OB is going to have moderators and rules? Doesn't sound very decentralised to me if so, but I'm not entirely sure how a fully decentralised or uncensored one would work anyway. If OB doesn't really work for people wanting to buy illicit materials one will come about that will work for those people that's for sure.

Well that's the risk you take when you hold a percentage of coins instead of using a payment processor, but who knows how much those coins might be worth in the future.

I think they're probably the next evolutionary step from Silk Road. Any darknet market will likely have to be decentralised in the future to actually remain operational or to give its users faith that the admins or some other entity isn't going to run off with their money at some point.


Well that's the idea with desentralised markets  .

I can't stand this level of PC-pandering. It's ridiculous. If you're offended by a game or anything in it - don't play the game. Problem solved. And what's next? Removing Shindler's List and Inglorious Basterds from itunes? I love how they've been fine with the confederate flag up until a couple of weeks ago.

2-2


Yeah, I think it should. Don't know why they don't do it this way to be honest.

What the hell are you talking about? Where does lying come into it and how is it shady? You use an escrow to make sure you're getting what you asked for and I don't see how it's any different from other escrowed deals here. Without one you have to give op the name of the account which he could then turn down or expose your account or worse someone will get scammed or not get what they asked with. My proposition is the opposite of shady and protects both the buyer and the seller. The op wants an account with decent posts and the buyer wants to make sure he gets his money. An escrow would likely be used anyway to conduct the deal so I have no idea what you're on about.

How much are you willing to pay, op? State your prices and I'm sure you'll get some interest but accounts with higher quality posts/history will go quite a bit higher than others.


You could use an escrow to check the quality of posts beforehand. I'd trust someone like Quickseller to do this.

Are there actually any pen vapes that do what they're supposed to? Seems most of them apparently suffer from this and it kinda defeats the purpose of a vape when this happens.

What portable one would you recommend for around $150?

They'll have to adapt to survive. If there's ways they can massively save money they're not just going to let them pass up. There's already several banks looking into how they can adopt blockchain technology but that likely won't do anything positive for bitcoin as they'll use their own systems or a third party company, but bitcoin will still remain as a decentralized alternative outside of the mainstream.

Because the argument is it's not relevant to some boards. Does having negative feedback effect your posts/contributions in Politics and Society? Nope, but it might if others let it effect their opinion on that user though even though it shouldn't given the circumstance.

Such as? It's obvious and easy to say that all we need to do is get people using it, but it's not as easy as that and most people have no real need or desire, especially for a currency that could lose them money (though the opposite is also obviously true).

Using bitcoin isn't even that difficult, maybe only slightly more daunting than using online banking or something. I've always said there's not that much difference between using Paypal and blockchain.info. In fact, I think bc.info even has more security features than PP. Wallets and services will only get easier and more secure over time too.


True, but those people likely don't care too much about privacy in the first place as if they did they would likely already be more careful and aware of how to keep themselves anon.

I think it could be valuable in Beginners and Help for sure. It's probably not uncommon for deals or scams to originate there. Lots of naive newbs looking to make (or lose) some money etc. It's not really relevant in the others but can sometimes help you identify trolls easier (a lot of accounts seem to start trolling once they get neg-bombed).

Once every 24 hours. Please remove previous bumps when you make a new one. You should also state an asking price.

They're wildly different because there is no fixed price and many variables. If someone has a just turned hero with crappy posts and can't sign a message then that will go for much less than if someone has a higher activity hero with great posts and can sign a message from an old address. Sometimes people want a quick sale and will accept the first lowball offer they get whereas if they had a little patience they will likely be able to sell it for much more.

I cannot fathom why anyone would do this. Wouldn't you get more from faucets? You'd certainly get more with just a few posts on a signature campaign that's for sure.

Why would anything happen? Bitcoin will go on regardless and the other companies will use their own blockchains and tech. If they plan to use our Bitcoin blockchain in some way then I'm sure they'll have to pay the appropriate fees.

I didn't say all members, but it's logical as time goes on that Legendary will become more and more common and as common as Hero is now and the longer time passes this becomes even more so. If the new ranks double in time every time they're added it will be fine though you could make the existing ranks longer to achieve.

It would be funny if he got sued for defamation or something.  No idea why he or KFC bothered to send it off for testing. A visual (or a quick taste test if you're feeling brave) would have sorted it.

Badbear didn't seem too keen on it last time it was brought up. I'm on the fence. Would be helpfully in some ways and not in others.