The dude was doing merit abuse which AFAIK isnt against the rules yet but is 100% taggable by a DT member and that's what happened

Please message Theymos or Cyrus and request them to change your name from EndlaSuresh to SaltySuresh please. And if possible stop shitposting before you get banned instead of just a red mark

Therefore, I conclude that selling of merit is not illegal right? Since it is just a form of trading which theymos already have stated that it should not be an issue? Trading merit is pretty obvious tho. Unlike selling it in which it stays between the two persons involved. Good point there that if a certain user sells its merit then it isn't illegal? Correct me if im wrong then that certain user should not be tagged?

The same here, so, will be any legal action from mods side against Lauda and her puppet team?

While reviewing those who have the extrotionist lauda on their trust list as of the last trust dump (from I believe Feb 17, 2018), and I came across something very concerning.

A total of 53 people have Lauda on this trust list (which is roughly 1/2 of the number of people who have excluded Lauda from their trust list).

What is most concerning is that of the 53 accounts who have Lauda on their trust list, 6 accounts are part of a farm of purchased accounts that are owned by the same person. I am wanting to know why over 11% of those who have lauda on their trust list are all owned by the same person.

These accounts were purchased on or around (very broadly) January 2016, yet none of them have negative trust from Lauda (as of early morning Feb 22, 2018). I also came across an account seller while reviewing these very clearly sold accounts that also does not have negative trust from Lauda.

I would also like to know why neither any of these 6 accounts nor the account seller have any kind of negative trust from Lauda.

One of these accounts was last active as of late May 2017, and most were last active as of June 2017, so I can rule out someone recently adding Lauda to their trust lists.

The staff have nothing to do with red ratings or any ratings at all, at least directly. Yeah they can use the trust system like any other user, but moderation shouldn't be a thing when it comes to removing/editing trust ratings. The staff are responsible for acting upon reports and dealing with anything they find infringes the guidelines, and they do their best from what I can see. Several staff members are on 8+ hours a day and it's not even a well paid 'job'.

Handled.

I need names and evidence.

It's amazing how this bounty program could run all this while with participants not having a clue that the ICO is being ran by a supporter of terrorists. I nearly became a victim because I intended to consider investing in it big time