Have you got the permission from real person to use it on your site then? If yes then I would like to see them (Better if you post them here). If not then you could have used sketch or some cartoon-type edited pictures well but you rather chose to put pic of some random people who might have problem of you using the photos of them in your site.

I would have done the same thing. Why sould a manager pay a spammer? And on top of that your post and upvotes gets all hidden and not shown on Reddit so I don't think it put on any effort towards promoting the project.

I think what btcltcdigger makes sense and I don't find anything that makes him untrustworthy.

It is possible that connections I found are invalid if the user copied their profile link urls or telegram ids. Furthermore I haven't seen this user posting any tweet links or facebook post links which if had been provided would have linked them.

Thus I would request @Pharmacist to review his rating again and I agree that connections I found lacks a solid evidence.

This could be another alternate account connected to the same above jusjeruk (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1371395)


(Archive: http://archive.is/ImIAi#selection-5982.5-5991.32)


(Archive: http://archive.fo/Bvinq#selection-9347.22-9347.32)

Seems like they didn't added/changed content to the template. There are many things for instance this portion http://archive.is/qKWAw#selection-2371.0-2371.216 . It is obvious that this is not a serious project at all and more likely a scam project.

Will add a tag...

Interesting that he is creating so many accounts for this purpose. I smell ban evading...


(Archive: http://archive.is/tApMQ)



(Archive: http://archive.fo/E3GUt)



(Archive: http://archive.fo/DIiPq)



(Archive: http://archive.fo/aEgjD)



(Archive: http://archive.fo/JFxPe)




(Archive: http://archive.fo/hEaj8)



(Archive: http://archive.fo/7EK5b)

---

There could be possibly more...

Its digaran2 and not diagaran2 and I think they both are owned by separate individual as just like @Coolcryptovator said there is a huge difference between their posting quality.

You mean the one they do by posting in thread? If that is what you meant then I don't think it is effective at all since someone with a coding experience can make a bot and automate this proof of authentication.

Those are forum rules and not trust rules. If that have been disallowed you could have faced action by moderators/staff.



Like I said those are forum rules and trust feedbacks are based on opinion "N" The Pharmacist doesn't trusts your character because you were doing an activity which is discouraged here.

First, I wouldn't call him a scammer because its bounty managers job to choose a good translator for the project he is working for. I agree that he is unprofessional towards his work (after checking FilipeHenriques report) but IMO neutral feedback is sufficient in this case unless he is cheating by using translation tools.

I think what he is doing is something like this: He first jumbles up and adds on words here or there in English translation and use google translation tools to translate the thread.

For example:

This is  from Original ANN Thread:


This translator translates the above as:


And Google translate gives us the following translation:


I will add a neutral feedback towards as unprofessional work since it is limited to only low quality content and I am not quite certain that he used any translation tools. IMO low quality translation is something that bounty managers should worry about so at the moment I suggest you to report him to bounty managers.

Seems like account connected to the same ring was reported here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3962143.msg37725130#msg37725130.

Most of them are either Newbie and Jr. Member and I think best way is to disallow participation of Newbie and Jr. member rank into bounty campaigns or signature campaigns. The biggest problem is bounty allows participants with those ranks to participate. Along with it I think raising the merit count to rank up to Member should be good .

Correct it doesn't shows such warning after a time in trust page but one can still look through for possible password/email changes/woke after a long period through archives of seclog which are being maintained here : http://archive.is/https://bitcointalk.org/seclog.php

Someone reported similar here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4960078.msg44713780#msg44713780. Yeah I also find it hard to believe a new site site having so much players at start.

I would advise not to play here until the current accusation is resolved. Better play on another similar site like bitdouble.

Accounts Connected : AltT25, Nafta012, unpack

Proof of Connection : All of them uses same twitter profles: @altcoinsINF


(Archive: http://archive.is/kgz3l#selection-5566.3-5573.31)



(Archive: http://archive.fo/WpQA1#selection-5578.2-5585.31)



(Archive: http://archive.fo/c6qL7#selection-12160.14-12263.31)

---

Both AltT25 and Nafta012 participated in VINCHAIN BOUNTY Campaign (Archive: http://archive.fo/vSkYB#selection-1215.2-1215.109) with multiple accounts.


Nafta012 posts this in the VINCHAIN Bounty thread:


(Archive: http://archive.fo/lhtAW#selection-9141.0-9141.8)


And, AltT25 posts his tweets here:


(Archive: http://archive.fo/c6qL7#selection-12157.0-12157.6)

Did you tried their support yet? I have sent a PM regarding this and will leave a feedback on the main profile until this is resolved.

No one thinks about this because they always are looking out for a name to blame them for losing their rewards. In actual participants don't understand that manager doesn't handles the bounty payment in general.

However I think that all are to blame if a project turns out to be a scam. Hope you guys get the point why I am saying this but I will give you a good point why I think that way.

Wow!!. Never thought will see something like this. Indonesian section is full with comments going off-topic, one liners, spammers and with account buying-selling threads. No wonder that section needs a good cleanup.

OP PM'ed me that he is not a part of unicrypt.info and I think that what he is saying is true. Unicrypt.info and e-coins.info both were the scam exchanges planned in the same way:

Thread reporting about e-coins.info: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4933249.msg44459617#msg44459617
and Unicrypt.info: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4848364.msg43723626#msg43723626

Thus 114uiWmL5amDjpsCGfwUMRsgTrzezjEY3P  is linked to Unicrypt.info and e-coins.info and not linked to the OP.


Op was also scammed by e-coins.info here. Scammer asked for help regarding their funds just like others were asked in unicrypt.info and e-coin scam and OP deposited to the address 114uiWmL5amDjpsCGfwUMRsgTrzezjEY3P  to unlock the balance. After some point he had no funds and asked for loan here for unlocking that balance.

Now OP PM'ed me these messages which will interest you guys.



When I asked if he asked for loan to unlock that balance he pm'ed me this:



Also exchange withdrawal screenshot^[1] shows that there were two 0.027BTC withdrawals being sent from his binance account and when I asked for TXID's he pmed this:



Now here is the screenshot of koolboyshikha's trust page where Amresh51963 gives a positive rating to him for loan which he gave him with TXID: a3cc40ac6308c7c7b07dfc0a82d81c9eda7db2c82b6d38e1aa0cad033e6a023e which is now being repaid (acc. to the feedback).

Interesting that a3cc40ac6308c7c7b07dfc0a82d81c9eda7db2c82b6d38e1aa0cad033e6a023e was the txid in which loan was given to koolboyshikha and a3cc40ac6308c7c7b07dfc0a82d81c9eda7db2c82b6d38e1aa0cad033e6a023e was the withdrawal txid made by koolboyshikha from his Binance wallet. Amresh51963 and koolboyshikha both are alts and he gave positive trust to his alt.

I actually had my suspicions that Amresh51963 and prabhapriya019 could be his alts but didn't had any proofs then. I have connected Amresh51963 and koolboyshikha giving abusing trust but couldn't find a proof linking prabhapriya019  to this connection.

---

Profiles:
Amresh51963
koolboyshikha  

Archive:
Page 1 of this Thread: http://archive.is/N553Z
Page 2 of this Thread: http://archive.fo/hT4v7

You won't find any concrete evidence. OP posted how he thinks about automated bounty platforms so it should go down in Altcoins Discussion or in Marketplace (Altcoins).

@OP
0 transparency doesn't means they are scamming but gives them the chance to manipulate calculations for their own benefit (which is hard to prove unless you have the sheet) . You cannot determine that it is also the sole result of failed ICO . I don't like automated bounty portals much but yes I do agree that use of such should be avoided.

Firstbit also does the same thing. Either it was an unused address or maybe isn't the part of address. I suggest trying out searching for him with last known address.