Withdrawal received. Thank you.
You got your withdrawal but the OP still hasn't been on here, that is kind of strange. Hopefully he is back soon I have stopped playing and thinking about withdrawing until he shows back up here. If withdrawals are working fine, what do you need OP for? Maybe he's just busy with other things. |
|
|
|
The pros and cons of adopting Bitcoin into your businesshttp://www.information-age.com/it-management/strategy-and-innovation/123459442/pros-and-cons-adopting-bitcoin-your-businessYou'd have to have been living under a rock for the last few years to not have realised that the world is fast becoming an increasingly more digital place. It started with a boom in online shopping, then the iPod and Kindle transformed the way we listen to music and read books, and we bet you can't even remember the last time you developed a photo! So where do we go next? Cash is now seen as a dying form of currency, and card use is becoming more modern with contactless options becoming more popular. It would make sense that if everything we're buying is now digital, that the way we pay for them is digital too.
...
|
|
|
|
Yahoo Finance coverage on itBit licence (video interview with Charles Cascarilla, CEO of itBit). Bitcoin comes to America: Now, with regulated exchangehttp://finance.yahoo.com/news/first-bitcoin-exchange-gets-approval-from-new-york-state-regulators-022427666.htmlitBit has become America’s first national regulatory-compliant BitCoin exchange. On Thursday, the exchange received approval from New York State regulators to form a trust. It can now accept customers from anywhere in the U.S.
Charles “Chad” Cascarilla, CEO of itBit, tells Yahoo Finance’s Aaron Task in the video above that the approval is a big deal because he believes customers can now feel more comfortable with the virtual currency. “We’re regulated. We hold regulatory capital,” he says. “We have regulatory exams and we have someone who is doing oversight of the exchange and can make customers feel as if there is someone else who is looking over what we are doing and making sure customers are in good shape,” he explains.
... |
|
|
|
Can Bitcoin Kill Central Banks?http://www.investopedia.com/articles/investing/050715/can-bitcoin-kill-central-banks.aspBitcoin is a digital currency that, in the words of its sponsors, “uses peer-to-peer technology to operate with no central authority or banks.” By its very definition Bitcoin seems well positioned to kill off central banks. Could it? Would it? Should it? Like just about everything else involving finance, the topic of central banks and their potential replacements is complex with valid arguments for and against.
...
|
|
|
|
Hey! Want a FREE TOASTER that makes BITCOIN? What? You DO?http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/05/06/bubblicious_bitcoin_bonkers_business_bods/Worstall on Wednesday The Official Greatest Business Plan Of All Time was back at the time of the South Sea Bubble of the Georgian Age. A promoter made a stock offering for “A company for carrying on an undertaking of great advantage but no one to know what it is.”
What made it the officially greatest ever was that this was, obviously and clearly, a scam, yet the promoter still got his money. The reason being that there was obviously an investment bubble going on and people happily bought the stock assuming that they would be able to pass it on to a greater fool soon enough at a higher price.
...
|
|
|
|
Someone pointed me to this thread in pm. Care to explain why did you link my profile as an author of multidoge (if I understand your post correctly)? ps I don't even know what multidoge is. |
|
|
|
It is now more than 40 hours of waiting.
That's not right. Have you emailed them yet? Was it a large withdrawal? Maybe they need to fill up the hot wallet or something... The owner is still not getting online...
He's not on this forum everyday, so no need to panic. |
|
|
|
I'm kinda newbie, so really need a quick answer, cex.io is legit or not?
Trading and buying BTC, yes they re legit. They do not offer cloud mining anymore. Not quite. They still offer cloud mining but it's suspended by default (due to no profitability). Afaik you can still unlock it and mine at loss if, for whatever reason, you wanted to. On other subject, mintsy.co is in beta (pre-enrolled users only though), I wonder how would they score. |
|
|
|
Yesterdays leaderboard winners:
Dice - elowin, Roulette - pawel7777, blackjack - tomhammers
0.025 awarded to each player
I finally made it! Although it did cost me more than 0.025 to get it  Roulette is just not my lucky game. Anyway, reward received. Thanks Dean. do you get it for amount you wager? if yes you could just place bets on both red and black Don't forget the possibility of a 0 . It still has a chance of 1/37 to occur, and will make you lose your entire wager. That is the house edge that you have to beat. Yup, that's exactly what happened to me. Hit zero early on, luckily didn't bet everything, so still had funds to play with. Changed the tactic and managed to get on the top wagered for the day. |
|
|
|
Yesterdays leaderboard winners:
Dice - elowin, Roulette - pawel7777, blackjack - tomhammers
0.025 awarded to each player
I finally made it! Although it did cost me more than 0.025 to get it Roulette is just not my lucky game. Anyway, reward received. Thanks Dean. |
|
|
|
|
Nah, this project is already few hours old and didn't even go mainstream yet. This is sooo 2015, I'll just wait for 23 Inc.
|
|
|
|
Do not forget we still have our 3mBTC Hourly freerolls going on. Come join us!
its nice to see freerolls her though people might start abusing it and play only free games That's actually what's happening right now. But that's normal. You need to giveaway a lot of free chips, in form of freerolls, to attract new players. Hopefully with time user-base will grow and more people will start playing rake games. The site could use some more promo though, or maybe referral program? Tip, if you want to play ring game, but there's no-one there, just ask around in the general chat (under 'logins' tab) or in active freeroll chat, often helps. |
|
|
|
Why would people want to allow some company to hold on to their gold (or any precious metals) instead of keeping it in their own possession? Doesn't that defeat the purpose of possessing physical assets? If the company is legit (registered, licenced etc) and the assets held on behalf of customers are insured, then why not? Would you feel safe holding large amount of gold in your own house? Most people wouldn't and they'd rather use bank safe-deposit boxes, so trusting 3rd party. |
|
|
|
Some people say Banks invest into Bitcoin startups to fight their enemies from the inside. They find out what's all about with the Blockchain etc and then they come up with their own technology and Bitcoin will go down.  They don't need to invest in start-ups to learn about blockchain. And, in fact, IBM is allegedly working on some blockchain-like technology that is supposed to change the financial system: http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/03/12/us-bitcoin-ibm-idUSKBN0M82KB20150312 |
|
|
|
I don't get why to everyone that 'proves" that dorian satoshi nakamoto is not THE satoshi nakamoto.
I mean if they were the same person, and he wanted to remain anonymous, what else would he say?
Then he would just make a short statement that he doesn't know what the reporter is talking about and refuse further comments. While Dorian got confused and said something like "I'm no longer involved in that project" in the presence of witnesses which gave Newsweek a good reason to publish the article as a fact. But let's not further derail this thread. |
|
|
|
You'll Never Guess Who's Investing in Bitcoinhttp://www.fool.com/investing/general/2015/05/03/youll-never-guess-who-is-investing-in-bitcoin.aspxGoldman Sachs recently announced that it was partnering with a Chinese investment firm to lead a $50 million investment into Bitcoin start-up Circle Internet Financial. This deal represents the first large investment of its kind by a major bank, and it definitely could make a big difference in the Bitcoin space as well as the way we transfer money in our everyday lives. So what does Circle Internet Financial do, and why is it the first Bitcoin company to attract an investment from a major bank?
...
|
|
|
|
Joining the campaign (agreed with Carra in PM):
• username: pawel7777
• post count (incl this one): 1996
• BTC address: 1CstuTvCxadzEq3GzxTsDpB55VJJTJoScd
Re-applying (just in case). Current post count: 2026 ps My name is not yet shown in google doc |
|
|
|
1- CIA wouldn't publicly interview their own agents (or potential ones)
2- TBF screwed themselves + stopped paying the devs in April. GA is still Chief Scientist though afaik.
3- Feel free to contribute yourself, offer alternative solutions or just stay on the old fork.
1/ Thats not an argument. Fact is Satoshi vanishes when Gavin is "invited" @CIA. but lol nobody is just "invited" there.. XD 2/ Gavin is/was an accomplice. Kinda like acknowledging their misbehavior by omission. 3/ I wouldnt call the 20Mb Fork a "contribution". More like a "retribution".. all the way back into USG's frame freaks. Centralize & ControlTM1- That's not really an argument for or against. But using the common sense, if CIA was to recruit GA, they would far more likely approached him quietly, instead of letting him make public statements about the invitation. Seems to me Satoshi did freak out over wikileaks accepting bitcoins (see his 2nd latest post). 2- Sure, let's not blame the ones that misbehaved, lets blame GA for his 'omission'. Anyway, how's that an argument of him being an agent? 3- I was referring to 'your contribution'. Don't like the fork? Let's hear your ideas/solutions. Most of people seem to agree with the need of lifting the limits with some difference of opinions on details. That being said, I think it's actually healthy to consider the possibility of GA or any other dev to be an agent, and properly examine any proposed changes and look for threats etc. But announcing that as a fact because of the reasons stated in the OP is just daft. |
|
|
|
|
1- CIA wouldn't publicly interview their own agents (or potential ones)
2- TBF screwed themselves + stopped paying the devs in April. GA is still Chief Scientist though afaik.
3- Feel free to contribute yourself, offer alternative solutions or just stay on the old fork.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
