My cross-compiling setup suddenly fails on the newest git master version. I get multiple errors about sys/socket.h not being found. I traced the problem back to commit 31aa4f6cebc51e26b349606fd78d71954bda87da. Commit 657e64477b75603bc9b08eed425bc47f606814cb and everything before that compiles correctly. Is there a new dependency that I'm now missing, or is this a bug? The only sys/socket.h I have (/usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/sys/socket.h) is not under my mingw toolchain, but that wasn't a problem when cross-compiling until now. For reference, here are the files in my toolchain: http://pastebin.com/sSEqFL63 |
|
|
|
|
I have received all my withdraws almost immediately. Even when I messed up the last withdraw by inputting a bogus address, support answered my email in 5 minutes and cancelled it.
|
|
|
|
|
BN68q8M5AQigWMrSNncQbuJD3h4W3r7QHi
|
|
|
|
|
5 orphans & 5 valid blocks after about 4 hours of mining with 3 threads on an i5-3570. gethashespersec shows that I'm hashing at about 100-200kh/s.
I tried cpuminer, but it only hashed about 40kh/s on a much faster CPU. After reading a bit it looks like only the yacoin client can be used to mine ATM.
|
|
|
|
|
Scrypt difficulty is converted in cgminer. Actual difficulty is the shown value divided by 2**16 (65536).
|
|
|
|
Pity Freicoin can't be merge mined, I'd definitely be adding it to the pool.
Is it possible to run a Freicoin (or any other sha256 coin) pool that also merged mines NMC, DVC & IXC? So that Freicoin would be the parent blockchain and NMC, DVC & IXC the auxiliary blockchains. |
|
|
|
|
CW2LoLYpqVpW6HgjEQsrTKWAS9eue2jiir
|
|
|
|
This might be really useful, I'm tired of checking the charts every day to decide myself. I already have my own scripts to switch configs and restart all rigs, so it sounds like a simple plug-n-play job! That auto-selling feature sounds especially interesting. I guess auto-withdrawal is not supported yet?  EDIT: There are config options gkeypersec for vanity mining speed and ghashpersec for BTC mining speed, but no option for LTC mining speed. Is the default 1MH/s -> 1kH/s ratio assumed? |
|
|
|
MY FRC rewards haven't been paid out. Maybe the hot wallet has ran out because of sudden popularity?  |
|
|
|
|
MinCoin difficulty has increased, but the block explorer is not updating so CoinChoose is still displaying the old difficulty.
|
|
|
|
PPLNS has no vowels in it. That's a flaw from my point of view. Makes it hard to pronounce. It's a flaw all reward methods (apart from PoT) seem to have, CPPSRB being the worst offender.
Oh, now I see why the proportional method still has some support. |
|
|
|
|
I can only agree with what DrHaribo explained above. Shift-based PPLNS is a very good payout method that is fair (hopping-proof) and has no risk for the pool operator. Because variance is experienced by users, not by the pool operator, DrHaribo can keep the fee very low. The method is also very easy to understand, compared to DGM. To be honest, I haven't looked into the newer methods with capped payouts, backpay or whatever. PPLNS works very well, and I've yet to hear anyone point out an actual flaw in it, only complaints that stem from misunderstanding.
|
|
|
|
Can you explain the prolonged low luck? Over a period between Jan 17 to May 1, blockchain.com shows pool luck at 60 percent. Statistically this just doesn't seem likely.  That site claims that Eligius has had ~250% luck over the same period, with a total of 273 blocks. Why would you even consider Bitparking if you believed that site, Eligius is clearly enjoying some divine luck. |
|
|
|
|
I guess the only available options would be to calculate it yourself from block explorer data, or fetching from other websites. Calculations would differ a bit for each blockchain, and I'm not sure how the timing can be accurate that way. Also fetching from other websites is maybe not such a good idea after all. It's actually very hard to find a site that lists difficulty estimates for even most of the currencies.
|
|
|
|
|
This is a very useful site, and the graphs make it much better than dustcoin. But both sites are lacking estimates for next difficulty. That would be a great addition.
|
|
|
|
Someone tried to login to my blockchain.info wallet, too. I don't have any coins there and can't even access it myself (lost the password), but the timing is curious. Authorize log-in attempt
An attempt to login to your blockchain.info wallet was made from an unknown browser. Please confirm the following details are correct:
Time: 2013-04-27 10:35:24
IP Address: 91.37.37.166 (Germany)
User Agent: Apache-HttpClient/4.2.3 (java 1.5)
If the above details are correct please use the following login link:
https://blockchain.info/wallet/1496c01a-95a3-78e7-9b31-eadfab3eb580
If this login attempt was made by you this email can be safely ignored however you may wish to change your wallet alias.
The alias for that identifier is my username here, so it might be a coincidence. Just thought I'd let you know, in the off chance that this is related and might help. This is the first time I received such an email, even though I made that wallet last year IIRC. |
|
|
|
|
I can't change any payment thresholds, it says "Change data successful" but nothing changes.
|
|
|
|
Just upgraded to ubuntu 13.04 - cgminer didn't like it:
cgminer/cgminer: error while loading shared libraries: libudev.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
I believe you can quickly fix this by running ln -s /usr/lib/libudev<whatever> /usr/lib/libudev.so.0. Be aware that this is an ugly hack and you should instead compile cgminer yourself or wait for a new release that supports Ubuntu 13.04. |
|
|
|
|
How are altcoin payments processed for DGM users? Are they still using PPS, or is it possible to use the same DGM score for those?
|
|
|
|
Hello,
i have a problem with cg 3.0.0:
pool 2 JSON stratum auth failed: (unknown reason)
{
"url" : "stratum+tcp://mining.eligius.st:3334",
"user" : "MYBTCADRESS",
"pass" : "123"
}
the same config runs with cgminer 2.11.4 without Problems
Try the latest git master version, this should be fixed now. Or you can wait for a new release. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
