|
Can I reserve a spot as well? The letter e if possible. Thanks.
|
|
|
|
Okay so I understand why people would get banned for using their security questions when there was a security breach, but why not remove security questions altogether and tell people why they need to know their password instead of banning people who might well have genuine intentions?
I find that it's also kind of useless for security questions to exist since as long as you have the password to the account, you are able to change the answers to them with ease. In fact, with solely the password, one can do essentially anything they want (to the account - any transactions would likely require them to provide a signed message) |
|
|
|
It doesn't make sense to Photoshop a screenshot like this, a huge waste of time considering pretty much every modern web browser has developer tools for manipulating the page in a few clicks.
Example:  You can't really trust any text in screenshots. |
|
|
|
I know. And i messaged him multiple times... what do i Do?!?!?
whoosh.
When did you message him initially? You should know that you can't expect an immediate reply (even after a fortnight). In fact, some people took months to retrieve their accounts. I'm not saying that this is good, but have some more patience and do what you can with the current. |
|
|
|
accounts connected : Lutpin and mexxer-2 ( yeah ... quite funny ... but true ! )-snip- To summarize, addresses closely connected to mexxer-2 sent three transactions to Lutpin’s deposit address, all in different amounts (0.098, 0.13, and 0.12), Different dates (19 July 2016, 25 April 2016, and 11 May 2016), and different days of the week (Tuesday, Monday, and Wednesday). These were made to an address that Lutpin keeps generally private as the only place it has been posted on the forum is here ( https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1545527.msg15535220#msg15535220) (archive- http://archive.is/Blsrf#selection-6025.3-6025.37), which was posted by him and then deleted - Lutpin has sent many transactions to that deposit address from addresses that are closely associated with him.
i would seriously like someone take an eye on this post .... i'm surprised this post was saw "muffled".. ( sorry for my bad english ) lol . when you see how chronicsky is attacked for .... how to say ... nothing ? ..  a big thank you ( and congratulations... by the way ) to the one who had included this poor asshole into DT ... what a pitty .. I thought that the Second World War was now over ... and that the low denunciations were gone ... I was wrong ... LOL  guys: dont you have better things to do in your own life ? better than playing those poor games ? You've proved that [139954a360] is a part of [17a6c0fbac], which is part of [0fe6ed7d35]. Thus, what you have done is tried to connect the accounts of Lutpin and mexxer-2 solely with mexxer-2's transactions to Lutpin. What you've done can't really be considered a link. If I have sent bitcoins to satoshi multiple times over a year, does that mean that I am satoshi as well?  You spent a lot of time figuring out change wallets, but it didn't connect Lutpin and mexxer-2's wallets together - apart from transactions (that could have been anything at all)
What you should have done was connect brituspol with mexxer-2. |
|
|
|
|
I created a thread about this previously, but I do have one method that works somewhat well: go into the search tool of BCT and type in your own name, and it'll show the most recent quote of yours (in a quote tree1, even) or any mention of your username. It's a little barbaric, but it gets the job done until someone creates a script - which I would gladly pay for2 - to automate the process and send unseen quotes to a notification bin.
1. where you have long chains of quotes
2. nothing too big, maybe two beers worth.
|
|
|
|
This is conversation about moving of price of stratis befor Blockchain Expo between iamvadimm and other members of forum. You deleted this post. And deleted many posts like this befor. And you banned him 3 times, for this "low content". This message does not look like low content. And you did not delete same posts of another members. On forum people talking, quarreling, discussing. He not lie, he disagree. Me to.
You not banned people who throlling, insultind and slandering my country like Asi4btc. But you bann iamvadimm for communication. With one people he have good attitude, with another he quarreling. but it still communication on forum.
So i think you baned him not fair. if it is personal, than it is not wright.
The very last post of an individual does not sum up their entire historical post quality. For example, suppose there was a businessman who brought revolutionary ideas to the world but the last thing he said before he died was "2+2=5". Is this a true representation of the individual? Of course not. Then there's the flipside - if there is a serial killer and the last thing he said was something that changed the world for the better, that's not a true representation of them either.
If after three times your "roommate" did not get the message, then he deserves to be banned. He must have done something wrong if the moderators have judged the account post quality insubstantial; people must have reported that content, where the mod - not knowing the link between accounts - would agree with the fact that the posts were spam. |
|
|
|
Correct, this thread is not an appropriate place to post some scam accusations, there is a right section as mentioned by one of the posters here. For me, I would rather see some bonuses or promotion to be posted in this thread. No wonder there are certain threads here that are self-moderated because there are people who keeps making repetitive posts which are baseless or with insufficient evidence.
I have only this to bring up (again for the third time) |
|
|
|
transaction ID here
00119c2e778e68dffc6818b09971b5e70d310c922d44f1926342a3c85938b436
That's not your/the transaction Now onto what I promised What are you talking about? The transaction matches up with the amount transacted and the date (though we aren't sure about the output address) dream4, can you sign the 1McJ15kXTkqDscUsMh8kCLJXfYqW4JgVHx address for us so that we can clear any doubts? |
|
|
|
0% or 1% house edge casinos will still win in the end. Not because they have 1% house edge, but due to statistics.
This is wrong. In the long run, the casino has more money than any gambler that would come to their doorstep. They will outlast a gambler in the money game, and they will win in the long run. Even if the gambler has a winning streak, it will not still be lesser than the losing streak he has plus all the other player's losing streak.
This is wrong too.
Having a game that is 0% house edge means that there is an equal likelihood (using basic 50/50 odds) for the house or for the player to win. Keeping this in mind and extrapolating, this means that for a given bankroll of the house, there is an equal likelihood over a long duration for the house to lose or win x amount. For example, let's say that the bankroll is $10 and a number of players wager within a given time. You can consider this one player in total, and it won't change anything. Let's say that the total wagered amount is $10. Whatever the chances, this is 0 ev. Meaning that the casino can expect to make an average profit of $0 from the wagers. It matters not how much their bankroll is: the profit is independent of that. Keep that in mind. For example, if we flip a coin for $5, does it matter whether I have $5 or $5000? No. My odds of winning and losing $5 are the same. Even if we continue for N times, my odds of winning and losing are still equal.
|
|
|
|
|
MyPrediction: 4,097,253,105
RollinUsername: fiction
BitcoinAddress: 1ActBTCi5XUMjqnyFxVWgSfE5xWicj8g3o
|
|
|
|
No, that thread is evidently a scam. If it were truly an exploit, there would not be an attempt to sell it because the user would be able to earn more from exploiting it himself. In the event that he does want to (for some odd reason) sell some technique of being able to exploit the website, the price would not be a measly 0.03 BTC. |
|
|
|
According to forum rules: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=703657.0Rule 8 and 18 8. No threats to inflict bodily harm, death threats. 18. Having multiple accounts and account sales are allowed, but account sales are discouraged. He saying that we are threathing him, but no bodily or death threats have send by us. He saying that i tried to buy accounts, but only selling accounts is not allowed. According to forum rules: 420. Feedback is moderated and must only be about the forum rulesWait, it's not. And Zepher can choose to do whatever they want with the feedback. If they think that you deserve red trust due to the fact that you have alts, or buy accounts, then they are allowed to leave the feedback there. Feedback is not moderated and does not need to be limited by only the rules. The forum rules don't have anything about 'no scams' but obviously, there is negative feedback declaring plenty of users as scammers. Also, selling accounts is allowed, but all account sale activity is heavily discouraged (and will likely net you with a red trust) |
|
|
|
they should stop promoting this scammy site.
If you look in to history of this thread, you will see that all accusations have been resolved. Every service have problems, that's why they have support and security sections.Most of the websites reserves 30 days to explain the case and this is a normal practice. It seems to me that accusing someone just because of a mistake or delay is very not fair. Firstly, the complaint from h4ns was poorly resolved and the issue was a fault with 1xBit's odds - which they made far higher than they should have. Instead of paying out any large bets, they decided to simply cancel them and refund the original wagers. That isn't great in my opinion. Secondly, here's an unresolved accusation, idiot. Perhaps you'd like to explain, given that 1xBit refuses to. After all, you care about the site so much you promote it non-stop. |
|
|
|
today mixan send me this MSG i already send PMS to all related forum members so just waiting for there reply How much is to pay you back?
I only do this for the following rules:
to clear up all the trust feedback and all the accusation threads |(you must delete them all) and tell EVERYONE who has put neg on my account to remove them all!
Do not ask for stupid amount because that will be posted to your open accusation thread and it will be labelled as extortion and even lauda can not get away from it on their negative given on their account.
Do not ask for stupid amount because that will be posted to your open accusation thread and it will be labelled as extortion and even lauda can not get away from it on their negative given on their account.
extortion ikˈstôrSH(ə)n/ noun the practice of obtaining something, especially money, through force or threats. I hardly think that asking for any amount of money would be a threat or force - the damage is done. There's nothing to threaten unless you consider the omission of a request for people to remove their negative feedbacks a 'threat'. I don't.
I'll wait for COINMAN1 to publicly state an amount and I will state whether I agree with it or not. However, regardless of the amount requested, there is no reason for anyone to remove their feedback unless they feel like it is reasonable to do so. If COINMAN1 requests 0.1 BTC, so be it. It's a simple request. |
|
|
|
#49 @ 0.028
The previous bet was already 0.03. But I'm betting #49 @ 0.031 |
|
|
|
1ActBTCi5XUMjqnyFxVWgSfE5xWicj8g3o 12 tickets, from red. |
|
|
|
@Op,what exactly you want the mirrors for ? Caching helps.
It'd be useful to try to find one in order to give things like much faster searches or a way to download topics that can then be viewed offline.
Read.
Bitcointa.lk used to be good for finding deleted/original posts that you no longer can or weren't archived fast enough.
And if you need to search faster, then specify your searches using Google. If you need to "download" topics, there's the print page of every topic where you'll have all the replies. From there, you could save it or just simply keep that webpage opened for offline use. |
|
|
|
Accounts connected: dawnasor, Greenbits (bought acc), Proof: Screenshot archive, showing name: [Archive]Post archive, showing link [Archive]Post is about proving that the current Greenbits user bought the account from a "Mr3", but revealed the username. The messages are incredibly likely the Inbox due to the blacking out of the names in previous messages. Addresses: Not necessary, but the addresses from their profiles are as follows 1NeENMQfutSuNHKHWRBWEquuWbycHawFbX
1tipjaRDhjX4GrNiiia7BAxDQYmtGraWV
12jenhYCr6faZCwv1QC6HKinL6mRVSrDVC
38GJemGr4jouEMLSnxXpKZtocJc8mamkbY There's a noticeable similarity in the profiles - "don't have". ** should be void if original owner confirms that they have bought the account back with a signed message as per this post
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
