Reason I ask. To know if securing the seed is adequate for a restore or not adequate.
I'm sure you realize it now, but for the sake of others that stop by and read this thread... This, right here, is one very important reason NOT to import private keys.
Spendulus now doesn't know if his backups are adequate or not. If he never imported seeds, he wouldn't need to worry about it. I'm sure at the time of importing the seed, it didn't seem like a big deal. He either figured that he would remember to store the private key separately, or he thought he'd remember to back it up separately.
Spendulus, The only keys that really matter are the keys you are using. I'm neither an Armory nor Electrum expert, but I think both of them offer some sort of "coin control" features that allow you to see which addresses have bitcoins on them? If so, then it should be possible to generate a long list of addresses from the seed and see if any of the addresses in use are not on that list. Bolded above is the very point. Any situation where one "does not know if his backups are adequate" is essentially a situation where one has no backups. It had crossed my mind that a full audit of the transactions would answer the question, but identifying keys that were generated from the seed as opposed to those which were imported ..... Well, I can think of some ways to do that in an excel spreadsheet. More private keys floating all over the place to try to resolve an obscure issue about the validity of private keys.... An associated point to be made is that this is the very situation with all the people who have imported lists of private keys into a wallet such as Electrum to recover bitcoin cash or gold. The only way to get recovery from seed to work would be to move all those funds from imported keys to keys generated from the seed.
|
|
|
I know it's dumb to use a wallet with seed phrase such as Armory or Electrum, and directly paste a private key into it, because then, the seed will not generate ALL the addresses used by the wallet. It will generate all except for the inserted private key(s).
But what if you have some wallets laying around, and you know in the past you probably did some dumb things?
Is there a way to see/know/figure out that in the past, private keys were imported?
Reason I ask. To know if securing the seed is adequate for a restore or not adequate.
|
|
|
Why do you guys think we didn't move to BCH from BTC? Even though the segwitx2 was cancelled, BCH still seems to be Bitcoin 2.0
Bitcoin and and bcash have completely different views for the future. Bitcoin is evolving as a digital commodity, and bcash is just trying to pursuit the new payment method option. Bitcoin is way ahead of every other cryptocoin out there, if we talk about the digital commodity path. Institutional money is cumming to the market, so bitcoin is on it's way to become a new asset in Wall Street. No other coin is getting any attention from big investors, like BTC is. Except for maybe ethereum, but for completely different reasons, since ether works more as a platform to invest in "start ups". As for bcash, like I said, is completely focused in being a form of payment, so it's not really competing with bitcoin. Is actually competing with dash, or monero, and to be honest I would prefer any of these two in comparison to bcsh. So for me, the only reason we see bcash this high, when we compare it to dash for example, is because it is taking advantage of the "bitcoin name". As for technology, it is ahead of bitcoin right now, in terms of transactions, but again that is not important for BTC right now, because it is evolving as "digital gold" and not a payment option. In the future, the Lightning network will be a much better option for scalability than the block increase, so bcash will continue to struggle, and BTC will be able to move as a well establish digital asset, to a form of payment. For me, this is the reason why bcash is not king, and never will be, and I still think it will probably fail as a form of payment, when compared to the other options out there. Reasons why bitcoin is king don't matter if fees are so high that competition rushes in. Now it's here.
|
|
|
ok thanks. not exactly the kind of information that is staring at you in the face when researching about starting with bitcoin. I checked out that link - hard to tell what is real and not real in there with some of the posts. I'm guising localbit coins has it's own built in Escrow. I'll see what I can figure out. Hard for a newbie to get into buying their first fraction of bitcoin these days, bet it was easier when bitcoin first arrived. Coinbase is my usual recommendation to get started.
|
|
|
i would like to say thank you very much,guru!! Reaffirming... I swap various wallet.dat files around almost daily. This is obviously better than maintaining several 130gb blockchain files!
|
|
|
Why is using energy "bad for the ecology" in and of itself. Or "bad for sustainability". Sustaining what?
Is this some kind of malthusian scientific case for genocide you're presenting? (all human activity, eating and breathing especially, consumes energy, it's called being alive)
Why are you presenting these vague, unscientific assumptions to be in any way relevant to Bitcoin's hashing security
Assume, for a moment, that you/I/They forked a bTN and a BTR. These stand for Bitcoin generated only by Nuclear power, and only by Renewable (solar/wind/geothermal/hydro), respectively. The free market then quickly establishes if anyone cares. I think they don't...
|
|
|
The spam is lessen these days, so they already confirmed both ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) I’ll tip you tomorrow too - Tired man today, going to stick my head in a cold bucket before I send more coins over tomorrow Okay, so like I can't not ask. Did you really stick your head in a cold bucket?
|
|
|
I sent 0.01587494 bitcoin with a 0.00000494BTC fee to an online market vendor. The transaction took 4 days to confirm by which time the market had cancelled the order. But it is confirmed now. This was over 3 weeks ago now but no bitcoin has come back into my electrum wallet. Do I have to do anything to get it back? Or will it eventually show up? Or is it in the vendors account or escrow? Any help would be really appreciated.
Here's the info from Blockchain if that's of any help.
Summary Size 226 (bytes) Weight 904 Received Time 2017-11-04 21:12:10 Included In Blocks 493094 ( 2017-11-04 21:12:10 + 0 minutes ) Confirmations 1871 Confirmations
Some vendors accept bitcoin but do a customer credit by mailing a check or crediting a credit card, not by bitcoin. Ask them how you get your money.
|
|
|
Does that old version of bitcoin-qt not have the "dumpwallet" or "dumpprivkey" console commands? You don't need to be synced to use those. Failing that, if you're familiar with Python/Command line stuff, then I'd recommend "PyWallet", it definitely has a "dumpwallet" command that will extract everything from your wallet.dat. It does not require bitcoind to be synced... in fact, it doesn't require bitcoind/bitcoin-qt at all... just your wallet.dat file Download here: https://github.com/jackjack-jj/pywalletBitcoinTalk Thread here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=34028.0Yes, it does have dumpwallet and dumpprivkey, but I didn't think the console was available till the sync completed. Least thats what I had in my notes... for some reason. I'll look at getting a vintage copy of PyWallet since I'm sure the wallet format on my file is way older than it's expecting. As always, remember to only work on COPIES of your wallet.dat ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) Amen Brother... I have so many backups, it's a treat to try to find the real thing ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) Not sure about old versions of Core regarding dumping the keys before the sync is complete, but I am pretty sure this can be done on the current version. Another option is to build on your computer another copy of Core, using a pruned database, then dumpprivatekeys. That would be pretty quick to load.
|
|
|
I’m hoping someone can help with this issue, as I believe I have been robbed by bitstamp! I sent 1 bitcoin some time ago to my receiving address at bitstamp, I was then informed that they had cancelled old addresses and that they would not honour my 1 bitcoin, how can this be? Please see the reply email I received from them. I would be most grateful with any help regarding getting my coin back, I don’t believe that they can’t do anything! Email from bitstamp:
As already mentioned, our old private key has been cancelled due to security reasons and new addresses issued on our users' accounts. Unfortunately old deposit addresses are no longer linked to Bitstamp accounts.
We are unfortunately unable to honor or credit any bitcoins sent to old deposit addresses after 5th of January 2015 (9 a.m. UTC). We notified customers that they should stop making deposits to previously issued bitcoin deposit addresses. We published a public notification on our website, Facebook page, Twitter feed and also sent personal email notifications to our users' addressesP
I think that is total bullshit, first of all. It might be true that they can't get to that address, but it also may be that they can and don't care about your plight. Or they can and already have. Fourth, it could be that the keys in question were compromised and someone else has those coins already. This is a glaring example of why you need wallets which allow you to have your own private keys, with no intermediary between you and that key.
|
|
|
I'm sorry that this is a level 11 amateur post...
I have a family member who got an email from blockchain stating: This is an automated notice that your wallet account has been credited with funds in the amount of 0.54798743 BTC.
I would have chocked this up to spam or phishing, but that same family member remembers being gifted .5 bitcoin in 2011 and found a folder on their computer with the transaction number (am I even calling it the right thing? It's an empty folder named with the transaction number)
They don't remember ever opening a wallet, we created a new blockchain wallet as nothing was linked to her email.
Where do i even start?
You start by assuming the email was spam or phished, and from that attempt to work out how the scam worked. Did it infect the computer? Did it point to a phished address? Etc. I have also received spam alleging it was from blockchain alleging I was the owner of 0.5 btc. I assumed it was simple phishing intended to gather login credentials when the sucker eagerly goes to checkout his new fortune.
|
|
|
A Lot of concerns have been raised as to the relationship between Islam and radical extremism. Most extremist carry out their heinous act and claim that they are doing it in the name of 'Allah'. What is the real application of the concept of holy war and Jihad in Islam? Does jihad in the classical sense mean war? What is the true position of the holy Quran in all of these.
Its all a lie, a fugazi, bs, nonsensical, and stupid. This is what the media wants you to believe that they are linked, that they are one in the same. But have you actual met a Muslim in real life? They are the nicest people you will ever meet and they do not take part in many of the "sins" that we do in daily life. Dont be fooled by the media in the West they are always trying to put one over on you especially when it comes to terrorism. Takiyya. You fool nobody.
|
|
|
I have installed bitcoin core on my laptop and noted down the wallet address and private key. I have transferred some BTC into the wallet. Is it safe to uninstall bitcoin core now?
No. First, you haven't done what you said you did. You THINK you did that. You know you have done that when you have tested and verified what you think you did. Next, as others have noted, there are the "Change" addresses. Why not simply backup the "wallet.dat." Back it up to a couple of places NOT ON THE CLOUD or your computers. Be sure you are backing up the right wallet.dat too. Move the wallet.dat file from the bitcoin directory to somewhere else. Then run Core. It should recreate the wallet and read all zeros. If it does not, then you backed up something else, right? Now that you've positively identified the file, back it up to several thumbdrives and label them.
|
|
|
Yes but it is not about promo offers. Its more about the customers don't know how to pay by bitcoin. So there must be a way to provide them a solution which supports easy bitcoin transaction by known payment methods: Like they can buy bitcoin via paypal and pay us via bitcoin easily...
I think your thinking is a little flawed here. Why would a customer go "Paypal -> Bitcoin -> You"... when they can go "Paypal -> You"? Likewise for CC... why "CC -> Bitcoin -> You"? Where is the "value add" for the customer to get involved in Bitcoin? ![Huh](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/huh.gif) If you're not offering any incentive for using Bitcoin, what is the point? Only people who already have Bitcoins will use Bitcoins to pay you... otherwise, they'll just pay with Paypal or CC. One reason is when there is a currency translation involved and a fee for that. Another reason is when one of the two parties lives in a country where there is an "official exchange rate" and a "street exchange rate" for their currency. In this case they may get 10x the value by using bitcoin. PayPal and credit cards go through the banking system hence are uniformly at the official exchange rates. Of course in this case the authorities may well have made bitcoin illegal and for those very reasons.
|
|
|
.....
The definition of a paperwallet is a wallet, which is created offline, with the private keys printed on a piece of paper (or otherwise stored in an offline way), without anything, apart from the public address, ever touching the internet until its funds are spent. After that, a paperwallet is not a paperwallet anymore.
Good definition. Another option is to load wallet software, import the funds, then just write the private key on a piece of paper. Then delete the wallet software and wallet. Not as perfect but quick and dirty. DEFINITELY NOT AS PERFECT.
|
|
|
So, how about b2x? Which wallet is the best to claim free b2x? I'm not so sure right now.
That's completely irrelevant... B2x got "cancelled", so there is nothing to claim... ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif) Just a technicality here, but it doesn't matter whether it got "cancelled." The forking client was in the wild; there are still btc1 nodes online as we speak. The reason that the fork didn't occur is that the btc1 client broke. All btc1 nodes apparently got stuck at height #494,782 - 2 blocks before the fork was supposed to happen. I'm not sure that a block would have been mined once the fork occurred anyway, given the high difficulty and lack of user/service support. I actually got "YOB2X" tokens credited to my account at 1:1 to my BTC on Yobit. I'm assuming this is due to B2X. People are buying it at 0.03-0.04 BTC for some bizarre reason. Okay I'll byte. How do I get my free Yob2x?
|
|
|
.....2,023,005 bitcoins reside in addresses which have been untouched in over three years. ....
It makes me sad to think of all those abandoned BTC... I wish I could call them into my wallet and give them a nice home where they will be loved and cherished.
These are cared for by the God of Hodling.
|
|
|
No... you didn't understand incorrectly... Spendulus did ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) So my plan would be to rename my current wallet.dat to something like wallet.old, restart the client and let it generate a new wallet.dat with new private keys and addresses. I could then write down one of the new bitcoin addresses, and then do the same thing but in reverse; rename the new wallet.dat to wallet.new, rename wallet.old back to wallet.dat, fire up the core client and then transfer the btc in the old wallet to my new address in the new wallet.dat file.
This process is EXACTLY "transferring the bitcoin to a temporary safe address"... although it doesn't need to be temporary... your "new" wallet.dat should be fine to continue using for the future. By renaming your "old" wallet.dat to wallet.old and then starting Bitcoin Core, you will create a completely new BTC wallet.dat... So, your idea to take an address from the "NEW" wallet.dat, shutdown Core... then rename "new" wallet.dat to wallet.new... rename wallet.old back to wallet.dat... then start Core, and then send ALL your BTC from "old" wallet.dat to the address you just wrote down from "new" wallet.dat then your BTC will be "safe"... it is now on a completely new address, in a new wallet with all new seed/addresses/private keys. You can then safely import copies of the "old" wallet.dat into BCH Core (and probably BTG Core) to get those coins as all the BTC will be gone... or you can dump the private keys from your "old" wallet.dat and import the old keys into compatible ilghtweight SPV wallets if you don't want to download 3 copies of the blockchain ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif) NOTE: If you're super paranoid (although BCH is fast becoming "worthless" again)... You could then repeat the exercise with BCH so that you create new BCH wallet.dat so when you import into BTG your BCH is "safe" #cryptoInception ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) Ok, thanks for this as I wanted to make sure my thought process was correct on what is happening, which it seems it is. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) I know I probably missed the boat on BCH and I am in no hurry to sell anything, but just thought it would be a good idea to finally get around to separating all these coins from one another so I can be in a better position going forward should one of the prices spike up again. But before I do anything I want to protect my btc which is my main concern for now. Thanks again for the input, it is what I am looking for. The simplest way to do the first part of this is as follows. Assume you have Bitcoin core wallet. Load a copy of electrum, do what it says when it is setting up. Like writing down on paper the seed and the phrases, not storing them in a computer. First save a copy of the bitcoin core wallet.dat. Next.... Generate a Receive address. Then go to Core and execute a Send to that receive address. Wait if you like and verify it worked. Do this until the Core wallet reads 0.00 funds. Now you are done with emptying out the wallet. Save a copy of the bitcoin wallet and the electrum wallet. Next you are ready to take the core wallet.dat private keys and use them to retrieve your bitcoin cash.
|
|
|
So apparently hex seed were a thing. Didn't know that.
You can actually recover your wallet just by entering the hex seed, you know. I just tried and it works. If you want to get the non-hex seed just do it from the client.
Now how cool is that. This solves my problem in Scene 1 (Still curious whats the relation between the hex and the 12 word seed) And for the Scene 2 now, What encryption is used to encrypt the hex in Scene 1... Any devs here to help? Interesting. Question: Do you use the phrase "hex" here to imply the base 58 encoded string? Hex traditionally meant base 16 eg 0-9 and a,b,c,d,e,f.
|
|
|
..... I'm confused. So can the "peer list poisoning" bug cause BCH and BTC lost ? In short, if I import my wallet into electron cash, is there any chance I will lose my BTC and BCH ? I understand it's better to transfer all of my BTC out before using electron cash but the network's fee now is so high, transfer 1.5 BTC costing me 0.16 (more than 10% ![Undecided](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/undecided.gif) ) My understanding is that you must do the transfer first, otherwise yours losing BTC. You want private keys that show a balance on 8-1-17, but which show zero at the current date.
|
|
|
|