I have 980GTX and 960GTX. My local Blakecoin hashrate 4.8Ghash, on pool accepted hashrate is 4.6 Mhash!!!!!! (no rejects). It is no good...
Display issue, if you remove the unit, values are almost the same (4.8 vs 4.6). As elbandi mentioned, it's simply a miss calculation and display issue. And my sharerate and profit can be calculate correct? |
|
|
|
|
I have 980GTX and 960GTX. My local Blakecoin hashrate 4.8Ghash, on pool accepted hashrate is 4.6 Mhash!!!!!! (no rejects). It is no good...
|
|
|
|
[...] WHO on the forums actually does release their miner with conditions and prices that are clearly disclosed in advance? [...]
I did, not so long ago. Works out pretty well as far as I can tell, but would likely get very messy if said miner was being sold to a large number of people. I don't know of any other examples, but I'd imagine other people have done the same. Side note 1: Being public about the terms of the deal, and changing them after-the-fact, is utter bullshit. I'd say that's much worse than not being public about the terms but sticking to them no matter what. Side note 2: I understand people are around here with a miner's mindset, and ROI is king. But, if you folks care for the potential of cryptocurrencies at all, maybe someday, try to pick some altcoin that you like, mine it even at a loss, grow a bag, help that community, participate, develop some service, some utility. Much more fun, and oddly enough, big profits on occasion... I agree... ROI is king... It's hard to open your wallet for donations when there are cobwebs at the bottom (I'm currently negative last month because of Cryptsy)... Right now a 970 makes about $1.20 mining Eth without taking out cost for power. but then you understand, we may be reluctant to release new miners in these conditions... I mean you can't really expect us to release for free because the conditions are bad (because it would just be bad for us as well...) hence what is expected is that we find a middle ground or a compromise which would make happy everyone. and in that case dev fee isn't either a good solution, because miners won't wait for us before dumping on a coin... (and there are a lot more miners than devs) Not sure what you mean about a dev fee... A % based miner will be constantly mining whatever you have at your proxy setup for X algorithm. 98 shares for the miner, 2 shares for the dev. Maybe we've always been on a different page when it comes to a miner fee? You have a miner submit 98 shares for whatever pool they're connected to and then two shares to whatever pool you want for the algorithm it's operating on. That would be a 2% fee, relatively speaking. Or you could do it based on time... 72secs every hour. Also not entirely certain what you mean by 'bad conditions for developers'. If you say sold your Neoscrypt miner for .1 a pop three months ago things would be quite a bit different or even right now. Kernel developers basically help set the conditions for miners. I can look at SPs miner right now and go 'hey it's not going to ROI, but I have a option of a 5% faster miner in the future for .1'. And of course SP will be improving it so it turns into a better option into the future. So something like x11 will be about 5% faster. Still not profitable, but could be. Honestly though a % based miner is just the best solution. It rewards developers for making faster kernels constantly and gives miners big and small a chance to compete. You keep updating your miner and the amount of money you make keeps growing too. It's win-win the problem with the dev fee, is that it collects an altcoin, and technically there are a lot more chance that people dump the coin before a dev has any chance to do it, making it a rather bad deal for the dev. 2 shares from 100 use to point on nicehash... ☺ |
|
|
|
|
Plz look on argon2 algo... SP_ its try to big profit!
|
|
|
|
ccminer.exe --algo=neoscrypt -o stratum+tcp://hashpower.co:4233 -O x:yHardware  @ CCMiner v1.5.77  @ CCMiner v1.5.78  Is it normal? Use @ CCMiner v1.5.74 for neoscrypt. |
|
|
|
the pool website is down! anyone know whats going on?
maybe the pool owner closed it because the dev isn't showing up and bcause of that he decided to do so.... maybe not so soon there will be something ufficial for now we can only wait Website is down. But miner works good and payout going every 2-3 hours. |
|
|
|
|
Its hard to find POW blocks now, POW two...
|
|
|
|
Dumping Jack game started... Month or two later - price will be grow up!
meh, means those coins arent staking, and POS diff drops a little  Soon POS reward drop to 0.5 FNX... |
|
|
|
|
Dumping Jack game started... Month or two later - price will be grow up!
|
|
|
|
WTS 20k FNX for 5 BTC. PM.
what is FNX? Fantom coin. Oh the ANN says FCX. was it changed? Dev rename. |
|
|
|
WTS 20k FNX for 5 BTC. PM.
what is FNX? Fantom coin. |
|
|
|
HI,
I am trying to do a 'build' on the new ccminer, in windows, using Visual Studio Community but am getting errors when I try to load for a solution.
error reads;
W:\TEMP\ccminer-1.5.73\ccminer.vcxproj : error : The operation could not be completed. Unspecified error
W:\TEMP\ccminer-1.5.73\ccminer.vcxproj : error : One or more errors occurred.
Has anyone else had this problem and how do I correct? I know there is a working .exe in the 7z file but I like to build on my machine. What do I not have installed? Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks
VS 2013, CUDA 6.5 + patch CUDA 6.5 for maxwell  |
|
|
|
|
WTS 20k FNX for 5 BTC. PM.
|
|
|
|
54% higher payouts is not a little bit.. Somone is renting your rigs cheap from nicehash and make 50% on the mulitpool!  I look on btc/gh/day ... strange but not so higher... |
|
|
|
0 active connections to I2P fantom network
this is normal?
yep. It`s normal. |
|
|
|
You can use the nicehashminer or just switch to another pool like this one: http://hashpower.co/site/miningIt pays bether than Nichash in most algos. but 2% fee and 2% more with BTC payouts. This time only Lyra2v2 a bit more... Other is chiper. |
|
|
|
nVidia Driver 358.91, Win 7 x64--
I upgraded the driver on my Win 7 box today, and all I get from NiceHash is "retry in 30 seconds" using release dot 73. Not just Quark, but Lyra2v2 and Neoscrypt also. I rebooted, no better performance. I then played a game, as my GTX 960 on this box is usually the first to try something new. My rigs are Linux boxes.
I'll maybe roll the driver back tomorrow. --scryptr
It is a pool side problem. I use miner control and after 3 retries switching to another stratum. |
|
|
|
Alright.. Its up and running... http://fantom.blockpioneers.pw (still indexing, and I forgot to change diff to PoS.. Will do after full index) Explorer donation address : FeFVswx4QmzDtmQcwFzQNT7gBvogLnVXT8 (This is not for a giveaway, so it is allowed) Its from me Статус: 20 подтверждений, разослано через 5 узлов Дата: 08.11.2015 20:34 Для: FeFVswx4QmzDtmQcwFzQNT7gBvogLnVXT8 Дебет: -250.00 FNX Комиссия: -0.01 FNX Чистая сумма: -250.01 FNX ID транзакции: eed4ac4c6f95b1ecdb85aa1d14e82da4186ace19a54a5dadea149b28ce29b969-000 |
|
|
|
joincoin is still profitable, but only with my 120% faster penta miner..
0.3BTC and you will get it.
quark, lyra2v2 and etherum are profitable now. But only with private kernals.
sp_ How much faster is quark in the private kernal? Considering the purchase but I doubt it's worth it or maybe the ROI would take a long time since I only have 7 GPUs mining (750ti). Thank you. SP doesn't sell his Quark. You have to suck DJMs dick hard to get the Lyra miner... and have a lot of money.  |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
