|
Does anyone know what version of wallet we should be using and what nodes that wallet should be on?
|
|
|
|
look at the pool, no crash  New work for worker! Difficulty: 0.000001 Share difficulty: 0.000022 Total block value: 50.020000 BCR including 2 transactions Also i don't get your argument against cutting out old clients. what relevance do they have to p2pool? Look at the screen shot I've posted. The hashrate went to zero. yes so for one block, the pool did not hash.... how does that connect with updating the wallet and cutting off old unsupported wallets? t WTF? p2pool does not work if any transaction is included in a block. If you cut out the solo miners with 0.30.14, no one will include the transactions into the chain. Or an attacker will include his transactions. That was just a demonstration. One can DOS p2pool for hours. I am solo mining with 0.30.16.4b and finding blocks Yes, because the network accepts the blocks. But they do not pay masternodes. In the future those blocks won't be accepted (or shouldn't be accepted) So after block 85,00 (or whatever it is) all my solo blocks will be rejected? |
|
|
|
look at the pool, no crash New work for worker! Difficulty: 0.000001 Share difficulty: 0.000022 Total block value: 50.020000 BCR including 2 transactions Also i don't get your argument against cutting out old clients. what relevance do they have to p2pool? Look at the screen shot I've posted. The hashrate went to zero. yes so for one block, the pool did not hash.... how does that connect with updating the wallet and cutting off old unsupported wallets? t WTF? p2pool does not work if any transaction is included in a block. If you cut out the solo miners with 0.30.14, no one will include the transactions into the chain. Or an attacker will include his transactions. That was just a demonstration. One can DOS p2pool for hours. I am solo mining with 0.30.16.4b and finding blocks |
|
|
|
|
I personally feel that 50% of block rewards are too high for BN.
|
|
|
|
|
Is 1.3.1.0 the current wallet? I am currently stuck at 96% syncing.
|
|
|
|
Make sure you are on 2.0.2
So has staking changes? |
|
|
|
|
I have not staked in 5 days now.
|
|
|
|
|
@ bstdev and CaptDavidPorter
Thanks for the help.
The link to the github worked fine.
|
|
|
|
|
Just downloaded the wallet from the OP and it says version v1.1.0.1, is this correct?
I am stuck at block 18,678 remaining.
|
|
|
|
In the north east thailand:
1 hour of Thai-massage costs 0.012641 BTC
1 bottle of 40% thai whiskey costs 0,0088487 BTC
1 noudlesoup meal with meat and clean ice water in the resturant costs 0,0029495 BTC
I am going to comment on this. Those are some awesome prices. Here 20x that and you still don't get a massage. Enjoy. |
|
|
|
So I tried to start mining again with v3.7.7 but it closes at the start of it.
Last 2 lines of log are:
[2015-03-31 07:15:46] Probing for an alive pool
[2015-03-31 07:15:46] Popping work to stage thread
Can you post the full command line you are executing? cgminer.exe --kryptohash --kernel kshake320v2 --cl-opt-disable -d 0 -I 32 --worksize 64 -o stratum+tcp://mine4.khc.nonce-pool.com:3390 -u USERNAME -p x --shaders 2048 --shaders-mul 8 --debug 2>log.txt Sorry just getting home. Don't used the --debug. It can cause the annoying libpdcurses.dll crash Also, keep in mind that the "--cl-opt-disable" switch only helps on newer AMD GPUs with GCN architecture. Don't used it with your nVidia GPUs For your 280x, try this cgminer --kryptohash --cl-opt-disable -d 0 -I 32 --worksize 64 -o stratum+tcp://mine4.khc.nonce-pool.com:3390 -u USERNAME -p x --shaders 2048 --shaders-mul 8 If it gets too hot, reduce the Intensity to 28 or less. Thanks. Got me going again. I will keep an eye on the temps. |
|
|
|
So I tried to start mining again with v3.7.7 but it closes at the start of it.
Last 2 lines of log are:
[2015-03-31 07:15:46] Probing for an alive pool
[2015-03-31 07:15:46] Popping work to stage thread
Can you post the full command line you are executing? cgminer.exe --kryptohash --kernel kshake320v2 --cl-opt-disable -d 0 -I 32 --worksize 64 -o stratum+tcp://mine4.khc.nonce-pool.com:3390 -u USERNAME -p x --shaders 2048 --shaders-mul 8 --debug 2>log.txt Sorry just getting home. |
|
|
|
|
So I tried to start mining again with v3.7.7 but it closes at the start of it.
Last 2 lines of log are:
[2015-03-31 07:15:46] Probing for an alive pool
[2015-03-31 07:15:46] Popping work to stage thread
|
|
|
|
|
@bitcreditscc
Just getting home and seen the wallet update to 0.30.16.3 Tried running but the wallet closes every time. No error or anything.
On Windows 7 64bit.
|
|
|
|
addnode=52.64.96.117
addnode=54.206.17.83
addnode=82.168.169.216
addnode=52.64.59.8 If you got coins in a local wallet please add those nodes, wait for a re-sync and unlock your wallet. PM or post here if you run into any problems Still stuck on block 89,031. Should the config be called eventtoken or EventToken |
|
|
|
I'm getting 330Kh/s on my 290x
What does your config look like? I do not see even close to that. With AMD HD 7xxx and later GPUs, running the latest Omega drivers, you have to use an option called --cl-opt-disable. For some reason these latest AMD GPUs with GCN architecture work better when you disable OpenCL optimizations. On the other hand, this option doesn't have a positive effect on older AMD GPUs and nVidia. Example for my 290x: cgminer --kryptohash --cl-opt-disable -o http://127.0.0.1:38912 -u {RPC_username} -p {RPC_password} --shaders 2816 --shaders-mul 8 Very important: Don't forget to delete the kshake320v2%YourGPUname%.bin file inside the cgminer directory after you add/remove the --cl-opt-disable parameter. It is the only way to force cgminer to recompile the OpenCL kernel and include/remove the cl-optimization flag. Urrr? I'm only getting 280 Kh/s out of my R9-290 and I've got it cranked up to 1175! Same too simple to fail config, obviously with shaders at 2560. But... duh... let's go through those cl libs. Yeah, runs kinda hot eh! Shader is a cozy 45C but I've still got this 10-15C discrepancy between that and the VRM1 block. Edit: Ah bugger. Right, throttling due to power. I was cranking it for a low power algo earlier and had upped the voltages. Interesting cards, the 290's, I'm used to pushing it 'till it moves, but with these you've gotta finesse. Boo-Yah! 326 Kh/s @ 1125/1250. Shader 45C & VRM's still needing a heat-sink (59C). Now for the 7950.... Check it... notice something about the mount here? Cooler Master Seidon series...  They are exactly matched to ATI card heat-sink mount holes. It's the easiest mod around, and I'm sure there are a lot of used units out there. I can't get my 7950 over 70 C, over-volted and shoving hard!If you're on Linux - use this: AMD_OCL_BUILD_OPTIONS_APPEND=-cl-opt-disable ./cgminer ...
You may use -O0, or -cl-opt-disable, it doesn't matter. On Windows, set the environment variable with setx - and do NOT run CGMiner from the same shell! Start a new prompt after setting it, or it won't take effect. Dear Mr.Wolf,I don't think you can make a big improvement from wr104's gpu miner,bcz he has already made it good enough. Ohhh, boy. |
|
|
|
Ok guys, here is a logo design in black, gold and purple.
Let me know what you guys think!
Cheers.
I think you're on to something with the design, but I don't like those color schemes. Maybe a black/blue or black/purple? What does everyone else think?  I think one color is best, but let me know! Cheers  I like that the colors are matching the wallet now. Either one. |
|
|
|
no 100 you get on every 30000 block that means 1-29999 5 coins
30000 block 100 coins
30000-59999 block 5 coins
60000 100 coins and so on
I just don't understand what you are trying to say. Sorry. Do you mean that: Blocks 1-29,999 are 5 coins per block Blocks 30,000-59,999 are 100 coins per block Blocks 60,000-89,999 are 5 coins per block and so on? so if blockheight divisible through 30000 without a remainder then is the block reward 100 bitcrystal in other words if blockheight for example 40533 modulo 30000 == 0 then is the block reward 100 bitcrystal otherwise the current block reward of 5 bitcrystal... is the block divisible through 30000? block 50000/30000= 1 remainder 20000 and since the remainder is not 0 you get 5 Bitcrystal... block 120000/30000 = 4 remainder 0 <-- remainder is 0 so you get 100 Bitcrystal... the question is every is the block divisible through 30000 if yes the reward is 100 Bitcrystal otherwise the reward is 5 Bitcrystal... i hope that everybody understood me if not here (blockheight modulo 30000 equals 0) < -- block reward 100 Bitcrystal (blockheight modulo 30000 not equals 0) < -- block reward 5 Bitcrystal I was just using the wrong wallet when I was getting 100 coins per block so it is straightened out for me.  |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
