I guess if you didn't aware about the the team has already put the rules if they can change the rules anytime as they want. this makes the hunters have no power as they can decide what they wanna try to do for the next step.

Remember the team is a party who has created the rules.

in this case the problem should be there were even hunters who were still lack of educations about how to choose the right one and try to avoid the scam bounties.

As someone stated above if there will be a new update that will come this week. A few days are not so long to be waited by us to make sure whether the developer and owner have the good intention to make everything will be clear for sure.
So many people are still waiting for the unidapp to be listed on the uniswap too as someone has already added it and add very small liquidity in the uniswap.

We will see that in the upcoming days.

It's caused by the hype of DIA has already gone and people have already started to cashing out their money from the DIA market and the first batch of bounty has already distributed by the team and that's a huge amount that enough to create a small correction in the DIA market too.

The next batch will be distributed next month but it's not wrong to try to catch this token when the dump will come after the bounty will be distributed by the team.
Whole of cryptos have been facing very big correction.

You must focus with the team who has been running such ico. in the majority of the exit scam cases that happened in the crypto mostly getting dominated by the icos who have been created by the anonymous team.
Everyone should take a project that being created by the anonymous team as a very high risk project with the possibility to be the scam project anytime.

Just take a look at how yuno, kimchi and so many scam defi have become exit scam projects.
We must learn a lot from there.

The second place should be on the contract audit.

There's a better smartcontract platform that worthed to be called as a competitor for ethereum and it was polkadot. NEO has already lost its demand and so many new projects didn't even interested to use it as a tokenization again. That means NEO will not become a competitor for ethereum again.

Do you wanna start a new thread that discussed about the top 10 DEFI? My first pick should be UNI and the second place was YFI. Both were legit defi projects.
I think that you may create a new one in the service discussion section.

400 UNI airdrop have already airdropped for people who have ever traded on uni swap even with small amount of money.

The liquidity providers since UNI V1 and V2 have already received a lot of UNI tokens. Some people have already earned a half of million dollars and I have seen that there's someone who have already earned more than 1 million dollars because they have become the liquidity providers since UNI V1 has already released and used by the community.

The different proportion have already dedicated for the liquidity providers and it looks like he's also a part of the liquidity providers.

Remember this because this is a common thing that majority of crypto users known about this, the team that goes into the anonymous team and hide their identity from the public will always have a very high risk.

We must look at the history of the anonymous team because it will always be linked to the scam projects. When it was running by famous developers and then they will never try to hide their face from the public but sometimes there will always also an anonymous team that looks legit and after they have done successful development and then they reveal their identity to the public.

As far as I know when bounty detective said if that was guaranteed that means if the reward has already distributed to the manager and I know that from the arcs bounty too as the reward has already escrowed to the manager but the problem is when the project didn't wanna to continue the development progress and how the token will be valuable? it will be a worthless token too.

I'm glad I have not joined in this scam project. So many members have sent their passport.

The usability has become the main problem in the crypto that so many platforms can't afford it to create a good usability especially for the its own token or coin. Decentralized platform is only a gimmick without any utility usage on its platform. So many tokens without any usefulness are still exist in this market too.

We can't take the major coins as a base to determine how good the development that is happening in the crypto. We are still crisis with the usability of tokens. I didn't take defi trend as a good progress.

that's more than enough to take a conclusion if this one as a scam project. I believe the creator was also using the fake identity and that's why it was only using a surename only on its members.

If there was a member who has been asking a sense question to the team and when the team was deciding to kick that member and then can we call the team has a good attitude?
The scam project was always doing it and when someone asked a sense question to make sure if that was running by the real people and then scammer will always called that as FUD. lol

you are already in the profit zone and I think it's better if you sell coins and then move into the potential coins.
Imagine when you are investing about 1k in the past and this time your investment have turned into the 1200 and you can take your $200 as your intial capital to invest in the legit project again and make it doubled.

I think that you should also try to decrease the risk of your money too but that depends on the result of your DYOR. It looks like ethereum is quite difficult to break $400 without a big news from the development progress.

I don't think if that will happen as this exchange site is still alive. I have some funds on gate.io too. I will not take any FUD that comes to an exchange site.

I have learned a lot from the binance's case in the past. I have also actively participated in the gate IEO.

You can buy more and more defi coins to be stored into your wallet. Stake is just like a feature that being offered from that platform. As a user you can choose whether you wanna try to stake your coins or keep it in your wallet. it doesn't matter whether you wanna get the passive income from your coin or not.

Majority of buyers will always take the opportunity to get more profit from the market. I should remind you that if when you can get more and why not? That's not a mandatory but that's worth when you are staking your coins.

POS was not always using masternode. As someone said above as there was no limitation but that depends on how good the profit margin when you are become the masternode. People will not use a lot of money to be a masternode if that was not even profitable.

that's why the masternode coin will have another option like it will let miners to help to secure the network too. In masternode service and what means of POS is proof of service and it's not proof of stake.

I remember when there was a news about the binance news like this https://cointelegraph.com/news/binance-denies-police-raids-very-existence-of-shanghai-offices

This could be true but that doesn't mean if that will be shutdown or it can be another FUD too. Remember what happened with binance and everything is still going very smooth even so many haters were also doing FUD in the past.

I'm withdrawing my money from gate to test it and everything is normal.

Redomination that happened with pokadot has already made this one entered the top 6 CMC.

I have owned the old DOT and it has already swapped into the new dot. After the swap and the launch of DOT main net the price of DOT is also getting increase drastically and that was also pumping the total market capitalization that has already reached by the DOT too.

Some new platforms are also helping the DOT platform to get the hype by started to use the parachain as the tokenization on the DOT platform too. This is not a scam platform. I could say this one is legit.

The price of tron is so difficult to be pumped without a big event. The latest event called SUN airdrop is not giving a lot of impact to the tron's price although multi million tron already locked to participated in the SNU airdrop.

Tron is not putting its product as a way to defend its position or create the hype but it was always releasing more and more new coins in various way to attract people to buy tron. This is unhealthy growth that happened with tron. Product is not the first thing that can attract people to use tron.

The future price of tron will not moving so much from the current rate.

Basically, if you are seeing this project and try to make a comparison with the feature that has already offered by YFI and newtonium just like a copycat of YFI but I believe what makes it looks different than YFI consider from the farming yield that has already offered. So many new copycat platforms of YFI offered huge farming yield for the users and that's why the defi project is still getting hyped caused by people were still betting on these defi projects.

Did you watch the development progress that have already made by EOS and TEZOS? I did but both were creating useful product (repetitive). The problem was the products that created by them are not 100% perfect. A new platform has used the new mechanism to make it looks different than other and that makes people will be quite difficult to follow that.

KUSAMA is also a part of the DOT ecosystem too. DOT is getting hyped and it can be the reason why DOT can enter top 10. If you are comparing the price before the redomination and it's only 6x

How can you sure  about XRP to be the bridge to the global currency while it has no chance to compete with mastercard?

https://cointelegraph.com/news/mastercard-launches-virtual-testing-environment-for-central-bank-currencies

The IMF or even world bank will actually use CDBC instead of ripple. This foundation is also rarely generating the profit and that means the burning portion to be used for the various things like marketing, development, etc is much greater rather than its margin profit.