IFC is okay but i have taken most of my ifc and spread them over tix and adt .... i feel best to have all 3 right now. I have gone longer still in ADT now it is on the cgb base and an active dev is back.
Tix i like too ... been very strong from the start. All 3 are good, but at current prices i rank them adt>tix>ifc> in terms of value but keep some of all 3 of course.
It is a good strategy. Keep some of a coin in hopes that it improves. I'll have to define a number of coins to keep in storage if the coin development team matures or another one takes over. There really is no risk at this point. |
|
|
|
I personally supported IFC up until the point I realised that its going to be really hard to keep mining power on the coin when the block reward drops very low right now IFC can be 51% attacked with not to much hash power if the block rewards were dragged out over a longer amount of time it would have made a lot of difference but right now the only way to keep the minors mining it to keep upping the TX fee if would like to have a more secure investment you might want to take a look at POS ( Proof of Stake ) coins as they don't rely on POW hash power to keep things moving  This is what I anticipated would happen. Instead the initial development team walked away and a new team took its place thinking that it was just a mere marketing effort rather than a technical issue. There were several potential changes that should have been made and still could be made. Infinite coins... do what DOGE does, infinite coins, provide random rewards with a high stake. Miners would join the network on the off chance that they hit big. Change to variable-n factor. Transition is easy and you gain the adopt of many GPU farms after the ASIC flood swamps scrypt mining. There are SOOOOOOOOOOO many options but the developers are not smart enough, or aggressive enough to try to redefine the coin network. Unless I see more innovation or better ideas, I don't have high hopes for IFC like I did. I have to find the original developer to see what he is doing today. POS is a good idea and should be included in ever coin bot shouldn't be the end all be all factor of a coin. POS would help IFC but would not be game changer for me. |
|
|
|
Take tons of capital to keep the prices where they are/were. Now that you lost the one person who was pumping, the end is near.
What I am afraid though, is all those poor people you all coned into buying at 180+ are holding coins...They might hold a lot, but for many it could be a lot to them, and if that is the case and they lose their asses on it ( which is most likely going to happen ), this might turn them off.
this coin was a joke to begin with ...imo the only reason it originally exploded is because the pennystock puffers pumped it over on investorshub! >>>GAME OVER<<< Wow. flash from the past!!! Investorhub. I remember when they were small time to ragingbull!!! LMAO. Brings back memories.... |
|
|
|
|
So I've been working on a BCX coin. I used the crap gravity well. I've also been working on an algorithm that values any wallet GUID that have ~BCX~ in the GUID with a 10x stake when establishing trust in determining confirmation in the block chain.
I think this will be as big as BTC.
|
|
|
|
microwaved a new batch of jiffypop.  |
|
|
|
What are they not being transparent about?
Transpernecy is about presenting the developer's view and the consumer/miner/traders views. blade007 you posted: Obviously you have a very personal beef with the devs. You should take that and get it resolved privately. Seems like they gave you an option to have some say in the future of the coin and there was a misunderstanding, maybe in the way it was asked. Doesn't make sense holding so much and putting it down. You are ultimately just hurting yourself. If you want me to take it offline then you oppose transparency because you do not want me to post publicly what my "beefs" with IFC developers are about. In reality it is what was discussed privately is what caused me to initially loose favor with IFC. I held on for some time thinking it was just my perception of posts and events. But my long term view is justified by threads like this and others that just solicit IFC through giveaways and shameless pumps. Its fine for a new coin but for one that is almost a year old seems incredulous. It should me mature enough to use better tactics. |
|
|
|
That is creative and, in some ways, very accurate. That is why I bought doge and then registered the domains.  Worked out well! this dogescam has been lucrative for you aye? =) hahahahahah!!! DOGEcoin predicted the double top and collapse!!!!! |
|
|
|
totally agree! 0,007 per MHash is totally BS :S
Welcome to cryptos. What? Did you think that 100% profits was the norm?!?!?!? Seems you got hooked during the spike. Welcome to the reality where profits are 5 to 10% depending on your electrical costs if you are lucky. At times your expenses will be higher than what you can sell your coins for. LOL. N00bs. |
|
|
|
Obviously you have a very personal beef with the devs. You should take that and get it resolved privately. Seems like they gave you an option to have some say in the future of the coin and there was a misunderstanding, maybe in the way it was asked. Doesn't make sense holding so much and putting it down. You are ultimately just hurting yourself.
What about transparency? Doesn't it cut both ways? |
|
|
|
Regulation through Hacktivism
|
|
|
|
For someone that claims to be a whale in IFC he really tries hard to piss all over it.  Don't worry, ifc won't go up till you offload all of it and leave you behind  I recommend you dig, I mean really dig through my old posts regarding IFC and you will see how much I invested in IFC back almost a year ago when it was first released. You can contact RubberDucky as well, hopefully he retained the post I made to him about y holdings in IFC. |
|
|
|
LOL GJ IFC supporters Keep proving my point.  Your point is we are poorly illustrated lawyers? Only that you imitate poorly illustrated ambulance chasers. Sorry if that was over your head. I'm only making a statement when I should be asking why you would play off of the collapse of another cryptocoin by promoting your cryptocoin. What it means to me is that you are not identifying with the merits of your coins but instead trying to collect people who lost money in DOGE to trust IFC instead. I find that somewhat amoral. And this is why I do not like the new IFC management. |
|
|
|
I'm still ignoring you anderi until you get your presentation style sorted
~~LOL~~
You have such a high value of your perceptive capabilities that far outstretches that of others around you. |
|
|
|
|
Make it a kimono gravy swell coin.
|
|
|
|
LOL GJ IFC supporters Keep proving my point. |
|
|
|
You do realize I"m out of popcorn. WTH am I supposed to do now???  |
|
|
|
|
Do you still plan on pursuing this coin?
|
|
|
|
|
Anyone know where their offices are so I can stand outside and protest? When will this be reported to the New York Times? What do you think will happen the the price of BTC and LTC?
|
|
|
|
Who asked you for IFC? As far as the exchanges go they are still HEAVILY centralized on BTER. Users want more exchanges so they do not need to depend on a single one. More exchanges allows less dependence on a single exchange to pick up the majority of volume. Especially with the complete train wreck Cryptsy has been it is completely useless for IFC holders. The new exchanges are simply meeting the demand for more options. No one forced it on them, and we couldn't stop them if we wanted to. This is a open source p2p system. As far as there being no reason to mine, the transaction fees pay far more than the block reward now. Why does this not count in your assessment?
No actually request by jrretirement for specific IFC, but the implication that I was not helping the community by sitting on the sidelines. The additional suggestion that I could help the community through bounties and giveaways was the implication that I "should" put the coins to good use. When I thanked you and jrretirement for the request but I wasn't interested, is when both of you became hostile that I was sitting on a large stash and not helping the community. I ask you why I should do more in the IFC community? Because I can get richer from the coin? Sure but why would all of you be so angry that I wasn't trying to make myself richer? Maybe I was happy with the wealth I had in IFC. I think that some of the hostility comes from fear. Because I own so much IFC I could "potentially" thwart" and plans you may have. I'm a rogue IFC owner that you can't predict or influence. That would suck. It's like the fear everyone has about BTC/LTC whales. People who could just go Galt and destroy all the value in the coin. Don't worry I don't plan to destroy the value of IFC. I wish you the best of luck with it. It would be nice if you were more transparent about where IFC was going. A roadmap would have been great with timetables, but I guess I will never know because I'm not in the "inside". I do hope IFC does well and if it becomes more successful I may be back. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
