If you only want to search the titles, you can use CTRL-F on the forum page Search topics.

But you have the data, right? Take topic 2423 for example: the first post is 32717. Can't you somehow pull this from your database? I can get you a list if you want.

Thanks again for your flawless timing!

None of this is correct

I'd say an economic crash is long overdue, and the longer it takes, the worse it's going to get. You can't just make economic problems go away with "brrrr", it only postpones them (while they build up in size).

I'd say let them! If that much banks are in such a bad shape, it looks to me as if they've gotten far too comfortable. Banks don't deserve their special position: any other company would go bankrupt instead of getting a bail out.

Considering the number of banks that are in a bad shape, I'd even say there should be a minimum of 1 bank per month going bankrupt, just to cleanse the system a bit and remind them there can be consequences.

If addresses in one transaction belong to different Mods, I can take a guess Payments are higher than I expected.

This is Bitcointalk, Mods have their Bitcoin address in their profile. Payments are public

Like I said, I can remember a few passwords. But I can't remember hundreds of them, and most of them I don't need very often. If I'd try to remember them all, I'd either have weak passwords, of lose access all the time.

I always type with my eyes closed

The main problem I see here is that the law enforcement agency gets a (large) share of the money that gets confiscated. That makes it almost a commercial enterprise, and that's the part to change.

If, here, I'd be stopped carrying €100,000 in cash, I'd have some questions to answer too. But as far as I know the local police doesn't financially benefit from it, which is a good thing.

It's going to be an interesting case for sure.

I've seen several posts saying they shouldn't have seized everything, but that's not really an option. Chances are someone else still has the private keys, and once they move it, it's too late to seize it.

It depends: if you're comparing one random character to a word, the word is harder to find. But if you compare 4 random characters to a 4-letter word, the word is easier to brute-force (by using a dictionary attack).

I've seen similar phrases used as brain wallets, and they were found.

Both isn't ideal, but VPNs are often used to connect to a company network too. Or for streaming.

"I'd like to give the t-shirt I won to a Newbie who lives in the same country as me"....

What makes you think they're equally strong? If the first one is generated randomly, it's much stronger. If you want to use words as a password, at least generate them randomly. Kinda like Electrum does it.

You should look up the words "dictionary attack"

Even if that's true, it still depends on who you're hiding from. If you don't want your local barista to know you're rich in Bitcoin, you're still good. There's still no blockchain evidence linking your addresses.

I haven't seen anyone who's against that.

I noticed it, and updated it again. I assume there was a connection problem.

I've accepted an offer on my signature space, starting April 1st.

For exactly this reason, I've refused physical prizes that I was offered, and never bought collectibles. It's unfortunate, but each time a "Trusted member" turns out to be a scammer I'm very happy I kept this part of my privacy.

It depends on who you're hiding from. I'm not hiding from taxes, and I'm not hiding from law enforcement. But if you are, you should indeed not use any centralized service that requires your real data.

This is not allowed on Bitcointalk. You're only allowed to do on-forum Bitcoin giveaways on this board (Games and rounds), and you're not allowed to give people an incentive to post in your ANN thread.

Another common mistake is using a few different passwords, and not remembering which one is used where. So when trying to get access, those people try all passwords they know  until one of them works, without realizing they've just compromised them all.

If it helps: loyce.club/other/tmp/ibminer/ (scheduled to be deleted in 30 days) lists all userIDs who posted on the past 29-ish days. Note that the files contain duplicates if users posted more than once.

My guess: Law Enforcement.

Tor browser can do that too, but it ticks "Always use private browsing mode" by default.

I'm not losing my account, but many people do. And when it happens, for instance because someone gains access and changes the password, it's good to have a recovery option. That's one of the reasons I staked an address.
Note that "recovery options" are often a risk factor on their own. If a service uses SMS for recovery, gaining access to your phone is enough to gain access to that service. That's why I prefer not to enable recovery options, although a signed Bitcoin message is safe enough for me. If anyone gets access to my wallet, they have access to my forum account already.

I only remember a few passwords, but I use hundreds of different ones. Most of them look like "(f#L!{p[oKGzz[2aV$'[P6!n$", and I'm not even going to try to remember them.

Stake an unused address.

Yes.

I don't think Bitcoin Core can do this directly, but there are some python scripts to dump address data. I think it comes from chainstate, so it may also work on a pruned node.