 a month, they could be given such an opportunity. Here's what's what I’m interested in: if I'm an individual and I have 4 apartments, will I have to pay any monthly fee? Well, judging by the information from the white paper, any platform’s user who owns 3 real estate objects and more, whether it is a large company or an individual, will have to pay a $30 fee per month. |
|
|
|
And what about if a company which possesses many empty houses and flats works on your platform?
Good afternoon. I’ve read that there will be such an opportunity. It seems that legal entities and corporations will have to pay $30 per month; it's something like a subscription fee. В Rentberry будет что-то подобное? Hah, that's very cool. By the way, I saw some companies’ message boards with a lot of ads giving an opportunity to small companies to create their personal pages with promo materials. Will there be something like this in Rentberry? |
|
|
|
|
And what about if a company which possesses many empty houses and flats works on your platform?
|
|
|
|
How are you going to distribute those tokens that are not sold during ICO?
10% is for development fund, 10% for investors, 15% - team support but team is going to get it only in case of capitalization growth. |
|
|
|
Hello. What is the minimum number of tokens you plan to sell? What happens if you’ll sell less?
The minimum amount of tokens sold, in case of gathering which the ICO is considered to be held is10 million. In the opposite case, the funds are returned to the owners. |
|
|
|
|
Hello. What is the bonus for purchasing tokens now?
|
|
|
|
|
Привет! Когда наконец стартует само ICO? Я кучу знакомых музыкантов уже заинтриговал.
|
|
|
|
Do I have the right to order a repost of your entry on a Twitter account that does not belong to me? Of course, I will pay for its placement. I'm still rceive tokens anyway, right?
You may repost from our twitter! It doesn’t matter for you. You get great advertising, I get tokens. Or does it violate the terms of the user agreement? |
|
|
|
|
Will you allow selling of weapons on your platform?
|
|
|
|
I see that you want to move tokens to another platform in 2018. Why is that the case?
Not part of team, but I guess it is due to the fact that ERC20 token is very formalized and straightforward now, but does not provide any technical advantages in case platform would work on Ethereum. Yeah, that might be that case. Thanks for the explanation. |
|
|
|
|
I see that you want to move tokens to another platform in 2018. Why is that the case?
|
|
|
|
I think one thing that would make it truly great is implementation of dApps and ad network on mobiles.
Agree. This is one of the selling points that should be stressed by the team more often. Eh, I am not sure this is the good choice of words here. It is better to promote ad network for business customers first, then think about dApps and dev community that would like to integrate it as they are much smaller part of business chain. |
|
|
|
|
I think one thing that would make it truly great is implementation of dApps and ad network on mobiles.
|
|
|
|
Hello! It looks like the company is going to work only in high-risk derivatives markets. Are such risks taken with aiming on high profit?
Good day! It seems to me that not only high-risk transactions are planned here, because the company is announcing plans to earn money on buying, selling and even short positions. Derivatives are only a part of the tools proposed. The strategy claims that there are plans for more significant markets than the ETF and institutional investors are also mentioned... Will small investors have sufficient opportunities? Perhaps, it’s planned that small participants will be able to take part in the growth of capitalization of institutional investors via investments in their stocks, shares, etc on this platform. In itself, this is a normal and traditional move, but there questions about the way in which these institutions should be evaluated. Institutionals are large companies, it’s easy to find and evaluate information about them. Therefore, there shouldn’t be any problems. In addition, the service plans to offer not only investments in bitcoin, but also a wide range of tools, even at the initial stage. So it will be quite possible to choose an acceptable level of risk. But I’m still wondering how you can interest such a “big fish” like institutional investors and make them invest considerable means in similar funds ... Bro, everyone wants to earn money and institutional investors are not an exception, too. They also notice the record growth of bitcoin and probably “rub their hands”. Everyone wants to take part in such a growth. Therefore, I’m sure that they will start allocating funds to investment. And the further, the more institutional investors will invest considerable means in similar funds... |
|
|
|
Hello! It looks like the company is going to work only in high-risk derivatives markets. Are such risks taken with aiming on high profit?
Good day! It seems to me that not only high-risk transactions are planned here, because the company is announcing plans to earn money on buying, selling and even short positions. Derivatives are only a part of the tools proposed. The strategy claims that there are plans for more significant markets than the ETF and institutional investors are also mentioned... Will small investors have sufficient opportunities? Perhaps, it’s planned that small participants will be able to take part in the growth of capitalization of institutional investors via investments in their stocks, shares, etc on this platform. In itself, this is a normal and traditional move, but there questions about the way in which these institutions should be evaluated. Institutionals are large companies, it’s easy to find and evaluate information about them. Therefore, there shouldn’t be any problems. In addition, the service plans to offer not only investments in bitcoin, but also a wide range of tools, even at the initial stage. So it will be quite possible to choose an acceptable level of risk. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
