We need some more votes.

I don't think we need to vote, when we focus on technology, get more recognition.
MintPal directly add Supercoin.

Hey dev,

if you want this coin to live just hold off on the "whitepaper".

Implement the anon function, test it properly and then release it.

I'm with you on this one, No need for animals, Need to add one or two more features.

I am pretty sure Mintpal's decision makers already have their eyes on this coin, It will go there for sure and will have the same path as crypt and vrc.

I believe super deserve much higher rank in this list
https://www.mintpal.com/voting

Let's keep voting.
https://www.mintpal.com/voting#SUPER

Starts slows grow fast.

Its unfair because Devs are not central bankers.

The developer sets the network. network should be allowed to run its course. If prices drop, devs shouldn't be allowed to cut supply. You might ask yourself why but let me ask you this. If prices were to to rocket to the moon, should the dev be allowed to increase supply?

If your answer is no to increasing supply, then the answer should be no to cutting supply.

It becomes a scam when you tell people "yes there will be 12 million coins over 1 year" then turn around 3 months later and say "just kidding, we are cutting suppy at 3 million". This would force a liquidity squeeze, send the price higher and reward early adopters.  

But that is exactly what you want right? Cut the supply after you have had your fill of coins and artificially pump the price? Sorry man. You argument for cutting supply hold no weight. So what if multipools sell coins at market? They control the hashrate, they earn those coins fair and square. If you want to compete with them, get yourself enough hashrate, mine supercoin and hoard them.

If multipools are mining supercoin and dumping, then clearly the price is too high and liquidity needs to be injected. I welcome multipools because if I am trying to buy big blocks of coins, why should I be forced to pay a higher price? This is were multipools are a godsend. while everyone is hoarding, multipools are liquidity providers. They will sell to me. Amazing.

I can provide more points but this should suffice. Its becoming clear that you only care about the price going higher. the only time PoW or PoS should be cut is when there was a clear error in the development of the coin. Two examples would be CENT and NINJA. Clear coding errors that hyper-inflated and ultimately killed the coins. Supercoin is not suffering from that so I don't see any problems with the way things are right now.

I'm for re-brand as well.

And this shows how undervalue we are. Is there any fault of the Supercoin? Not at all, despite people scrutiny the source code of Supercoin, they were unable to find any errors (well, someone was excited to report some "errors", but you know who understands better the code... ). Supercoin dev team is one of the best in alt coin arena, they clearly know very well what they are doing. They promised anon features, they delivered on time, and community tests showed it is very nice and fast. Compare it with some other high hyped coins, though they started anon features earlier, did they do any better than Supercoin? Well you can tell me what they did better.

When people realized what I said above, Supercoin will fly...