Church in Russia is completely subordinate to the owner of the Kremlin. All church servants are propagandists of state policy.
As for Putin's friends, they are all members of a gangster group that controls all business in Russia and provides economic support for Putin's aggressive policies.

 В ожидании контрнаступления украинской армии русские жители Крыма спешно покидают исконные земли в отличие  от крымских татар.
 На крымском мосту создались автомобильные пробки.

What kind of Ukrainians have you decided that they are obliged to be friends with the Russians after they destroyed Ukrainian cities and killed tens of thousands of Ukrainians?

 Imagine that during the Second World War, when all of Europe was occupied by Germany and the English Coventry was destroyed, the war was stopped and peace was made. I think that if you were an Englishman, you would not agree to such a peace treaty. Peace between Ukraine and Russia as an aggressor can only consist in one case, if Russia withdraws its army and pays an indemnity for all the evil that it brought to the Ukrainian people, as Germany did after the defeat.

 Why can't I say! At least what he says is that Ukraine started the war. Putin lies always and everywhere. The poisoning of Navalny, as he says, was organized by the American special services. And how many lies coming from him in connection with the downed Boeing. I do not know an example when Putin told the truth.

 Putin is not an atheist or a believer, he is a thief. If he believed in God, he would not kill people. Putin is a bandit and progmatist.
As for private property and business, he gave away all big business to his friends, who in return subsidize his aggressive policy.

Армянский Буриданов осёл находится в ужасном положении. Стояние на двух стульев, которые всё далее удаляются друг от друга грозит ослу разрывом гениталий.

Alik Bakhshi
Political conflicts and the fate of Azerbaijan

        Moscow does not like to remember, let alone discuss the shameful pages of Russian history, which are not few and which were hidden from the population, for example, the so-called Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact (08/23/1939) on non-aggression between Nazi Germany and the USSR, after which Berlin and Moscow began implement their aggressive plans, the first victims of which were Poland, then Finland, which Russia attacked without declaring war. On that day, November 30, 1939, Russian bombers dropped 350 bombs on civilians in Helsinki, for which Russia was expelled from the League of Nations. However, this did not stop Moscow's aggressive intentions, and the subsequent victims of expansion were all European countries that had the misfortune of being neighbors of the Russian Empire. These are well-known facts, so to speak, but there are also little-known facts that were carefully hidden from the population. The fact is that Moscow at that time also planned to continue the aggressive policy of tsarist Russia towards Turkey and Iran. Thus, Russia sent an ultimatum to Turkey on granting her permission to deploy naval bases on the Bosphorus and the Dardanelles, to which Turkey responded with a decisive refusal. By the way, during Stalin's negotiations with Hitler on Russia's accession to the Tripartite Pact (Germany, Italy, Japan), Stalin raised the issue of the Black Sea Straits, but Hitler did not want to slaughter Turkey for Russia. Instead of Turkey, Hitler suggested that Russia direct its aspirations to the South-East towards Iran and India, controlled by Great Britain. The negotiations dragged on for a long time, this circumstance, in my opinion, aroused Hitler's suspicion of the reliability of Stalin as an ally, and in the end led to Hitler's decision to attack Russia. (1)

     Regarding the policy towards Iran, Stalin seems to have been preparing for a long time to invade this country, so to speak, to continue the expansion of tsarist Russia, and then Hitler insisted, because oil was supplied from Iran to England. It is interesting that Stalin was not stopped by the German attack on the USSR and on August 25, 1941, despite the outbreak of war with Germany, the Red Army invaded Iran from the territory of Azerbaijan and Turkmenistan. The weak Iranian army was unable to stop the rushing wedge of 1000 tanks, which already on August 29 was 150 km away. from Tehran. On September 1, Shah Reza Pahlavi ordered an end to resistance and abdicated, giving way to his son Mohammed Reza Pahlavi. The occupation of Iran by the Soviet Union continued until April 1946 and was explained by the Kremlin to ensure security in the event of aggression from Turkey. Naturally, few believed in this absurdity. Stalin wanted to include the territory of South Azerbaijan into the USSR and bring a puppet communist party to power in Iran, as was done later in the countries of Eastern Europe that became members of the Warsaw Pact. For this purpose, a communist party was organized in the occupied part of Iran, the task of which was to establish a communist regime in the country. However, these plans of Stalin were opposed by Winston Churchill, who understood Russia much better than the naive Roosevelt, who completely trusted Stalin.
   
      According to the decision of the Potsdam Conference, Soviet troops were to leave Iran by March 2, 1946, however, instead, the People's Republic of Azerbaijan was proclaimed on March 3, and on March 4, Soviet tanks moved towards Tehran.

 

     The next day, March 5, when the crisis associated with Moscow's aggressive actions in Iran reaches its highest apogee, Winston Churchill delivers the famous Fulton speech, in which he opens the eyes of the Western public to what Russia is like. Here are his prophetic words:
    “Today, a black shadow has fallen on the stage of post-war life, which until recently shone in the bright light of the Allied victory. No one can say what can be expected in the near future from Soviet Russia and the international communist community led by it, and what are the limits, if any, of their expansionist aspirations and persistent efforts to convert the whole world to their faith.”
     Further, Churchill outlines the mechanism that Moscow uses in its aggressive policy and which can be characterized as international terrorism:
    “In a number of countries around the world, although they are far from the Russian borders, communist fifth columns are being created, acting with amazing coherence and coordination, in full accordance with the guidelines emanating from the communist center. The Communist parties and their fifth columns in all these countries are a huge and, alas, a growing threat to Christian civilization.”

     Although Churchill's Fulton speech refers to events in the distant past, it contains words that are very closely related to the actions of Putin's Russia in Ukraine and which indicate the great power mentality of the Russian people:
       "nothing they admire more than strength, and nothing they respect less than weakness, especially military weakness."
   
    What to hide, it is thanks to the mentality of the Russian people that Putin manages to pursue an aggressive policy. (2.3)
     Churchill's speech contains words directly related in time to Russia's aggressive actions against Iran and Turkey:
      "Turkey and Persia are seriously alarmed by the territorial claims presented to them by Moscow and the pressure exerted by it in connection with this."

      The violation of the Potsdam Agreement by the Soviet Union provoked a sharp protest from the United States and Great Britain, who demanded the immediate fulfillment of the obligations signed by Moscow, setting a deadline by the anniversary of the end of the war, that is, by May 9, 1946, not a single Russian soldier should remain on the territory of Iran. Stalin had to obey, because he was given to understand that otherwise the United States would not fail to use the atomic bomb. At that time, the Soviet Union did not yet possess the secret of creating atomic weapons, received from the Rosenberg couple a little later.
     After the withdrawal of the Red Army from Iran, the People's Republic of Azerbaijan, created in Iranian Azerbaijan, did not last even one day. Fleeing from the persecution of the Iranian government, the communists of South Azerbaijan, whom Shah Mohammed Reza Pahlavi considered the fifth column, hastily fled to Soviet Azerbaijan. In Baku they were called Iranian democrats. All of them remained citizens of Iran for a long time, until Moscow finally lost hope of returning to South Azerbaijan. And, who knows, if political circumstances had developed differently and Stalin had not made concessions, then today, after the collapse of the USSR, the Turkic people of Azerbaijan would live in one state. (4)

 
 

   
     It should be noted that Stalin did not leave his maniacal idea with territorial claims against Turkey, which he tried to impose on the Potsdam Conference, arguing that the Montreux Convention on the Black Sea Straits was outdated and subject to revision. In addition, Stalin insisted on granting the USSR the right to have a naval base for joint control with Turkey over the straits in order to ensure their security, in addition, he demanded that the territory in the North-East of Turkey be transferred to the USSR to accommodate more than a million Armenians living abroad and dreaming of returning to Armenia. Moscow has already allocated a part of the territory of Azerbaijan for the Armenians, now it is necessary to provide the Armenians with a part of the Turkish territory. Having not achieved success at the Potsdam Conference, the USSR in 1946 turned to Turkey with a note of brazen demands to revise the status of the Black Sea straits, which Turkey resolutely rejected with the support of the United States and Great Britain. Only after Stalin's death in 1953 did Russia renounce territorial claims against Turkey in connection with Turkey's entry into NATO.

      Using the example of the people of Azerbaijan, we see how the political intentions of strong countries influence the fate of peoples. In order not to be like a leaf in the wind, subject to someone's political aspirations, it is necessary to discard the rivalry between the Turks that is constantly pursuing each other and unite, creating an alliance similar to the European Union. (5,6)


1. Stalin's fatal mistake that saved the world. https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/20036.html
2. The state-forming people and its Fuhrer or Ukraine and further down the list. https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/21749.html
3. Great Russian chauvinism, and Putin is his Fuhrer. https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/21133.html
4. Azerbaijan, Azerbaijan. https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/13967.html
5. One language - one Motherland. https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/16879.html
6. Turkic language and Azerbaijan. https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/16879.html

     04/07/2023

  Original: https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/95510.html

Алик Бахши

Политические коллизии и судьба Азербайджана

       Москва не любит вспоминать, а тем более обсуждать позорные страницы истории России, которых не мало и которые скрывались от населения, например, так называемый пакт Молотова-Риббентропа (23.08.1939) о ненападении между фашистской Германией и СССР, после которого Берлин и Москва начали осуществлять свои агрессивные планы, первыми жертвами которого стали Польша, затем Финляндия, на которую Россия напала без объявления войны. В тот день 30.11.1939 русские бомбардировщики сбросили 350 бомб на мирных жителей Хельсинки, за что Россия была исключена из Лиги Наций. Однако, это не остановило агрессивных намерений Москвы, и последующими жертвами экспансии были все европейские страны, имеющие несчастье быть соседями Российской империи. Это так сказать известные факты, но есть и малоизвестные факты, которые тщательно скрывались от населения. Дело в том, что Москва в тот период также планировала продолжить захватническую политику царской России в отношении Турции и Ирана. Так, Россия послала ультиматум Турции о предоставлении ей разрешения на размещение военно-морских баз на Босфоре и Дарданеллах, на что Турция ответила решительным отказом. Кстати, во время переговоров Сталина с Гитлером о присоединении России к Тройственному пакту (Германия, Италия, Япония) Сталин поднял вопрос о Черноморских проливах, но Гитлер ни за что не хотел отдавать на заклание России Турцию. Вместо Турции Гитлер предлагал России направить устремления на Юго-Восток в сторону Ирана и Индии, контролируемых Великобританией . Переговоры надолго затянулись, это обстоятельство, на мой взгляд, вызвало у Гитлера подозрение на надёжность Сталина как союзника, и в конце концов и привело к решению Гитлера напасть на Россию. (1)

    Касательно политики в отношение Ирана, то Сталин похоже давно готовился к вторжению в эту страну, так сказать, продолжить экспансию царской России, а тут ещё и Гитлер настаивал, ведь из Ирана в Англию поступала нефть. Интересно, что Сталина не остановило нападение Германии на СССР  и 25 августа 1941 года, несмотря на начавшуюся войну с Германией, Красная армия вторглась в Иран с территории Азербайджана и Туркменистана. Слабая иранская армия не в силах была остановить несущийся клин в 1000 танков, который уже 29 августа был в 150 км. от Тегерана. 1 сентября шах Реза Пехлеви приказал прекратить сопротивление и отрёкся от престола, уступив место своему сыну Мохаммеду Реза Пехлеви. Оккупация Ирана Советским Союзом продолжалась до апреля 1946 года  и объяснялась Кремлём обеспечением безопасности в случае агрессии со стороны Турции. Естественно в эту нелепость мало кто верил. Сталин хотел включить территорию Южного Азербайджана в состав СССР и привести к власти Ирана марионеточную коммунистическую партию, как это было проделано позже в странах Восточной Европы, ставших членами Варшавского договора. С этой целью на оккупированной части Ирана была организованна коммунистическая партия, в задачу которой входило установление в стране коммунистического режима. Однако, этим планам Сталина воспротивился Уинстон Черчилль, который намного лучше наивного Рузвельта, всецело доверявшего Сталину, понимал Россию.
    
     Согласно решению Потсдамской конференции советские войска ко 2 марту 1946 года должны были покинуть территорию Ирана, однако, вместо этого 3 марта была провозглашена Народная республика Азербайджан, а 4 марта советские танки двинулись в сторону Тегерана.

 

    На следующий день 5 марта, когда кризис связанный с агрессивными действиями Москвы в Иране достигает наивысшего апогея, Уинстон Черчилль произносит знаменитую Фултонскую речь, в которой раскрывает глаза западной общественности на то, что из себя представляет Россия. Вот его пророческие слова:
   «Сегодня на сцену послевоенной жизни, ещё совсем недавно сиявшую в ярком свете союзнической победы, легла черная тень. Никто не может сказать, чего можно ожидать в ближайшем будущем от Советской России и руководимого ею международного коммунистического сообщества и каковы пределы, если они вообще существуют, их экспансионистских устремлений и настойчивых стараний обратить весь мир в свою веру.»
    Далее Черчилль очерчивает механизм, который использует Москва в своей агрессивной политике и который можно охарактеризовать как международный терроризм:
   «В целом ряде стран по всему миру, хотя они и находятся вдалеке от русских границ, создаются коммунистические пятые колонны, действующие удивительно слаженно и согласованно, в полном соответствии с руководящими указаниями, исходящими из коммунистического центра. Коммунистические партии и их пятые колонны во всех этих странах представляют собой огромную  и, увы, растущую угрозу христианской цивилизации.»

    Хотя Фултонская речь Черчилля касается событий далёкого прошлого, в ней содержатся слова, которые весьма точно соотносятся с действиями Путинской России в Украине и которые указывают на великодержавный менталитет русского народа:
     «ничем они не восхищаются больше, чем силой, и ничего они не уважают меньше, чем слабость, особенно военную слабость.»
  
   Что скрывать, именно благодаря менталитету русского народа, Путину удаётся проводить агрессивную политику. (2,3)
    В речи Черчилля содержатся слова непосредственно связанные по времени с агрессивными действиям России в отношении Ирана и Турции:
     «Турция и Персия не на шутки встревожены предъявляемыми им Москвой территориальными претензиями и оказываемым ею в связи с этим давлением.»
   
     Нарушение Советским союзом Потсдамского соглашения вызвало резкий протест со стороны США и Великобритании, потребовавших немедленного выполнения подписанных Москвой обязательств, установив срок, к годовщине окончания войны, то есть к 9 мая 1946 года ни одного русского солдата не должно оставаться на территории Ирана. Сталину пришлось повиноваться, потому что ему дали понять, что в противном случае США ни преминут воспользоваться атомной бомбой. В то время Советский Союз ещё не обладал секретом создания атомного оружия, полученный от четы Розенбергов несколько позже.
    После вывода Красной армии из Ирана, созданная в иранском Азербайджане Народная республика Азербайджан, не продержалась и одного дня. Спасаясь от преследований иранского правительства, коммунисты Южного Азербайджана, которых шах Мохаммед Реза Пехлеви считал пятой колонной, спешно бежали в Советский Азербайджан. В Баку их называли иранскими демократами. Все они долгое время оставались гражданами Ирана, пока  Москва окончательно не потеряла надежду вернуться в Южный Азербайджан. И, как знать, если бы политические обстоятельства сложились иначе и Сталин не пошел на уступки, то сегодня после распада СССР тюркский народ Азербайджана жил бы в одном государстве.(4)

  
 

       
    Надо отметить, что Сталин не оставил свою маниакальную затею с территориальными претензиями к Турции, которые пытался навязать Потсдамской конференции мотивируя тем, что конвенция Монтрё о черноморских проливах устарела и подлежит пересмотру. Кроме этого, Сталин настаивал на предоставление СССР права иметь военно-морскую базу для совместного с Турцией контроля над проливами с целью обеспечения их безопасности, кроме того требовал на передачу СССР территории на Северо-Востоке Турции для размещения на ней более миллиона армян, проживающих за границей и мечтающих вернуться в Армению. Не добившись успеха на Потсдамской конференции, СССР в 1946 году обратился к Турции с нотой наглых требований по пересмотру статуса черноморских проливов, которые Турции решительно отвергла при поддержки США и Великобритании. Только после смерти Сталина в 1953 году Россия отказалась от территориальных претензий к Турции в связи с вхождением Турции в НАТО.

     На примере народа Азербайджана мы видим как политические намерения сильных стран влияют на судьбы народов. Чтобы не быть подобно листку на ветру подверженным чьим-либо политическим устремлениям, необходимо отбросить постоянно преследующее тюрков соперничество между собой и сплотиться, создав союз подобный Европейскому Союзу.(5,6)


1.   Роковая ошибка Сталина, которая спасла Мир. https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/20036.html
2.   Государствообразующий народ и его фюрер или Украина и далее по списку. https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/21749.html
3.   Великорусский шовинизм, и Путин его фюрер.  https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/21133.html  
4.   Азербайджан, Азербайджан.  https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/13967.html
5.   Один язык – одна Родина. https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/16879.html
6.   Тюркский язык и Азербайджан. https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/16879.html

    7.04.2023
  
 Оригинал: https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/95510.html

Alik Bakhshi

Turkic language and Azerbaijan

        The Parliament of Moldova made a bold decision to rename the state language from "Moldovan" to "Romanian". "Those who for decades told us that we, the citizens of the Republic of Moldova, speak the 'Moldovan' language, and not Romanian, pursued only one thing: to divide us," President Maia Sandu wrote. Russia, having torn away part of Romania, gave it the name Moldova This is how the Moldavian people and the Moldavian language appeared. Although in fact the population of the so-called Moldavia is Romanians and their language is Romanian. A similar, and even, I would say more confusing, situation has developed in Azerbaijan, for a full understanding of which without resorting to a distant the past of the two most numerous peoples of the Middle East, namely the Turks and Persians (Iranians), is indispensable.

    The Iranians are the mighty Persian Empire (the power of the Achaemenids), which existed from 646 to 329 BC, revived again, after the empire of Alexander the Great and the Seleucid Empire, the Parthian kingdom from 250 BC. - 227, which stopped the advance of the Roman Empire to the East, and the last Sasanian Empire 227 - 651, which fell as a result of the Arab conquests and the formation of the Arab Caliphate. It should be noted that since then the Iranians have lost power within their state for many centuries until the Islamic Revolution and the expulsion of the last Shah of Iran, Mohammed Reza Pahlavi, from the country.
   
     The penetration of the Seljuk Turks, which began especially actively in 1036, eventually led to the collapse of the Arab Caliphate. In 1055, Togrul-bek deposed the Caliph of Bagdat and became the sultan of Baghdad, and the state of the Ottomans began to emerge in Asia Minor. In 1256, the Middle East region was invaded by the Mongols with the formation of the Turkic-Mongol Hulagunid Empire (1256 - 1335) with its capital in Tabriz. An important point for understanding the future situation considered in this article, namely, the state languages of the Hulagenid Empire are Turkic and Farsi (Persian). However, traditionally, Farsi continues to be used exclusively in oriental poetry.
    In the future, the Khulagunid dynasty is replaced by the Timurids. A talented military leader, who did not know defeat, of Turkic-Mongol origin, Timur (demir, from the Turkic "iron"), known in Europe under the name Tamerlane, creates the Great Turan empire (1370-1507) with its capital in Samarkand.

 

    Timur becomes the ruler of the entire East. He defeats the army of the Ottoman Sultan Bayazet, his campaign against Khan Tokhtamysh ends with the complete defeat of the Golden Horde and the pursuit of Tokhtamysh to the borders of Moscow. After this campaign, the "Golden Horde" will no longer recover and will subsequently become easy prey for the Moscow principality. In my opinion, the main misfortune of the Turks, and this can be traced throughout their history, is the constant internecine hostility, which ultimately affected their inability to resist enemies.
    After the death of Timur, his empire disintegrates and two Turkic unions of Ak-Koyunlu and Kara-Koyunlu appear at war with each other, the difference of which was that the first were Sunnis, and the second Shiites. The internecine war ends with the victory of Ak-Koyunlu, who turned their aspirations to the Ottoman state, which had grown stronger by that time, but were defeated. Over time, in the state of Ak-Koyunlu, as a result of an internal struggle, power passes to the Turkic dynasty of the Safivids, who professed Shiite Islam. The Safavid Empire (1501-1736), also known in history as the Kyzylbash state.

    In the Middle East, two powerful, eternally opposing each other, Turkic states are being formed - the Sunni - the Ottoman Empire and the Shiite - the Safavid Empire, in which Turkic and Farsi are the state languages.

 

     It is important to note that the Turkic-speaking population in the Safavid Empire was mostly concentrated in its northwestern region, which in ancient times was called Antropatena, preserved, but transformed for thousands of years into the name Azerbaijan, and the name Azeri is assigned to the Turkic population of this historical and geographical area, in Russian version of Azerbaijanis.

     If the power in the Ottoman Empire throughout its entire historical path was in the hands of the Ottoman dynasty, then this cannot be said about the territory located to the east. The power of the Safivid dynasty passed to the vizier and regent of the last Shah from the Safavids to Nadir Shah from the Turkic Afshar family, who turned out to be an insane despot, known for bloody repressions against his subordinates, who brought Persia to a political and economic crisis due to continuous wars with neighbors. As a result of a conspiracy of court khans, Nadir Shah was killed in 1747, after which a leapfrog of shahs of the Afshar dynasty began. The political crisis, detrimental to the country, continued until 1795.
The situation in Persia stabilized with the accession of the new Turkic Qajar dynasty (1795-1925), but this dynasty was not lucky in that Persia had to resist the Russian Empire in its intentions to conquer the Caucasus. Russia, seizing lands, brutally cracked down on indigenous peoples, the conquest of the Kuban was accompanied by the complete expulsion of the Nogais, some of whom fled to Dagestan, the other part escaped to Turkey. The lands were distributed to the Cossacks who served in the Russian army. So, Kuban Cossacks, Terek Cossacks with their numerous villages appeared on the occupied lands. Having conquered the North Caucasus, the Russians invaded Persia. As a result of the Russian-Persian war of 1804-1813, the Gulistan peace treaty was signed between the Russian Empire and Persia (the village of Gulistan in Karabakh), according to which Georgia, Dagestan, and the following khanates departed for Russia: Baku, Karabakh, Ganja, Shirvan, Sheki, Derbent , Cuban, Talysh.

   The military successes of Russia in the wars with Persia were facilitated by the constant enmity between the Azerbaijani khanates. It should be noted that although the Shah of Turkic nationality exercised the central power in Persia, the Turkic khanates of Azerbaijan, formally submitting to the Shah, waged endless wars among themselves. I have already pointed out that constant rivalry is the scourge of the Turks throughout their history. True, there were attempts by individual khans to unite them, but they all ended in failure. So the last and most significant of them, undertaken by Fatali Khan, also failed. The only representative of the Turkic state with a strong central power is the Ottoman Empire, which existed for more than 6 centuries.

    Russia did not stop there and in 1826 resumed the war with Persia, which ended in 1828 with the Turkmenchay peace treaty, according to which the Yerevan and Nakhichevan khanates were transferred to Russia, and a new border was established along the Araks River. The remaining 12 Azerbaijani khanates remained in Persia. Thus, the Azerbaijani khanates and people find themselves in different states.

 
   
   
        The Russians called the local population of the occupied territory the Caucasian Tatars, because of the similarity of the language with the Kazan Tatars. The population defined themselves as Turks or Azeri (Azerbaijan is a historical and geographical region), and the language - Turkic (Turk Dili), in Russian Turkish. There was no state of Azerbaijan, there was no Azerbaijani nationality and the definition of the language as the Azerbaijani language. Moscow, for political reasons, in order to hide the proximity of the Turkic population of the occupied territory with the Turks living in Turkey and Iran, gave the name of the formed Soviet Republic as Azerbaijan, the people were Azerbaijani and, accordingly, the language became Azerbaijani, although the local population called Turkic for centuries.
   
   The slogan "One people - two states", voiced by Presidents Erdogan and Aliyev, means one thing - the Turkic people live both in Turkey and in Azerbaijan, and the language of this people is Turkic. By the way, the Arabs also have several states, and their language is Arabic, there is no separate Egyptian language, or Jordanian.

      In my opinion, it would be nice to restore historical justice and return the Turkic language to the Turkic people of Azerbaijan, as is done in Moldova, which returned the Romanian language to the people.

     Returning the status of the Turkic language to the people of Azerbaijan will be an important step for the Union of Turkic States.(1)

   1. One language, one Motherland. https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/16879.html
 
      1.04.2023
 
 Original with maps: https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/95415.html

 Всё что русские насозидали в Крыму перемолят леопарды, а созидателей вышлют в их Московию, пусть там созидают.

  Потерпи дорогой, весной вы все зацветете и запахните. Вас всех настигнет запах ...

 Кстати, после того как кляча Путина вызвала смех в Индии, она более в цивилизиванном мире не появится.

  Русский фюрер за всё заплатит, так устроен Мир.

А на каком тебе писать прикажешь! Именно на русском, чтобы вы поняли, кто вы такие. И права устанавливай у себя в сарае, а не в интернете. То же мне распорядитель из русского мира нашелся!

Идея панруссизма провалилась на первом же шаге, - Украина оказала сопротивление идее создания прсловутого русского мира.

Alik Bakhshi

Turkic language and Azerbaijan

        The Parliament of Moldova made a bold decision to rename the state language from "Moldovan" to "Romanian". "Those who for decades told us that we, the citizens of the Republic of Moldova, speak the 'Moldovan' language, and not Romanian, pursued only one thing: to divide us," President Maia Sandu wrote. Russia, having torn away part of Romania, gave it the name Moldova This is how the Moldavian people and the Moldavian language appeared. Although in fact the population of the so-called Moldavia is Romanians and their language is Romanian. A similar, and even, I would say more confusing, situation has developed in Azerbaijan, for a full understanding of which without resorting to a distant the past of the two most numerous peoples of the Middle East, namely the Turks and Persians (Iranians), is indispensable.

    The Iranians are the mighty Persian Empire (the power of the Achaemenids), which existed from 646 to 329 BC, revived again, after the empire of Alexander the Great and the Seleucid Empire, the Parthian kingdom from 250 BC. - 227, which stopped the advance of the Roman Empire to the East, and the last Sasanian Empire 227 - 651, which fell as a result of the Arab conquests and the formation of the Arab Caliphate. It should be noted that since then the Iranians have lost power within their state for many centuries until the Islamic Revolution and the expulsion of the last Shah of Iran, Mohammed Reza Pahlavi, from the country.
  
     The penetration of the Seljuk Turks, which began especially actively in 1036, eventually led to the collapse of the Arab Caliphate. In 1055, Togrul-bek deposed the Caliph of Bagdat and became the sultan of Baghdad, and the state of the Ottomans began to emerge in Asia Minor. In 1256, the Middle East region was invaded by the Mongols with the formation of the Turkic-Mongol Hulagunid Empire (1256 - 1335) with its capital in Tabriz. An important point for understanding the future situation considered in this article, namely, the state languages of the Hulagenid Empire are Turkic and Farsi (Persian). However, traditionally, Farsi continues to be used exclusively in oriental poetry.
    In the future, the Khulagunid dynasty is replaced by the Timurids. A talented military leader, who did not know defeat, of Turkic-Mongol origin, Timur (demir, from the Turkic "iron"), known in Europe under the name Tamerlane, creates the Great Turan empire (1370-1507) with its capital in Samarkand.

 

    Timur becomes the ruler of the entire East. He defeats the army of the Ottoman Sultan Bayazet, his campaign against Khan Tokhtamysh ends with the complete defeat of the Golden Horde and the pursuit of Tokhtamysh to the borders of Moscow. After this campaign, the "Golden Horde" will no longer recover and will subsequently become easy prey for the Moscow principality. In my opinion, the main misfortune of the Turks, and this can be traced throughout their history, is the constant internecine hostility, which ultimately affected their inability to resist enemies.
    After the death of Timur, his empire disintegrates and two Turkic unions of Ak-Koyunlu and Kara-Koyunlu appear at war with each other, the difference of which was that the first were Sunnis, and the second Shiites. The internecine war ends with the victory of Ak-Koyunlu, who turned their aspirations to the Ottoman state, which had grown stronger by that time, but were defeated. Over time, in the state of Ak-Koyunlu, as a result of an internal struggle, power passes to the Turkic dynasty of the Safivids, who professed Shiite Islam. The Safavid Empire (1501-1736), also known in history as the Kyzylbash state.

    In the Middle East, two powerful, eternally opposing each other, Turkic states are being formed - the Sunni - the Ottoman Empire and the Shiite - the Safavid Empire, in which Turkic and Farsi are the state languages.

 

     It is important to note that the Turkic-speaking population in the Safavid Empire was mostly concentrated in its northwestern region, which in ancient times was called Antropatena, preserved, but transformed for thousands of years into the name Azerbaijan, and the name Azeri is assigned to the Turkic population of this historical and geographical area, in Russian version of Azerbaijanis.

     If the power in the Ottoman Empire throughout its entire historical path was in the hands of the Ottoman dynasty, then this cannot be said about the territory located to the east. The power of the Safivid dynasty passed to the vizier and regent of the last Shah from the Safavids to Nadir Shah from the Turkic Afshar family, who turned out to be an insane despot, known for bloody repressions against his subordinates, who brought Persia to a political and economic crisis due to continuous wars with neighbors. As a result of a conspiracy of court khans, Nadir Shah was killed in 1747, after which a leapfrog of shahs of the Afshar dynasty began. The political crisis, detrimental to the country, continued until 1795.
The situation in Persia stabilized with the accession of the new Turkic Qajar dynasty (1795-1925), but this dynasty was not lucky in that Persia had to resist the Russian Empire in its intentions to conquer the Caucasus. Russia, seizing lands, brutally cracked down on indigenous peoples, the conquest of the Kuban was accompanied by the complete expulsion of the Nogais, some of whom fled to Dagestan, the other part escaped to Turkey. The lands were distributed to the Cossacks who served in the Russian army. So, Kuban Cossacks, Terek Cossacks with their numerous villages appeared on the occupied lands. Having conquered the North Caucasus, the Russians invaded Persia. As a result of the Russian-Persian war of 1804-1813, the Gulistan peace treaty was signed between the Russian Empire and Persia (the village of Gulistan in Karabakh), according to which Georgia, Dagestan, and the following khanates departed for Russia: Baku, Karabakh, Ganja, Shirvan, Sheki, Derbent , Cuban, Talysh.

    However, Russia did not stop there and in 1826 resumed the war with Persia, which ended in 1828 with the Turkmenchay peace treaty, according to which the Yerevan and Nakhichevan khanates were transferred to Russia, and a new border was established along the Araks River. The remaining 12 Azerbaijani khanates remained in Persia. Thus, the Azerbaijani khanates and people find themselves in different states.

 
  
  
        The Russians called the local population of the occupied territory the Caucasian Tatars, because of the similarity of the language with the Kazan Tatars. The population defined themselves as Turks or Azeri (Azerbaijan is a historical and geographical region), and the language - Turkic (Turk Dili), in Russian Turkish. There was no state of Azerbaijan, there was no Azerbaijani nationality and the definition of the language as the Azerbaijani language. Moscow, for political reasons, in order to hide the proximity of the Turkic population of the occupied territory with the Turks living in Turkey and Iran, gave the name of the formed Soviet Republic as Azerbaijan, the people were Azerbaijani and, accordingly, the language became Azerbaijani, although the local population called Turkic for centuries.

      The slogan "One people - two states", voiced by Presidents Erdogan and Aliyev, means one thing - the Turkic people live both in Turkey and in Azerbaijan, and the language of this people is Turkic. By the way, the Arabs also have several states, and their language is Arabic, there is no separate Egyptian language, or Jordanian.

      In my opinion, it would be nice to restore historical justice and return the Turkic language to the Turkic people of Azerbaijan, as is done in Moldova, which returned the Romanian language to the people.

     Returning the status of the Turkic language to the people of Azerbaijan will be an important step for the Union of Turkic States.(1)

   1. One language, one Motherland. https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/16879.html
 
      1.04.2023
  
  Original with illustrations: https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/95081.html

Алик Бахши

Тюркский язык и Азербайджан

       Парламент Молдавии принял смелое решение переименовать государственный язык с «молдавского» на «румынский». "Те, кто десятилетиями подряд твердили нам, что мы, граждане Республики Молдова, говорим на "молдавском" языке, а не на румынском, - преследовали только одно: разделить нас, - написала президент Майя Санду. Россия отторгнув часть Румынии дала ей название Молдавия, так появился молдавский народ и молдавский язык. Хотя на самом деле население,  так называемой Молдавии это румыны и язык их румынский. Аналогичная, и даже, я бы сказал более запутанная, ситуация сложилась и в Азербайджане, для полного понимания которой без обращения к далёкому прошлому двух наиболее многочисленных народов Ближнего Востока, а именно тюрков и персов (иранцев), не обойтись.  

   За иранцами числятся могущественная Персидская империя (держава Ахеменидов) просуществовавшая с 646 по 329 год д.н.э., вновь возродившееся, после империи Александра Великого и империи Селевкидов, Парфянское царство с 250 д.н.э. – 227 г, остановившее продвижение на Восток Римской империи, и последняя Сасанидская империя 227 – 651 г., которая пала в результате арабских завоеваний и образования Арабского халифата. Надо отметить, с тех пор иранцы на долгие столетия потеряли власть в  пределах своего государства вплоть до Исламской революции и изгнания из страны последнего шаха Ирана Мохаммеда Реза Пехлеви.
  
    Проникновение тюрок сельджуков, особенно активно начавшееся с 1036 г, в конце концов привело к крушению Арабский халифат. В 1055 г Тогрул-бек смещает Багдатского халифа и становится султаном Багдада, а в Малой Азии начинает зарождаться государство османов. В 1256 г Ближневосточный регион подвергся вторжению монголов с образованием тюрко-монгольской империи Хулагунидов (1256 – 1335 г) со столицей в Тебризе. Важный момент для понимания будущей ситуации, рассматриваемой в данной статье, а именно, государственными языками империи Хулагенидов являются тюркский и фарси (персидский). Однако, традиционно в восточной поэзии продолжает использоваться исключительно фарси.
   В дальнейшем династия Хулагунидов сменяется Тимуридами. Талантливый военачальник, не знавший поражений, тюрко-монгольского происхождения, Тимур (демир, с тюркского «железо»), известный в Европе под именем Тамерлан создаёт империю «Великий Туран» (1370—1507) со столицей в Самарканде.

 

   Тимур становится властителем всего Востока. Он разбивает армию Османского султана Баязета, его поход против хана Тохтамыша заканчивается полным разгромом «Золотой орды» и преследованием Тохтамыша до пределов Москвы. После этого похода «Золотая орда» уже не оправится и в последующем сделается легкой добычей Московского княжества. На мой взгляд основная беда тюрков, и это прослеживается во всей их истории, заключается в постоянной междоусобной вражде, которая в конце концов сказалась на их неспособности противостоять врагам.
   После смерти Тимура его империя распадается и появляются два враждующих между собой тюркских союза Ак-Коюнлу и Кара-Коюнлу, отличие которых заключалось в том, что первые были суннитами, а вторые шиитами. Междуусобная война заканчивается победой Ак-Коюнлу, которые обратили свои устремления на окрепшее к тому времени Османское государство, однако терпят поражение. Со временем в государстве Ак-Коюнлу в результате внутренней борьбы власть переходит к тюркской династии Сефивидов, исповедовавших Ислам шиитского толка. Сефевидская империя (1501-1736), известна в истории также как Кызылбашское государство.

   На Ближнем Востоке образуются два мощных, вечно противостоящих друг другу, тюркских государства суннитское - Османское империя и шиитское - Сефевидская империя, в которой государственными языками являются тюркский и фарси.

 

    Важно отметить, что тюркоязычное население в Сефевидской империи большей частью было сосредоточенно в её северо-западной области, которая в древности называлась Антропатена, сохранённое, но преображенное тысячелетиями в название Азербайджан, а за тюркским населением этой историко-географической местности закрепляется название - азери, в русском варианте азербайджанцы.

    Если власть в Османской империи на всём её историческом пути находилась в руках Османской династии, то этого не скажешь о территории расположенной восточнее. Власть династии Сефивидов перешла к визирю и регенту последнего шаха из Сефевидов к Надир-шаху из тюркского рода Афшаров, который оказался безумным деспотом, известный кровавыми репрессиями против своих подчинённых, доведший Персию из-за непрерывных войн с соседями до политического и экономического кризиса. В результате заговора придворных ханов Надир-шах был убит в 1747 году, после чего наступила чехарда шахов афшарской династии. Пагубный для страны политический кризис продолжался до 1795 года.
    Ситуация в Персии стабилизировалась с воцарением новой тюркской династии Каджаров (1795-1925), однако этой династии не повезло, в том отношении, что Персии пришлось противостоять Российской империи в её намерениях покорить Кавказ. Россия, захватывая земли, жестока расправлялась с коренными народами, покорение Кубани, сопровождалось полным изгнанием ногайцев, часть которых бежала в Дагестан, другая часть спаслась в Турции. Земли раздавались казакам, служившим в русской армии. Так, на отторженных землях появились кубанские казаки, терские казаки с их многочисленными станицами. Завоевав Северный Кавказ, русские вторглись в пределы Персии. В результате русско-персидской войны 1804-1813 годов между Российской империей и Персией был подписан Гюлистанский мирный договор (селение Гюлистан в Карабахе) согласно, которому России отходили Грузия, Дагестан, и следующие ханства: Бакинское, Карабахское, Гянджинское, Ширванское, Шекинское, Дербентское, Кубинское, Талышское.

      Военным успехам России в войнах с Персией способствовала постоянная вражда между азербайджанскими ханствами. Надо отметить, что хотя центральную власть в Персии осуществлял шах тюркской национальности, тюркские ханства Азербайджана формально подчиняясь шаху вели между собой нескончаемые войны. Я уже указывал, что постоянное соперничество это бич тюрков, преследующий на протяжении всей их истории. Были правда попытки отдельных ханов объединить их, однако все они оканчивались неудачей. Так последняя и наиболее значимая из них, предпринятая Фатали ханом, также провалилась. Единственным представителем тюркского государства с крепкой центральной властью является Османская империя, просуществовавшая более 6 веков.

   Россия не остановилась на достигнутом и в 1826 году возобновила войну с Персией, которая закончилась в 1828 году Туркманчайским мирным договором, согласно которому России передавались Ереванское и Нахичеванское ханства, а новая граница устанавливается по реке Аракс. Остальные 12 азербайджанских ханств остались в Персии. Таким образом азербайджанские ханства и народ оказываются в разных государствах.

 
  
  
       Местное население захваченной территории русские называли кавказскими татарами, из-за сходства языка с казанскими татарами. Население же определяло себя тюрками или азери (Азербайджан историко-географическая область), а язык - тюркским (тюрк дили), по-русски турецким. Не было государства Азербайджан, не было национальности азербайджанец и определение языка как азербайджанского языка. Москва, по политическим соображениям с целью скрыть близость тюркского населения захваченной территории с тюрками проживающими в Турции и Иране, дала название образованной Советской республики как Азербайджан, а народ азербайджанским  и соответственно языком стал азербайджанский, хотя местное население столетиями называло тюркским.


    Лозунг «Один народ – два государства», озвученный президентами Эрдоганом и Алиевым, означает одно - тюркский народ проживает как в Турции, так и в Азербайджане и язык этого народа – тюркский. Кстати, арабы также имеют несколько государств, и язык у них арабский, нет отдельно египетского языка, или иорданского.
    
   На мой взгляд неплохо было бы восстановить историческую справедливость и вернуть тюркскому народу Азербайджана их тюркский язык как это сделано в Молдавии возвратившей народу румынский язык.  

   Возвращение статуса тюркского языка народу Азербайджана станет важным шагом для Союза тюркских государств. (1)

1. Один язык, - одна Родина. https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/16879.html  




     1.04.2023

Оригинал с иллюстрациями:https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/95081.html







                                                                                                                                          

 Вы на редкость догадливы.

In Israel, Netanyahu, in order to stay in power and preserve the government coalition, made concessions to religious and far-right politicians who encroached on the third power in the country, namely the judiciary, which was previously independent. Netanyahu, as a merchant of conscience, is ready to do anything to stay in power. Not only does the country not have a Constitution, but with the elimination of the independence of the judiciary, Israel will slide into a group of countries with a totalitarian regime. There is the Islamic Republic of Iran, why not be the Jewish Republic of Israel, because in Israel religion is not separated from the state, as it is in all democratic countries. The people of Israel, realizing what this could lead to, went out into the street. Grandiose demonstrations swept the country, even the military took the side of the protesters. As a result, Netanyahu suspended the process of changing the legislation regarding the judiciary. What will happen next is not clear. But it may well happen that forced elections will be held again. Until there is a Constitution in Israel with a clear separation of all three branches of government, the election leapfrog will be constantly present in the country. I foresaw a similar situation in 1996.
     
     This article was published in Israel in the newspaper Our Country (04.12.96.) in the wake of the assassination of Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin by a Jewish terrorist. Today, left-wing Israelis mark the 19th anniversary of the death of a man who hoped to bring peace to his country. I must say that under Rabin, reconciliation between Jews and Palestinians was much closer than it is today.


Alik Bakhshi

To the question of who killed Rabin


    More than two years ago, the people of Israel said goodbye to their prime minister, Yitzhak Rabin. The military general, who fought against numerous enemies of Israel and did not know defeat, was vilely killed by his own compatriot, a young religious Jew, only because he passionately wished peace to his people. Fate decreed that the Jews and Arabs, these two Semitic peoples, having common ancestors and the richest thousand-year experience of peaceful coexistence, who made a valuable contribution to world culture, became enemies. But, the same fate today provided a chance that Yitzhak Rabin wanted to take advantage of.

    Yes, Jews and Palestinian Arabs cannot and do not want to live in one state, but this does not mean that they cannot be peaceful neighbors. Alas, there is simply no other way out. The political situation is such that only lasting peace is the key to Israel's future. And if this is not understood, then the Jewish people may again find themselves without their own state.
Israel needs to establish good neighborly relations with the surrounding Arab countries before America withdraws its active military and economic support for Israel, and this will happen sooner or later, because the United States has recently been making closer contacts with the Muslim world, which can be seen in the example of how a number of Arab countries and Bosnia.

    Let's immediately agree that we will operate with facts, and not with the subjunctive mood, what would have happened if Rabin had not been killed, but the right would have come to power anyway. The facts are that Rabin was killed, power is in the hands of the right, the peace process is marking time, the political situation has worsened and, as a result, worsening of the economic situation in the country is on the horizon. Planned provocations with the notorious Hasmonean tunnel, with construction on Har Homa, which caused another series of riots and terrorist attacks, did not bring any political dividends. The purpose of these provocations is to show the whole world that political dialogue with the Palestinians is impossible and once again point out the fallacy of the policy of Rabin and Peres, which allowed the autonomy to create armed police units that will not fail to use the weapons given to them against the Jews.

     The stalemate in Israeli-Palestinian negotiations puts Arafat in a very unenviable position. All his attempts to give at least some movement to the peace process are futile. The population of the territories begins to lose hope in the reality of the changes promised by the treaty. It turns out that the Hamas leaders were right when they called for a boycott of any dialogue and asserted that only the destruction of Israel as a state would solve the Palestinian problem. Arafat's departure from the political arena would lead to a dead end. There would be no one to talk and negotiate with.

The global political changes that took place after the collapse of the Soviet Union also affected the Middle East. Moscow has almost completely lost its political influence on events in the region, which was well manifested during the Gulf War. The value of Israel as an ally for America has decreased and even serves as an obstacle in establishing friendly relations with the Arab countries. Seeing no political and economic benefit, Washington will renounce such an obstinate ally, and then, the fear of becoming like [sorry for such a rude but vivid comparison] a chain dog abandoned by the owner will force Israel to take the only reasonable decision - to resume the peace process, but this time the initiative in the negotiations will be on the side of the Arabs and the conditions will become tougher. And there will be no one to blame but themselves.

   Israeli society lives in a world of illusions, seeking to pass off the wishful thinking as reality. We see a vivid example of how illusions turn into troubles in Russia. And there is no need for Zhirinovsky and Solzhenitsyn to look for the guilty and make assumptions that someone is drugging the Russian people and arranging revolutions for them. Only the Russian people are to blame for all their troubles. Only he, and not the Ruriks invited at the dawn of Russian history, not the German monarchs who converted to Orthodoxy, not Marx with his communist fairy tale, not the conspiracy of the “wise men of Zion” and not the Chechen mafia. The longer the illusion lives, the sadder the end. So we should not be led by illusions, so as not to look for those responsible for the misfortunes that have befallen us among the Americans, Arabs, French or anyone else.

   The Israeli society is seriously ill, it is divided for political, national and religious reasons, and the assassination of the prime minister is a symptom of this disease. Rabin's killer is neither crazy nor alone. He fulfilled what many dreamed of. Someone openly called with posters, someone in their minds wished the death of the prime minister, deceived by the fact that with the death of Rabin they would be able to take the world into the past, to the time of superpower rivalry. But the Soviet Union collapsed. Europe has undergone tremendous changes. An avalanche of political changes has come to the Middle East region. And the policy of Rabin and Peres was based on these realities. And if the current right-wing government does not fall, then what Yitzhak Rabin did not have time to do, his opponent Bibi Netanyahu will have to do, and I will not be surprised if again some rabbi, waving the Tanakh, does not stigmatize him and call him nothing but a traitor to the earth Israel and again looms the shadow of death in the performance of a religious fanatic killer. Alas, this is how political problems are solved in the conditions of Israeli democracy with a religious filling.

    Can you think of a single instance where an American Secretary of Health or, say, Transportation would make a political statement? I don't think you can. Even the US Secretary of Defense will not allow himself such speeches. This is the prerogative of the president and the secretary of state. In our country, all the ministers are occupied with politics without exception. Apparently, this is much easier than solving specific problems of their own ministries. So Mr. Sharansky successfully absorbed himself among the members of the government. He makes political statements of this nature: they say, we cannot negotiate peace with Syria while the regime of Hafez al-Assad is in power there, and history is taught in Syrian schools from bad textbooks. Let democracy be established in Syria first, and then we will talk about peace… Great, right? In the meantime, the court and the case can be fought for the glory of democracy.
Does Minister Sharansky consider Israel to be a truly democratic country? And what about the fact that the countries of democracy do not accept the suppression of one people by another.
    A country that still does not have a constitution, a country with socialist principles of government, a country in which the executive and legislative powers are not separated, a country in which part of the population has no rights at all, a country with a conglomeration of mutually exclusive democratic and halachic laws Finally, a country that changes its prime ministers with the help of assassins cannot be democratic.
And if so, then the Arab neighbors have every reason not to negotiate with us "until the onset of democracy."

    "Homo sapiens" differs from other representatives of the fauna in three values created by him - this is art, science and religion, which are the fruit of the creation of a free spirit and do not tolerate regulation, and any attempt to use them for inhumane purposes turns into disaster.
The use of science and religion to spread power over people is associated with colossal sacrifices. The application of the achievements of science and technical inventions in wars claimed millions of human lives.
   Especially dangerous is a power based on an ideology based on dogma, be it religious or communist. Using the dogma of faith and speculating on the name of God, religious officials sought unlimited power over people. Europe has gone through a whole era of medieval obscurantism, when any free-thinking was severely punished. Thousands of those burned at the stakes of the Inquisition, quartered, hanged, tortured by sophisticated tortures - this is how religious officials, giving themselves the right to judge on behalf of God, dealt with everyone who encroached on the dogmas of faith, which was used as the foundation of their power.

  History mocked them evilly, perpetuating Giordano Bruno, Galileo Galilei, consigning to oblivion the names of their executioners. The Sanhedrin of the time of Pontius Pilate sentenced to death a man who preached a new philosophical concept, and the world learned the name of the most popular Jew - Jesus Christ.
    It must be clearly understood that neither science nor religion in themselves are guilty of being used by dirty-hearted people for the sake of their selfish goals. Having come to power in Iran, Muslim fundamentalists plunged the country into the darkness of the Middle Ages. In an instant, Iran became a danger to the entire world. In the name of Allah, movie theaters filled with people watching “obscene” Western films were set on fire, and the guards of Islam took great pleasure in public executions of unfortunate women who dared to appear with a bare face or who were convicted of infidelity to their husbands. Is there a fundamental difference between Muslim fundamentalists, who force all women to wear a veil, and Israeli Orthodox, who forbid driving on the Sabbath and set fire to non-kosher shops? In both cases, this is ultimately an encroachment on the freedom of the individual.
    The essence of religion is not in coercion, but in the freedom of the spirit, only then is the believer close to the spiritual principle of nature. And where religion takes the path of coercion and prohibition, it turns from a road to God into a pernicious road to power.
     The struggle of the Orthodox to close Bar Ilan Street on Saturdays is part of the power struggle in Jerusalem. Calling on believers to demonstrations and riots, under the pretext that this is pleasing to God, religious officials, with the help of the crowd, are irresistibly rushing to power. Did you see the looks of the people in the black crowd towards Bar-Ilan? Everyone has one - this is the look of madness and it's scary!
   
    Believers, although they make up a smaller part of Israeli society, they are strong in organization and discipline. The Bolsheviks were also outnumbered by the Mensheviks, but thanks to a cohesive organization and iron discipline, they seized power in Russia.
By handing over the main street of Bar-Ilan to religious orthodoxies, the secular population will eventually lose Jerusalem, and there is not far off the formation of another religious state after Iran, in which power will belong not even to the king or dictator, but almost to the vicar of God, will which will not be discussed. And go and make out then what is primary and what is secondary.
A true believer is far from fuss, he is completely indifferent to who, where and when he travels, who and what he eats, he is one on one with God in the hour of prayer and does not need intermediaries. It is not for nothing that the countries of Western democracy and even Muslim Turkey, having understood the root of evil, separated religion from the state, and religion immediately acquired a human face, having been cleansed of people thirsting for power.

     In peace and democracy, in these two concepts inseparable from each other, the religious oligarchy quite rightly saw a threat to its selfish goals. Although the mechanism of the struggle for power by the Orthodox has been launched, it will not have time to gain momentum, because the peace process initiated by Rabin will end with the establishment of peace and the arrival of real democracy, which the political rabbis are so afraid of and which will return them to what they are obliged to do - to the Creator and faith.

      Here is the answer to the question of who and for what was killed Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin.