Looks like quite a bit of people are abusing the BetKing.io "faucet" promotion. Dean has a list of people who cheated with multi accounts I made the list clickable: -snip- [/quote] 905379, luckylucky**** 905383, 5ato5hi8itcoin**** 905392, bitcampaign**** 905398, samuraijin**** 905364, iotacampaign905369, btcforchild**** 905371, indocafe**** ^^^all created within a few hours of each other on October 3rd. This one on October 2nd: 905011, bitcoinissatanAll have addresses in profile i havent checked yet.
------------------------------------
Having more OP is definitely better than not - so I vote to lock this and start fresh. Just link this thread in new OP. |
|
|
|
My Responses in Red BoldYour claim of calumny would be correct if you could prove that my statements were false. Because you have yet to even try to prove my claims were false, your claim of calumny has no standing anywhere.
No. It is you, who has to prove your alleged claims (something which you did not do). If you actually read through my posts, you would see that I have provided reasonable proof that my claims are reasonable. Your complete refusal to address my claims, only make prove my statements are probably correct. Just so you can see, here are the threads where I have given reasonable proof that these statements are true and correct (I have highlighted the areas in purple, bold, and underlined with my proof):https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1682304.msg16889589#msg16889589https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1682304.msg16899630#msg16899630https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1682304.msg16915075#msg16915075https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1682304.msg16980916#msg16980916https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1682304.msg16981063#msg16981063https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1682304.msg16988857#msg16988857After some additional digging, I see that one of the feedback you left was on an account you inquired about purchasing from another member but were turned down for a low offer. Smells fishy to me! I can not prove this, so it is just hearsay at this time. I have messaged the member to give me proof so we can dig deeper into you.
Another member committing felonies via defamatory statements? I can't wait to get more *details* about these fantasies. Again, if you read my statement correctly, it clearly states "I can not prove this, so it is just hearsay at this time.", and there is no felonies here you ignorant fool. If you think I was being vulgar in calling you that, please look up the definitions of the words; describes you to a tea. Let me show you how: Libel (you incorrectly identify it as calumny) is considered a civil violation, not criminal, thus carrying no criminal rating such as "felonies". Learn your law before you state it. ..showing you have spent countless minutes bashing me and wining about it all on here..
I did no such thing. Just because you take part of my sentence and comment on it does not make your comment valid to the purpost of the statement I have made. You must be a politician. This would explain why you have not addressed my accusations...instead of taking 5 minutes to show proof your feedback is accurate or that you have good reason to leave it. I think you will not show proof because you have no proof to show.
I do not have to prove anything as the proof is in the post history on said accounts. Besides, even if they were not used for spamming, they are still used for account sales (diff. reason, same consequence). In order to claim my statements and title in my thread are trus, you do need to prove. Next these accounts were not used for account sales, they were being sold. Just like your false feedback, you do not know how to properly state true facts, do you.Other trusted members are even agreeing with me, check your feedback.
What other "trusted members"? All the negative ratings on me are from untrusted members which have been exposed in one way or another.
I may be incorrect about this, for I don't understand the levels of trust. You are correct that all of the feedback are from un-trusted members. But in reality, if the trust system allows people like you in there to make some of the incorrect comments you have made, is the trust system really accurate and dependable?? However, I am seeing that BG4 is a level 3 Default trust member, if I am seeing this correctly and this is the feedback he left you:
Lauda is clearly immature and is abusing the trust system and replacing his trust after any other trust I have received to hurt my Rep. Lauda is unstable and has no business being on any moderator list to be able to do this to someone be cause of a disagreement,,,
This is clearly moderator trust abuse...
At this point I'm not even sure: 1) Which accounts are/were yours. What difference does it matter which accounts were mine. If you think I am wasting my time to help my accounts, you are wrong. I am in this to make sure the bitcointalk trust network, (not the joke of a trust system) does not fall to stupidity. There are to many people out there who will not trust Bitcoin because of the number of people who are using it for illegal activity. Having someone like you in a Staff Position and in a Default trust level, making statements that you will not back up, does not help the trust others have about Bitcoin. All it does it hurt the system even more. Why would someone want to get on here and buy or sell something when you have Staff members in a Default trust level attempting to extort another member. (Image clip below) Though this does not prove this is you trying to extort the other member, seemed funny you referring to yourself in the message in first person and just some added physiology for you Lauda, it has been founded in many studies when an individual is trying hide who they are online, they will make the mistake of claiming they are not someone else when it is brought to attention. First you tried to exclude the validity of the evidence .by trying to scare the other member that it is not evidence. If you were not the Lauda in this screen shot, you would have let the other member in this screenshot believe you were and ruin that Lauda's reputation, you would not have tried to protect it by claiming you may be a Doppler Shame on you because he did not want to sell something you wanted. You are not fit to be a Staff member on this forum nor are you fit to be trusted as a default trust member. This is my opinion, but I am going to call you out in another thread and ask for your removal of both. Your actions bring down the integrity of this forum. (To prevent Lauda's next claim of Libel or Calumny, this is my opinion which is protected under the first amendment)
 free adult image hosting2) Where the loans took place. If you are not even sure of this information, how can anyone trust your opinion and statements? Every other default member can tell me about the feedback they left a member when I question the feedback before giving a loan. Why can't you?? But the community is supposed to trust your statements. If you dont trust her then remove her from your trust network and/or leave neg feedback. You're looking at it like users should be considered innocent until proven guilty. This isn't a law and order system, there is no criminal justice system. It's just an online community with mostly anonymous users. Everyone should really consider everyone else guilty until proven innocent. |
|
|
|
Hallo allemaal, Ik ben benieuwd of er een aantal Nederlanders zijn die de vDice/vSlice crowdsale volgen. Laat eens wat van je horen in deze thread. Op dit moment zijn er al 201,553.9 ETH ingezameld met nog ruim twee weken te gaan voordat de crowdsale gesloten is. Je kunt 'live' meekijken en zien hoeveel ETH de mensen storten via de volgende link: https://etherscan.io/address/0x8bccc9ba2e5706e24a36dda02ca2a846e39a7bbfHeb je al eens een gokje gewaagd op de www.vdice.io website? Zo ja, wil je dan eens je ervaringen delen? Ik denk dat het heel duidelijk dat vdice is een zeer slechte investering, misschien zelfs crimineel. Ze zijn niet aantoonbaar beurs of gedecentraliseerd zoals ze beweren. De nieuwsberichten worden betaald en zo zijn de posten van de steun. Lees hun vertrouwen. Ik heb ook vermoed dat de meeste van de ETH, dat is geďnvesteerd is van binnenuit. |
|
|
|
Okay, I apologize if my line of questioning seems intrusive, but if each manager has the ability to reduce spam in their campaigns on an individual bases, what is the intent of the organization?
Just read the thread. It is a joint effort to fight spam via a general blacklist. Is it to gain the ability to eliminate "rogue" campaign managers, questionable services, or competitive markets?
We can not gain such an *ability*. I have no idea what you're talking about; I'm no magician. And, what mechanism might their be put into place that would mitigate collusive marketing practices?
What collusive marketing practices? And, three members who share levels of default trust do have a collusive power to implement their will via "mob rules" because their voices are more esteemed by default and the "band wagoning" nature of the trust rating system.
Yahoo is not in DT, and most of the trust ratings left by Lutpin and me are not on the same members (at this time). What is the function of this organization: is it to reduce spam by eliminating "rogue" campaigns, or to eliminate "rogue" campaigns by disenfranchising competitive services?
1) How exactly does one "eliminate a rogue campaign" by having a general blacklist? 2) I do not even know what that means. I feel like you're implicitly trying paint the image of malicious intent behind SMAS. Warning: Cjmoles is just posting because it's his time of month. You won't win any arguments with him, although it's sometimes entertaining to see how far he'll go to back up his irrational nonsense. As soon as he meets his posting quota for his signature campaign you won't hear from him for a couple weeks. And he probably won't be that annoying until the 25 or 26th of next month when he realizes he has to make X number of posts to get his sig campaign payment. Does SMAS have an official name for users like him? (ps I promise not to respond to him in this thread, don't mean to derail) |
|
|
|
Новый логотип  более точные логотип |
|
|
|
Some announcements and things worth noting:
-Table Starter Rakeback doesn't exist anymore. There is no timetable for it to return.
-Betcoin Sports Book does not offer 2-10% better odds than most sports books. That's ridiculous.
-Xiao does not offer 58%-133% rake back or have hundreds of "rake-back pros" He also doesn't do this out of the goodness of his heart. He does it for the Casino/Sports revenue. (nothing wrong with that, except lying about it)
-And as always, check out BetcoinRakeback.com!
When are YOU going to stop lying? No one has time to butt heads with you. Why is it just you and your alternate/internet goons polluting my thread? Yeah, look at their odds in comparison to other sportsbooks. You're an unbelievable troll. I'm not lying. I don't have alternate or internet goons. I have looked at their odds in comparison to other books, occasionally you'll find better line there. Unless you're being intentionally ambiguous when you say "Betcoin offers nearly 2-10% better odds than most sports books!", maybe there's a misunderstanding. Are you returning any of your affiliate commission to players for their sports bets? I wasn't calculating that, if so. Since you said yourself you don't rely on sports or casino commission from players (I admit, I don't believe you, but I'll play along) maybe if you started returning 100% of your sports and casino commission to every poker player you would benefit overall. I'm sure the players would appreciate it anyway. 600+ players on my rakeback program and only you are trolling me. I wonder why... and you're not even a player under me. Get lost.
Betcoin is a cancer to the poker and bitcoin communities.
Stop promoting them and I'll stop annoying you.
More attacks, lies, trolling, making false claims to back up his stance, etc by Twitchy. I have not lied about anything. Do some research and then thank me for the update and remember to trust me next time. 600+ players have signed up under your affiliate. over 200,000 accounts on betcoin. Big numbers, huh? Yet for some reason they have to give away the tickets to get 20 players in their nightly feature tournament - and even then it often misses the guarantee... For some reason they are averaging less than 25k hands a day total....that's for all tourneys and cash games, including freerolls and microstakes...pretty pathetic. What happened to your 600+ signups xiao? Perhaps they...left? Perhaps because they are treated like shit and lied to? I'm just trying to save people the trouble and also try and salvage what's left of Bitcoin Pokers reputation for the day someone capable is ready to get an honest site up and running. What does it say about Betcoin when you look at their profile? https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=202115 Doesn't seem like the same site that you promote in your thread , huh? |
|
|
|
Here is the NEW LOGO for vSlice.  Why you don't use the current logo, aka my avatar one, it is more obvious to know it is a dice project when we see dice in logo, but when see vsl logo, we can't realize it is dice project. There is vDice and vSlice. One is the game and one is the token. They have separate logos. But they work together. The token is called:- vSlice. The platform is called:- vDice. The token is your share of profits from the platform. The vSlice token can also be traded for its own value, like any other alt-coin. So, there are 2 ways to earn from vSlice: 1) Trade the vSlice token on exchanges for its trading value. Or, 2) Hold the token and automatically accumulate profits from vDice platform (in ETH), each month. Also, enjoy any possible increases in price of the token itself. Sweet logo dudes. Nice to see you have time to update logo but leave the sig that says 10k+ bets and still haven't fixed the buggy contracts that don't even work. |
|
|
|
I tested sites with free money, and after few minutes i decided not to deposit here.
https://i.imgur.com/GlKuSYS.png
I think this is very bad way to promote your site. All rolls are bet on tail, and on head i actually had few green hits.
The house edge is 5% though so you might have lower chance to win it but to get those red streaks is really possible, sometimes dice site will also have this thing too. But what is really matter is about the roll number there. Why you still lose when you rolled on number 700? What is the different between 7000 and 700 outcome? If this is dice site you can already with that outcome if it is 2x odds[/size] Go spam your bitcoinag signature off topic post somewhere else. What do you mean? I saw that btcevo is clearly see about their result though, just like you said between 250-4899 and it is head and 4900-9898 is tail so why he keep on losing when he get those number 700 and 7000? Does not make sense right? Mind to explain this? What in the world are you talking about? BTCevo is stating that "red streaks is really possible" and has no idea what's happening in marlboroza's screenshots. In fact, I don't even know what BTCevo is saying with the sentence, "If this is dice site you can already with that outcome if it is 2x odds." I've also already encountered this problem, where playing on tails is literally unwinnable. Regardless of your roll number, you lose on tails. Every single roll number ends in a loss. This is a scam. Is this clear, or do I have to dumb it down even further? I just agree with btcevo about red streak is possible though, sometimes in dice also we have the same problem but I dont know about this site or similar to this sote about coinflip because saw that everyone always complaining that they cant even win when they keep on placing on the same bet In all gambling sites, indeed red streak is very possible but in this case you do not understand the real issue. And certainly, you will always agree with BTCevo as you are him. Mind to explain something HERE |
|
|
|
It still not a gurantee, let me ask you if you got pairs of ace. Will you all in? Because there is still a chance that people might beat you using lower straight so to all in instead of playing slowly I dont think that it might be good option. Unless you are really guarantee that you will win but we never know about the future so we cant predict who is gonna win
Yeah agree, you cant done this just by watchint videos yo understand what is happening on that table.l, you really need to practice ot though. Facebook application which is offer you some free playing will help you to get some experienece. In order to get some win you really need tons of experience before you can start to play for real using bitcoin
Spammers gotta spam... |
|
|
|
Account connected Erza and BTCevoBTCevo use 1PmkhY5KxsKZr9uyPst13sdrcbKJoxpAef here http://archive.is/Io975 and Erza use 16FGjz2v74UhdmKCEb4bXpBjHHheQixMRu here http://archive.is/WeISm 16FGjz2v74UhdmKCEb4bXpBjHHheQixMRu
1PmkhY5KxsKZr9uyPst13sdrcbKJoxpAef Both addresses are part of wallet https://www.walletexplorer.com/wallet/2d6949c861ea87a7/addressesNotes: ~ both accounts are in betcoin.ag signature campaign. ~ surprisingly both accounts were always joining in the same campaign in the past (mostly) ~ now under review by betcoin.ag staff @BTCevo & Erza : if it is a false accusation, please come here and prove that you are not the same person. lol at their latest posts if true: I tested sites with free money, and after few minutes i decided not to deposit here.
https://i.imgur.com/GlKuSYS.png
I think this is very bad way to promote your site. All rolls are bet on tail, and on head i actually had few green hits.
The house edge is 5% though so you might have lower chance to win it but to get those red streaks is really possible, sometimes dice site will also have this thing too. But what is really matter is about the roll number there. Why you still lose when you rolled on number 700? What is the different between 7000 and 700 outcome? If this is dice site you can already with that outcome if it is 2x odds[/size] Go spam your bitcoinag signature off topic post somewhere else. What do you mean? I saw that btcevo is clearly see about their result though, just like you said between 250-4899 and it is head and 4900-9898 is tail so why he keep on losing when he get those number 700 and 7000? Does not make sense right? Mind to explain this? What in the world are you talking about? BTCevo is stating that "red streaks is really possible" and has no idea what's happening in marlboroza's screenshots. In fact, I don't even know what BTCevo is saying with the sentence, "If this is dice site you can already with that outcome if it is 2x odds." I've also already encountered this problem, where playing on tails is literally unwinnable. Regardless of your roll number, you lose on tails. Every single roll number ends in a loss. This is a scam. Is this clear, or do I have to dumb it down even further? I just agree with btcevo about red streak is possible though, sometimes in dice also we have the same problem but I dont know about this site or similar to this sote about coinflip because saw that everyone always complaining that they cant even win when they keep on placing on the same bet |
|
|
|
Big press,Big Community,Big Support will be BIG PROJECT. I'm realy speechless for looking this are big one, and don't want to missed this chance. Can't wait for the day  Bad news. They paid for those articles to be posted just like they pay you for posting. Big lies. |
|
|
|
Please some more competent to answer...
Hunter VIP Agent
Hunter: Hey dd. How may I help you?
Me: what is your edge on
1. Slots: 100% contribution to wagering requirements
2. Video slots: 100% contribution to wagering requirements
3. Other games: 100% contribution to wagering requirements
Hunter: Hey, the wagering requirement is 35 times the bonus amount, these games affect the wagering requirement fully as some others in a decreased manner
Me: Did you read my question???
It's not now X wager is required. It's what IS YOUR HOUSE EDGE on these games. E.g. what EV the bonus have....
Hunter: I'm sorry i do not have that information
Me: ?! So how can I understand what house edge have your games. It should be a public information...
Hunter: It is no different than any other casino
Me: Very unprofessional answer. You cannot tell me how much money you want to take me on every spin. Ok. I will ask @ bitcointalk. Have a nice day.
Hunter: Have a good day
Dear maskottUnderstandably, no online casino would agree to disclose that kind of information. We hope for your understanding. Cheers and best of luck, VegasCasino.io That is not information you should treat as top secret. Without this information player is not in fair environment. Casinos will hide their house edge only if it is ridiculously high. Displaying HE should be mandatory to get licence. Some of the NetEnt & Quickfire games display house edge. Example from BVC: https://i.gyazo.com/4abc4e7def96a5a1c150757ec6165a2c.pngAgree with Joksim. Regulated online sites in US publish their finances every month, total bets, winning, taxes, etc down to the penny. You can go back and look at every month since open: http://www.nj.gov/oag/ge/docs/Financials/IGRTaxReturns/2016/October2016.pdfYou guys are essentially unregulated which, imo, means you have even more reason to be transparent. |
|
|
|
-snip-
Can't even acknowledge that your accusations were based on faked logs? That's pretty messed up. |
|
|
|
Did bitstarz close their main thread? That is a horrible decision to take, A casino should never cut off communication.
I thought they were starting to get their act together by requesting Net entertainment to change their software so they could enforce max bet rules during bonus wagering, But with this sort of action shows they aren't committed to the player at all.
Yeah. Disappointed and slightly surprised. Would expect that kind of behavior from any other softswiss site I guess. So only slightly. This topic will remain open and i'll keep posting until bitstarz pays my stolen funds and rebuild their system for prevention on max bet thing.
I think your behavior is rather inappropriate. Yes, you were undoubtedly ripped off, and I'm sorry that it happened to you. However, you were paid out in full with a generous gesture by betking. At this point, you're no longer out of pocket and continually campaigning to have them pay you doesn't sit right with me. If you want to campaign that they reimburse betking, or pay out all the other people who were in your exact position (which they damn well should!) but were not so lucky as to have someone donate them the money; then I'd fully support you. But demanding they pay you to close the thread, is just being opportunistic. +1 |
|
|
|
Yes, when I call out sites for doing unethical things, they have no way to defend themself other than discredit me. That;s what you're trying to do right now. In the end, you're just proving that you're on the same level as Betcoin.ag, Fortunejack, Pocketdice, Btc-casino and any other site that thinks they can bullshit their way to success. 
 |
|
|
|
|
By giving away func tokens, aren't you making everyone elses worth even less?
|
|
|
|
As a casino visitor, I like gambling, I like live games and dice in the Internet, I was a dice winner, have won 10 BTC before, so you guys will be my favorite site.  Winning players arent the target audience   But still congrats for this. They aren't targeting any players actually. "Investors" are their target audience. fuck dude, go the fuck away. you need mental help or you are retarded. i say both. Then there is this. Well, what more needs to be said...I mean really. Well, you could explain why you think you are decentralized and provably fair despite your audit stating this? "Participants in the vdice smart contract bear a small amount of risk from the ‘house’ being a bad actor, and from a bad actor internal to Oraclize"and this: As it stands, the owner can reset emergency withdrawal forever by just calling the function over and over, making sure money never goes to the emergency address.You could explain how or why you went from Production ready, successful app for 5 months to Alpha phase? You could explain why the team listed on your site has more blogging and secretary experience than software dev. Or you could just keep insulting me for asking with the help of your shills and then spamming up your thread I guess. |
|
|
|
this stuff will not make you money. imo at least.
Why? Give people the reason please. In the contrary, I believe it will be a great project, we can earn from betting, as well as platform dividends. Well, because... - They aren't provably fair.
- They aren't decentralized.
- They don't seem to have any plans to become provably fair or decentralized.
- They have had very little success since they launched in June
- The players that do give them a try often run into issues due to their shoddy code.
- They have lied and continue to lie about all of the above.
Reading your points and remark at first are convincing. the second time it's effect is lower, and then the third and forth..... Eventually reading the same thing over and over just makes you a troll... You stated you thoughts in each of the pages at this thread, WE GET IT Then why are you still promoting them? Because I believe that despite some problems they have, its a legitimate project. By the way you got answers to your questions already your'e just keep ignoring them... Really? I honestly don't see them. Did they explain how they are decentralized and provably fair despite their audit stating this? "Participants in the vdice smart contract bear a small amount of risk from the ‘house’ being a bad actor, and from a bad actor internal to Oraclize"and this: As it stands, the owner can reset emergency withdrawal forever by just calling the function over and over, making sure money never goes to the emergency address.
Did they explain how or why they went from Production ready, successful app for 5 months to Alpha phase? Did they explain why their team has more blogging and secretary experience than software dev? |
|
|
|
this stuff will not make you money. imo at least.
Why? Give people the reason please. In the contrary, I believe it will be a great project, we can earn from betting, as well as platform dividends. Well, because... - They aren't provably fair.
- They aren't decentralized.
- They don't seem to have any plans to become provably fair or decentralized.
- They have had very little success since they launched in June
- The players that do give them a try often run into issues due to their shoddy code.
- They have lied and continue to lie about all of the above.
Reading your points and remark at first are convincing. the second time it's effect is lower, and then the third and forth..... Eventually reading the same thing over and over just makes you a troll... You stated you thoughts in each of the pages at this thread, WE GET IT Then why are you still promoting them? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
