Bitcoin Forum
June 08, 2024, 03:48:18 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 [259] 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 »
5161  Local / Español (Spanish) / Re: Clientes bitcoins: Bitcoind on: November 08, 2012, 03:12:11 PM
Entonces solo se puede saber cuanto ha sincronizado, pero no si ha sincronizado completamente.

Si el cliente qt lo muestra, será por alguna razón...
5162  Local / Español (Spanish) / Re: Clientes bitcoins: Bitcoind on: November 06, 2012, 05:06:25 PM
"litecoind help" te da la lista de comandos, uno de ellos es settxfee así que por ejemplo "litecoind settxfee 0.001" te establece esa comisión por transferencia.

Aparte de esa comisión hay otra que no se puede ajustar y que se calcula en base a la "antigüedad" de las coins que envías y al tamaño de la transacción resultante. O sea, que el hecho de hacer 'bitcoind settxfee 0.0005' no garantiza que todas las transacciones vayan a ir con 0.0005 btc de comisión.

Pero al fin y al cabo el costo x transaccion no puede ser menor a 5 mBTC?

No estoy seguro, pero creo que si lo pones a mano a 0.0005, eso se envía siempre como comisión (más lo otro, si procede).


Es posible saber, cuando bitcoind se ha sincronizado completamente? Los clientes graficos lo muestran automaticamente.

'bitcoind getblockcount' te dice hasta dónde has sincronizado. Si más o menos te sabes por dónde vamos (206000 y pico ahora mismo), con eso te basta.
5163  Local / Español (Spanish) / Re: Clientes bitcoins: Bitcoind on: November 05, 2012, 11:04:09 PM
"litecoind help" te da la lista de comandos, uno de ellos es settxfee así que por ejemplo "litecoind settxfee 0.001" te establece esa comisión por transferencia.

Aparte de esa comisión hay otra que no se puede ajustar y que se calcula en base a la "antigüedad" de las coins que envías y al tamaño de la transacción resultante. O sea, que el hecho de hacer 'bitcoind settxfee 0.0005' no garantiza que todas las transacciones vayan a ir con 0.0005 btc de comisión.
5164  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Are ASIC's the endgame? on: November 05, 2012, 06:10:13 PM
By the time ASICs as a technology is obsoleted, all the bitcoin blocks will have been mined anyway  Grin

But that doesn't imply an end to mining.
5165  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: About a year ago.... on: November 04, 2012, 11:11:49 AM
At this time, this forum alone has over 68K registered members.

Any metrics on daily/weekly unique users logging in? (ie active users).
5166  Other / CPU/GPU Bitcoin mining hardware / Re: My PSU just had a catastrophic failure (i.e. exploded) on: November 03, 2012, 06:28:33 PM
I think you meant either 16% above its capacity, or 785W instead of 875:

No, I do not mean that; I specifically stated that 875 was wall-draw. There is a difference between power drawn from the wall, and power delivered to the components of your computer, and PSUs are rated for power delivered to components. A gold rated PSU will run at roughly 87%-90% efficiency (depending on the one you purchase) at > 75% load. I believe the one I had, being one of the most superior models on market, was running close to 89% or so (don't recall where I got that now, so I will take it on faith) -

.89 * 875 * 100 / 750 = 103.833333; or roughly 104% give or take.

Ah, thanks for that. I'm not a hardware junkie Wink.
5167  Other / CPU/GPU Bitcoin mining hardware / Re: My PSU just had a catastrophic failure (i.e. exploded) on: November 03, 2012, 04:17:32 PM
I ran a 750W PSU, with ~875W coming from the wall (4 or 5 heavily overclocked 5870s), which was something like 5% above its rated capacity

I think you meant either 16% above its capacity, or 785W instead of 875:

875 * 100 / 750 = 116.67
785 * 100 / 750 = 104.67
5168  Other / CPU/GPU Bitcoin mining hardware / Re: Jalapeno question on: November 02, 2012, 06:43:37 PM
why is everybody assuming 12$ not to change while calculating for any other circumstance?

Because it's impossible to know. We take into account an increase in the difficulty because we know it's going to happen, but price can go any direction. It's anyone's guess.
5169  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Running the bitcoin daemon on a server - Costs on: October 30, 2012, 08:26:44 PM
Since this thread has already been revived, I'd like to state that I'm running bitcoind on 256 MB RAM with no problems. System reports bitcoind is using 112 MB. FWIW.
5170  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: 2-3 weeks to go until the first unboxing of a BFL ASIC?? MAYBE? on: October 26, 2012, 02:57:20 PM
Will you please stop feeding the troll? Have you seen ckolivas wasting time on answering him? Just add him to the ignore list (or not) and go on!
5171  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Difficulty drop on: October 23, 2012, 08:39:38 PM
SHA-256 encrypted data

Care to elaborate on this?
5172  Other / Off-topic / Re: BFL offers 1000 BTC back up on power claims on: October 21, 2012, 03:41:12 PM
66 watts DC, or 66 watts AC?

I asked that on the BFL forums,it will be from the wall=120 volt  Wink

That depends on where you live.  For me- from the wall = 240 V

OOO,higher voltage=less wattage Shocked  

BFL may get less than 60 watts yet..........over in europe  Cheesy

I know it'll almost be the same in reality.


W=A*V

In Europe the wattage will be the same.

Last I checked in Spain we got 220V, not 240. Not that it makes a big difference though.
5173  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Vanitygen: Vanity bitcoin address generator/miner [v0.22] on: October 21, 2012, 01:10:59 AM
I can generate 1Love but I can not generate 1love. I guess that "l" (small L) is forbidden character. Why?

Addresses can't contain "O", "0", "l" and "I". I'll let you guess why.
5174  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: More than one address within each vout? on: October 18, 2012, 02:12:22 PM
I think never.

It may contain multiple vouts, but each should have only one address.  Even with multisig, I think the address shown would be the hash of the multisig script.

Then it's funny that the field is called "addresses" instead of "address" and that it's actually an array, instead of a plain scalar:

Code:
    "vout" : [
        {
            "value" : 0.01055000,
            "n" : 0,
            "scriptPubKey" : {
                [some stuff],
                "addresses" : [
                    "17BXw4qwrKv8bd8gLZtYj75V368K88GJW6"
                ]
            }
        },

vs (hypothetical):

Code:
    "vout" : [
        {
            "value" : 0.01055000,
            "n" : 0,
            "scriptPubKey" : {
                [some stuff],
                "address" : "17BXw4qwrKv8bd8gLZtYj75V368K88GJW6"
            }
        },

There must be some reason to this.
5175  Other / CPU/GPU Bitcoin mining hardware / Re: Your Electricity Cost per Kwh (Which country is the Most Expensive) on: October 11, 2012, 06:37:23 AM
----------------------------------------------------------
Price per kWh      |      0.15 EUR (0.19 USD) /kWh (and counting)
Current as @       |      Jul 2012
Provider              |      Gas natural - Fenosa
State/Province     |      Madrid
Country              |       Spain                 
----------------------------------------------------------
5176  Other / CPU/GPU Bitcoin mining hardware / Re: Jalapeno question on: October 10, 2012, 08:43:13 PM
Now, if from there on out the network continues to grow at 20% a month as new BFL and bASIC units come online and Avalon and Reclaimer launch, your ROI at current BTC prices would be about 232 days. If the network were to grow at 30%, you've never make your money back.

20% a month (or any amount per unit of time) is an exponential growth. While I think we'll see something resembling that during the first months, I think it's unrealistic in the long run.
5177  Local / Español (Spanish) / Re: España on: October 10, 2012, 06:24:20 PM
Grupo de Facebook para usuarios y desarrolladores de Bitcoin en España:

¿Los de facebook no son esos que están ahora todos locos por que usemos nuestro nombre real? No sé vosotros, pero yo ya no tengo facebook desde hace un tiempecito.
5178  Other / CPU/GPU Bitcoin mining hardware / Re: Jalapeno question on: October 10, 2012, 04:00:35 PM
FWIW I'm estimating a diff increase of 30x in my calculations. Maybe it's excessive but I prefer to err on that side rather than the other.
5179  Other / CPU/GPU Bitcoin mining hardware / Re: Jalapeno question on: October 10, 2012, 02:13:42 PM
But with a 4.5GH/S hash rate, it can mine pretty quickly; I imagine.  What would the BTC average per day be?
Given the number of pre-orders, if you're not the first person to get one but you're not the last either, after they've settled in for a couple weeks, you're looking at something in the neighborhood of 0.8BTC/day after the block split to 25.

That's assuming a difficulty of 3e6, which won't likely be the case.
5180  Local / Español (Spanish) / Re: Cambio de password despues del vandalismo del el 8/9 Septiembre 2011 on: September 11, 2011, 08:24:10 PM
NOTA 2: Al 'corrector-propietario'  ¿Tengo solamente  dos mini-post y troleo? !Vaya! !Vaya! Que maneras ...  Shocked

Allá aquel que "ve" lo que nadie "ve"-  ¿ o no? ¿o si?

Eso de "troll" me parece excesivo. Por otro lado yo no hubiera creado un hilo sólo para decir eso; que cada uno haga con sus contraseñas lo que le parezca conveniente. Los usuarios de este foro ya tienen evidencias de sobra para saber qué política seguir.
Pages: « 1 ... 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 [259] 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!