|
You have to take risk then, those who actively trade keep some coins on exchange and rest in their cold wallet.
You are at risk of getting hit while cross the road, doesn't mean you should not go out. There you take precuations, same applies here.
|
|
|
|
|
I have faced this situation many times that i no longer care of airdrops, utter waste of time.
|
|
|
|
If this is confusing to you, imagine how I feel (English is not my first language).  ...
Additionally, if you want to lose your hardware wallet, you can always recover your currency in a new wallet. If you want to search cryptocurrency for a long time and ensure maximum security, the way to protect hardware wallets is to protect, it is recommended that coins should not be stored in any exchange wallet for extended periods of time.
I have never met anyone who wants to lose a wallet...  I don't think it's a shit post, just worded wrongly. He likely meant, "in case you lose hardware wallet, you can recover it with phrase". |
|
|
|
|
The 'Hard Facts' after every comment you write, is it closing line like in letters or you mean it with substance of comment?
|
|
|
|
....there is only one problem with the BTC payment getting bigger...
Are you talking about the BTC network congestion and many unconfirmed transactions that are waiting in the mempool queue or about the latest problem on the Digital Golg marketplace itself? As we can see they are already working on this problem and with the clogged BTC network not much can be done TBH. The only way is to send transaction with a lot bigger fee or to use ETH instead. I always try to use ETH on the Digital Gold market because is faster, cheaper and I have never waited more than a few minutes and I did already dozens if not hundreds of transactions there. Of course, if you only have BTC in your wallet, then there is not much you can do in such situation. I would advise checking the BTC network before sending transaction. https://jochen-hoenicke.de/queue/#0,4dHaha, transaction fee has never been a boring story. Honestly guys, this week, two or four days ago, I moved my funds from Binance, and to be honest I noticed the transaction fees to move a same amount of fund in BTC is nearly 4 or 5 fold compares to the fees for moving it as USDT on ERC20 (not OMNI, of course). Bitcoin is the King in crypto, I totally agree and I won't start a discussion about it. It is the truth so there is no demand to prove it. The longer time you spend in crypto, the more solidly perception on that you will have. Nevertheless, when you want to move your funds, bitcoin should not be your first priority. Reasons: Bitcoin block time is about 10 minutes per block and most of platforms often require 3 confirmations to credit to your account balance. So if you move your funds in bitcoin, when transaction fee is low, and your fee is set up at good rate, your balance will be credited after 30 minutes in perfect condition. If not, you will have to wait longer. In such cases, let choose other cryptocurrencies. Fortunately, on GOLD marketplace, we have Ethereum. It will be a pleasure to have USDT in the future but I worry about conflict of interests.  Ethereum is kinda bad too, currently it's like 25c but around a week ago you you had to a buck or two for fast transaction, and remember its hovering around $200 right now, if it were on ath the same fees would $6-$8, it's not good. I had hopes for eos but after that RAM fiasco, i find it trash now lol |
|
|
|
Bit of suggestion, my deadass was trying to sign message with 'bc1' and 'segwit' addresses, I'm not sure of the difference between the two, anyway, i wasted like half hour about the problem then from Coinomi support (yes i use that wallet don't hate me), i got to know some services don't recognize those addresses. So could you throw proper error (instead of directly showing 'invalid') or support those types of addresses altogether?
As far as I know only Electrum wallet supports signing a message using P2SH (starts with 3) and bech32 (starts with bc1) and it is the only wallet who can verify your signed message since there is still no standard format which enables you to verify it using any other wallet. The only address that let's you verify using any other wallet is the legacy (start with 1)I could sign with all those types of addesses using Coinomi, it's just that yolodice wasn't verifying the signed message (with p2sh and bech32 addresses). |
|
|
|
|
When you are passionate about something, you don't need motivation. That very thing motivates you.
|
|
|
|
|
Bit of suggestion, my deadass was trying to sign message with 'bc1' and 'segwit' addresses, I'm not sure of the difference between the two, anyway, i wasted like half hour about the problem then from Coinomi support (yes i use that wallet don't hate me), i got to know some services don't recognize those addresses. So could you throw proper error (instead of directly showing 'invalid') or support those types of addresses altogether?
|
|
|
|
You are in crypto since 2016 and don't know what's altcoin  I'm not acting 'violently' as you say, i just find question stupid plus a simple Google search will give you the answer. |
|
|
|
Miss id anhmanh
It's over. @op can you lock the topic as it's no longer active? (bottom left corner > lock topic). |
|
|
|
|
Yep, etherscan also alerts users about addresses used for scams.
|
|
|
|
Also it worth mentioning that in the GOLD campaign the requirements for the number of posts are much better (less spammy!) than for most other campaigns.
Most of participants are good users and not spammers. I see your names and recognize who you are on the forum. I guess that I was misunderstood. What I meant is that for everybody after a certain number of posts, the quality can decrease. But GOLD requirement is far from high, so there's no pressure, so GOLD users will most probably always achieve very good quality of posts. Indeed. People don't aware of the campaign because it is not paid in BTC and it has not been shown in the Mitchell's topic. People who aware of it but fear to join because their doubts on legitimacy and validity of GOLD project.
The fact the campaign pays in token makes it a no-go for many. Name it laziness, name it extra-cautiousness, doesn't matter, the result is the same. The fact the campaign manager is from GOLD team and not somebody known can make people even more cautious. I can say that I also came in only after seeing good feedback from others (feedback with was and still is scarce). But the campaign is one year old now, people should have been convinced by now that the campaign is good. Kinda accurate, when I came across this project it looked shady idk why may be the thread representation wasn't a quality, and it put me off. Still gave a try because of lack of good campaigns and this was paying in stable coin (better than gambling in ICO campaigns), thought to myself, if it turns of well then good otherwise well one month for learning lol. |
|
|
|
|
Rip me, i just won some BTC from your previous round, should have checked this thread first before gambling those away at random chances.
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you, received and lost too in dice haha.
|
|
|
|
|
You can always ask the bm how post count is handled (as mentioned in first reply), if it's 1-2 posts, then just make those extra posts. No biggie.
|
|
|
|
...There is dice, bj, sports history is available but for landlord it is not while that's what this competition was for.
I have to admit that there is not much going on and the game has to be mastered but after a few rounds, I am sold to this game. Not only players are limited, but also the amount of free money we can claim per day, so maybe it would be wise to make the minimum little bit higher? I would like to play more, but I don't have so much free money to be able to buy in (many times) and have to log off and wait another day. It is fun, card games always are. I'm not sure about those extra play chips, I'm already having hard time finding lobbies (op must be tired of this by now lmao). You can play with real cryptos if you like, also you do not have to log off, just open website next day and click 'claim tokens'. |
|
|
|
|
If there is red trust on your profile, forum people (may) find you untrustworthy, might not trade with you, (most) bounty campaigns won't accept you.
|
|
|
|
|
I usually find lobbies where players have already left, so may be it would good idea to just give bot filled lobbies to get a headstart. Plus, i also feel you guys should have started this competition after there were sufficient players.
There is dice, bj, sports history is available but for landlord it is not while that's what this competition was for.
|
|
|
|
|
I relate to type 3 (being too lazy lmao), anyway I used to use Google authenticator but the access of codes on app open, no encryption and hassle of backup made me switch to Aegis. It's much better.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
