I agree with Loaf, those people should get in touch with Risto and get refunded directly from him, they never played these accounts themselves, and probably don't exist anyway.

Bullshit champ, you bought spr for an airdrop, and you can sell it anytime you want, so you got nothing locked up. If you fomo bought after the announcement pump and paid too much you made a rookie mistake, that's why you're butt hurt. Learn from your mistakes, and move on. HLM is an airdrop, it's a freebie, so saying you entrusted your money to HLM devs makes you sound like a whinging dick, champ.

Devs did a 51% attack on themselves, they collected some btc donations from a few people, maybe this is the exit, very strange behaviour, they must realise market won't accept that level of dev compensation.

HLM is an airdrop on spreadcoin, so you bought spr to get HLM, and you're free to sell your spr anytime you want, so how is your money being locked up? You didn't entrust any money to HLM devs at all.

That makes sense, good decision! If an imbalance in the regions does occur you could always give a slight advantage to candidates running in that region next election to compensate, get more high quality candidates running in that region.

Is the voting based on regions this time, are there still going to be 16 NN in each region?

I can see a scenario where a candidate gets enough VOTES to be in the top 30 in the election, but they are in a sort after region with many candidates, and they don't win one of the available places to make up the 16 from their region. What would happen in that situation? Would they get option to move to another region?

I have this problem too, how to sign from an ethereum address, it's impossible to verify on UB website correctly.

SuperDAO devs have  chosen to operate in super stealth mode since the beginning, hard to know exactly what stage of their roadmap their on as we don't really know the roadmap, but if they're going to crypto conferences that's a good sign.

Any news on distribution of the NEM silver coin fund from NXT asset exchange days?

Also, I see on NEM rich list some huge accounts for dev funds and marketing which is great, but where are details of how those funds are being spent?

That's insane, this project looked good for a while, but devs must have lost their minds 51% is ridiculous

Nice offer, but it wouldn't be a community pool if one entity controlled the majority of the pool, would it. Small investors are being offered nice profit shares by some high profile candidates with good chance to get elected (20%-30%), so there's no need for a community pool now.

I agree, DEX like BarterDEX are not for every crypto user, if you don't mind kyc regulations and don't mind some risk from hacks and scams from using centralised exchanges then DEX is probably a lot more trouble than it's worth in many ways, slow and requires effort to learn new way of thinking based on things like utxo and atomic swaps. Maybe 80% of small-medium traders will not bother to learn, but DEX niche will still be substantial.


I disagree though, BarterDEX fees are cheaper, and security issues are non existent, you always control your private keys, and there's no central website, so no chance of phishing or dns spoofing.

The download link from decred.org goes to a github , but i get page error in my browser ...

That's an awesome incentive to hodl.

What happens if you want to move your tokens for security reasons, like onto a ledger or trezor, can you apply to move 100% of your coins to a new address and still keep the bonus status?

Very generous jl777, most other devs would have kept 100% of unclaimed assets for themselves, thanks

Where can I download decrediton wallet for windows, github link from OP isn't working ...

Is BTCH on CMC yet, what's the ticker?

There have been literally thousands of complaints of bittrex locking accounts for the last 9-12 months. I see two basic types:

1- people from 'banned' countries like Cuba, Iran, Syria
2- legacy account holders from before the KYC era

In both cases many thousands of users were using bittrex for a long time without problems, and bittrex was gladly letting them, and collecting fees. Then WITHOUT WARNING, these users had their accounts locked without any grace period to withdraw their funds.

Bittrex could have announced their change in policy and let people withdraw before the new terms of service were introduced, but they chose to freeze accounts without warning. We can speculate why, maybe they plan to keep these users funds, maybe they were presurred by someone to do this ... who knows, but the facts are clear for all to see.

In my case I am in category 2- above, and I have +20k USD frozen unless I upload KYC data to these people, even though the original terms of service never required this when I first opened my account.

Eventually the operators of Bittrex will pay for what they have done, Karma always catches up.

Yes, that's a good summary.

The obvious next question to ask is why did DCI behave this way, and why are other academic cryptographers like Matthew Green attacking IOTA team?

Answer is jealousy and greed as far as I can tell, these academics want to earn big money like early crypto tech pioneers, they are very jealous of CfB in particular as creator of NXT and IOTA, and they work with rivals of IOTA to make big money if they can too, and they want to use their 'credibility' to bring down a competitor.

When all this comes out, and it will, many reputations will be destroyed, but so far they are doing some short term damage to IOTA, but eventually this episode will be legendary in IOTA's history.

NASdaq is a stolen account, do not trust this user