Zepher recently left positive trust for TMAN (on 1/27/17) that reads as follows:
"Purchased a 1 BTC Casascius Silver/Gilt from TMAN. Sent funds direct and coin was received next day. I trust him to stick to what he agrees to."

The risked amount reads 1.8BTC. There is no reference, and neither account makes any mention of attempting to engage in this kind of trade looking back a week prior to this rating being left.

Zepher very heavily reuses the address 1VAULTPU7XXsB5h6pb6VdZE7ZxKHCxmVb and there was no above described transaction from this address in a relevant timeframe.

I would like to see the txid of this payment from zepher to TMAN.

Below is a screenshot of TMAN's recently received trust:
https://i.imgur.com/WsDkYki.png



Update: based on the response I got from zepher, I now believe that he is engaging in leaving trust for fake trades that did not occur.

Can you either post or PM me the original of what you sent them? It would help if you do

What features do you want to see? Theymos somewhat recently added the ability to navigate to the next/previous page more easily on mobile devices. I am sure he would be open to implementing other changes/features if you had something in mind -- although if implementing the feature is too complex/difficult, then it might need to wait until the new forum comes out. 

My question is, did you send btc-e a screenshot that resembles this picture? https://i.imgur.com/vppQXmB.png

You are asking how people feel about a user wanting to get paid more money? I don't think the sig campaign managers are that anti-capitalist

Bullshit. There was no intention to "gather evidence". This was not the first time that Lauda has tried to extort someone. All that the "witnesses" did was participate in a conspiracy to extort zeroaxl.

It doesn't give you very much credibility when you are going around giving extortionists positive trust. It doesn't give Cyrus nor HostFat very much credibility either if you remain on their trust lists.

Are you referring to wanting to use a seed to recover your entire wallet? (eg a HD wallet?). If this is the case, I would note that this is not quite the same as using a "password" to recover your wallet.

I am not aware of any other HD wallets (other than core) that are an HD wallet, although you might have a couple of options if you have a little bit of technical expertise.

What I believe to be your best option would be to run an electrum server, then run electrum and have it only connect to your electrum server. This will probably also be your simplest solution.

I believe that both the blockchain.info and the blocktrail.com wallets are open source. You could potentially fork either of these wallets on github, and modify the code so that transaction information is retrieved from your own full node instead of the blockchain.info or blocktrail.com full node respectively. I know that blockchain.info's wallet uses a seed to derive the xprivkey, and I believe the same is true for blocktrail. If you go this route, the chances of you loosing your money are elevated as if you made a coding mistake then you might either tell someone to send BTC to an address whose private key you do not control or outright lose access to your private keys.

@OP - can you please confirm that this is in fact a screenshot that you sent BTC-e to help "prove" that you are in fact the true owner of your account? If this is the case, then I may have something that may very much strengthen the case.

I would point out that the btc-e database was hacked/leaked some time ago, although I am not sure exactly what information was leaked, it would not be unreasonable to be able to deduct a decent amount of the information that seven guy provided to btc-e from a DB leak.

I would also point out that financial institutions will require different amounts of identity verifications for different withdrawal amounts. For example, I can write a check to myself for $100, walk into the bank and cash it without having to show any kind of ID, nor swipe my ATM card (it is possible the teller recognize me), while if I want to withdraw larger amounts of money, I will need to swipe my ATM card/enter my PIN, and for even larger amounts, I will need to swipe my ATM card/PIN, and show two additional forms of ID to get cash. Similarly, btc-e might require different identity verifications when restoring access to accounts with differing amounts.

I would not think it is unreasonable for btc-e to ask that a withdrawal be only sent to a previously used deposit/withdrawal address, especially when nearly a half million dollars is involved.

As to the OP's allegation that cryptodevil is an alt of the steven guy and/or is expecting a cut of any amounts recovered by steven, I will leave that up to the spectators. I have not seen any solid evidence that this is the case, and I would not say that cryptodevil is acting especially different towards a potential scammer (btc-e in this case) then he usually does.

edit: I would also point out that no policy/procedure of a financial institution is a replacement of good judgment. If all the criteria to process a withdrawal is met, but there is a good reason not to process a withdrawal (that is outside of any procedure), then the withdrawal should not be processed.

Very, very nice

I hope that you are donating a portion of sales to NastyFans since you are using the NastyFans Name/logo

I heard through the grapevine that he has been busy IRL, and the last time I heard from him some time later he told me the same.

He has not been active in a long time now.

No. Signature campaign managers do not make forum rules.

Additionally the kind of campaign rules that say one account per person are worthless to companies receiving advertising.

Edit: fix broken bb code.

Yes, and yes.

You are not however allowed to make off topic comments nor make insubstantial posts.

The forum believes in a free market.

This is the mindset of Lauda. He always only looks at his own viewpoint without talking anything into consideration that would weaken his viewpoint.

@OP your only recourse is to contact dooglus, HostFat and Cyrus about this rating. These people are those who are the reason that Vod's ratings are visible by default.

Most people will want to see the house in person prior to making an offer, and will frequently at the very least look at comparable listings of sold properties in the area as well.

I think it is somewhat counterintuitive to list your home on bitify as the terms of a contract to purchase real estate are almost always much more involved than "I offer $x for your house", and usually include a number of disclosures.

If you have not done so already, I would recommend at least consulting with a real estate agent to possibly give you some advice on how to maximize your chances of selling your property at the price you want, and representing you if you feel like that would be beneficial to you.

You can of course conduct business however you wish, however I believe the above will result in the most money in your pocket at the end of the day

If you want to put together an analysis with a longer scope to capture more posts, then I will look at those results after you post them, and if my mind is changed I will remove your name from this thread. Or, if you want to present other measurable evidence of your stance on enforcement of bans and/or enforcement of forum rules (with a heaver emphasis on the former), that convinces me of your reasonable innocence, then I will remove your name from this thread.

I would also be willing to review the unabridged IRC logs from when it was agreed upon to extort zeroaxl up until when your second thread about zeroaxl was created, that can be authenticated by someone who I believe in this case to be telling the truth (if the only people that can confirm it's authenticity are those who have admitted to being involved, then I will by default not trust that it has not been doctored). If I believe it is reasonable that you were not involved after reviewing the IRC logs, then I will remove your name from this thread.

---

Including your name here, if anything, weakens my case against Lauda/TMAN. I am a critic of Lauda because of how I have observed him act towards others, and because of his ethical principals (eg lack of ethics), not for anything personal. Additionally, while reviewing your post history, I noticed that you were responding to Shorena multiple times of Shorena being critical of Lauda, so you could say that same thing about Shorena.

Shorena has essentially said that he more or less wants a confession to believe that you are involved, which is not something I agree with. I think the available facts allow a reasonable person to reasonably conclude your involvement, even when giving you the maximum benefit of the doubt. I took the time to attempt to prove myself wrong (after I had considered what I believed to be reasonable explanations prior to naming you).

I am not sure what you mean by this? I see that dooglus has given negative trust to a small number of ponzi operators, which would imply that running a ponzi = scamming in his eyes. Or are you talking about Vod...if so, then it seems that Vod only selectively leaves negative trust when doing so will not jeopardize his power.

The OP wrote a program that can be used to steal passwords and other similar sensitive information.
Dooglus wrote/fixed a program that is designed to steal money from others.

The OP received a negative rating from Vod, Dooglus did not....hypocrite much?

It was resolved in the sense that you were able to get Rodger out of the Default Trust network, it was not resolved in a sense that it is actually reasonable to believe that you are trustworthy.

Requests to remove people from the DT network really should be public so others can present evidence of the situation, so the person making the decision does not have only one side of the story.