rpietila, in general I think your table is roughly accurate. It matches quite well what I have in my head about the BTC holdings distribution. Thanks for sharing!
Perhaps you send your proposal as a table for all to see
![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
[...]
If your estimate is correct, the bitcoin holding is even more top-heavy than in my calculation. Since you will have to add 100 holders in between 10-100k (100*30k) = 3.0 million to the equation.
Therefore all smaller holders would have <5 million, combined. Show me the results as a table!
![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
#People | #Bitcoins | poeple * avg |
1 | BTC1m-1.5m | 1.25M |
2 | BTC500k-1m | 1.5M |
3 | BTC250k-500k | 1.125M |
7 | BTC150k-250k | 1.4M |
15 | BTC50k-150k | 1.5M |
50 | BTC10k-50k | 1.5M |
300 | BTC2.1k-10k | 1.85M |
1000 | BTC100-2.1k | 1.1M |
5000 | BTC10-100 | 275k |
10000 | BTC1-10 | 55k |
50000 | BTC0.1-1 | 27.5k |
150000 | BTC0.00000001-0.1 | 7.5k |
total sum of last column: 11,555,000 BTC
into the last column I put the avg("from", "to") * "# of people" . In below chart this avg was used for the blue bars.
![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2F6fTnQOA.png&t=663&c=N6tTXE_IHrB4pg)
pulled out of my ass and yes: it's extremely top heavy compared to rpietilas distribution.
It's interesting that the groups down to and including the "100-2.1k" group all sum up to pretty much the same amount. (I didn't manipulate this, it was a surprise to me). Maybe I'm underestimating the number of people in the lower groups ("0.00000001-0.1" through "10-100")? There's probably more that 10,000 people with holding of 1 to 10 BTC, no? I'm really not sure.
I somehow hope I'm completely wrong with this guesswork of mine.