I think he was able to change the avatar but I will load up my wallet with the vanity address I made and see if it's the same. You can even look through post history and see that his typing is not the same, punctuation, line spacing, etc. I am really pissed, not about the account as much as him scamming people using my name!
He staked the address on 28th January. surprised I never stumbled across this. Extra security never hurts: 1JudeUMPJHUcXE5urZZ4iJ6FriLVE6vF8Q -----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE----- Jude Austin Bitcointalk January 28 2016 -----BEGIN SIGNATURE----- 1JudeUMPJHUcXE5urZZ4iJ6FriLVE6vF8Q HCLxLn84EY0tEUUhfXMIhAFEeYN2NU88cSBsLsADnU33OQMN7evjuI3zh49wdMqyBibEUlEC1nrfDPZ w0EKlFXs= -----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Try one of the two I posted above. 13z6Q or 1dP6c, if you still got access to one of them.
|
|
|
where did you even find that? can't find anywhere on bitcointalk. Wherever he found it, that one isn't going to help much in case of connected addresses. (total addresses: 2,811,169) -> Have fun searching through this.
|
|
|
-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE----- Die Adresse 1LutpinPFH8CtNoV5ShL718NA61Vqr6k1X wird von Lutpin kontrolliert, der sich sonst nur selten im Deutschen Subforum herumtreibt. 07.02.16 -----BEGIN SIGNATURE----- 1LutpinPFH8CtNoV5ShL718NA61Vqr6k1X HJ3mjgwrhRR71yE/GtWh8DW81Ysy3BTXkKv+E53A0ceGbvt+dDiCK0BswTt+I3VnnW4ngfSRvO79E0Pw1Qh4xgI= -----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
|
|
|
Hello people, I don't think I've ever post my adress. So here it is, just in case: 1BSfFEF6NTcbbiCRcRf5y7JGPEkf5d7DwQ
Congratulations, what was the prize for your new senior member account? As for the address, you posted 14Voa1RKo8n5Psaw4skB9d7QFmnAvHDAsf, can you still sign messages from that one?
|
|
|
not sure 100% if this is closed because we haven't hit 300 entries but whatever ;d
Giveaway closes 96 hours from when this topic was posted and is only eligible for the first 300 posters!
Entries closed.
Hm...which of those two is misleading for you? Is is counting to 96? Well, that was 2 days ago ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif)
|
|
|
You ban the people selling the accounts.
Must be cool in your transfigured version of the reality. You lack the knowledge of how the forum works.
Nuff said.
|
|
|
You conveniently ignored my very simple question - how? How would the "admin" prevent account sales? So when you get off you high horse please address that issue in depth. Preferably in your own thread because it's really getting off topic here.
I addressed your question quite clearly and you conveniently deleted my post because you are self moderating. It makes one wonder if you paid for your account, maybe you should hand yours in. It's always great accusing people who clearly are not OP of censoring a thread. How would suchmoon delete your reply in a self-moderated thread started by Operatr?!
|
|
|
I am not sure that a negative feedback is warranted, or even that removing the previous positive feedbacks is warranted. -snip-
Taking the loan part aside, a green trusted account is being sold, you think everyone should act as if the trust status the previous owner reached also simply applies to the new owner, just beause he paid a bigger price for it due to the positive trust?
|
|
|
address: 1D21VbzEakD5sdTPajcXDBkj9Ev3Uqxnic
---begin signed message--- hey bitcointalk.org users this is ultimo_dragon aka the cruiserweight champ. this is an address that i have used all over the forums. ---end signed message--- Signature: Gx9zFvK80TBzpImJW865TUy7gIQ236iCXFu4uIUEaVeNZJ3BY9AkvrrbXbIAJ5sxPV7JNzrc+gaNV5IxduzIwtw=
Address is used by ruggedman_dan several times, e.g. here: --START SIGNED MESSAGE-- Loan amount: 0.5 BTC Repayment: 0.54 in 1 week or 0.57 in 2 weeks Collateral: Forum account Address: 1D21VbzEakD5sdTPajcXDBkj9Ev3Uqxnic --END SIGNED MESSAGE-- HF9I53NmqRfkuUm5fMCaWpGcHxcgs9UM3rQHNHnNSluSZ1IfpBYZkMxIl5nRASj9RH16UNJYgnBwZjA Z83NxBH8=
The account is also currently on DT3 in haploid23's downlist.
|
|
|
We now changed to a bi-weekly payment concept. As a result of this, I ask everyone who was/is part of the campaign or who had an open enrollment post, to make a new enrollment post. Posts before this post won't be considered for the roster. Post after this post are considered as to be done agreeing with the new terms.
|
|
|
Payments will be based on the following table (round 9):And here's the tweet of the week: https://twitter.com/AceFPage/status/694866512956403712Bet Higher! Wager more! Be in top and get a 5% bonus of your total wagered amount!
Congratulation to jacee, have fun with the little bonus.
|
|
|
hmm ,received 0.001 what you do not misdirected ? but thank you in advance !
That's because full member were credited the same amount as members, reading seems to be a special ability. full member, can not participate?
Full members can participate. ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) 0.001 BTC each.
|
|
|
...or just dont update with this pastebin, but the one from lutpin above.
I used your latest pastebin for my changes, so unitaco are listed as active in mine as well.
|
|
|
screenshots cant be searched. get the people to delete their posts so you guys have some in a row
That's one of the point's why I am against this solution aswell. I prefer a more direct, more usable and more clean solution. Nonetheless I'll PM the guys who had the first few posts, before me
Made an archive of the first page -> https://archive.is/aNwshSome of the posts are used as reference, they have been replaced with archive links here -> http://pastebin.com/k3ay0qtkHow will he create a post in between even after deleting the first reply?
The idea is that the users delete all their replies up to mexxer-2s first reply. That would be Quickseller, shorena, Athertle, james.lent and Kanapka deleting their first posts. A new child board under reputation would be better: Alt accounts
Don't think we need a child board for this, just a better organized thread. Maybe more than one for the future, right now one thread is enough. It would be better to start a new thread and make 3-4 posts reserved wither by you or mexxer-2. Afterwards it will just get filled up.
At some point, this will be the only solution (besides not including some alts/keeping the list to a limit, but I don't support that). For now, we're both trying to stall this step as long as possible.
|
|
|
Im not sure if this is directed at us, but we dont track whether certain ranks are full or not. Xotika is full right now, but that changes regularly so they have been moved to the new FLUX section.
Xotika.TV have changed their campaign rules for the upcoming 3rd round. The thread is currently locked, so I can't quote it to you, but from what I see, they wont enroll Legendary/Hero Members in this round: AVAILABLE SLOTS (Round 3) Senior Members: (10 Slots Left) Total number of users to be enrolled in the campaign: 10
|
|
|
BitStarz campaign paid out for the january campaign and stopped with that, the campaign is over for now: Hi Everyone, All rewards have been payed. After saying that, I must inform that BitStarz will be halting its signature campaign for indefinite time. We will bring it back at some point. Best regards, Nick
-> http://pastebin.com/54arSpbR
|
|
|
want to see my new awsomeness ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) Well, I might aswell explain the situation here, since we're currently looking for a solution. It seems like the table has reached its maximum. I can neither add a new line to it, nor add a second table below. In both cases, we are getting a BBCode error. My current ideas are: Either the posts below OP until the first post by mexxer get deleted by those users and we continue the table in the first reply. Or we continue the table elswhere and just link it in OP/post a screenshot in OP. I guess both, mexxer and I, don't want to start the thread from 0 again (what would be the third option). I tried cutting unnecessary lines and obsolete whitespaces from OP, but it didn't help anything. If any of you got some input, feel free to suggest any other option.
|
|
|
|