Hello Usecoin Investor and future Investors

you all must be aware of the Usecoin dev's (Shameonyou) actions that lead to the end of use coin. Many have lost alot of money investing in Usecoin. I also being one of them. I was fortunate not to lose much. Our team have been working on launching a coin for some time and were planning to launch soon. we have decided it would be better to takeover usecoin as it has the specs required for our ambitious plan.

why Usecoin?
The reason for it being use coin is firstly it is listed on two exchanges. by taking over the coin we would already have saved time by getting our coin launched and saved funds to get on a exchange.

secondly although Usecoin has gained PR from the developer's negative actions it is known so we have head start rather than launching our new coin.

Our plan

first plan is to do a complete makeover. most importantly we will be changing the name of the coin to remove the tainted Usecoin. we cannot discuss our plans as of yet but they are better and much more advanced than Usecoin. i would even say we have features that have not yet been implemented by any other coin.

if you do not wish for us to takeover Usecoin we will go ahead and launch a new one. if we have the support of our community we can give a few details before you can decide what you would like us to do.

We are looking forward to hearing your thoughts for our plan

Hello Usecoin Investor and future Investors

you all must be aware of the Usecoin dev's (Shameonyou) actions that lead to the end of use coin. Many have lost alot of money investing in Usecoin. I also being one of them. I was fortunate not to lose much. Our team have been working on launching a coin for some time and were planning to launch soon. we have decided it would be better to takeover usecoin as it has the specs required for our ambitious plan.

why Usecoin?
The reason for it being use coin is firstly it is listed on two exchanges. by taking over the coin we would already have saved time by getting our coin launched and saved funds to get on a exchange.

secondly although Usecoin has gained PR from the developer's negative actions it is known so we have head start rather than launching our new coin.

Our plan

first plan is to do a complete makeover. most importantly we will be changing the name of the coin to remove the tainted Usecoin. we cannot discuss our plans as of yet but they are better and much more advanced than Usecoin. i would even say we have features that have not yet been implemented by any other coin.

if you do not wish for us to takeover Usecoin we will go ahead and launch a new one. if we have the support of our community we can give a few details before you can decide what you would like us to do.

We are looking forward to hearing your thoughts for our plan

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=615953.0

The above thread has a list of all the active signature campaigns and is very helpful.

They have shut down the campaign. They said they will pay out through today and will not continue the campaign moving forward.

This really is too bad.

When should we expect payment to be made?

The created of the altcoins would have no reason to do this. And the miners would need to trust that the creator would actually payout the dollars.

The closest thing to mining dollars would be to mine bitcoin or some other alt and convert your mined coins into dollars.

This is essentially what China has done to bitcoin. It would he nearly impossible to ban bitcoin trade because of TOR and because BTC nodes are coming online and going offline all the time and it would be nearly impossible to keep an up to date list of them all.

It is the amount that is programmed into the protocol of the coin. It is essentially an arbitrary number that is known to everyone in advance before they start mining or trading so market participants can have some idea as to the value of each coin.

Although this is true, it is much easier to keep inflation to be moderate and keep it moderate then it is to keep deflation to be moderate. It is also much easier to slow down inflation then it is to slow down deflation.

I don't think this is true. QE was designed to attempt to prop up the economy. Once the economy is able to grow at a strong enough pace on its own then QE will no longer be necessary. Now getting the balance sheet of the fed back down to more normal levels is a much different story.

I don't think this so much has to do with the profitability of the exchanges but rather the amount of coins stored on these types of exchanges. I think a lot of people like to trade altcoins in a "day trading" fashion and as a result keep their coins on the exchanges. This results there being more coins on the exchange then there really should be.

I think the association that bitcoin has with illegal activity is hampering its price. I agree that big, legit merchants accepting bitcoin for payment will, over time, take away this association, thus causing the price to rise.

The problem with this is that most transactions will eventually get confirmed within 24 hours even without a fee. If you are sending what most would consider to be dust and/or Blockchain spam then no it probably won't but if you are sending a tx that is actually involved in commerce the it probably will. Commerce Tx usually have exactly two outputs (one for the the person you are sending to and one chance address).

Some transactions will also not get confirmed in the next block that is found even with the recommend TX fee. If you were to use a larger fee then the chances the TX will be confirmed in the very next block are much larger.

I found it very interesting that the author of the article in the OP was willing to pay 20 and 40% to a third party to receive payment. From what I can tell the third party was providing very little service above collecting payment.

I don't think people just getting into crypto currencies should be dealing with enough bitcoin so they need cold storage until they get more comfortable with it. I think cold storage in General is very advanced and someone just getting into bitcoin has a greater chance of messing something up when dealing with cold storage - mainly not paying close enough attention to detail and sending coins to an incorrect address to destroying the private keys to an address that they need to keep.

President Obama is Muslim and he does not support Israel. I don't think he has anything to do with the ISIS directly however his early withdrawal from Iraq certainly contributed to this happening.

Obama has announced that he may authorize air strikes however I doubt he will actually go through with them as he has let others cross "red lines" many time with no consequence.

He can probably eventually make it there. He is likely living off bitcoin donations now, he lawyer is probably working for free.

The long term residency will also likely allow him to leave Russia without the plane carrying him being stopped in international airspace as he can leave somewhat in the middle of his residency. He would probably also not make it public that he has left Russia.

This would not be smart. This is asking for it to end up in the hands of terrorists. I think Obama should never of pulled out of Iraq as they simply did not have the security to do so yet.

The US is going to eventually have to commit troops to Iraq m

This is true regarding the ideologies of the stations but I think enough of the population has access to cable that most can watch all the MSM stations. I think that liberals have a huge media advantage in any election and this causes them to get more of the vote then the ideology of the country would suggest.

the wallet does not ever "allow" or not allow transactions. It is the fact that you control a private key that has unspent outputs that allows you to make a transaction.