There's tons of coins that only marginally changes something - rewards, hashing algorithms, etc. There's innovative coins that adds things like Proof of Stake, but it does it in their way with flaws. There's cool and innovative but centralized cash ins like Ripple. There's also a spot for a non PoW, non PoS, and non centralization/validators/web of debt/checkpointing coin.

Features
No waiting an indeterminable amount of time for your transaction to confirm.

No "dedicated miners" - mining is incredibly cheap yet spam proof, and there's no reward/incentive/transaction fee because the barrier to mining is a Raspberry Pi.

No transaction fees. You can choose to pay for additional double spend protection.

No centralization of any kind! In fact, it's more decentralized than bitcoin because of the low barrier to entry for mining, and the lack of mining pools.

Cool and fitting name, awesome four letter domain name.. On the scale of "PayPal", not "Bytecoin".

OK - so why is this in services?

We need a fluent C++ developer to implement the changes as a fork to bitcoin. It's not complex and the scope of the change is like PPCoin's, but the actual concept is different.

Would this help bitcoin?

When this is shown to be a better model, Bitcoin can migrate to it after the PoW subsidy drops to zero. Or even now - because you're tired of waiting a hour or sometimes days for bitcoin deposits to confirm, right?

So - contact me if you'd like to help

Let me know if you're interested in a few GH/s.

lol

Each page contains 20 PMs, so just multiply the amount of pages you have in your private message inbox by 20. I have 1120 PMs!

Yeah. I have received more than a thousand PMs, I don't want to have clicked through a thousand alert boxes

You shouldn't take a bitcoin loan for a fiat denominated investment.

Block reward is 2 satoshi.

That's called shorting

Great thing until the server crashes! 

Definitely. Of course, if you are not using the BTC for fiat purposes, for example if you're a BTC seller on OTC and convert the fiat back into BTC fast, then borrowing BTC is a better idea than borrowing fiat.

Correct - all shareholders have being fully refunded!

Not a scam, but the house edge increases the more bets you make. Up to 25% or something, which is an insane house edge.

Of course, if you gamble on satoshidice 15 times, then you're going to see a 25% house edge, but why do that instead of just gambling once on lower odds?

SCAmASICS.

Bump!

Make it provably fair, no excuse.

That isn't going to happen on a large scale, because you'd be throwing money away due to defaults.

If difficulty is 5% of the "base difficulty", no coins are produced. Transaction fees are also forfeited.  64kb max block size (prevent spamming). However, this is useful in case of a sudden drop in network hashpower, to retarget the difficulty.

If difficulty is 40% of the "base difficulty", 30% of the base coins are produced. 256kb max block size. This can be more profitable when there are a lot of transaction fees waiting to be picked up (during streaks of bad luck)! You'd collect the TX fees faster (on average) than someone mining at base difficulty.

If difficulty is the base difficulty, then the base coins are produced. 768kb max block size.

If difficulty is 400% of the "base difficulty", 405% of the base coins are produced. 1MB max block size. Good for sudden increases in hashpower, without disrupting the network

Difficulty target would be placed in the block header, to force a miner / pool to choose an option. Generally miners will choose the base difficulty, unless there are a lot of TX fees pending to be collected, which miners may start switching to 40% difficulty to try and claim it before someone else does. Those who are about to introduce a lot of hashpower in the network would go with the 400% difficulty option, which won't spam the network with too much blocks yet give him a small bonus (to compensate for the variance).

Coinbase cannot reach zero (maybe a minimum coinbase of 5?).

The difficulty targeting system would obviously need to take in account the actual difficulties, and the confirmations system would need reworking (a 5% confirm is worth less than a 200% confirm).

Thoughts?

But you claim " 100% [money?] back guarantee and anonymity.(EN) " which obviously won't happen

yawn, another ponzi / scam

No, BTC-e did. They can still get the private key.