It is a pity that this happens with the next crypto-currency market in Japan. The market, of course, needs to be regulated. It is possible that exchanges that do not want to enter their customers' identities or pass on their data to the relevant state authorities will have to open either in countries with suitable legislation or even open in offshore zones where this should not be a problem. In general, I still assess the current situation as a working one and do not see any big problems. While the states will not finish with the legalization of the crypto currency and the solution of all related issues, including taxation, then such situations will arise.

This will be the most stupid decision of the government of the country that will make bitcoin its national money. I am absolutely against such a decision, because bitcoin, with its high volatility, is able to quickly unbalance the economy of any strong state. Budget planning and implementation of individual indicators of the country's economy development in bitcoin is impossible. Bitcoin is only able to walk along with national money, but do not replace them.

If you have available funds, it is better to buy both bitcoin and ethereum, as both coins will soon grow in value. Simply now, you should not invest in bitcoin anymore, it has fallen a little in popularity and it is still difficult to predict the further dynamics of its growth. However, the situation may still change when bitcoin introduces planned improvements. On the other hand, such as the Tokyo Mt. Gox can once again throw their bitcoins onto the market and again fill it up for a long time.

With banks nothing will happen. They will work, as they did before, only adjust to the crypto currency and will also provide services in the crypto currency. Banks can not disappear because they are needed by the state. Through them, the country's budget is being implemented. Therefore, the state will always protect banks and establish a preferential regime for their existence.

When all 21 million bitcoins are mined, I think that nothing significant will happen. It is unlikely that after this will significantly increase in price. By this time, it will already be a decent price, and if it does not have some exceptional functions by then, people will not buy it too much. What is the point of doing this, if we already have a lot of good crypto-currencies with qualities much greater than bitcoin and at the same time very low in price?
In addition, it should be borne in mind that the high cost of bitcoin will mean a high risk of investing, because given the high volatility of bitcoin, there will be a high risk of its depreciation due to negative information and the consequent panic of investors.

If a country decided to replace its national money with bitcoin, it would be a very stupid act. Because of the large volatility, the economy of the country would quickly unbalance. In addition, it would be strongly influenced by other countries, where bitcoin would be used extensively. In general, this would be a big problem for the state and its bodies.

In my opinion, bitcoin does not have much influence on the financial stability of the state in the event that it walks in the country along with national money. If bitcoin was used instead of national money, then it could completely disbalance the economy by its volatility in the price. The features of the behavior of bitcoin depend on the specific situation and the specific country in which it is located. As yet, the influence of bitcoin on the country's economy and on its stability has been little studied.

If you look at the price of bitcoin for each year, then its growth is quite impressive. Despite the fact that there have been problems with bitcoin recently, it still represents a certain interest for investors, as it is assumed that this year it should still grow well in price. Therefore, holding bitcoin should make good profits this year. However, it would be better to use its greater volatility and sell it at its price peaks and buy when its rate is significantly lowered. This will give a very decent extra profit.

Yes, this reasoning is true. If people invest in bitcoin because of speculative aspirations to get a big profit from its growth in price, bitcoin rises sharply and its financial bubble manifests itself. If this happens further, especially when it reaches high price values, then it can ruin it. If it is used primarily as a payment system, a way of storing the value, it can exist for a very long time.

Banks will not die because of the massive introduction into our lives of crypts. This opinion is not true. There are many functions of banks, which can not be replaced by crypto currency. Including because of its high volatility, it is generally not able to replace the existing money in the economy. Planning the country's economy in the crypto currency is impossible. Banks will gradually introduce blockchein technology into their system and will adapt to the crypto currency, but they will remain. Without them, the state can not exist.

I also join the generosity campaign, including those that are managed by good managers. Among them I also like Silon, which clearly and in a timely manner conducts calculations of the steaks in the table and keeps correspondence on the problems of the campaign. As for the good ICO campaigns, yesterday I looked at the new ICO campaigns, so far they did not like me and I did not choose anything. I thought here on the last pages of this thread will share specific good ICO projects, however in the reports only general information is said. Well everyone spoke about the DFINITI campaign, but I did not find it.

Some ICO campaigns do limit the number of participants in the generosity campaign in their own terms of joining the generosity campaign, but this is done only when a fixed amount is paid in bitcoin or even if in the released tokens, but in terms of dollars per message. That is, in this case, a certain number of released tokens is not allocated, and a fixed amount is paid in bitcoin or in dollars, and the increase in participants in the generosity campaign leads to an increase in payments. In general, since such ICO companies mainly rely on headhunters for a predetermined amount of tokens to be issued, then even the more such participants are, the better. They are not interested in these cases in limiting their quantity.

I did not understand something. Kyrgyzstan has always been on the list of countries that have completely banned the use of crypto currency in their territory. Here it is also indicated that this is a friendly country to the crypto currency. Is this a change in position relative to the crypto currency, or is it some kind of mistake? If this country really changed its attitude to the crypto currency, then it's very good. There will already be fewer countries that are hostile to the introduction of crypto currency.

The technology of using crypto currency does not stand still and develops. Of course, hackers, thefts and hacking of crypto currency in purses were and remain one of the big reasons for losing our coins. In the future, perhaps, this will be one of the ways of autonomous safe storage of our crypto currency. This is quite interesting.

Usually, in the context of joining the campaign of generosity, it is indicated after what time the ICO company intends to pay the tokens earned by the generosity campaign participants. This usually ranges from two weeks to a month. Recently, however, some campaigns deliberately delay payment so that the tokens that appeared on the exchange do not fall in price due to the increase in the offer for sale after such payments, when a significant number of bounty hunters immediately try to sell the received tokens. They directly, sometimes, point out this in their announcements. Sometimes already paid tokens for the same purpose are blocked already in purses after payment. That is, sometimes several months you can not make any transfer of received tokens from the wallet.

I think that one of the best purses for storing altcoyins, namely the tokens of the ERC20 marker, is the MyEtherWallet wallet. This is one of the most reliable and easy to use wallets. Now appeared some kind of purse LocalEtherWallet, which has the same interface, the same similar features, but it in this connection has signs of fraud.
It should be noted that LTC, this. it looks like a litecoin coin for which the MyEtherWallet wallet will not work.

Now again there is a good opportunity, maybe one of the last, when we can buy ethereum at a fairly low price. A few days ago, this coin had a value below $ 400, but now bitcoin and other crypto currencies began to rise in price. Together with them began to grow and ethereum, rising to 500 dollars. Perhaps, for some time the price of ethereum will still fluctuate, but soon it will fairly decently grow in price. So we still have the opportunity to purchase ethereum at a relatively low price.

The process of acceptance and legalization of the crypto currency will be very complex and time-consuming. It will probably take more than a decade, because there is a conflict of interest and it is very difficult to implement technically. Banks and some government agencies are not interested in introducing crypto currency into our lives. Each state will decide this issue in its own way. As we can see, the solutions to such issues are also different. Only when the crypto currency will prove its usefulness and necessity, when the leading countries legalize it in themselves, only then this issue will be solved much faster.

This information is not true. The Reserve Bank of India did not prohibit and did not have the authority to prohibit the circulation of crypto currency in this country. He simply recommended that other banks stop providing services in the crypto currency. However, these services were insignificant in volume and could not have any significant impact on the use of crypto currency in this country. In India, the crypto currency has been in the country, and it is free to walk, citizens make all transactions in the crypto currency without hindrance.

Bitcoin and the basic well-known coins are crypto currency of general use, that is, they actually perform the basic function of the payment instrument. The main part of the crypto currency is made up of tokens, which, as a rule, have their own specific task and their functions. Despite the fact that we currently have about 1,300 tokens, this does not mean that there are too many tokens and they are superfluous. Tokens and their blockchein technology are now finding diverse applications and the scope of such applications is expanding. This is to be welcomed. Therefore, I do not think that we have too many tokens and they are completely unnecessary. They are very useful for a person, because it makes our life easier, creates convenience and comfort.