Note: Since I wrote this while reading, I didn't know where you are getting at.
I read the first few paras and wrote the below. So don't get confused. The first few paras have nothing t do with the last message.
The concept is interesting, and it will do good to the society if implemented.
But, the problem is such a system is nearly impossible to implement.
Achieving it is not practically possible due to various reasons:
The resources, be it food or water, are limited. If it is fairly distributed,
This will ensure individuals will have access to a place to live comfortably, the ability to use technology like a laptop and internet connection, and run all necessities of life such as cooking.
cannot be achieved.
Fair distribution is difficult. People who are in an advantageous position currently, the haves will oppose it.
I am not sure what will happen to established corporations? Microsoft, Google??
Governments should have some power, monetarily, to keep the system out of control. Else, there will be no one to check it, if it goes astray.
And you will find a hundred more reasons, as you think more and more about it.
At this point, people will lack the motive to work for, to earn a living, to achieve the dreams. Remember what happened to USSR.
Innovation, when exceeded, can only cause destruction. In 500 years, from now, if human population exists, they will be living like robots.
I have a concept, in which all governents come together to stop innovation in specific fields, like AI, DNA stuff, etc.
It is crazy. What have you really achieved by going to Moon?
A million more tonnes of CO
2 and toxic gases?
Why wouldn't they spend the same amount for eliminating poverty, planting forests etc. instead of finding out what is beyond our Solar System? I am not saying the latter has zero priority. But obviously, some issues need to be looked at and solved first, before going to somewhere else.
Whatever be the system, there will be people against it. If it has everything free, there will be people misusing it. If there are no restrictions, who will put a check to it?
Centralization is good. To a point.
Decentralization is good. To a point.
If any one estimates large proportions, the result will be devastating.
... Reading the economic theory part. MU, Resources, stuff...
Unless, the chocolate bar is quite large, I will eat both at the second hour.
1 hour is too long.
Put it like, giving 10000 glasses of water continuously to a thirsty man, one after the other.
With the economic ideas of scarcity, perceived value, and marginal value we should think about humanity’s economy on a galactic scale. How valuable is water compared to the supply of water? If we were to want to trade water to another civilization in the future and their world has perhaps 95% water compared to our 75%, the purchasing power of our water would obviously be less due to their own supply. The questions posed within this also beg to ask the question of how does a civilization lay claim to assets which are not within the home-world of that civilization?
It is the same as you have 1 million USD, I have 1000 million USD, and the total supply is 1001 million USD.
I certainly can't claim your assets! I am not sure, what the question is?
This brings up a philosophical argument of greed and that there is an assumption in many people on Earth that humans by nature are greedy. To be fair, the majority of humans on Earth are scared. They are fearful in their beliefs. They do not believe that they are abundant and they have all of these instances in their past and present where they are lacking in many things they want or think that they need. Humans are not greedy by nature. Humans are able by our very nature within creation to choose to experience negative or dark themes within their judgements, opinions, thoughts, and actions. The same is true for all things which are of a positive and enlightening fashion. The tipping point of the universe is that it is slightly skewed towards the positive because of the balancing point in which you get to choose how you would like to experience humanity for yourself.
We are positive. So, you are positive. You can't admit that we are greedy, lol?
Yeah, people like to be optimistic. Being greedy depends on how you define "greedy" and the degree associated with it.
Foe those, who don't have time to read all this stuff, the summary is:
"Be positive" and "Be yourself"
Signed,
A Humble Human
Show Posts
)
gt ready ripple choo choo train
