Trust color now appears on DT1/ DT2 strength reports. Suggestion: replace the words "Dark Green" by the Trust score number. The dark green background color in the cell is obvious enough to omit the word, and replacing it by a number adds more information. Unless you're a blind person relying on a text to voice reader? |
|
|
|
Did you also backup the Lightning wallets within BlueWallet? Yes - I've got all wallets (Zap on PC, Eclair on Tablet and now Blue on Mobile) - just not the first Eclair on mobile. @TL, if you don't want to lose it/want to expand your channels more then you can always transfer the funds to the new wallet. Done (see above) Does my personal text look alright? I can't work out what to call it that'll fie in the length limit. On my mobile up to the arrow are on one line then the rest. On my PC, the whole lot are on one line. It conveys the message. |
|
|
|
I would ask the OP if he (or Suchmoon) can cite any scientific research that validates the use of common spelling errors to identify common authorship? If so, the research would be, at best, mixed on the subject.
I am reviewing this post as the search patterns suggested by others in this (and part 1 thread) yield a wider number of posts than the ones I found, hence the findings I made did not take into consideration other avenues of inquiry which would result in a far different conclusion. I won't be able to examine this in full today, but it is the only thing I am currently working on.
Just as a side question for others, why was tspacepilot's research on Master-p widely accepted, but phrase usage being cited here isn't? |
|
|
|
|
Have a scroll back through some of my previous trust/feedback wall posts. I've compared word use in the past and been slapped with "crazy ideas" labels.
Nice to see someone else using the same principal.
|
|
|
|
I don't seem to have written down the twelve/twenty-four word password. I can't find the option to export the mnemonic again in Eclair, but if you have the password and the wallet itself works, that means the wallet has the mnemonic stored somewhere. Eclair is open source, so it must be possible to get the mnemonic out somehow. It's probably not worth the effort (yet) though for 0.004 BTC. Which is why I'm happy to keep it on standby and use Blue for small amount testing. (and yes, I have the 24 word password written down) |
|
|
|
Was that program's name Trillian perhaps?  BINGO! Yes, that's the one! |
|
|
|
I have stated multiple times that I have no interest participating in forum related drama ...
Good to hear. I concur. |
|
|
|
Blue are definitely only one hour requests and I can't find anywhere to change that. It was recently changed from 1h to 24h. If it still says 1h, that's a bug in the client. Ordinarily I intend to use Blue LN for outgoing test-payments (and Zap for incoming), so that shouldn't be an issue. I'd prefer 24 hour requests, or be able to set time-frames - will update when I can. *edit* Invoice has expired, can you send a fresh one please? |
|
|
|
...
Friend of yours? Your account? Know something we don't? |
|
|
|
|
My ICQ number is seven digits long and I know someone who's number was six digits long. I had been using it via a third party application enabling me to use other ICQ style chat channels on my laptop (the names were in one list and in the background they were processed via the various applications (ICQ mIRC etc)).
I downloaded the ICQ program about 18 months ago, but didn't get around to installing it. I did read at the time that their focus was changing, or something or other.
I'll definately miss ICQ.
Removing those links list a simple matter of a couple of mouse clicks - I suspect NO ONE has enough clearance to do that hence it and a number of other features that can be modified haven't been.
<OT>There's another thread concerning splitting a thread into two new topics, this is also a feature of SMF that is rarely used here.</ot>
|
|
|
|
|
Zap has been "processing your payment" for many hours now...
Blue are definitely only one hour requests and I can't find anywhere to change that.
|
|
|
|
My mistake is I don't seem to have written down the passwords for the Eclair wallet in question. So you can't use the wallet and can't find your addresses using the backup words? Yup, that's a mistake I can call my own. |
|
|
|
Afaik you can't have a channel without any funds in it...
There's a minimum amount you can have in a channel.
Like the one I opened with whacker/daveF has a limit of 40 micro btc.
One has seven and a bit satoshis, the other 235 and a bit satoshis and the third has a shave over a thousand satoshis that can be sent. (the balances total 0.00027500042 in the three channels). Two started with 0.01 and 0.011 balances and the third was, um 0.0011 starting balance.
The 0.0010528 and 0.0010801 "unconfirmed" (but in reality actually are confirmed) balances probably make up the 0.00251849 on-chain balance that can't be moved to another wallet address. |
|
|
|
There's actually a few things you can do, like checking if the guy has a history of copying other peoples' info, which he does.
That may well be true, however, as with The Pharmacist, I don't delve into ETH addresses or their connections which I leave to others. |
|
|
|
|
Thanks for making the list, I was thinking of doing something similar after coming across the one Loyce's mobile UID mentioned (in my sig too).
Will advise if I come across any.
|
|
|
|
Hello, this is quite surprising to me. The thing is that I don't have any relation with the user Demlom. I have read his posts and the only thing I can say is that is not my responsability that someone does not know how to use an internet forum. I don't know what he was trying to do, maybe he copied my post to write his account details and he forgot to do it, I don't know, but that is not my fault and I can't do anything about it. The only thing I know is that my account and that one have no relation at all, so this case is a false positive because of someone who doesn't know to use an internet forum maybe because he doesn't even know to tie his shoes.
Perhaps that is true - we can only sit back and see if the other UID does it again. BTW - it is not necessary to quote an entire post to then reply to it. A simple: ...
is suffice. |
|
|
|
You could create a three by three table and the outside cells are black with a full stop and the center cell holds the data.
| . | ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ | . | | . | Your data goes here | . | | . | ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ | . |
[table][tr][td][glow=black,1].[/glow][/td][td][glow=black,1]ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[/glow][/td][td][glow=black,1].[/glow][/td][/tr]
[tr][td][glow=black,1].[/glow][/td][td][center]Your data goes here[/center][/td][td][glow=black,1].[/glow][/td][/tr]
[tr][td][glow=black,1].[/glow][/td][td][glow=black,1]ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[/glow][/td][td][glow=black,1].[/glow][/td][/tr]
[/table] Regards, *edit* Not sure why the left column has gone haywire... |
|
|
|
|
All of the above transactions are the mobile phone Eclair wallet.
The link from Loyce was a web page to enter the /12/24 passwords and delve into the various wallet addresses. My mistake is I don't seem to have written down the passwords for the Eclair wallet in question.
the dust in the LN for the three channels open is the held for closing funds, so there wouldn't be any point in closing those three which are all now max inbound. I'm wondering if the two "unconfirmed" channels (that have been confirmed on the block-chain) are still in operation and might still work with the inbound channels? If a stray TX were to come via any of the three inbounds and go out via the two "unconfirmed" channels, then I could simply leave the Eclair wallet running from time to time and then shift any inbound back out again?
|
|
|
|
Speaking of Quickseller:
PrimeNumber7:
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
