|
Yea, especially now as there are projects like Arbidex around. Those who could've been interested in STeX don't know about their plans and are blown away by those other projects although STeX came out first with their idea. The same money can't be spent twice, right.
|
|
|
|
Birdchain veranstaltet derzeit einen Bloody-Sale, ganz entsprechend der aktuellen Marktsituation. Makaber aber lukrativ!  
|
|
|
|
hello stex team. i have participated in the translation bounty from last year and i have some stex tokens in MEW. i cant seem to find the deposit address for stex in https://stocks.exchange can anyone point me to how i can trade my stex tokens there? thank you What are you talking about? stocks.exchange is another project, you will find all informations about STeX on their homepage: https://www.stex.exchange/i looked at cmc and saw that stex is listed only on stocks.exchange https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/stex/#markets The STeX Token (token symbol STE) will first be listed on the STeX Exchange. Since STeX Exchange isn't live yet, the STE tokens aren't listed anywhere. Please check the following contract address 0xeba49ddea9f59f0a80ecbb1fb7a585ce0bfe5a5e. It's 'STeX Exchange ICO' |
|
|
|
Update:
Der Arbidex KYC-Prozess hat derzeit eine Quote von 80% Erfolg. Bitte achtet darauf, die korrekten Angaben zu machen.
Der Token-Sale läuft im internen Bereich und 7190466.91 Token (derzeit ~8000 ETH) wurden bereits verkauft.
 
|
|
|
|
Such results were achieved without conducting a bounty program? It's amazing. Tell me the ETH address of the wallet on which the money was collected? Here is the old ETH address (PreICO): https://etherscan.io/txs?a=0xae5652ea226bfae00b8d542e58231362af836fda&p=70mithrim
Could you please clarify whether you are a community manager or a bounty manager? Or maybe you are a member of the team?
I'm a devoted community member. I talked to the STeX team about the thread and they were glad for the help. I try to help as much as I can, as time permits. |
|
|
|
How many tokens were sold in the first round?
The first round (PreICO) raised an astounding 15.000 ETH and was sold-out rapidly, I made several posts about it: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2071543.msg25426318#msg25426318So, the cap is more than reached. I'd figure that they need to change the valuation to ETH and abandon fiat. That's a huge problem for many ICOs during that time as ETH was worth ~$300 At the current rate, we're roughly at $22,500,000 (PreICO+ICO). So it's basically +50% compared to the softcap. Are you still worried  ? |
|
|
|
Hi alle, vielleicht eine blöde Frage, aber nachdem ich einiges Kritisches zu falschen Seiten, Fakes etc. gelesen habe, möchte ich mir nun ein ledger nano s auf deren, wie ich denke, offiziellen homepage www.ledgerwallet.com bestellen. Dort kostet es, im Gegensatz zu vielen anderen Anbietern mit 94 EUr ca die Hälfte, wird aber erst Ende März zugestellt. Meine Frage bezieht sich darauf, ob ihr wisst, dass dies auch die echte Ledger-Seite ist? Wieso diese enormen Preisdifferenzen? Danke und vG Du hast auf jeden Fall die richtige Grundeinstellung für das Thema crypto - stets auf der Hut und aufmerksam sein! Prinzipiell kann man nicht zu 100% sagen, ob eine Seite "echt" ist oder nicht. Es gibt lediglich ein paar Dinge, die man beachten kann. 4 einfache Schritte, mit denen man die meisten Seiten checken kann (sofern es sich um eine etablierte Seite handelt): 1. Google die Seite und guck dir die Ergebnisse an. Am besten nutzt du einen Add-Blocker wie uBlock Origin, damit du nicht aus Versehen auf einen Werbe-Link klickst (beliebte Falle). 2. Die URL auf Vorhandensein von https prüfen. Viele Fake-Seiten nutzen lediglich das http-Protokoll 3. Nachschauen, ob die Verbindung durch den Browser als sicher identifiziert wurde ( Schloss muss grün sein). zusätzlich kann noch auf das Schloss geklickt werden um die Details zu sehen. 4. Die URL selbst checken. Guck dir an, ob Sonderzeichen verwendet wurden. Beliebt sind z. B. Dinge wie mye ťherwallet statt myetherwallet (ť statt t). Sog. Punycode ist leider oft erst auf den 2. Blick ersichtlich Am besten die URL auch nochmal direkt in die Google-Suche kopieren, wird sie korrigiert ist es ein Fake.  Hoffe das hat geholfen sich ein wenig sicherer zu fühlen  |
|
|
|
Delisting is making mainly due to the fight against the scam, and not because of small amounts of trade. I agree that a lot of new coins are scattered on many different exchanges - the total capitalization of token is normal, but liquidity on each individual exchange is small.
What's important is that exchanges are making a certain volume a requirement for new coins/tokens. Therefore new projects need to address this issue, else their asset doesn't get listed and exchanges require a deposit isn't returned if the contract isn't kept. STeX can profit from this. |
|
|
|
Unsold Tokens will be burned at the end of the ICO with the percentage of the burned tokens being transferred to all other Token allocations.
Can you say as of how high the ratio will be? The distribution, I mean. Is there a special purpose to distribute part of the unsold tokens? |
|
|
|
dude, you have been given 52 merits in a week.. you cant be a shitposter.. so you are cool and gravy. Activity will be the only limiting factor for you, so just go about your day as usual. IMO theymos will end up increasing the sMerits given to sources every month x5 and increase the total number of sources x5 then there will be a fair distribution, Until then there is likely to be a big lag and lots of moaning posts
Yes, I try to do useful posts as shitposting serves no purpose + it wastes my time as well. I didn't shitpost before those new rules and I certainly won't start now, but I'm not sure if everything is gravy, as you phrased it. I already had several situations where I thought about how I could get more Merit. Just an example. Early on, I made a German infographic for the local forum. ( https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2818999.msg29007624#msg29007624). I posted it in the main Merit-thread (not pinned at that time) as I thought that it would add value and answer many questions that came up. I wrote OP that he could use it in his post. He got 50 Merit, I got 10 so far. I thought about creating a new thread, modifying it a bit so that it wouldn't be a copy of his. That way, I would have gotten more Merits for sure, but decided against it, because I hate redundant threads myself. My point here is: I don't like the way the new system lets us compete. Why wasn't the x5 of merit sources and spendable sMerit introduced in the first place? Why only give the minimum of Merit needed for the Rank and not doing a proportional distribution (activity >> merit)? You yourself said that there will be a lag and lots of moaning posts. This could have been partially avoided. Now people will moan and they have reasons. It's just sad to see so many higher-ranking members who are annoyed by these posts instead of showing sympathy, they simply don't need to face the same situation. Patronizing behavior doesn't serve anyone (not saying you are doing it). But sure, I will go about as usual and I hope that the increase in distributed sMerit will happen sooner rather than later as it is much needed so that we can forget about all this drama and continue with the reason we are all here for - crypto. |
|
|
|
Ich habe bis jetzt 11 Merits bekommen, habe 1 smerit vergeben und kann noch 10 smerits vergeben.
Habe ich am Anfang etwas falsch verstanden? Ich habe gedacht wenn ich 11 Merits bekomme kann ich die Hälfte also 5,5 smerits vergeben. Nach meiner Statitsik wäre es aber 1:1
Ich müsste doch von Anfang an viel mehr smerits zum vergeben bekommen haben, sind die bereits verfallen, wenn ja nach welcher Frist verfallen die.
Als Member startest du ja inital mit sMerit, es ist also keine 1:1 ratio. Deine Rechnung ist schon korrekt, für 11 erhaltene Merit bekommst du 5,5 wobei nur 5 angezeigt werden. Du hast also 5,5 erhalten, 6 initial gehabt und jetzt 1 vergeben. Demnach solltest du jetzt 5,5+6-1 = 10,5 haben. Das kannst du relativ einfach prüfen. Sobald du beim nächsten Mal 1 Merit bekommst, solltest du wieder 11 vergeben können (durch +0,5 sMerit). Sowei ich verstanden habe, wurden jedem eine gerade Anzahl an Merit zum Start vergeben; sMerit verfallen nicht. Hast du beim nächsten Mal wenn du 1 merit erhältst keine 11 sondern nur 10 zu vergeben, ist meine Rechnung falsch gewesen |
|
|
|
newbies have not been given merit as there are so many farmers out there, how will that help the system? think of it like a champagne pyramid, the merit will get to the bottom eventually. Some of us are pouring it at all levels, others like Lauda will not give to anyone they do not know or deal with, but the main point is that it will trickle down in time.
I totally get what you are saying here. But that's not the point of all those posts many lower-ranking Members are creating in the last days. Sure, some try to get or 'farm' Merit but many refer to the highly subjective nature of the new system. The old one was objective and fair: more posts = higher rank over time. I understand why this leads to spam and I support measures that put an end to spam in the forum. But please understand that ' it will trickle down in time' is like your boss saying, ' sure, you did a good job, but I can't pay all of you. But be assured, you'll be paid eventually.' As long as there is money involved, being able to distribute sMerit is a form of power and if this power is distributed subjectively, people will always feel left out. That's just the way things are. It doesn't help when Members who have this power (and tend to give it to their own more freely) say that everything is fine. Sure, it is a new rule and can't be changed, so people better get used to it, but it's not 'fine'. I hope you don't get me wrong here. I accepted the new rules - obviously, otherwise I could just leave - and I try to adapt. But I keep seeing higher-ranking Members who try to argue that everything is ok and that it will sort itself out eventually. People have to accept the new system but you can't will it a fair system by repeating that everything is ok |
|
|
|
Ich habe 2 waveswallet.io Accounts
als ich heute reingesehen habe sind bei beiden keine Transkationen und auch keine Token bzw. Coins mehr enthalten.
Hat jemand das selbe Problem oder weiss was da los ist?
Habe es auch eben gecheckt weil mich deine Frage ein wenig verunsichert hat. Bei mir sieht alle ok aus. Konntest du die Wallets denn ohne Prolbleme öffnen? Nutz doch mal bitte https://wavesexplorer.com/ und check deine Wallet(s) auf Transaktionen. Da müsstest du ja alles sehen - sofern es mal Transaktionen gab. Gib gerne hier nochmal Bescheid, interssiert mich. WAVES fliegt ja ein wenig unter dem Radar und ich verfolge die Entwicklung mit Spannung. |
|
|
|
Why would I give random spammers any merit? E.g., this thread is a nice example of attempted, yet failed, quality posting.
That's a bit harsh to say, don't you think? People try to cope with this new situation and it's only natural that different people have different ideas and views. He just expressed his. As I understood it, he maybe meant to exclude those higher ranks from the necessity of getting Merits in the first place while at the same time grant them the function of a merit source. You can't deny that higher ranks often get a higher amount of merit compared to lower ranks - sometimes without even having made a 'quality post'. That's no problem per se - at least for me - but people observe this and voice their concern. This will fade in time but for now, it's something that will be discussed in the forum and people will try to come up with a 'better' way - at least in their eyes. |
|
|
|
If all conditions are favorable, then Stex can become a kind of aggregator of exchanges. This will be a very big achievement, since if you summarize the trading volumes on several small exchanges, you will get a huge amount.
I'd also think that volume is key here. There are more and more exchanges with a ridiculously low volume in trading pairs. This is bad for a trader but also bad for the exchange itself. coins with a low volume cost money to maintain. Every coin/token that is supported by exchange needs to be maintained. That's why almost all exchanges set certain volume goals for a project on application. If they are not met, the asset gets delisted. That's also why you see so many contests after an asset hits an exchange - volume. It could also be interesting for projects to cooperate with STeX and to utilize the liquidity pool in exchange for giving STeX a certain amount of their asset. There are so many beneficial possibilities, I love this project and can't wait for the launch. |
|
|
|
Hi, you can add my German version (link/image) in you OP if you like, as not all who speak German frequent the local forum  The sentence below translates to 'Here is a German version'. Hier ist eine Deutsche Version: https://i.imgur.com/RmCjbRP.png |
|
|
|
It turns out that a significant part of the tokens will be frozen for a long time. Will this create problems with liquidity? Will the remaining tokens be enough to support it?
Frozen tokens is no problem for the liquidity pool, as e.g. possible private placements that are locked already paid in ETH that is now used for the liquidity pool. The tokens that are locked either because they are from founders or bounty participants only have an impact on the token price, which in turn doesn't affect the liquidity pool either. Simple example: - Token price: 1 SUB/ETH
- Token prive: 0.5 SUB/ETH
If someone wants to buy SUB and his budget is 2 ETH, then he gets either 2 or 4 SUB. In both cases, 2 ETH are added to the liquidity pool |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
